The DHS Director received a call from Mr Dwayne. Today, I contacted Mr Wayne he wanted to complain about his visitation plan has changed, and he said that it is a response of his complaint against Osmond Fredericks.
By checking OR-KIDS, I saw a long history of issues about Mr Dwayne not able to follow through court ordered services and DHS guidelines. One of the most recent case notes made by David Schmidt summarize clearly Mr Dwayne interactions with DHS.
I thought you may want to know Mr Dwayne concerns as we strongly encourage the constituents to work cooperatively with DHS and to have open communication channels.
DCAMM employee Carl Duemling’s attitude and the way he conducts buisness reflects poorly as a state employee and an employee of DCAMM. Duemling attempts to verbally disapline ISA officers. This is not the first time he has displayed such behavior and I am sure it will not be the last. Duemling reapetedly threatens ISA officers jobs. As Supervisor of the Charles F. Hurley building I will not tolorate such bevaior toward my officers. Myself and the officers assigned to the Hurley are well aware of what needs to be done to secure the building properly. Duemling forgets it was my staff and I who trained him on policies and procedures associated with the sucurity of the building.
One of the cases assigned to me by Eggleston Family Services was of 12 year old boy that was having a difficult time adjusting to his new placement. He had difficulty controlling his
Not every service is capable of doing what they supposed to do. The lives of these children and families be can be taken for granted by those who don’t take their jobs seriously. If DYFS had more people who dedicated their time on their job, many situation could have been avoided. You wouldn’t want to be the reason why a child lost their life or placed in a home where the environment is worse than where they were before. DYFS can be capable of helping others, but it could also put others in danger.
Based on the information provided in case 8, Crashing Planes and Tranquil Dreams, Richard is a 4 years old boy, who is experiencing challenging behaviors at school, as well as at home. Richard lives with both parents, and two older brothers. Richard has been attending the YMCA’s full-day preschool program for the past 2 years. He is described as a “good kid” by parents and teacher, however, he is constantly active, impulsive, and frequently becoming involved in conflicts with adults. Parents are continuously working, and as mentioned in this case, they have to spend most of the time at home yelling at Richard or putting him in time-out as part of his consequences for not listening or misbehaving.
Social agency and the court authorizing the placement, and caregivers are responsible for the continuing monitoring to ensure that the child in placement receives adequate care and supervision (Downs, Moore and McFadden, 2009, p.275). Services for children in foster care are a teamwork effort of the different parties involved (Downs, Moore and McFadden, 2009). Unfortunately in Antowne’s situation the agency and the court system failed him because although he was removed from his mother, the abuse and neglect continued. The systems involved did not provide the safety net Antwone needed.
Many parents are faced with this issue across the United States, but in Katy’s case, she has inflicted with a life changing event a terminal illness that prevents her from working and paying for child care services. Katy received a letter from her employer stating that they will no longer reimburse for child care services because of her not working. Denial of child care has contributed to the exacerbation of Katy’s symptoms and poor health outcome. Therefore, I am requesting a meeting held during this week with Katy and the Department of Social Services (DSS). The discussion will be focused on denial of child care payments and agreement for a Fair Hearing to discuss Katy’s inability to work and her limitations.
The reporting party (RP) stated her son Michael Girard DOB: 2/13/68 is a resident living in the facility. The RP disclosed the facility does not provide meals that meet the recommended dietary allowance. An example of breakfast would be two donuts and a glass of milk; one hard-boiled egg. The residents were served hot dogs and can soup. The residents are not provided fresh fruits or vegetables. The residents are sent to their rooms at 6PM and receive cookies and soda as a snack. According to the RP the residents don't have access to the food. All the food is locked up and a resident named Dale has the only key. The residents do not have access to the microwave oven to warm their food. Additionally the residents have no access to the television and are forced to watch CNN or programs preferred by the caregivers.
Review ILP and Client Code of conduct; Client missed a few face to face meetings. CM reiterates the shelter rules and regulation and DHS Code of Conduct.
