Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american stereotypes research paper
Inclusive education
Inclusive education curriculum
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Native american stereotypes research paper
It is not uncommon for people of one culture to misunderstand people of another. Patricia Riley’s “Adventures of an Indian Princess” introduces this concept and its underlying causes. As she illustrates a day in the life of Arletta, a twelve year old adopted Cherokee Indian, Riley reveals the misinformed and disinterested nature of the Rapier family. These individuals accept the stereotypical portrayal of Indians in America and do not wish to delve deeper into Indian culture, to much of Arletta’s chagrin. “Adventures of an Indian Princess” conveys the message that although one may not be properly taught about another culture, typecasting in place of attempting to understand is not an acceptable alternative.
Riley attempts to show the reader
…show more content…
how little the Rapiers know about Indian culture through anecdotal examples of ignorance. It is clear from the beginning of the story that the Rapiers know essentially nothing about their newest family addition’s heritage. For example, the Rapiers make the collective decision to make a pit stop when they see a sign on the side of the road reading “Indian Trading Post” printed ironically in red, white and blue ink (Riley 135). The patriotic American design should be a clear indicator to the Rapiers that this site may not be a genuine Indian trading post, considering Native Americans and European explorers were not exactly great friends. However, the Rapiers do not pick up on this subtle hint; and despite having objections to the family outing, Arletta remains quite. Once at the trading post, Arletta is shocked to see that her family fails to even realize that the “Cherokee Indian” on display is simply a white man with his face painted a brown color. What makes it worse is the man himself cannot even differentiate between tribes; he appears to be wearing articles of clothing of Plains, Maidu and Chippewa Indian heritage, yet calls himself a Cherokee (Riley 137-138). Her new family’s lack of knowledge continues to surprise her when Mr. Rapier buys her several faux Indian props with which he expects her to pose for a picture. After he dresses her in them, Mrs. Rapier even exclaims that Arletta “’looks just like an Indian princess,’” as if she actually knows what an Indian princess looks like (Riley 139). Frustrated with her family’s blunder, Arletta removes the store-bought articles from her being as they begin to make her physically ill. After each incorrect cultural reference the Rapiers make, Riley directs the attention of the story to Arletta and her subdued responses to her new family’s ignorance. It is Arletta’s described reactions in the story that indicate just how shockingly little the Rapiers understand about Indian culture. Although some of these mistakes seem rather obvious to the reader, Riley does make known that the sources from which the Rapiers have received their information regarding Indians does not always portray Native people accurately. She lists “old John Wayne movies and TV reruns of The Lone Ranger” as the sources for the Rapiers “sophisticated knowledge of Indian people” (Riley 136). These are Hollywood portrayals of Indians, made not to satisfy historical factuality, but consumer entertainment. Thus, the Rapiers only know about Indians what mainstream America has taught them in the hopes of receiving laughter and monetary compensation in return. Through her mentioning of illegitimate fountains of information, Riley removes some of the blame from the Rapier family, because they are a result of their environment. What Riley does blame the Rapiers for is that, in addition to their overall lack of knowledge on the subject, the Rapiers show little to no interest in actually learning about Arletta’s culture. Although Arletta does admit to the family originally being rather curious about her culture, in the story Riley describes the Rapiers as often trying to tune out what Arletta says or ignoring her completely. After a while her family becomes tired of learning about Arletta’s background, so “they never [listen] when she [talks],” answering themselves all the questions they ask her (Riley 137). Of course they do so with the knowledge they have attained from Hollywood productions and commonplace stereotypes. The Rapiers simply give in to the prevalent typecasting of Indians in America rather than talking to their adopted daughter about what her culture means to her. Arletta grows more and more aggravated as the story progresses until she reaches a breaking point.
