Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The rhythm of love sonnet xvii essays
Short essay on literary translation
The rhythm of love sonnet xvii essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The rhythm of love sonnet xvii essays
This essay will compare two translations of Love Sonnet XVII by Pablo Neruda- one is by Stephen Mitchell, the other by Stephen Topscott. I enjoyed the version by Stephen Topscott the most. Before we can begin comparing translations, we must first understand what the poem is focusing on. Pablo Neruda is using symbolism to compare his love for nature to the love he has for his significant other. His figurative language helps bring the poem to life, by forcing you to use your imagination. In my personal opinion, the more symbolism and sensory details used the better because it holds my interest while reading since poetry is not something I particularly enjoy. There were some lines and stanzas within the poem that stood out to me in particular. …show more content…
The way he chose to translate it had a more dark mystic tone in my opinion, which made it harder for me to envision the light within the flowers. In my head I just saw an old barren plant without much light coming from within it. Mitchell’s writing style didn’t appeal to me. In Stephen Topscott’s translation of the same line he said,
“I love you as the plant that never blooms but carries in itself the light of hidden flowers;”
Topscott’s words within his translation were much more simplistic and laid back compared to his counterparts. He was also more straightforward with what he was saying which made it easier for me to visualize what he may have been hinting toward. While I read the same line in his I imagined an old barren plant that had gorgeous flourishing flowers that gave light to the inside of the plant. I related this to the beauty that is within one’s soul. One of the more confusing parts of the poem for me was the last two lines in the second stanza. Stephen Mitchell has a mystic almost dark tone when he is translating the following:
“and thanks to your love, darkly in my body lives the dense fragrance that rises from the
Consider the first few lines, “I have nothing else to give you, so it is a pot full of yellow corn, to warm your belly in the winter” (Baca 8-10). The imagery here is clear. The author invokes the images of yellow delicious corn while stressing the importance of his poem in relation to food. The speaker cannot give the recipient food, so he gives the only thing he can, poetry. This imagery is strong in demonstrating the importance of the poem in comparison to food. Not only was imagery strong in this line it, it is also a metaphor: Thing A = Thing B. The author appears skilled in using both imagery and metaphors in this poem. Consider these lines, “It is a scarf for your head, to wear over your hair, to tie up around your face” (Baca 11-12). The author uses again both imagery and metaphors in this line. He is stating that his poem is as important to his love interest as a “Scarf for your head”, and that it should be valued. The imagery used within this stanza appears to be coordinating with Santiago’s message quite well. The second stanza invokes warm images of kindness, while the third stanza is more mysterious and
In sonnet XXV of 100 Love Sonnets, Pablo Neruda utilizes personification and implied metaphors to create vivid imagery in his poem.
In Pablo Neruda’s love poems, ‘Body of a Woman’ and ‘Sonnet 89’ the theme is about a woman who Neruda loved. This essay will analyse how Neruda uses imagery and metaphor, amongst others, to reflect on how much Neruda has matured over time.
The speaker of We Are Many is someone inside of all of us. Neruda uses many metaphors to our changing lives. The speaker describes the changing faces of life and how it’s never what we want it to be but when we are where we want to be it doesn’t shine through.
...heir message. Neruda uses imagery as an aching, lonely night, which is incomplete without her. Frost, on the other hand, uses nature, as imagery to life, where in the beginning had no purpose, but eventually leans that it is his heaven. Pablo Neruda uses repetition to directly display his message of what he feels as literary devices. However, Frost uses figurative language, like similes and metaphors. Neruda’s purpose seems to differentiate due to the fact that he seems indifferent to the idea of leaving and forgetting her, or even loving her. With Frost, it starts off him finding his purpose for life, and questioning whether what is right or wrong. Then, in the end, he realizes that countless people have it worse than he does. With these comparisons and contrasts, it shows that Robert Frost’s poem has a greater meaning for life, and picking up and starting over.
This last line ties up the strings with a final saying of: In the middle of flowers, we watch the sky. Relaxation is shown by the attitude towards the words and gives a visual of a happy couple in the grass laying there together watching the clouds moving in the sky. The flowers can symbolize the beautiful happy times he has experienced in the land of love. He never says anything negative in here, actually this line might serve as a way of surrendering to love and that “it’s all worth it”. The description also gives location and feeling that readers can have a true impression of love and butterflies.