PER REPORTER: Draton was charged as an adult for a sex offense with a child under the age of 14. The circuit court gave it back to youth court. Draton is in need of special care. He has no legal guardian in the state. His legal guardian is in Texas. He does have family in Mississippi (MS). The mother sent him to Mississippi to be with the grandparents. The sex offense happened in MS and he was placed in jail. He just got out of jail. He was in jail for a year and a half. He was in jail too long without treatment. The reporter was told to call a report in so the child could be placed in CPS custody. This is per Judge William E. Andrews III. Draton has no physical or mental limitations the reporter is aware of. For a while, he has been on the
CM normally meets with the client every Wednesday for face to face meeting. On 8/4/2016, client walks in the social services office. CM completed Bi-Weekly ILP Review. In the meeting the client was emotionally teary, upset and angry. Client reported to this worker she doesn’t want to be here anymore. She continues to report this is not a Working Shelter and she have an appointment with DHS advocate today at 4pm and she will request to be transfer to a Working Shelter. This worker inquires what happened for the client to be teary and upset. Client reported she requested metro cards to attend a housing interview to fill out application. She continues to report she didn’t submit any documentation as proof of her appointment and she didn’t get the metro card. This worker
Per psychologist, Quadir can be placed back into a regular class, however Quadir’s behavior is causing him to do poorly on some test and exams. Per psychologist, Quadir is at risk for hyper activity and aggression. Per Psychologist, Quadir has a behavioral problem which make him at risk for behavioral modification services. The psychologist remanded for Quadir to continue to receive behavior intervention services. Ms. Wingate stated, that Quadir is a good student, like school and is friendly. Per Ms. Wingate, Quadir is working on goals at school which includes, improving reading, math, and behavior conflict and utilizing coping skills. Per Ms. Wingate Quadir is in need of a 504 accommodation plan during test taking because of his ADD. Per Ms. Wingate Quadir can become very aggressive with his peers and teachers when he get angry. Per Ms. Wingate Quadir can become very non complaint, use profanity, and abusive when he get upset. The coordinator ]from One & One Youth Services, stated, that he would be requesting for Quadir to receives duel service, which includes, Day treatment and continual IIH services from Progressive Care
On January 30, 2018, the Office of Inspector General’s Office (OIG) received a hotline report alleging Dr. Katrina Alexander committed abuse, fraud, mismanagement and waste against the VA by purposely lying and manipulating scheduling to receive un-deserved overtime pay, misleading providers, clerks and patients about availability in her schedule. Further, the Psychologist doubled billed for groups, misused the billing codes for psychological testing getting her higher Relative Value Units (RVU), possibly overcharging patients, then allowing her to appear as working more than any other provider. The claimant alleges that this is causing significant access issues for the Mental Health Center (MHC). Additionally, leadership at the facility permitted the Psychologist sole control of her schedule (only Mental Health provider in MHC with this permission) that led to her ability to mask the improper activity, and no action taken by the Texas Veterans Health Care System’s leadership to rectify the alleged improper activity.
...acility. This solution provided safety for the resident by placing her in a higher monitored region of the facility. Her son would have to check in before visiting, allowing staff to keep an eye on him in a designated meeting area. Even though the solution seemed fitting, the resident did not wish to be moved. The facility could not violate her decision to stay, but we also could not allow her son to continue to pose a threat. After two days of working with the resident and discussing options, she hesitantly agreed to move to another room. This benefited her in many ways, because it allowed her to stay in contact with her son while retaining a safe environment. Through this situation I learned that the human will can defy rationality, but as a Social Worker I must still strive to safely and efficiently handle these situations in a way that accommodates their rights.
...ddler that the social worker had good reason to question the toddler’s attachment to his mother. However, it is also evident that there are other factors outside of the mother’s control that needed to be take into account before reaching a final conclusion.
Dunnes Stores is an indigenous, family owned Irish Company. The Company is a retailer in both the food and textile market who work around the principle of providing competitive prices, high quality products and a vast variety of choices. The company’s motto of “Better Value” looks to draw in all these principles together.