Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
War poetry in English literature
Attitudes toward war as reflected in poetry
War poetry in English literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: War poetry in English literature
The Contemporary Period of English literature transitioned an era of unbound expression to one characterized by great intensity not shying away from the pitfalls of the modern world . The shift in focus enabled poets to tackle world issues of the current day, one being the horrors of war. Charles Simic, a renowned English poet during this period attempts to portray war in it’s purest form in his work, “Paradise Motel”. Simic displays the true nature of conflict through the eyes of the narrator whose experience reveal that warfare is subjective as well as the personal impact war can have on an individual.
The opening lines of the poem thrust the reader into the grim reality of armed conflict. Simic describes through his narrator a mere moment
…show more content…
a magic love potion”(3). To make such a claim and even sexuallize war to make it appear more enticing is heinous in the eyes of the narrator and the body language makes it ever so apparent as he states“My eyes opened in astonishment”(4). The feeling of shock at this moment is not allowed to truly resonate with the reader as instantaneously the speaker is exposed to a feeling of despair and subsequently met with intense guilt following the president’s statement, “In a mirror my face appeared to me/ Like a twice-canceled postage stamp./ I lived well, but life was awful”(4-6). He sees his face and compares it to that of a “twice-canceled postage stamp”, essentially a letter that never reaches it’s location. The letter is representative of the wish to return to a state of happiness but, the feeling of anguish is too great and the emotion is unreachable. He further emphasizes the guilt in the opening line of the second stanza where he describes living well but having a life that is dreadful. Further consumed is the narrator knowing that he is powerless to stop the bloodshed that has been glorified by others and whatever attempts that could have been made to try to rectify the situation have long since passed. The final stage that the narrator arrives at is the complete loss of empathy. The
In the end of the narrator’s consciousness, the tone of the poem shifted from a hopeless bleak
While the poem's situation is simple, its theme is not. Stafford appears to be intimating that life is precious and fragile; however, nothing so clearly discloses these attributes of life as confrontation with death. Furthermore, the very confrontations that engender appreciation of life's delicacies force action-all to frequently callous action.
The narrator is presented as this strong figure at first, but the piece tears away this wall brick by brick. In stanza six when they are coming back from Mexico, the narrator says the drugs “might help him live longer.” The biggest turn of hopelessness is in stanza 8 for the narrator. His brother falls into a coma and his brother’s lover cries in his arms and he “Wonder(s) how much longer you will be able to be strong.”(Lassell 481) It only progresses only further when the narrator says: “Offer God anything to bring your brother back. Know you have nothing God could possibly want.”(Lassell 481) The narrator becomes almost emotionless during the funeral of his brother, and it shows that this sense of hopelessness has grown even larger, to the fact where he stands in silence and stares at the casket. During the funeral, he thinks to himself “Know that your brother 's life was not what you imagined.”(Lassell
Tim O’Brien states in his novel The Things They Carried, “The truths are contradictory. It can be argued, for instance, that war is grotesque. But in truth war is also beauty. For all its horror, you can’t help but gape at the awful majesty of combat” (77). This profound statement captures not only his perspective of war from his experience in Vietnam but a collective truth about war across the ages. It is not called the art of combat without reason: this truth transcends time and can be found in the art produced and poetry written during the years of World War I. George Trakl creates beautiful images of the war in his poem “Grodek” but juxtaposes them with the harsh realities of war. Paul Nash, a World War I artist, invokes similar images in his paintings We are Making a New World and The Ypres Salient at Night. Guilaume Apollinaire’s writes about the beautiful atrocity that is war in his poem “Gala.”
War is a brutal, bloody battlefield from which no one returns unscathed. Nonetheless, there are those who believe war to be a glorious honor, a bedtime story filled with gallant heroes, a scuffle fought an ocean and several countries away. In “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” by Ambrose Bierce and “August 2026: There Will Come Soft Rains” by Ray Bradbury, the authors seek to convey the devastation that comes from romanticizing war by using impersonal and ironic diction.