She grows very tired of misinformed people telling her who she is and what her heritage means instead of asking her about it and accepting and appreciating her answer. In the beginning Arletta admits to feeling “compelled to play along” (Riley 137). At this point in the story Arletta is willing to let the Rapiers’ erroneous and insensitive comments slide. However, over time, Arletta is less tolerant of her new family’s chosen ignorance; she no longer plays along. She refuses to smile and say Mr. Rapier’s magic word “Cherokee” after he tells her to take a picture with the not-so-genuine Indian. By the end of the story, Arletta’s passive attitude vanishes and she finally speaks up for her background, although she does so indirectly. When asked by Mrs. Rapier if she is ashamed of herself for throwing up on the faux Indian souvenirs Mr. Rapier bought for her, Arletta plainly states “No ma’am, I’m not” (Riley 139). Arletta refuses to apologize for rejecting the Rapiers’ __ gifts, and symbolically their lack of knowledge and interest in her culture. Arletta’s growing, and finally culminating, frustration is how Riley illustrates how difficult it is for Arletta to live day in and day out with people who neither understand her culture, nor care …show more content…
to. As a whole, Patricia Riley’s story “Adventures of an Indian Princess” reveals the causes of the cultural rift between Americans and Native Indians living in this country.
Riley exposes a series of events that ultimately leaves Arletta extremely frustrated, and leaves the Rapiers as falsely educated at the end of the novel as they are at the beginning. The Rapiers are provided very little accurate information regarding Indians. Arletta passively accepts the stereotypes thrust upon her and chooses not to speak up about her culture; and when she does, the Rapiers choose not to listen. Based on the conclusion of the story, this system is clearly not effective. Riley’s work stresses the importance of Indians and others working together to rid society of cultural stereotypes and stereotype-induced frustrations. The story makes it clear that Arletta must be willing to talk about her culture, otherwise she cannot expect the Rapiers or anyone else to stop relying on Hollywood depictions or stereotypes to form their understanding of Indian culture. Riley’s story also makes it clear that, in order for Arletta’s attempts to be meaningful and effective, the Rapiers must be willing to listen to what she has to say about her cultural
background.
Thomas King uses an oral story-telling style of writing mingled with western narrative in his article “You’re Not the Indian I Had in Mind” to explain that Indians are not on the brink of extinction. Through this article in the Racism, Colonialism, and Indigeneity in Canada textbook, King also brings some focus to the topic of what it means to be “Indian” through the eyes of an actual Aboriginal versus how Aboriginals are viewed by other races of people. With his unique style of writing, King is able to bring the reader into the situations he describes because he writes about it like a story he is telling.
In The White Man’s Indian, Robert Berkhoffer analyzes how Native Americans have maintained a negative stereotype because of Whites. As a matter of fact, this book examines the evolution of Native Americans throughout American history by explaining the origin of the Indian stereotype, the change from religious justification to scientific racism to a modern anthropological viewpoint of Native Americans, the White portrayal of Native Americans through art, and the policies enacted to keep Native Americans as Whites perceive them to be. In the hope that Native Americans will be able to overcome how Whites have portrayed them, Berkhoffer is presenting
In the book Bad Indians, Miranda talks about the many issues Indigenous People go through. Miranda talks about the struggles Indigenous people go through; however, she talks about them in the perspective of Native Americans. Many people learn about Indigenous People through classrooms and textbooks, in the perspective of White people. In Bad Indians, Miranda uses different literary devices to show her perspective of the way Indigenous People were treated, the issues that arose from missionization, as well as the violence that followed through such issues. Bad Indians is an excellent example that shows how different history is told in different perspectives.
One of the hardest realities of being a minority is that the majority has a thousand ways to hurt anyone who is part of a minority, and they have but two or three ways to defend themselves. In Sherman Alexie’s short story The Toughest Indian in the World, Roman Gabriel Fury is a member of the Native American minority that makes up less than two percent of the total United States population (1.2 percent to be exact). This inherent disadvantage of being a minority, along with various cultural factors, influences the conflicted character of Roman Gabriel Fury and his attitudes toward the white majority. Through his use of strong language, demanding tone, and vibrant colors, Roman Gabriel Fury is able to reveal his complex feelings about growing up Indian in a predominately white world.
Our spirits Don’t Speak English: Indian Boarding school is an 80 minute documentary that details the mental and physical abuse that the Native Americans endured during the Indian Boarding school experience from the mid 19th to the mid 20th century. In the beginning going to school for Indian children meant listening to stories told by tribal elders, parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles and storytellers. These tales past down from generation to generation were metaphors for the life experience and their relationships to plants and animals. Native children from birth were also taught that their appearance is a representation of pure thoughts and spiritual status of an individual.
iv-v) Works Cited Berkhoffer, Robert F. 'The White Man's Indian. Alfred A. Knopf Publishers, New York: 1978. Dowd, Frances Smardo. "Evaluating Children's Portraying Native American and Asian Cultures". Childhood Education; (68 Summer 92), pp.
