Overpopulation has become an issue around our world without ever being properly addressed; until now. This issue needs to be addressed and solutions for it proposed now and that is what I am here to do. Overpopulation is depleting our already low resources and creating issues among the poor by putting more of a strain on them. Along with the poor, the wealthy are also being affected due to their world and the world around us running low on resources and space to put us all. The only real solution to this issue is for countries to come to come together to use mass genocide amongst themselves. In order to properly do this countries must gather those who do not to contribute to our society but instead act as leeches on the rest of the working class. These people include the elderly, severely ill, disabled, mentally ill, and criminals who need to be apart of this solution. By gathering these people in particular, we rid the world of these people and leave behind those who not only contribute but can also help sustain a healthy way of living among those around them. Mass genocide can be achieved efficiently in many ways which brings us to the different ways that it can not only be used, but efficiently used …show more content…
With extermination camps, resources such as food, power, and water can be saved for those that need it. Unlike the extermination camps used in the Holocaust, creating the bare minimum of shelter for these people will allow nature to help. Extermination camps can be more effectively used in countries with more harsh conditions that allow nature to do more of the work. Countries with more comfortable weather conditions can be used as a storage for the people. While waiting to be transported, different methods can be used at these extermination camps to help speed the process of extermination. The people waiting can be put through gas chambers, starved, shot, or allow them to kill one
When there is any form of mass violence the perpetrators must disassociate human being from the people that they are killing. To dehumanize someone is no make them seem like a lesser being or an animal or savage in your eye. This causes us to lose our sense of empathy for that person, and allows us to be able to slaughter them like cattle, because that is what they are, cattle. There are many places all around the world that show how dehumanization is necessary for a genocide to occur.
L. Jones. (2010). Book Review: The Final Solution: A Genocide, by Donald Bloxham. The English Historical Review. cxxv (514), 776-778.
To start off with, what is genocide? Genocide is the killing of a massive number of people of in a group. Genocide has not only been practices in the present day, but it has been practiced for m...
Thousands of animals are put to sleep each year due to not having any available homes for them to be adopted. According to Jennifer Sexton and Tom Warhol in Domestic Animal Overpopulation, “The average female cat can produce two litters of six kittens per year, a female dog can produce one litter of six or more puppies per year, making pet overpopulation a significant problem.” Animal overpopulation is costing money and you can help the pets with spay and neutering programs. A new solution is mandatory contracts for breeders and spay and neuter programs. This paper will talk about spay and neuter programs, contracts for breeders, and why some people don’t think animal overpopulation is a problem. Thankfully there are solutions to this issue of animal overpopulation.
Genocide: The Holocaust and Holodomor Genocide is a huge problem in today’s society. While there are laws set down to handle cases where genocide occurs, the idea and premise of genocide and all that it entails is still widely debatable. It’s difficult to put a label and definition on a term that, while it has a long history of existence, is very rare and unknown to the common man. When I say rare, genocide only occurs in very extreme cases and situations, but it doesn’t make it any less of a horrible crime. By definition, genocide is the mass extermination of a whole group of people, or an attempt to destroy an entire group of people, either in whole or in part.
- We can learn from our mistakes in the past and how we can prevent a genocide from never happening again.
Our world is suffering from many tragedies. The biggest of which is genocide. Approximately nineteen million, seven hundred ten thousand, two hundred people have died in numerous genocides across the world since 1933. And yet, many civilians don’t realize that genocide is still occurring today. It has been addressed many times, but it must be said once more: This mass murder of men, women, children, innocence, and faith is not behind us. It's hard to fathom the sheer number of innocent people that have died from genocide. Countless people across the world are still being slaughtered for their race, religion, and even for living in a place that someone else wants to control.
The intentional murder of an enormous group of people is near unthinkable in today’s society. In the first half of the twentieth century, however, numerous authoritarian regimes committed genocide to undesirables or others considered to be a threat. Two distinct and memorably horrific genocides were the Holocaust perpetrated by Nazi Germany and the Holodomor by the Soviet Union. In the Holocaust, The Nazis attempted to eradicate all European Jews after Adolf Hitler blamed them for Germany’s hardship in recent years. During the Holodomor, Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union attempted to destroy any sense of Ukrainian nationalism by intentionally starving and murdering Ukrainian people. The two atrocities can be thoroughly compared and contrasted through the eight stages of genocide. The Holocaust and Holodomor shared many minor and distinct similarities under each stage of genocide, but were mainly similar to the methods of organization, preparation, and extermination, and mainly differed
Various schools of thought exist as to why genocide continues at this deplorable rate and what must be done in order to uphold our promise. There are those who believe it is inaction by the international community which allows for massacres and tragedies to occur - equating apathy or neutrality with complicity to evil. Although other nations may play a part in the solution to genocide, the absolute reliance on others is part of the problem. No one nation or group of nations can be given such a respo...
Richter, Elihu D. "Commentary: Genocide: Can We Predict, Prevent, and Protect?" Journal of Public Health Policy. no. 03 (2008): 265-274.
The idea that the successful health and health care organizations of the future will be those that can simultaneously deliver excellent quality of care, at lower total costs, while improving the health of their population is taking hold. The main reason is because of health disparities. Addressing health disparities has been a challenge for decades. This paper will look at a few examples of how health disparities can affect individually, thus the overall health of a population.
The first technique, which is often conducted by means of genocide or population expulsion, is
Human life should be preserved at any cost. The value of human life should never be taken for granted. Genocide is still a controversy in the world today. With the help of the peace intuitions, the International Criminal Court and the United Nations awareness will be brought to countries to stop these acts.
We as individuals do NOT understand the problems with overpopulation. We do not take the time or the effort to be educated enough; therefore we do not help in the prevention of future problems to keep our society as it is now.
Since the beginning of mankind, we have reached many great achievements. We have developed many technologies and theories to solve and explain many of our questions and to improve human life. Through our years of evolution, we have severely increased our own survivability. This has been a great achievement for us, but in the recent decade, overpopulation is becoming a great issue. In the recent years, the rapid increase in population growth has troubled many in the field of political sciences. Scientists like Ehrlich have calculated and expected our population to grow even faster if we do not act upon the increasing rate of population growth. The birth rate of our planet is increasing exponentially, meaning that the birth rate has surpassed the death rate and that the rate of growth will only increase if left alone. The politics of population is a debate that involves both the fields of sciences and moral and ethical considerations. Science may provide an insight of