The representation of war in literature allows for creative liberty in both its depiction and its message. While there are traditional tropes associated with the war novel genre like glory through combat or the heroification of a character, there are literary techniques in the 20th century that have expanded the thought provoking elements of the genre. In particular, Farewell to Arms’ use of marginalizing war with its focus on a love story and The Things They Carried use of metafiction of war storytelling, allow for reader’s to be challenged by providing different interpretations of the text. By Hemingway and O’Brien’s novels using these techniques, the war genre has progressed and allowed a new development of ideologies to accompany the traditional
Understanding the effects of war and the appalling experiences our soldiers have to endure while fighting for their country facilitates communicating effectively about literature and its function in the context of American and world history and culture (SLO2). The purpose of imagery is to help get the poet’s message across in a language that is strong and vivid.
The simple definition of war is a state of armed competition, conflict, or hostility between different nations or groups; however war differs drastically in the eyes of naive children or experienced soldiers. Whether one is a young boy or a soldier, war is never as easy to understand as the definition. comprehend. There will inevitably be an event or circumstance where one is befuddled by the horror of war. For a young boy, it may occur when war first breaks out in his country, such as in “Song of Becoming.” Yet, in “Dulce et Decorum Est” it took a man dying in front of a soldier's face for the soldier to realize how awful war truly is. Both “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” are poems about people experiencing the monstrosity of war for the first time. One is told from the perspective of young boys who were stripped of their joyful innocence and forced to experience war first hand. The other is from the perspective of a soldier, reflecting on the death of one of his fellow soldiers and realizing that there is nothing he can do to save him. While “Song of Becoming” and “Dulce et Decorum Est” both focus on the theme of the loss of innocence, “Song of Becoming” illustrates how war affects the lives of young boys, whereas “Dulce et Decorum Est” depicts the affect on an experienced soldier.
This type of writing interests me because it was used as a tool to open people’s eyes to the brutality of war. In a way it protested and spoke up against this injustice and most importantly gave a voice to the people who became the biggest victims of war – the soldiers themselves.
In the last line of the second stanza, the narrator states, “As under a green sea, I saw him drowning,” which further adds to the imagery of tattered soldiers. This is also a turning point where the narrator begins to describe his horror in seeing the image of a comrade dying. The narrator seems to be haunted by the image of his fellow soldier plunging into the depths, “In all my dreams, before my helpless sight, / He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning”
Often in old American literature war time is often fantasized as being wonderful. The men who are soldiers are often looked at as heros and almost nothing bad ever happens. This beautiful thought of war was crushed by the age of realism. Realism reveals to the reader how
The poem comprises three stanzas which are patterned in two halves; the rule of three is ingeniously used throughout the poem to create tension and show the progression of the soldiers’ lives. There is a variety of rhyming schemes used – possibly Duffy considered using caesural rhyme, internal rhyme and irregular rhyme to better address the elegiac reality. The rhythm is very powerful and shows Duffy’s technical adroitness. It is slightly disconcerting, and adds to the other worldly ambience of the poem. Duffy uses a powerful comparative in each stanza to exemplify the monstrosity and extent of war, which is much worse than we imagine; it develops throughout each stanza, starting with a syntactical ‘No; worse.’ to ‘worse by far’ and ending on ‘much worse’. Similarly, the verbs used to describe the soldier’s shadow as he falls shows the reader the journey of the shadow, as if it’s the trajectory of soldiers’ lives. At first, the shadow is as an act...
Essay 1 Final Draft Word Count 1,334 The Portrait of War Through Literature The literature of war takes a wide variety of approaches in its efforts to comprehend the war experience. Richard Lovelace’s “To Lucasta Going To the Wars”, Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est”, and Tim O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried” all share the common theme of war. Although the works are based on war they’re still different from one another.
In Stephen Crane’s poem, “War is Kind”, the basic theme of the poem can be compared to other themes in Civil War literature. The poem itself is ironic, stating that war is kind, when in reality, it is not. The theme is mostly the death of a soldier’s family members or loved ones. This is a recurring theme in most poems and stories about war. Crane uses imagery, alliteration, and so on to show his readers how he sees war.
The poem shows that the young man grows up to become a fighter who does not know when to stop all in the matter of a few lines that amount to one sentence. Then in an even shorter sentence, he dies in combat. Writing this as two sentences accentuates the idea that life is short, but can even be shorter if we can not get along. The speaker’s mourning tone probably ponders if the man avoided fighting maybe he could have lived longer as suggested when mentioning killing war elephants were not enough for the man who immersed himself in the battleground. By putting oneself in an environment of anger and aggression to the point of a questionable noticing of an arrow inside of oneself can only lead to a shortened