Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender and roles of women in literature
Gender and roles of women in literature
Research on gender roles in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender and roles of women in literature
Traditional gender roles exist in Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ novel One Hundred Years of Solitude, but traditional distribution of power between the genders does not. In analyzing each character and their life, it’s easy to see how Marquez presented each in terms of his own view on gender constructs. Marquez portrays femininity and masculinity very differently. But why would Marquez choose to make such a clear distinction between the roles of each gender? Marquez sees women as spiritual and overpowered by traditional standards, and men doomed by their own obsessions. Men are wily and therefore vulnerable, whereas women are dignified and durable, and survive for much longer. We all know that the Buendia men in are a mess when it comes to self-control. …show more content…
This is why Marquez depicts them as the weaker gender. A constant theme with these men is obsession that literally consumes their life. Most of the obsessions wither boil down to either knowledge or power, both of which lead to downfall. The first male character to experience downfall via obsession is Jose Arcadio Buendia, the husband of our favorite BAMF, Ursula. Jose’s obsession began with very innocent questions about, well, everything. He had a passion for learning and was always keen to discover something. New technologies and the unknown intrigued him. But, as they say, “curiosity killed the cat”. His desire for knowledge drove him crazy, and he spent the tail end of his life like a dog- tied to a tree for his own safety and speaking a language nobody else could understand. He ventured into what can be called “dangerous territory” for the Buendia family because he did not restrain his inquisitiveness, desire, or enthusiasm. Jose Arcadio Jr., the first son of Jose Arcadio and Ursula, was dictionary-definition macho- muscular, huge in size, and well endowed in the downstairs area.
He was every bachelor’s dream self. He traveled the world with gypsies and got every tattoo he could think of. He drank, slept around, and women idolized him. Unfortunately, his personality wasn’t as fabulous. He defied his mother’s direct orders and married his adopted sister, Rebeca. In a fight with Pietro, he states, “Fuck nature two times over” (92). He doesn’t care about what the laws of nature, the actual law, Ursula, or his family has to say about his marriage to Rebeca because he has no wish to control his desires. He has always been able to get what he wanted, and he doesn’t plan to stop that type of behavior any time soon. Because he defies Ursula, he gets banished from her house, and eventually killed- supposedly by an act of God against his actions, but the exact circumstance is unclear. What we do know is that Jr. overindulged in every desire he had, and he died for that. We can contrast this with the fate of Remedios the Beauty, who is the feminine-stereotype equivalent of Jose Arcadio Jr. Remedios ascended into heaven instead of receiving an almighty punishment. This contrast is a perfect example of Marquez’ views on
gender. Colonel Aureliano Buendia, the brother of Jose Arcadio Jr., seems to be different from the rest of the Buendia men- at least at first. He is the longest-standing male character of the novel, which should mean something. He is very attached to the war he fights, which keeps him separated from other emotional circumstances that would eventually lead to obsession. He seems to take the path of life opposite to what his brother chose. He had a child bride, and when she died in childbirth, he mourned without becoming obsessed. However, when he does lose his sanity, he has no chance of ever returning to it. The war and the death of his young wife start to take a toll on him, to the point where he attempts suicide. He managed to resist emotions, which is what his longer lifespan can be attributed to, but once they got the best of him, he was brought down just as quickly as any other Buendia man. Buendia women, on the other hand, are an entirely different story. Take Úrsula Iguarán, number-one bad-ass and OG mother. This book could not exist without her. She basically founded Macondo and then ran it from her house until she died. Even though her husband was technically the mayor of Macondo, we all know that “behind every successful man is his wife.” As described in the novel, “Úrsula’s capacity for work was the same as that of her husband. Active, small, severe, that woman of unbreakable nerves who at no moment in her life had been heard to sing seemed to be everywhere, from dawn until quite late at night, always pursued by the soft whispering of her stiff, starched petticoats” (9). Úrsula is equal to her husband, Jose Arcadio Buendia, instead of as inferior- a very important example of Marquez’ gender roles. Her word is Buendia Family law. Failure to follow these commandments results in immediate action (see José Arcadio Jr. marrying his adopted sister). Ursula’s longevity is a physical symbol of her own strength and power. This can be contrasted to the short life of every male character in this book. Proof of her absolute power is shown by the failure of Macondo so shortly after her death- nobody could ever fill her shoes. Amaranta, Ursula’s daughter, is another example of a power female. However, she is not naturally powerful; she gains her power through manipulation. The most obvious example is her reaction to the marriage of Rebeca