Paradox Of Servant Leadership Summary

822 Words2 Pages

In this article, Paul Wong and Don Page attempt to resolve the paradox of servant leadership. Servant leadership is of great interest because “SL is part of the larger movement away from command-and-control leadership towards participatory and process oriented leadership in the IT-based economy, and SL holds the promise of an ethical and socially responsible management and leadership as an antidote to corporate scandals” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 1). In addition, Wong and Page note that Christian leaders favor servant leadership not only because “it is biblically based and modeled after Jesus Christ [, but also because…their main thrust is to discover, recruit and train potential servant leaders in each congregation, so that in the future they …show more content…

Leaders instead share their power will their followers, which empowers everyone and leads to success. According to Wong and Page, there are four components of measuring servant leadership, which include; “character- orientation, people-orientation, task-orientation, and process-orientation” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 3). “Character-orientation is concerned with cultivating a servant’s attitude, focusing on the leader’s values, credibility and motive” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 3). “People-orientation is concerned with developing human resources, focusing on the leader’s relationship with people and his/her commitment to develop others” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 3). “Task-orientation is concerned with achieving productivity and success, focusing on the leader’s tasks and skills necessary for success” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 3). “Process-orientation is concerned with increasing the efficiency of the organization, focusing the leader’s ability to model and develop a flexible, efficient and open system” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 3). Moreover, “basically SL covers two areas: Servanthood and …show more content…

With respect to the leadership part, the leader builds the organization by effectively using people as resources; the emphasis here is on leadership skills, such as vision-casting and team-building” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 5). Wong and Page explain how a hierarchical system cannot follow a servant leadership, however, they note that in order “to overcome the barrier of needing an authoritarian hierarchy to lead an organization, leaders need to take the risk of intentional vulnerability – willing to lose their job and even lose their life in serving others as Jesus did. They overcome a sense of insecurity by embracing it in serving a higher purpose” (Wong & Page, 2003, pp. 7-8). Wong and Page reveal that servant leadership consists of a leader; “developing and empowering others, power and pride, visionary and leadership, servanthood, responsible leadership, integrity (honesty), integrity (authenticity), and courageous leadership” (Wong & Page, 2003, p. 10). Wong and Page quote Lao Tzu’s statement “‘a leader is best when people barely know that he exists. Not so good when people obey and acclaim him. Worse when they despise him. If you fail to honour people they fail to honour

Open Document