Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The idea of paternalism
The Principle Of Paternalism
The idea of paternalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The idea of paternalism
“Father knows best” that’s what is always told to a child at a young age. A father will tell a child “Don’t touch that fire, it is dangerous”, and like any child would do they will go touch it anyway. Leaving a father to say “I told you, I knew what was best for you.” This is a prime example of paternalism; a way to intervene with an individual’s ability to make choices of their own because someone else knows better. This extended essay will be discussing the well known topic of paternalism and the different forms of it. Paternalism is a broad yet informative topic to discuss, and in this paper paternalism will be defined and understood through examples. Paternalism is the practice of treating people in a fatherly manner, especially by providing for their needs without giving them rights or responsibilities. Paternalism is related to a fatherly manner because like a father figure, paternalism is a stern hand being put on a child to keep them in line for their own good like the government does with our society. One of the greatest forms of paternalism is the government, because the government takes it upon themselves to have the controlling choice in everything. Political libertarianism and soft paternalism is the two forms of paternalism that will be compared in this essay, including a brief induction to paternalistic laws. Presenting a stand point on whether to agree or disagree with paternalism is a lot easier said than to explain, in this paper the opinion that which I stand upon will conclude this paper.
Paternalism is the interference of one’s free will to make decisions or do things for themselves because someone feels interfering is in the best interest of another. Paternalism is defined according to the Stanford Encyclo...
... middle of paper ...
...st judge of their own interests, pointing out that some people lack good judgment when it comes to their best interest. For example, a child that has been abused or displays a sense of low-self-esteem may lack a sense good judgment and need assistance. Guided assistance can range in many ways because every case of choice is sensitive. Being that I plan to be a future educator I put a paternalistic reasoning behind this example because, knowing there could be several cases in the school that are of this nature. It would be my duty to address the situation as delicately as possible, leading students to speak with the proper authority or services to help them. Many victims of cases like these are more than likely to be overly sensitive when it comes to correct judgments. Helping someone in this case is justifiable paternalism. What would make it unjustifiable is going
The chapter “A Fathers Influence” is constructed with several techniques including selection of detail, choice of language, characterization, structure and writers point of view to reveal Blackburn’s values of social acceptance, parenting, family love, and a father’s influence. Consequently revealing her attitude that a child’s upbringing and there parents influence alter the characterization of a child significantly.
Many people see Susanna Rowson’s book, “Charlotte Temple”, as a comment on the need for youth to listen to their elders. However, the theme is far more complicated than this as it shows that the advice itself is flawed. As the characters travel from England to America, the inherent problems of the advice appears. It is here that Montraville father’s advice which is assuming similar experiences leads to lifelong misery. Charlotte the most obvious proof that ignoring your parents advice leads to trouble suffer far greater consequences because of the reversibility of that very same advice. Even the readers experience the dangers of advice as the author cautions the mothers reading the novel that their views and consequently advice are not enough because of the inherent problem of advice not being law. Montraville’s, Charlotte’s, and reader’s stories show that it is not enough to follow parental advice if the advice is misguided, founded in untrue expectations, creating more trouble and misery for the youths.
They summarize the term as “the action of one person interfering with another person's actions or thoughts to help him”. They describe the one doing the interfering as the “Paternalist” and whom break the moral rules of independency because they restrict the other person’s-who may be the reader, bystander or audience-freedom without their consent. Geisler and Penrose state that this act is called Paternalism because the one who is doing the restricting does it in a “fatherly, benevolent way, that assumes that the person being restrained will appreciate the action later”. Paternalism can be effective not only in reading and writing, but I think a great part of acting and theatre is Paternalism. Theatre can influence the way someone sees and perceives something. In literature, the writer is almost always a form of a paternalist. Whether they are consciously aware of it, there is a reason and motivation behind whatever is being written. It may or may not intentionally be a persuasive piece, but there is a point that the writer is trying to convey and they are trying to influence the thoughts of the reader. This can effortlessly be translated into theatre, with direct intentions and
Herring characterises the present law of the welfare principle is individualistic . A ceaseless debate has begun between several writers about the potential conflict between the welfare principle and the ECHR. Article 8 provides that there should be respect for everybody’s right to private and family life. This right is subject to certain restrictions as specified in article 8(2). The European Court on Human Rights (ECtHR) has been referred children’s rights. In Johansen v Norway it considere...
When analyzing a classic fairytale such as, Snow White, by the Brothers Grimm through a feminist lens, it is clear that it is a phallocentric fairytale that includes stereotypes, gender roles, the male gaze, and paternalism.
