Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Juvenile court system
PER REPORTER: Draton was charged as an adult for a sex offense with a child under the age of 14. The circuit court gave it back to youth court. Draton is in need of special care. He has no legal guardian in the state. His legal guardian is in Texas. He does have family in Mississippi (MS). The mother sent him to Mississippi to be with the grandparents. The sex offense happened in MS and he was placed in jail. He just got out of jail. He was in jail for a year and a half. He was in jail too long without treatment. The reporter was told to call a report in so the child could be placed in CPS custody. This is per Judge William E. Andrews III. Draton has no physical or mental limitations the reporter is aware of. For a while, he has been on the
In 1989, plaintiff Joseph Benning was cited for a violation of § 1256 for operating a motorcycle without wearing approved headgear in Caledonia County, Vermont. The statue states that “No person may operate or ride upon a motorcycle upon a highway unless he wears upon his head protective headgear reflectorized in part and of a type approved by the commissioner.1 The headgear shall be equipped with either a neck or chin strap.1” The County State’s Attorney dismissed the citation because he deemed the statue vague and unable to establish the elements necessary to prosecute the crime.1 However, the plaintiffs filed suit against the state, seeking to have § 1256 declared unconstitutional.
Her little boy wasn't expected to make it through the night, the voice on the line said (“Determined to be heard”). Joshua Deshaney had been hospitalized in a life threatening coma after being brutally beat up by his father, Randy Deshaney. Randy had a history of abuse to his son prior to this event and had been working with the Department of Social Services to keep custody over his son. The court case was filed by Joshua's mother, Melody Deshaney, who was suing the DSS employees on behalf of failing to protect her son from his father. To understand the Deshaney v. Winnebago County Court case and the Supreme courts ruling, it's important to analyze the background, the court's decision, and how this case has impacted our society.
The Court ruled for the juvenile, stating that his rights to due process were indeed violated according to the Fourteenth Amendment. “The proceedings of the Juvenile Court failed to comply with the Constitution. The Court held that the proceedings for juveniles had to comply with the requirements of the Fourteenth Amendment” (Oyez, n.d.). The Court analyzed the juvenile court's method of handling cases, verifying that, while there are good reasons behind handling juveniles in a different way from adults, adolescents seeking to settling delinquency and detainment cases are qualified for certain procedural safeguards under the Due Process Act of the Fourteenth
Stuart v. Nappi was class lawsuit Stuart’s mother filed against school personnel and the Danbury Board of Education because she claimed that her daughter was not receiving the rights granted in the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). Kathy Stuart was a student at Danbury High School in Connecticut with serious emotional, behavior, and academic difficulties. She was suppose to be in special education classes, but for some reason she hardly ever attended them. Kathy was involved in a school-wide disturbance. As a result of her complicity in these disturbances, she received a ten-day disciplinary suspension and was scheduled to appear at a disciplinary hearing. The Superintendent of Danbury Schools recommended to the Danbury Board of Education
A 12 year old stole money from a lady’s wallet that was stored in a locker at the time it was taken. Samuel Winship, the defendant was charged with an act of delinquency. If Samuel was charged as an adult the crime would have be larceny. A New York Family court judge convicted Samuel on a preponderance of evidence, which at the time was all that was necessary according to New York State Statute. At the time of the trial a juvenile in the state of New York was at least seven years old, but younger than 16. Samuel was 12, which by law made him a juvenile that could be charged with an act of delinquency.
Police took 16.5 year old Michael C. which was also on probation in juvenile court into custody. Michael C. had been on probation since the age of 12. Approximately one year earlier, he had served a term in a youth corrections camp under the supervision of the Juvenile Court. He had a record of several previous offenses,
The juvenile case of Ricky Smith was brought to the attention of the Michigan Juvenile Court as he had been initially referred for truancy. However, his probation had been extended due to Mr. Smith being found driving a stolen vehicle. According to People v. Smith (1991), Mr. Smith was referred to the juvenile court again for riding a bicycle while under the influence of alcohol and for stealing candy bars. The juvenile court, again, chose to extend Mr. Smith’s probation, even though he had clearly demonstrated non-compliance with the rules of his probation by continuing to accrue delinquent charges. An additional report was filed with the court alleging that Mr. Smith had violated the terms of his probation due to a curfew infraction and threatened an officer. It appears that the Assistant District Attorney in the case attempted to have Mr. Smith’s case transferred to adult criminal court after he had been charged with stealing a woman’s purse. However, the court denied the request to do so. After the denial, Mr. Smith was sentenced to a boy’s reform school. He absconded from the facility and was listed as a runaway until he was found later, as an adult, with pending adult charges.