An analysis of Pablo Neruda’s “Sonnet XVII,” from the book 100 Love Sonnets: Cien sonetos de amor, reveals the emotions of the experience of eternal, unconditional love. Neruda portrays this in his words by using imagery and metaphors to describe love in relation to beauty and darkness. The poem also depicts the intimacy between two people. I believe the intent of the poem is to show that true love for another abolishes all logic, leaving one completely exposed, captivated, and ultimately isolated.
Reading poetry, not only evokes feelings, it also triggers memories and past experiences. “The reader is paying attention to the images, feelings, attitudes, associations that the words evoke in him” (Rosenblatt, 34) We create our own meaning from a literary work of art when we relate to it; when we can bring our own personal experiences to the table. It’s all about the relationship between the reader and the literary work of art. This is why the reader response criticism is so effective in order to interpret literary works of arts. It allows the reader to experience the work in whole different level. After all, “The poem is what the reader lives through under the guidance of the text and experiences as relevant to the text.” (38)
While Chilean poet Pablo Neruda has been critically acclaimed for his political poetry, it was his love poetry that first established his reputation as a poet. Veinte poemas de amor y una canción desesperada (Twenty Love Poems and a Song of Despair) is a collection of romantic poems written by Neruda, first published in 1924. He also wrote Cien Sonetos de Amor (100 Love Sonnets) which is a collection of sonnets and was first published in 1959. These two collections were written and published at the beginning and near the end of his poetic career, respectively, signifying the importance of the women in his life and his admiration of them as Neruda’s poetry often reflected his real life experiences and affairs with multiple women. Despite the reverence towards certain aspects of women in his love poetry, Neruda is unable to recognize women as anything more than objects with sensual and erotic qualities, which he demonstrates through literary devices, such as imagery and personification, and his other poetry.
In the poem “A song of Despair” Pablo Neruda chronicles the reminiscence of a love between two characters, with the perspective of the speaker being shown in which the changes in their relationship from once fruitful to a now broken and finished past was shown. From this Neruda attempts to showcase the significance of contrasting imagery to demonstrate the Speaker’s various emotions felt throughout experience. This contrasting imagery specifically develops the reader’s understanding of abandonment, sadness, change, and memory. The significant features Neruda uses to accomplish this include: similes, nautical imagery, floral imagery, and apostrophe.
Spencer, Edmund. “Amoretti: Sonnet 54”. The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Gen. ed. David Simpson. 8th ed. Vol. 1. New York: Norton, 2006. 904. Print.
In contrast to the Nine-Inch Nails words, there are several phrases that become rather ethereal in their incantation. "Grooved columns of air", "But if it ends the start has begun", and "penetrates the Milky Way without contact" all seem to place this flower at the very center of nothingness. This contrast brings to mind high quality photography, which can make an image seem to have sharp edges and contrast greatly with its background.
Robert Frost is known for his poems about nature, he writes about trees, flowers, and animals. This is a common misconception, Robert Frost is more than someone who writes a happy poem about nature. The elements of nature he uses are symbolic of something more, something darker, and something that needs close attention to be discovered. Flowers might not always represent beauty in Robert Frost’s poetry. Symbolism is present in every line of the nature’s poet’s poems. The everyday objects present in his poems provide the reader an alternative perspective of the world. Robert Frost uses all the elements of poetry to describe the darker side of nature. After analyzing the Poem Mending Wall and After Apple Picking it is clear that nature plays a dark and destructive role for Robert Frost. This dark side of Frost’s poetry could have been inspired from the hard life he lived.
The opening quatrain of "Sonnet 46" sets up the conflict of infatuation versus true love, acknowledging the classic view of a battle between opposing forces, but swiftly moving beyond such a black an...
...allow for an unbroken sound, and evoke a bright, harmonious mood in the audience. CS: Personification appears all throughout the poem, and it is not by mistake. The poet personifies flowers and nature in order to send messages to or remind man that even amidst the chaotic ruin that instigates his neglecting of nature, he still has that sense of happiness and delight in him.