In Chapter 10 of John Coakley's Nationalism, Ethnicity, & the State, the relationship between the state and national groups is closely examined. Coakley argues that there are four ways in which states can interact with minority groups. First, the state may choose to remove minorities, creating an "ethnic monopoly". Similarly, the state may choose to constrain a minority group's influence by excluding them from politics. This leads to the creation of an "ethnic hegemony". On the other hand, states may choose to incorporate minority groups into society and political life as opposed to eliminate them. If the state does not acknowledge minority groups, there is an "ethnic homogeneity" present. If a state does acknowledge minority groups, however, …show more content…
This is an interesting point, and makes one consider whether or not all states have ulterior motives in recognizing multiple nationalities within their borders. By examining the examples provided by Coakley, however, he provides an overall convincing argument regarding the four ways in which states and minority groups interact, as well as the intentions of the state in protecting minority groups' rights. The first two types of state and minority interactions that Coakley mentions are aimed at limiting the rights of minority groups (220). States may limit the rights of minority groups by either getting rid of them within the state's borders or by politically excluding them. The first technique, which is often conducted by means of genocide or population expulsion, is …show more content…
An example of the first technique can be seen in Belgium, where both Dutch and French speakers are provided equal opportunities at the government level (229-232). For the latter, Coakley provides the example of the millet system during the Ottoman Empire. This system allowed non-Muslim countries to practice autonomy in the realms of education and religion, for example (233). However, this is not an example of territorial autonomy, a phenomenon that Coakley explains later in the chapter. If a state refuses to give a particular region autonomy, there is a "concentration of power" (235). If a state does give formal autonomy to a particular region, there is a federal system in place (236). Coakley provides the example of Switzerland, which is a federation of several different "cantons" or provinces, divided based on language (237). In between the concepts of federal governments and independent states lies the idea of a confederation (238). Coakley mentions several examples of confederations that have existed in the past, such as that of the United States from 1781-89
Confederation- a group of individual states that are in an alliance, but the independent states each have more power than the central government
These groups fought continuously against the restrictions imposed onto them, a discriminatory government, and the forced mixture of American culture and that of the minorities culture in which resulted in the “Melting Pot.” Additionally, Limerick used excerpts of documentations from several governments in which imposed these restrictions and acts on the afore discussed minorities in addition to personal experiences from both ends of the spectrum. Moreover, through the use of these personal statements, we are allotted the insight to the original discrimination minority Americans experienced in addition to explaining parts of history that most people do not often
Federalism plays an integral part in the growth and development of the United States of America and is a key factor in determining the basis of power in this country. Clearly, the term federalism can be understood in many different ways pertaining to each person's view, but it can be more broadly defined in terms of the separation between the state and federal government. Thomas E. Patterson defines federalism as, “the division of sovereignty, or ultimate governing authority, between a national government and regional (that is, state) governments. Each directly governs the people and derives its authority from them” (Patterson 74). He then goes on to give a more basic definition with, “American Federalism is basically a system of divided powers” (Patterson 74). But federalism is more than just a word with a definition. It is hard wired into the constitution because the framers knew how important this division of power would be for the development of America and to ensure power would ultimately reside with the people.
To start off with, what is genocide? Genocide is the killing of a massive number of people of in a group. Genocide has not only been practices in the present day, but it has been practiced for m...
Federalism is a system where a particular country has divided its government structure and power between a strong central government and a local government that forms constituent political units. Therefore the federal system forms an association between the two governments. The system came to existence as part of the solution to the problems that faced the federal government especially when it came to exercise of authority. The constitution only allowed for continental congress to sign treaties and call on war but in reality it had now enough resources to carry out the activities.