Critically examine how a range of rights and responsibilities contribute to wellbeing of the parent or child. (Textbook 242-247)
In permissive parenting, the guardians are more of the child’s friends and not a disciplinary figure. Permissive parenting embraces avoiding confrontation and being lenient as the key to success. Imagine a trip to the grocery store. You are walking down the cereal isle and you approach a child screaming because he wants his favorite marshmallow filled cereal, rather than a healthier choice. Fulfilling the child’s want in order to appease the child, rather than being assertive and making a healthier choice is a perfect example. A second contrast of permissive parenting is expectations of education. We saw that in authoritarian parenting an A plus grade is expected. The dissimilarity between parenting techniques would be that a B minus would bring praise in permissive household. This is similar to how I was raised. As a child, my siblings and I were expected to achieve good grades but that did not translate into an A plus on every exam. Our academic achievements were to be considered excellent and praiseworthy even if we brought home a B on a test. In hindsight, if we were to earn a C in a class we could expect some sort of restriction and forced remedial training in that area. Permissive parenting is a style of parenting that yields lower expectations and lenient rules for children. This parenting technique embracing fun and friendship between guardian and the child is believed to foster a positive environment for the child to succeed in
Let’s start with Authoritarian parent, which revolves around the idea of “my way or the highway.” This particular way is a parents know best approach emphasizing obedience instead of love and nurturing. While a child grows it is important for the child to know they can express opinions or choices but with an authoritarian parent it seems to be “impossible,” as the parent will utilize punishment with no explanation or reasoning. Authoritarian parents think they know exactly what is best
Paternalism, Goldman says, is never to obstruct an individual’s deeper long-range preference. He starts off with a scenario in which an individual who wants to go to New York is about to accidentally get on board a train going to Boston. A good Samaritan, who we may assume is aware of the individual’s intentions of going to New York, pushes that individual off the train, displaying a form of paternalism. In Goldman’s terms, this scenario depicts justified paternalism because it only sacrificed the individual’s immediate autonomy in order to preserve his deeper long-range preference. In this situation the individual only acted the way he did (board the train to Boston) due to ignorance. His intentions were always the same as his long-term preference, of going to New York. But Controversy arises when an individual’s immediate preferences don’t match up with his or her long-term preferences. In one circumstance, the individ...
To clear up any misinterpretations relating to my thesis, I can revise my thesis by stating that parents of a dependent not capable of independence are responsible to provide help when needed and cannot be obtained in any other way. This revision will ultimately define the responsibilities parents have when it comes to their children.
Autonomy is defined as the ability to make your own decisions without being influenced by anyone else. (Longman Dictionary, contemporary English)
Authoritarian-parents who are punitive and focus on gaining a child's obedience to parental demands rather than responding to the demands of the child.Authoritarian parenting styles give little to no options to a child. What the parent says goes. It is a rigid approach to raising children that may have been most effective in times of great famine or toil. It was used most commonly in large, traditional families in which the father was the patriarch, and everyone else was called to follow his command. Times have changed greatly since. Doctors see a problem with this approach in modern times,it creates a distance between parent and child in which the child doubts the parent's love for him. It is based on punishment, which can easily create anger.
...nturies. Mill presents a clear and insightful argument, claiming that the government should not be concerned with the free will of the people unless explicit harm has been done to an individual. However, such ideals do not build a strong and lasting community. It is the role of the government to act in the best interests at all times through the prevention of harm and the encouragement of free thought.
To summarise, this essay has shown that the concept of impartiality is a relationship between a moral agent and a particular group. It requires that one be not influenced by which member of the group is benefited or harmed by his or her actions. Moreover, it has also shown that impartiality is a necessary condition for the ethical theories of utilitarianism and deontology. Such theories, however, cannot account for human intuition that suggests that it is acceptable to be partial in some circumstances. Finally, this essay has shown that the conflict between partiality and impartiality has not been resolved. As such, the request to be impartial with regard to morality does demand too much.
Children are able to receive outstanding support and benefits with the involvement of their father in their childhood. The evolution of the father role in families has changed the course of development and attachment in children. According to Coltrane, in earlier times, fathers were viewed as “masters of their families”; hence, the father was more of a strict teacher (p. 139). Moving forward in time, fathers did not contribute to the home. They were more focused on the outside environment and the family income. In modern times, fathers play a dramatic role in child-rearing and involvement. The image of the father has greatly evolved, which essentially benefits the children and even the wife.