and Pietro. Amaranta is a woman fueled by jealousy and anger. The proposal damaged Amaranta’s pride, and she takes pride about as seriously as her father did (he killed a man over pride two chapters into this novel). Amaranta will stop this marriage, and not only that, but she drives Pietro to suicide afterwards as the manipulative little cherry on top. After it all, she burns her hand and wraps it up- which at first seems like a penance or sign of remorse, but is also a symbol of her virginity, and therefore her power over her own life. Following this, she remains a virgin and refuses all offers of marriage, staying true to what her bandage symbolizes, and keeping her power. Amaranta also has “fate power”. For example, she knows that she is going to die, and sews her own funeral shroud, symbolizing that she has power enough to know when her life will end. Not only this, but she knew when Rebeca’s life would end, too. “One afternoon, when she was sewing on the porch, she was assailed by the certainty that she would be sitting in that place, in the same position, and under the same light when they brought her the news of Rebeca’s death. She say down to wait for it, as one waits for a letter, and the fact was that at one time she would pull off buttons to sew them on again so that inactivity would not make the wait longer and more anxious. No one in the house realized that at that time Amaranta was sewing a fine shroud for Rebeca” (277-8). We know that she hated Rebeca and wanted her to die. She basically sewed this wish into reality. Amaranta could have played into anyone’s fate, yet she chose not to wear out this ability- a stark contrast to what Buendia men do when they are handed power. Amaranta pulled all of this off through manipulation and pride, and if that doesn’t sound like power to you, I don’t know what does. Amaranta Úrsula is the Buendia woman to end all Buendia women, and she is named after the other two most powerful girls in this novel, clearly not by accident. She is a combination of all of the powerful Buendia women of history- “active, small, and indomitable like Úrsula, and almost as pretty as Remedios the Beauty, she was endowed with a rare instinct for fashion. When she received pictures of the most recent fashions in the mail, they only proved that she had not been wrong about the models that she designed herself and sewed on Amaranta’s primitive pedal machine” (379). Amaranta Úrsula is Úrsula reborn, free from tradition, and a modern woman. She ignored all prophecies regarding incest, and married her nephew, which resulted in a child with the tail of a pig- literally Ursula’s worst nightmare. This sealed the fate of her child, even if it was unintentional. Amaranta Ursula sewed clothing for her child, just as Amaranta had done with a funeral shroud for Rebeca, to seal her fate. She allowed herself to feel any emotion that came to her and was no longer suppressed by tradition as previous Buendia women had been. This ultimately led to the apocalyptic end of the Buendia family tree- brought on entirely by Amaranta Ursula’s actions alone. Ursula’s life work was to prevent the pig’s-tail curse, yet it only took a pair of booties to bring it all crashing down. She kept everything in line by suppressing the incestuous sexual desires of women in her family. This tradition ties down those women with the hope of preserving their lineage and delaying a horrible prophecy. The Buendia women carry the strength of the family because they can control their emotions and desires- unlike the men. Úrsula’s longevity comes from this restraint. Ursula achieves her goal partially because she does a very good job at holding her family together while she is alive, even if it all fails once she passes away. Overall, Marquez’ depiction of women and men in this novel makes his views on gender roles extremely apparent. His females are wise and strong, allowing them to endure life’s curveballs. They have the power single-handedly maintain or destroy the family. They even have a mysterious control over fate. On the other hand, Marquez shows men as flawed and unable to live a complete life. They have no self-control, and this leads to their own demise. Marquez’ view on power division between genders is obvious because of the way that he choses to depict his characters.
Through his novel, author Marcel Theroux creates a dystopian era revolving around war, and man’s need to control and dominate over others. Through the life of one particular character, the audience is able to experience this world through the eyes of a woman. Makepeace, the protagonist, takes the reader on a journey through her past to reveal how these men demonstrate such characteristics. In contrast to her fellow characters, Makepeace manages hold on to humanity and continues to see the beauty around her. In the novel, Far North, I believe the protagonist’s desires were driven by her female gender, and the author used Makepeace to portray the differences between men and women.
At birth, we are a blank slate, regardless of gender. We are introduced into a world that wrongly believes gender defines who we are and what we shall be. Everything we see, hear, taste, smell, and feel impacts our minds and how we react. Therefore, behaviors between the sexes are learned from our interactions with the opposite sex and how we, as individuals, see our world. In the literary piece, The Distrust between the Sexes, Karen Horney asks this question: “…What special factors in human development lead to the discrepancy between expectations and fulfillment and what causes them to be of special significance in particular cases” (Horney)?