When a group feels as if their existence is threatened by another group, the only solution to their problem is the extermination of the opposing group. Genocide is also used to carry out systematic efforts in destroying enemies which will send out warning to other potential enemies. Acquiring economic wealth by destroying a group which stands in the way of that benefit is also another reason genocide is carried out. Finally, to create a “pure race” which means everyone practices the same way, follows the same culture, and the group who does not fit the guidelines, will be exterminated. The Center on Law and Globalization is a charitable organization which presents news about devastating problems in countries across the world. Its authors are reporters and journalist who experience firsthand the problems these countries are facing. In the article, Why Do Genocides Occur? Published by the Center on Law and Globalization, the conditions under which genocide usually occurs includes: when the victims are excluded, which means they have lost their citizenship and denied their rights, in crisis, when their government is in ruins, or in a dictatorial
In this paper, I plan to take a deeper look at this situation and try to figure out what it would actually be like if Quebec was its own country. & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbs The premier of Quebec, Lucien Bouchard, has been attempting to separate from Canada for quite sometime. If he had it his way, this topic would be old news by now. His main problem is the Federalist, English speaking citizens of his province. They have been very vocal on their stance to stay apart of Canada. They have sent around several resolutions stating this.
According to Stanton “It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide.” ( 3 ) Elie writes “Children were thrown into flames.” ( 32 ) These quotes are important because it shows throughout all the stages extermination was when they killed, murdered, got rid of people. Burning, poisoning, starving, assassinating, all types of killing are taken place just to get rid of the people they don't like and want off earth because they are worthless to
World War I, also known as “The Great War”, was a global war that revolved mainly around Europe. It took place from 1914 to 1918. This was a very brutal war that caused many casualties. The soldiers who survived experienced severe trauma and mental discomfort. This trauma was a direct result of the violence and agony they experienced during the war. Motivation for this war was the idea of nationalism and the pride in one’s country. This war was the cause of disillusionment among many of the soldiers that were involved in it.
Many people across the globe argue that nationalism within Canada is simply not feasible. It is said that we as a people, differ so greatly with our diverse cultures, religions, and backgrounds that we cannot come together and exist together as a strong, united nation. In his book, Lament for a Nation, George Grant tells the reader that “…as Canadians we attempted a ridiculous task in trying to build a conservative nation in the age of progress, on a continent we share with the most dynamic nation on earth. The current history is against us.” (1965) Originally directed towards the Bomarc Missile Crisis, the book argues that whatever nationalism Canada had was destroyed by globalization as well as the powerful American sphere of influence. Although it is true that the book was initially written as a response to the events that took place in the late 1950s, many of the points are still valid today.
More focus into the ethnic groups is just another racial grouping on a different perspective. The increased competition for ethnic identity among ethnic groups is posing as a rediscovery of racial groups, in which ethnic groups are termed as majority or minority groups. However, the shift to ethnic group has shaped some characteristics of individuals that were previously coined in social differentiation according to race. One of the noticeable individual features that have been shaped is the aspect of mutual and collective interests, in which every member strives to protect common interests of the group e.g. human rights. I believe that racial and ethnic groups are things that will continue to exist from our past historical experiences. We can together wipe out the problem of discrimination and injustices based on ethnicity and racial differences, if we all strive towards cherishing social consciousness for one another as a one human race and freeing ourselves from the trappings of our racial and ethnic
A Federal system is a system of government where power and sovereignty are shared constitutionally between a central authority and subunits. The central authority retains primary sovereignty while the subunits (state, province etc.) retain a degree of autonomy. Examples of federal countries include Ethiopia, Germany, and USA etc.
Federalism or “federal” ties around a system of government. It controls armies, declares wars, coins money, and regulate trade between states and foreign nations, and treaties (Mrs, Crouse’s powerpoint pg:3 num:9). Specifically this was created to organize the powers that exist in the system of government so everything can be organized. It also divides the power among a central government and several regional governments (Mrs, Crouse’s powerpoint pg:2 num:8). More ever Since everything passes through one system it had to be divided into 3 sections: delegated powers, implied powers, and inherited powers.
Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).
Anti in Federal Government A form of government where sovereignty is constitutionally shared between a central governing authority and constituent political units called states of regions defined as federalism, according to wikipedia federalism will break the country into autonomous regions with a national government focused only on interests with nationwide bearing: foreign policy and defense. Federalism is a type of government in which the power is divided between the national government and other governmental units. This is the mixed compound mode of government, combining a general government with the regional government (provincial, state, cantonal, territorial or other sub-unit governments) in a single political system. It contrasts with a