Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on women gaining the right to vote
Essays on the women's right to vote
History of women suffrage
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on women gaining the right to vote
Fairness for the People Justice affects us everyday of our lives. In history it has been proven over and over again. People like Gandhi, and Susan B. Anthony and Chief Joseph have went from no one, to people we read in our textbooks today. They have all taken a stand to those who want to affect us because they don't want these people to effect their friends, family and the world. From this, it is important for people to take a stand on justice in society. To begin, If people don't stand up for what they believe in, nothing will change. Susan B. Anthony spoke of a quote from her speech “On Women’s Right to Vote. “I not only committed no crime, but, instead, simply exercised my citizen's right.” Susan B. Anthony was arrested due to her voting illegally in the presidential election. However she was was very angry and confused when she was arrested because she was only doing what the constitution gave her the rights to do. She also stated that “It was the people; to we;the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens but we, the whole people.” What Susan B. …show more content…
Anthony is referring to is that in the constitution it does not specify who is able to vote, who is able to establish justice, etc. But it does say the people, not black or white but the people. By doing what she did, standing up for women's right to vote, it gave women the voice to speak out and regain their rights that was taken away from the government. Voicing your thoughts and opinion is in our DNA.
Whether people decide to take it another level, for instance, voicing your opinions to the government is different story for some people. However one man from Wallowa band tribe named Chief Joseph, shows that he will not let the government suppress him. And aslo will ensure that his people and himself are heard. From the speech “One Surrender”, Chief Joseph gave to General Howard discussing that his tribe and himself are “tired of fighting.” This relates to the issue of justice because of the fact that he is standing up to the military showing that he has the courage to speak when he needs too, to ensure the safety and well being of his people. Also this can be related to the federal government and the people fighting for what they believe in because again Chief Joseph stood up for his people in attempts to stop having the military/government try to kill
them. Although standing for what the people believe in is right, it does create speculation regarding consequences. For example, what if a 23 year old man killed one of his classmates because that person was bullying him. He goes to court and is converted to the rest of his life in jail. However the people of America believe that no one should go to prison if they kill someone and it was because they emotional harm someone. The federal courts now are in a dilemma with the American people because they believe that he should go to jail because he took the life away from another individual. This Is it right, or is it wrong to stand up for what we believe in? Many people in today's society continue to be oppressed by the power of the government. They fear the consequences of their actions and decide that were they stand is good enough for them. However by doing so they miss the opportunity to help others who also fear this, to show that the people have a voice and that fairness and equality are our basic foundations of life. This ongoing issue cannot be solved unless someone stands up for what they, call fairness.
Justice is among the most significant moral and political concepts. The word originates from the Latin jus, meaning “right or law”. All throughout history, injustice has been an issue each individual has experienced during his or her daily life. Even today we are still experiencing riots and protests from African-Americans in order to attain justice. In Twilight: Los Angeles, 1992 by Anna Deavere Smith, readers see an example of injustice through the Rodney King case and the shooting of Latasha Harlins. Rodney-King and Latasha Harlins experienced racial injustice, which can be described as the denial of rights based on an individual’s race or racial background. Both two victims were mistreated for the color of their skin and were stripped
History has encountered many different individuals whom have each impacted the 21 in one way or another; two important men whom have revolted against the government in order to achieve justice are Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Both men impacted numerous individuals with their powerful words, their words carried the ability to inspire both men and women to do right by their morality and not follow unjust laws. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” by David Henry Thoreau along with King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, allow the audience to understand what it means to protest for what is moral.
Anthony’s speech is more effective because she has evidence to show that they are withdrawing their rights as citizens for no reason. One example is that the Constitution says that citizens of the United states have the right to vote. In the Constitution, the only person discarded from this right is people that committed a criminal offense or bribery. The only part in the Constitution that says females can’t vote is when they mention men over the age of twenty-one can vote. Another reference is when Ellen Van Valkenburg stopped paying taxes because there were no feminine pronouns. She did this because of the justification of no taxation without
Throughout the 1800s, women across the world began establishing organizations to demand women’s suffrage in their countries. Today, there are still women in countries fighting for their right to vote. Some countries who’ve succeeded in the mid to late 1800s were Sweden and New Zealand. Once they expanded women’s suffrage, many other countries followed. Like Sweden, countries first granted limited suffrage to women and other countries approved to the full national level. Additionally, there were quite a few countries who had taken over a century to give women the right to vote, Qatar being a prime example. Although the fight for women’s suffrage varied in the United States, France, and Cuba in terms of length and process, each effort ultimately
Kale Reed, In previous times, the equality between men and women was at a dramatic difference. It is frequently believed that women's suffrage was desired and fought for only in England and the United States during the 19th century. Though these movements changed in their reasons and tactics, the battle for female suffrage, along with other women's rights concerns, cut through many national boundaries. Women's rights and suffrage changed drastically from the 1890s until the time of Nixon's Administration. During this time, women were treated poorly, and they felt as if they weren't equal to other citizens of the world, especially men.