When it comes to minors, we try to keep a balance between our logistic and moral views on the issue of their imprisonment. Usually, we end up thinking morally, but that isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Children raised in harsh conditions or without adequate parenting could stay bad forever, or grow up to become a great person. A huge slip up shouldn’t take their life. We could think that the children could stay bad forever and become an even bigger problem later in life, but prison time works well to deter against that. The supreme court was right. It’s completely wrong to sentence a minor to
Juvenile court is a special court that deals with under age defendants that are charged with crimes, who are neglected, or out of their parent’s control. The average age of the Defendants are younger than 18, but juvenile court doesn’t have jurisdiction in cases in which a minor is charged as an adult. The procedure of juvenile court is to involve parents or social workers and probation officers in order to achieve positive results and prevent minors from future crimes. However, serious crimes and repeated offenses can result in the juvenile offender being sentenced to a prison, with a transfer to a state prison when they reach adulthood. According to the film “Prison States”, Christel Tribble’s was a 15-year-old from Kentucky who was diagnosed
Copyright (c) 1999 West Virginia Law Review West Virgina Law Review, Winter, 1999, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. 477, 13457 words, STUDENT WORK: Changing the Law in Child Abuse and Neglect Proceedings: An Improvement on Improvement Periods?, Morgan E. Persinger
His legal history includes four intake contacts and two violations of probation. Cody has had an intake contact for a felony offense. One or more of the intake contacts were for felony offenses against another person. He has no history of escape and no court ordered placements. He has had three juvenile detention confinements. He has no failure to appears in court. He has had no previous contact with any other court service units or in any other states that resulted in diversion and informal resolutions at Intake. Cody has been placed on electronic monitoring approximately one time from 09/13/2016 to 10/12/2016. Cody was released from detention and into his mother’s custody. The youth had some monitor violations, but was overall compliant to electronic monitoring. Cody has had previous encounters with the court and is currently on supervised probation. On January 12, 2017, Cody was released from court on Prehearing Release Rules. His adjustment to supervision has been detailed by numerous court appearances and new charges. Cody has made improvements in his attitude and has acquired employment while on supervision. However, he is still in need of continued monitoring for safety and
Many people have heard or read about the situations of child celebrities such as Jenna Malone, Drew Barrymore, Christina Ricci, Michelle Williams and Macauley Culkin or child athletes like Dominique Moceanu, but few have heard of a more compelling situation as that of Aaron Kipnis. This young man was brutally beaten by his stepfather at the age of eleven. Instead of punishing his stepfather, the state of California made the eleven year old a ward of the state. Being a ward, in the states juvenile system, was a horrific experience. For the next five years, Kipnis began a cycle of running away, getting caught, and living in temporary housing. It was not until he was sixteen that a parole officer recommended he pursue legal emancipation. His freedom was finally granted at seventeen (Rupp 1&2).
Johnny is 14 years old and has ample opportunity for a better childhood. It wasn’t until Johnny started hanging with the wrong people that his behavior became more aggressive than the average teenage boy. In the juvenile system, wraparound services can be provided for Johnny and his family. This includes but is not limited to social services, clinicians, probation officer’s who would assist vagina to decide what to do to secure the child’s best interest. Juvenile court services provide proper diagnosis and treatment to focus on Johnny’s character and lifestyle rather than the crime.
Cooperton alleged a bare procedural violation that is insufficient to satisfy the concrete injury portion of the injury-in-fact requirement for standing.
When dealing with troubled youth and choosing proper treatments and consequences for offensive and anti-social behaviors, the individual in question is carefully considered. Will this punishment prevent future anti-social behavior? Is this treatment in the best interest of the child? What is the primary risk factor that will re-expose this child to future contact with the juvenile justice system? These questions, once a treatment plan is decided, cease to resurface. In fact, once a minor is taken into state custody, the state then has complete parental rights and can implement a harsh penalty for violating rules: solitary confinement. The use of solitary confinement has been widely overlooked and accepted due to the invisible nature of