Although the work is 40 years old, “Custer Died for Your Sins” is still relevant and valuable in explaining the history and problems that Indians face in the United States. Deloria’s book reveals the White view of Indians as false compared to the reality of how Indians are in real life. The forceful intrusion of the U.S. Government and Christian missionaries have had the most oppressing and damaging affect on Indians. There is hope in Delorias words though. He believes that as more tribes become more politically active and capable, they will be able to become more economically independent for future generations. He feels much hope in the 1960’s generation of college age Indians returning to take ownership of their tribes problems and build a better future for their children.
According to Deloria, there are many misconceptions pertaining to the Indians. He amusingly tells of the common White practice of ...
Adjusting to another culture is a difficult concept, especially for children in their school classrooms. In Sherman Alexie’s, “Indian Education,” he discusses the different stages of a Native Americans childhood compared to his white counterparts. He is describing the schooling of a child, Victor, in an American Indian reservation, grade by grade. He uses a few different examples of satire and irony, in which could be viewed in completely different ways, expressing different feelings to the reader. Racism and bullying are both present throughout this essay between Indians and Americans. The Indian Americans have the stereotype of being unsuccessful and always being those that are left behind. Through Alexie’s negativity and humor in his essay, it is evident that he faces many issues and is very frustrated growing up as an American Indian. Growing up, Alexie faces discrimination from white people, who he portrays as evil in every way, to show that his childhood was filled with anger, fear, and sorrow.
Culture has the power and ability to give someone spiritual and emotional distinction which shapes one's identity. Without culture, society would be less and less diverse. Culture is what gives this earth warmth and color that expands across miles and miles. The author of “The School Days of an Indian Girl”, Zitkala Sa, incorporates the ideals of Native American culture into her writing. Similarly, Sherman Alexie sheds light onto the hardships he struggled through growing up on the Spokane Indian Reservation in his book The Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven in a chapter titled “Indian Education”.
Stereotypes dictate a certain group in either a good or bad way, however more than not they give others a false interpretation of a group. They focus on one factor a certain group has and emphasize it drastically to the point that any other aspect of that group becomes lost. Media is one of the largest factors to but on blame for the misinterpretation of groups in society. In Ten Little Indians, there are many stereotypes of Native Americans in the short story “What You Pawn I Will Redeem”. The story as a whole brings about stereotypes of how a Native American in general lives and what activities they partake in. By doing so the author, Alexie Sherman, shows that although stereotypes maybe true in certain situations, that stereotype is only
In his novel, Thomas King plays on stereotypes and expectations that occur in our society on the portrayal of Native Americans. He show us the bias image that we have of them by describing what is an indian from a colonizers point of view, how the genre of western movies has an effect on our perception in society. In the novel, Nasty Bumppo, who represents modern society, explains that :
Growing up on a reservation where failing was welcomed and even somewhat encouraged, Alexie was pressured to conform to the stereotype and be just another average Indian. Instead, he refused to listen to anyone telling him how to act, and pursued his own interests in reading and writing at a young age. He looks back on his childhood, explaining about himself, “If he'd been anything but an Indian boy living on the reservation, he might have been called a prodigy. But he is an Indian boy living on the reservation and is simply an oddity” (17). Alexie compares the life and treatment of an Indian to life as a more privileged child. This side-by-side comparison furthers his point that
The story chronicles situations that illustrate the common stereotypes about Natives. Through Jackson’s humble personality, the reader can grasp his true feelings towards White people, which is based off of the oppression of Native Americans. I need to win it back myself” (14). Jackson also mentions to the cop, “I’m on a mission here. I want to be a hero” (24).
For example, in the local school, stereotypes such as the image of the ‘wild man’ are consolidated by claiming that there was cannibalism among the indigenous people of the northwest coast (Soper-Jones 2009, 20; Robinson 2010, 68f.). Moreover, native people are still considered to be second-class citizens, which is pointed out by Lisamarie’s aunt Trudy, when she has been harassed by some white guys in a car: “[Y]ou’re a mouthy Indian, and everyone thinks we’re born sluts. Those guys would have said you were asking for it and got off scot-free”