“If women are expected to do the same work as men, we must teach them the same things.” The famous Greek philosopher Plato once said this, and society still has not fully fathomed this idea regarding gender equality. Fahrenheit 451 is a novel written by Ray Bradbury, set in a dystopian society. It touches on censorship, individuality and technology dangers, but the most prevalent recurring theme is based on gender roles and stereotypes. In the story, Guy Montag is a firefighter, whose sole mission is to burn books and any houses that contain them. Everything changes when he meets a young and insightful girl, Clarisse, who changes how he sees the world. Montag’s wife Mildred, is a housewife not only to him, but to an entirely fake family composed
As seen in “The Kingdom of this World,” a connection with nature is a result of someone’s masculinity. This ideal is readily adopted here, pushing the notion that “The General” is the epitome of masculinity. Serving as another testament to “The General’s” masculinity-- his ability to conceive seven-monthers, children that are precocious as a result of their father’s virility. This could also be perceived as attesting to the General’s sexual rapacity. Shortly after the General’s masculinity is displayed to the reader, Benedicion Alvarado, his mother, makes a statement that is seemingly weary of her son’s ability to lead: “if I’d known my son was going to be president of the republic I’d have sent him to school.” (45-46) Though lack of schooling doesn’t preclude the General from having wisdom, it does call into question what warranted his rise to power other than his perceived masculinity. But perhaps this is the point-- by introducing the General as a masculine figure, and by making the General’s masculinity preeminent to his being, Marquez presents a basal idea that dictates masculinity is the driver of leadership. There is nothing to indicate whether or not this is something that should be accepted, after all, it was “read from a text.” This quote is important because it gives us a better understanding of what the perceived importance of masculinity is. This allows us
Protection – she could never offer protection to the creature she loved: Could you marry me, Stephen? She could neither protect nor defend nor honour by loving; her hands were completely empty. She who would gladly have given her life, must go empty – handed to love, like a beggar. She could only debase what she longed to exalt, defile what she longed to keep pure and untarnished. ( Hall 2978)
Gender Matters is a collection of various essays on feminist linguistic texts analysis, by Sara Mills. Mills develops methods of analyzing literary and non-literary texts, in addition to conversational analysis based on a feminist approach. The author draws on data from her collection of essays gathered over the last two decades on feminism during the 1990s. The essays focus on gender issues, the representation of gender in reading, writing, and in public speaking. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of feminists’ analysis of sexism in literature and the relation between gender and politeness. The article is informative for my research paper, as my topic is going to cover language analysis of the text and who women reading and writing differs according to the discourse analysis within linguistic, psychology, case studies audiences and surveys. The book would be helpful, particularly the last three essays that discusses gender, public speaking, the question of politeness and impoliteness in public speaking. Mills’ analysis is not complete without including the idea of global notions of both women and men, to see whether women and men write and read in the same way globally. Therefore, an update would enrich the book’s discussion section. Although, Mills addresses the class and race theme in language and public speaking, I will only look into the role of language that plays a part in doing or reducing gender in literary, non-literary texts and in conversation.
Born in Jackson, Mississippi in 1909 Eudora Welty was clearly influenced both by her mother’s love of reading and her father’s interest in photography. By 1931, when her father died of leukaemia, she had obtained her Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Wisconsin and then attended Columbia University Graduate School of Business where she focused on advertising. Returning to Jackson she worked for Jackson’s first radio station followed by the Works Progress Administration. On her web site Margret Bing outlines the key activities of the WPA in 1935 as a Federal initiative to provide work for both blue and white collar workers. In the case of white collar workers this was particularly in the field of public art, music, theatre and writing (Bing). At this time Welty was engaged in taking photographs of Mississippi people. A collection of these photographs was published in 1971 in One Time One Place: Mississippi in the Depression: a Snapshot Album. In the introduction to the 1996 edition William Maxwell when commenting on her work quotes a sentence from her novel, The Optimist’s Daughter: “The mystery of how little we know of people is no greater than the mystery of how much” (5), which captures the lightness of touch she employs to signify the essence of the characters in Ladies in Spring. Welty went on to right a range of short stories and novels receiving recognition both in America and Europe until her death in 2001.
