Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Eassy of organisational culture
Organizational culture is complex and cannot be defined
Organizational culture is complex and cannot be defined
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Eassy of organisational culture
Ravasi, D & Schultz, M. (2006). Respond to organizational identity threats: Exploring the role of organizational culture.” Academy of Management Journal, 49 (3), 433–458.
Research Question: The research question under investigation is that how organizations respond to environmental changes that might influence employees to question aspects of organization’s identity, with organizational culture playing a supporting role in organization’s response.
Background: The authors Ravasi and Schultz provides and discuss some of the background studies related to the research question. They specifically point out how employees’ beliefs about central and distinctive attributes of an organization can sway collective self-perceptions (). At the same time,
…show more content…
Furthermore, employees’ perception of how their organization, including B&O, is perceived externally serves as a gauge based on which they evaluate their identity and actions. So, as the employees think about and question organizational identity because of the environmental changes, organizations needs to respond with organizational culture playing the supporting role. “The role of culture in informing and supporting sensemaking and sensegiving processes triggered by external changes that induce members to reevaluate aspects of their organizational identity” ().
Conclusions: Ravasi and Schultz conclude that organizational culture is the “central construct” that can understand and manage the development of organizational identities because of the environmental changes in the organization. Furthermore, they opine that culture can preserve a sense of distinctiveness and continuity among employees even as organizational identity is subjected to reevaluation. Finally, they conclude that culture and external images might mainly play a complementary role in influencing organizational responses to identity
…show more content…
(2012). Strategic (mis) fit: The implementation of TQM in manufacturing organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 33 (11): 1321– 1330.
In the article, Strategic (mis) fit: The implementation of TQM in manufacturing organizations, authors C. D. Zatzick, T. P Moliterno & T. Fang discusses how during TQM implementation, organization need to fit it with its strategic orientation to get positive results.
The article having incorporated the concept of TQM, points out how organizations being a system of interrelated activities, need to achieve a internal fit during TQM implementation, by which the core elements of it are orientated primarily toward a ‘cost leadership’ rather than the ‘differentiation’ strategic position.
Thus, having studied TQM implementation in about 780 manufacturing organizations, the authors assume that TQM is positively connected with performance for the cost leaders, even while negatively related to performance for the differentiators.
The article provides good inputs regarding TQM process, its role, benefits as well as challenges, and so quite apt for further
TQM is a company’s complete “culture of quality” approach which focuses on long-term success. It strives for continuous improvement, in all aspects of an organization, as a process and not as a short-term goal. TQM’s involves everyone in the organization to transform the organization into a forward-thinking entity by influencing attitudes, practices, structures, and systems of the entire organization (Business Dictionary, 2014). TQM was crafted by William Edwards Deming, a statistician who specialized in statistical process control after World War II. Deming outlined 14 points of TQM where all people of an organization can constantly search for ways to improve the process, product, and service. Deming developed the
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2013). Reframing Organizations (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Contained within the following paper is the evaluation of the author’s organization’s mission, vision goals, and objectives .The author will discuss the pre-determined questions as set forth by Jeffrey Trapp, a certified University of Phoenix instructor. This paper will discuss the differences that a rise between a company that has implemented TQM (Total Quality Management) with that of the authors own organization’s management style.
TQM, or total quality management, is defined as "the process that involves everyone in an organization focusing on the customer to continually improve value". I do believe that all organizations should use TQM. It results in better quality products that result in better value, and these are the two aspects, in which customers look at in order to know if they want to buy the product. As long as organizations use TQM, they will always have products that customers are willing to buy.
TQM and BPR are two change management approaches which have received greater attention from organizations perspective throughout the world. Organizations are trying to be more responsive to change which are occurring in environment because of globalization and the use of technology. TQM concept is introduced by Japanese management in early 90’s that aims to achieve long term continuous improvements by achieving customer satisfaction by providing quality products and services. TQM is concerned with small steps in steady improvements in all processes of the organizations. The key elements of this approach are to enhance leadership, focus on customer relation and improvement in all processes by empowering the employees working with in teams. Many organizations have achieved dramatic results from this approach at that time but some were seems unable to get significant result from small steps in improvements. They need bigger change in improvements so during 1990’s BPR concept is emerged and seems to add value in TQM processes. Information T...