With hope that they could even out an agreement with the Government during the progressive era Indian continued to practice their religious beliefs and peacefully protest while waiting for their propositions to be respected. During Roosevelt’s presidency, a tribe leader who went by as No Shirt traveled to the capital to confront them about the mistreatment government had been doing to his people. Roosevelt refused to see him but instead wrote a letter implying his philosophical theory on the approach the natives should take “if the red people would prosper, they must follow the mode of life which has made the white people so strong, and that is only right that the white people should show the red people what to do and how to live right”.1 Roosevelt continued to dismiss his policies with the Indians and encouraged them to just conform into the white’s life style. The destruction of their acres of land kept being taken over by the whites, which also meant the destruction of their cultural backgrounds. Natives attempted to strain from the white’s ideology of living, they continued to attempt with the idea of making acts with the government to protect their land however they never seemed successfully. As their land later became white’s new territory, Indians were “forced to accept an ‘agreement’” by complying to change their approach on life style.2 Oklahoma was one of last places Natives had still identity of their own, it wasn’t shortly after that they were taken over and “broken by whites”, the union at the time didn’t see the destruction of Indian tribes as a “product of broken promises but as a triumph for American civilization”.3 The anger and disrespect that Native tribes felt has yet been forgotten, white supremacy was growing during the time of their invasion and the governments corruption only aid their ego doing absolutely nothing for the Indians.
Jane Addams was an upper class woman who thought it was her job to help others. Addams was an advocate of immigrants, the poor, women, and peace. In 1889, she created the Hull House, to help female immigrants become assimilated to the American lifestyle by helping them get a job, learn the language, and receive an education. It was no surprise that in 1915, Jane Addams wrote the life-changing article “Why Women Should Vote.”
“The Civil Rights Act of 1866 defined all persons born in the United States as citizens and listed certain rights of all citizens, including the right to testify in court, own property, make contracts, bring lawsuits, and enjoy full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of person and property” (Berkin, Cherny, Gormly, Miller, 2013, 430). To forever protect the freed people’s rights as citizens the Fourteenth Amendment was created. The Fourteenth Amendment was still flawed. Woman’s rights supporters Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony “complained that the amendment, for the first time, introduced the word male into the constitution in connection with voting and rights” (Berkin, Cherny, Gormly, Miller, 2013, 431). After much Congressional debate in February 1869 Congress approved the Fifteenth Amendment. It “prohibited both federal and state governments from restricting a person’s right to vote because of race, color, or previous condition of servitude” (Berkin, Cherny, Gormly, Miller, 2013, 435). Stanton and Anthony were against this amendment too because it “ignored restrictions based on sex” (Berkin, Cherny, Gormly, Miller, 2013, 435). The amendment still didn’t lessen the
The Native Americans have come across long journey of difficult times since the occupation of their land by European settlers. There are still two sides of a coin- a world of civilization and a world of underdeveloped society in this one country- USA. The paradox is that the constitution which seems to be a model of democracy to many nations of the world lacks a lot for not acting accordingly. Those organized and unorganized struggles of Native Americans were challenged by the heavily armed white majority settlers. This history is among the worst American experience because of the massacre and the violation against human right. In order to be heard, they protest, occupy land, and write books. The Native Americans have raised several human and civil right issues in several ways for hundreds of years including the seizing of Alcatraz Island in 1969, the occupation of Wounded Knee in 1973, and the consequences had left a meaningful impact in their lives.
It is a middle ground between the best and the worst. The inclination of all is to do injustice without paying any price for that action, the worst is to suffer injustice without being able to take revenge (37). It follows then that justice becomes a mean between these two extreme scenarios. Most people will tend to value justice not because it is a good in itself but because they do not have the ability to do injustice without negative consequences. An individual that does possess the ability to practice injustice without consequence will therefore never willingly enter into agreement not to do injustice for the simple proclamation of not to suffer it. For a man such as this, that would be truly mad.
I think both of these texts fully support women’s rights. They both show how the birthplace of women’s suffrage came together. They state when and where Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton fought for their own rights.
Have you ever been treated unfairly because you are a girl? Well I have, which is why I found the Women’s Rights to the Suffrage speech by Susan B. Anthony the most compelling. Our founding fathers promised every citizen of the United States of America equal rights, but women are being deprived of some of these rights, in this case the right to vote. She was promised this right but then reprimanded for exercising it which was clearly stated for all people.
In “women's rights to the suffrage” by Susan B Anthony women are just like men they should always be equal treated.Woman’s needs rights to vote not just men. Susan B Anthony is trying to persuade us not allowing women to vote is just illegally and woman are human too.
In the stories, Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote, and The Watsons Go to Birmingham the similar theme which is overcoming obstacles. They both find out how cruel the world can be and find the courage to try and protest unfair treatment. But they both push for equal rights, and eventually, it ends up working. While there are many similarities in the story there are differences too. There are different attitudes at the beginning of the story Susan B Anthony knows how cruel things can be, but in The Watsons go to Birmingham the kids don’t know how bad things can be until they visit their grandmother, they sit up front in a restaurant and someone tells them to go to the back.
Last but not least, injustice does not provide the most good for the most number of people. Just acts spawn other just acts just like unjust acts spawn other unjust acts. If everyone behaved unjustly, mankind would return to a state of nature (everyone is for themselves) which would be very unprofitable for the unjust individual due to a decreased likelihood of survival. An action is clearly unprofitable for the unjust individual if it would eventually create a hostile environment for him. Hence, one should set an example for others by living a just life which would create a better environment for him as well as for others.