Through the title of the essay, “Night to His Day: The Social Construction of Gender”, it’s already possible to verify that the author, Judith Lorber, claims that gender was created by the society in order to separate the two sexes, and, in some ways, make them complementary or dependent on each other. She believes that gendering is ingrained in every culture, and is one of the main ways of stratifying a society, besides age. Although, unlike age, it does not rely on abilities, such as motor skill and cognitive development; it relies mainly on perpetrated gender roles that do not reflect the true strengths and weaknesses of each people. Gendering is done so naturally that people only notice it when it goes against the usual binary pattern – male and female. The problem is how to stop this from happening, which Lorber doesn’t exactly discuss. It is very unlikely that society will undergo any drastic changes in this current generation, still it is possible to imagine some actions that could be implemented early in the process of child development to generate a solution for future generations.
If I was holding a family meeting on women’s issues I would have those who attend read “The Social Construction of Gender” by Judith Lorber (1994). I selected this reading because I feel gender is one of the most important topics that should be discussed when talking about women’s issues, especially in a room with both men and women. My goal would be to get my family members not only to understand, but also see how gender is continuously created by society every day.
During an in class discussion of the book 100 Years of Solitude, a fellow student suggested the women characters seem to be much more stable than the male characters. She stated that, “the women are the ones who take care of the house while the men go off and fight their silly wars.” She continued to note that the men seem to constantly immerse themselves in useless projects while the women are forced to take care of the home and dissuade their husbands’ irrational need for adventure and change. She was making the observation that the women behaved as the rational ones in the city of Macondo while the men took interest in shiny trinkets and inventions and left all care taking to the women.
In Gabriel Garcia Marquez's book “One Hundred Years of Solitude”, the characteristics of each family member resemble another. They may start differently, but their fates follow the same tragic conclusion. The Buendia men suffer from their own macho pride and recklessness. The women are subjected to the will of the men, and are burdened with tragedy that follows them. This book is locked in a time circle for 100 years, doomed to repeat the mistakes of their ancestors. The Buendia family all share unifying facts that tie them together creating their own solitude. Marquez describes the life and fate of the Buendia's struggle with madness, incest, and 100 years of solitude that is wiped out in he end of the book.
The treatment of women, women’s roles, and the portrayal of those roles in public spaces and publications is an issue that has changed and evolved over time. The shift often occurs during times of cultural change, revolution, or war and has significant effects on women of the area or time period. These shifts, their consequences, and their causes will be examined through the novel A Thousand Splendid Suns, through the Russian Revolution, and through changes in the portrayal of women in art, specifically in advertisements from the U.S. during the World War II period. Women’s rights and roles change during periods of war and political turmoil or revolution as a result of the chaos and conflict
Thelma & Louise’s wide appeal among women spectators is due to the use of the female gaze. The female gaze is presented from a female perspective and reflects female attitudes. It is often used because of the creators gender or because it is aimed at a female audience. The female gaze uses mockery as a device to illustrate the sexism of the male gaze. Stereotyping, depicting men as spectacles, and celebrating female friendships are the ways that Thelma & Louise utilizes mockery. This mockery opens the audience’s eyes to the idea of feminism. Geena Davis and Susan Sarandon play Thelma and Louise, two working-class friends who together have planned a weekend getaway from the men in their lives. Though the road trip starts out as a good time, the pair eventually finds themselves at a bar. After a tipsy Thelma ends up in the parking lot of the bar with a would-be rapist that Louise shoots, the two decide that they have no choice but to go on the run. The pair is pursued by a police officer sympathetic toward their plight. He chases them to the Grand Canyon, where the women make a fateful decision about their lives. Thelma & Louise resists patriarchal construction by representing the female gaze and because of this representation the film is often viewed as anti-male.
The social construction of gender can be identified in Matthew Lewis’ The Monk, which plays a critical role in the establishment and perpetuation of system sustaining phallocentric power. Lewis destroys the concept of gender being a biological attritute and plays with the idea of learned “rules” of society that individual must follow in order to gain recognition and respect with a specific culture. As gender models “progressed” throughout the years, the social classes that differentiated gender began to coalesce in a homogenous notion of normalcy Matilda/Rosario’s gender-bending showcases the fluidity of gender and the performativity of the cultural constructs Transgendering in the work disrupts the ordered binary of traditional roles and defines a new space—a third space.
It will be one of the luckiest things in the world if people could just do what they love in their careers, and pursue their dreams without any fears or worries about how society and others judge them. However, women in this society do not obtain the same rights that men own; many inequalities hinder women to live and work. From this class, I learned a lot about gender affects work, and women and men’ roles can be very different in the work. In many industries, even though women get same education and professional degrees as men do, they are hired at lower rates than men are. Many women meet glass ceilings and find it is hard to attain the highest status in the profession, and this causes the society locks women out of higher level