Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Archetypal themes in literature
Common themes in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Archetypal themes in literature
I read the book Paper Towns by John Green that was copyrighted in 2004 and watched the movie Paper Towns directed by Jake Schreier that was released in July of 2015. Some of the lead cast members were Cara Delevingne, Nat Wolff, and Justice Smith. In the book, Margo hadn’t talked to Quentin all of high school and she randomly came into his room in the middle of the night wanting him to drive her around. After going on a wild, crazy adventure with Margo, the next day she disappeared and left clues to find her. Quentin spent the last few weeks of high school trying to find Margo and missed graduation in order to do so. Many plot events were important to the story and stayed the same in the movie because of their importance , however in the movie …show more content…
One example is in the book Quentin and Margo went to “SeaWorld in the middle of the night” but this event did not happen in the movie (Green 68). In the book, Margo and Quentin went to a lot more places on their adventure and did things that were more dangerous. This helped change Quentin because he did things we would never imagine he would do and got out of his comfort zone because, he was so scared about getting in trouble. When they went to SeaWorld Margo got bit by a snake and they got caught, which helped add drama and suspense, that was missing in the movie. This also helped strengthen the relationship between Quentin and Margo because he tried to suck the venom out of her leg when she got bit by a snake. Another event that was different was in the book Quentin took “a pretty long look at the two pseudovisions but didn’t find much” (Green 158). Over the whole course of the book, Quentin went to five other pseudovisions, or abandoned subdivisions in order to find Margo, which didn’t happen in the movie. This shouldn’t have been removed from the movie because it showed how important it was for Quentin to find Margo and how determined he was. He drove hours to find her, skipping school to do so, and school was very important to Quentin, so it shows he truly cared about Margo and wanted to find her. The biggest difference between the …show more content…
In the book and the movie when Quentin and Margo went on their adventure they went to the top of a very tall building that looked over the city. While they were up there, Margo said “from here, you can’t see the rust or the cracked paint or whatever...You see how fake it all is” and how the city was a paper town (Green 57). When they looked at the city, everything seemed so perfect because you couldn’t see all the flaws from far away, making it look fake. When you are up close, you see all the flaws, but when you are far away you don’t, which shows that things aren’t always how they seem. This event was important to the story because it was the first time Quentin heard the word paper towns, which would help him realize where Margo has been staying while she was missing, and ultimately led Quentin to find Margo. Another way the theme was shown was that Quentin was imagining he would find Margo and be some extravagant event. He thought he would be like a hero and they would go home together and their lives would go back to normal, but that is the complete opposite of what happened. When Quentin asked Margo to come back home, Margo said no and that she would “get sucked right back in” and wouldn’t be stuck there (Green 295). In the book when Quentin found Margo she was really upset and they got into a fight, which was the complete opposite of
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
In the movie dwayne plays a good part. Dwayne was the guys that stuck up for them even though people did not like their documentary. Dwayne did get shot although that did not happen in the book. Another difference most of the characters that were in the book looked way younger that what the picture said that they looked like in the book. The book did not tell us that Lloyd liked to gamble. Lloyd gambled and almost got shot in the movie. In the movie Lloyd was like the bad guy in the movie, the movie told only bad things about Lloyd and only good things about LeAlan. Another difference in the movie is that the boys who threw Eric Morse out the window were sentenced to Juvenile Detention Center till the age of twenty-one. This is a big part because they never told what the verdict was which made it seem like they were let free from what they did. The last difference is in the movie the vacant apartment that in the book said that it looked creepy and run down it looked really nice in the apartment and I did not really understand why no one lived there.
Challenges and Trials: Quentin and his friends face a big bump when having to decide whether or not they are going to have to miss graduation to find Margo
While watching the movie, I could see that the main characters in the book, both their names and traits, were the same in both the movie and book. However, aside from that there were many different as...
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
In conclusion, details involving the characters and symbolic meanings to objects are the factors that make the novel better than the movie. Leaving out aspects of the novel limits the viewer’s appreciation for the story. One may favor the film over the novel or vice versa, but that person will not overlook the intense work that went into the making of both. The film and novel have their similarities and differences, but both effectively communicate their meaning to the public.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
Overall, the movie and book have many differences and similarities, some more important than others. The story still is clear without many scenes from the book, but the movie would have more thought in it.
There are many similarities presented to the audience between the movie and the novel. One
From the start, the movie is adapted from the novel and therefore it could not cover everything, some actions or acts in the novel are too dense such that it is not of any importance to angle them in the movie. It is very realistic to everyone that the movie cannot cover every single paragraph in the novel even the memorable ones. Some materials are left out in the film, and others were changed.
At this point, the readers create their own movie in a way. They will determine important aspects of how the character speaks, looks like, and reacts. Whereas, in the movie, the reader has no choice but to follow the plot laid out in front of them. No longer can they picture the characters in their own way or come up with their different portrayals. The fate of the story, while still unpredictable, was highly influenced by the way the characters looked, spoke, and presented themselves on screen.
Another example is when Chance watches television. In the book, the narrator explains that when Chance changes the channel, he feels like he is changing himself. As he changes the channel, he gets caught up in all the different images he sees. In the movie, all you see is a man watching television, which doesn't explain too much. In the movie, the only time we find out what Chance thinks of television is when he is talking to someone else.
Nine years later, Margo and Quentin are both seniors in highschool and have both drifted apart drastically since that day. They’re both into their own separate social groups and Margo has a boyfriend. With prom coming up, Quentin and his friends are still lacking dates. However,
Have you ever read a book and then watched the movie and saw many differences? Well you can also find lots of similarities. In the book “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer and the movie “Tom and Huck” there are many similarities and differences having to do with the characters personalities, the setting, the characters relationships with one another and the events that take place.