Chapter sixteen in our textbook highlights the benefits of organizational culture and what it can do for any company with a strong culture perspective. In fact chapter sixteen-three(a) speaks widely on how a strong culture perspective shapes any organization up well enough to perform better than any of its competitors who do not balance any organizational culture. If not mistaken after viewing SAS institute case they are well on track with facilitating a high performance organization culture. First, SAS institute motivate all employees to become goal alignment in their field of work. This is where they all share the common goal to get their work done. In one of the excerpts taken away from this case, an employee- friendly benefits summary expresses the statement “If you treat employees as if they make a difference to the company, they will make a difference to the company.” “SAS Institute’s founders set out to create the kind of workplace where employees would enjoy spending time. And even though the workforce continues to grow year after year, it’s still the kind of place where people enjoy working.” Clearly highlighted from this statement that SAS Institute is mainly ran off of a fit perspective. Which argues that a culture is only as good as it fits the industry. Allowing a good blueprint or set up will
Culture can be defined as “A pattern of basic assumptions invented, discovered or developed by a given group as it learns to cope with its problems of external adaptation and internal integration that has worked well enough to be considered valid, and therefore to be taught to the new members as the correct way to perceive, think and feel in relation to those problems”. Schein (1988). Organizational culture can be defined as a system of shared beliefs and values that develops within an organization and guides the behavior of its members. It includes routine behaviors, norms, dominant values, and feelings or climates. The purpose and function of this culture is to help foster internal integration, bring staff members from all levels of the organization closer together, and enhance their performance.
Organisational culture is one of the most valuable assets of an organization. Many studies states that the culture is one of the key elements that benefits the performance and affects the success of the company (Kerr & Slocum 2005). This can be measured by income of the company, and market share. Also, an appropriate culture within the society can bring advantages to the company which helps to perform with the de...
It is said that people are the greatest assets to an organization and it is their beliefs, customs, perspectives, attitudes, and values that constitute to the culture that prevails in an organization. Culture, a very common word in today’s world, plays a very vital role in organizations and it not only affects an employee’s professional development but also their personal harmony. Culture gives a sense of belonging to people, a sense of who they are and how productive they are at their work place. It helps in interacting with each other at a work place.
Corporate culture is the shared values and meanings that members hold in common and that are practiced by an organization’s leaders. Corporate culture is a powerful force that affects individuals in very real ways. In this paper I will explain the concept of corporate culture, apply the concept towards my employer, and analyze the validity of this concept. Research As Sackmann's Iceberg model demonstrates, culture is a series of visible and invisible characteristics that influence the behavior of members of organizations. Organizational and corporate cultures are formal and informal. They can be studied by observation, by listening and interacting with people in the culture, by reading what the company says about its own culture, by understanding career path progressions, and by observing stories about the company. As R. Solomon stated, “Corporate culture is related to ethics through the values and leadership styles that the leaders practice; the company model, the rituals and symbols that organizations value, and the way organizational executives and members communicate among themselves and with stakeholders. As a culture, the corporation defines not only jobs and roles; it also sets goals and establishes what counts as success” (Solomon, 1997, p.138). Corporate values are used to define corporate culture and drive operations found in “strong” corporate cultures. Boeing, Johnson & Johnson, and Bonar Group, the engineering firm I work for, all exemplify “strong” cultures. They all have a shared philosophy, they value the importance of people, they all have heroes that symbolize the success of the company, and they celebrate rituals, which provide opportunities for caring and sharing, for developing a spiri...
The concept of organizational culture is one of the most debated topics for researchers and theorists. There is no one accepted definition of culture. People even said that it is hard to define culture and even more change it. It is considered a complex part of an organization although many have believed that culture influences employee behavior and organizational effectiveness (Kilmann, Saxton, & Serpa 1985; Marcoulides & Heck, 1993; Schein, 1985a, 1990).
Organisational culture is emergent and socially created by constant interactions of organisational members with their environment as well as with each other. Looking at the former, Schein (1985) defines culture as learned solutions to problems that arise from positive problem-solving situations, be it problems of “external adaptation” or “internal integration”. Essentially, when confronted a problem that threatens the continuing survival of an organisation, members of the organisation would try out various responses until they discover one that most effectively remedies the situation. This solution, once accepted, is absorbed into the culture and becomes a cultural norm. For the latter, culture also emerges as a way for members to cope with environmental anxieties. For example, in order to cope with the stress of their occupational responsibilities and develop an effective way to communicate their points with each other, members of an organisation may develop their own jargon and language, which then becomes an implicit cultural
Another interesting research that recent academicians have developed is that corporate identity refers to an organization’s unique characteristics which are rooted in the behaviour of the internal stakeholders i.e., the members of the organization. Many scholars thus opine that management of an organization’s identity is a strategic function and it requires a multidisciplinary approach. Also, senior managers can essentially narrow the gap between actual and desired identity through optimally utilizing the corporate identity mix (behaviour, symbolism and
Another interesting research that recent academicians have developed is that corporate identity refers to an organization’s unique characteristics which are rooted in the behaviour of the internal stakeholders i.e., the members of the organization. Many scholars thus opine that management of an organization’s identity is a strategic function and it requires a multidisciplinary approach. Also, senior managers can essentially narrow the gap between actual and desired identity through optimally utilizing the corporate identity mix (behaviour, symbolism and
TQM is a system of continuous improvement of work processes to enhance the organization’s ability to deliver high-quality products or services in a cost-effective manner [2]. The focus of TQM is to improve customer satisfaction and reduce waste [3]. Customers include ...