Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of organisation culture
Functions of Organizational culture
Functions of Organizational culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of organisation culture
When someone spoke about the phrase “Organizational Development” I need to admit I did not know what they were talking about. Even up to the first class, I was still puzzled about what organizational development was, despite having read the first twelve chapters in Practicing Organization Development: A Guide for Leading Change by Rothwell, Stavros, Sullivan, et.al. I felt as if I was learning another foreign language and was not sure of myself. Now, that we endured four face-to-face classes in Education Organization Development, I can now say that I understand the material in the class. As the halfway point has drawn to a close, there are five topics that were explained in either the Rothwell textbook, supplemental readings or class lectures that have stuck with me and had me thinking over and over again about the core topic of organizational development. The first topic which was extremely engaging to me was brought to my attention in the class lecture from the first night of class on September 11, 2015 on “What is an Organization?” Since this was a question on my mind, I was able to get a true and precise answer to the answer. Dr. Wiggall lectured that Chester Barnard clarified that an organization …show more content…
To me this chapter probably was the most beneficial to my career now because we are trying to build our team at school. The text explains that the four c’s that must be understood by OD practitioners in order for them to do effective team building are: context, composition, competencies, and change management (Rothwell, Stavros, Sullivan, & Sullivan, 2010). This chapter explains how important team building and cohesiveness is to any job or company. I will be taking some of the information from this chapter and applying it to my career and work on team building at my
Brown, D. & Harvey, D. (2006). An experiential approach to organization development. (seventh edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The leader's new work: Building learning organizations. Sloan Management Review, 32(1), 7-22. doi: 812347
PPA 660: Organization theory presented me an understanding of why organizations behave in a specific manner as well as why the individuals in those organization behave as they do. While some of the topics discussed in class seemed rudimentary at the time of lecture, such as Fayol’s principles of management and Gulick’s POSDCORB, ultimately I came to realize that this is only because these are the practices I am accustomed to observing. In hindsight, the concepts and ideas presented by Fayol and Gulick in their era were groundbreaking. At the end of the course, I was able to take away concepts of organizational culture, leadership, power, authority, motivation, group behavior and decision-making. The following are specific areas of organizational theory that I consider as my strengths of the topics discussed however, they do not represent my entire understanding of the subject matter.
According to Dyer & Dyer (2013) research, to improve the team performance it is important to consider the four “C”s. It is essential that team and its member understand the meaning of the four C’s in order to have a high performing team. The four “C”s are (1) The context of the team, (2) The composition of the team, (3) The competencies of the team, and (4) The change management skills for the team.
This course has allowed me to reflect on my current role as an OD professional while also planning for my future success in this same role. Through reading, self assessment, peer review, and daily engagement of the organizational process, this course has been an invaluable learning event from both an academic and professional perspective. My perspective on the organizational development process has changed through an increased awareness of how to “solve[..] problems with S-T-P” (Schmuck, Bell, & Bell, 2012, p.155), an improved understanding of the importance of “goals, roles and procedures” for the examination of organizational conflict (Schmuck, Bell, & Bell, 2012, p.230); and the uses of “classical, complex and special interest OD designs”(Schmuck,
PRIMIS MNO 6202: Managing Organizations. 2007. The 'Secondary' of the ' Reprint of the book. McGraw-Hill Education, 2013.
Jones, G. R. (2010). Organizational theory, design, and change. 6th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and Practice of the learning organization (1st ed., Rev.). New York, NY: Doubleday.
Wirth, R. A. (2010). Why a Learning Organization? Retrieved from enTarga: Be the Change: http://www.entarga.com/km/whylrngorg.htm
In my opinion, there are some managerial roles that a manager needs to follow to become successful in the company. Depending on organizations these managerial roles changes and to be successful in business, every organization must assign right person for managerial roles. Finding a right person to a particular managerial role is really hard to do but there is another factor that we can consider here, which is the managerial skills. Managerial skills help a person to perform the managerial roles effectively. So by evaluating a person’s managerial skills we can identify whether he is suitable for particular managerial job or not. There is a company called Tata group, which is one of India’s biggest company, follows certain procedures which is called the Tata way, for dealing managers which includes hiring, training and assigning efficiently and effectively. This is reason why managerial job in the Tata group became my favorite job. This paper examines how this unique procedure for dealing managers make the Tata group successive and how can the study of organizational behavior help to replicate it and maybe even improve it.
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organization development & change (9th ed.). Australia: South-Western/Cengage Learning.
French, W. L., & Bell, C. (1999). Organization development: behavioral science interventions for organization improvement (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their
What I benefit from this course strategy management class is knowing. The strategic management is consisting of the analysis, decisions, and actions an organization undertakes to create and sustain competitive advantages. strategic management analyses. concern with overall objectives, involves multiple stakeholders, incorporates short and long term perspectives, recognizes tradeoffs between effectiveness and efficiency. The strategic management analysis, formulation, and implementation the challenge managers face of both aligning resources to take advantage of existing product markets as well as proactively exploring new opportunities.
Cummings, T. G. & Worley, C. G. (2001). Organizational development and change (7th ed.). Ohio, USA: South-Western College Publishing.