Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Susan b anthony analysis
Essay on susan b anthony's impact
Essay on susan b anthony's impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the stories, Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote, and The Watsons Go to Birmingham the similar theme which is overcoming obstacles. They both find out how cruel the world can be and find the courage to try and protest unfair treatment. But they both push for equal rights, and eventually, it ends up working. While there are many similarities in the story there are differences too. There are different attitudes at the beginning of the story Susan B Anthony knows how cruel things can be, but in The Watsons go to Birmingham the kids don’t know how bad things can be until they visit their grandmother, they sit up front in a restaurant and someone tells them to go to the back. There are many ways that Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote shows overcoming …show more content…
obstacles. Susan B Anthony has to go to court because she voted for the next president. At the time women could not vote because they were not treated equally to men. Also, the judge made the Jury say that Susan B Anthony was guilty, this shows that the judge got so mad that he did not let the jury vote. Even though everyone knew Susan B Anthony was guilty, she did not get a fair trial, as it says in the text the whole crowd was mad because the judge did not give her a fair trial, which is a direct violation of the Constitution. But even with all her challenges she still overcomes them in the end, Susan B Anthony inspires women all around the world to fight for equal rights and fair treatment, as it says in the story, even though Susan B Anthony ended up dying her story inspired women all over to fight for equal rights. It says in the story “I have been striving for over 60 years for a little bit of justice, and yet I must die without obtaining it.” This is important to the theme because it shows that no matter what happened Susan B Anthony fought for equal rights no matter what. Plus she fought for 60 years which is a long time. The Watsons go to Birmingham, also shows the many ways in which overcoming obstacles is shown.
For example, Sarah from The Watsons go to Birmingham protests for equal rights, and she is just a kid. Plus she ended up going to jail and her parents ended up being proud of her. Then when the kids come they adopt a little rebellion against not being treated equally, when they would not have had to in Michigan. Also, it says in the story the kids ask to go with her to protest! Plus at the end of the story when people bomb the church the kids run in to help people even though it is dangerous because he thinks one of his family members is in there he does not think twice. This shows that they really care for each other and would do anything to make sure that each other is safe. After that, they all know how good they have it in Michigan and they know that if they can, they want to do something to help, Michigan was considered a northern state and blacks were treated equally to whites. This story has many similarities, but there are also many things different about the story. One difference in Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote, and The Watsons go to Birmingham is the risks the characters took. The Watsons took a much bigger risk because they could have died, the only risk Susan B Anthony took was going to jail. Another difference is the characters actions, Susan B Anthony has peaceful protests, but The Watsons do not. In The Watson´s protest, a girl got a dog bite and people got hit with
fire hoses. Both stories have similarities but they also have a lot of differences. The common theme in both stories is overcoming obstacles. This is shown when Susan B Anthony votes when it is illegal, and The Watsons protest for equal rights for blacks. The theme is shown it a more convincing way in the story The Watsons go to Birmingham. The theme is shown in a more convincing way because people bomb an all black church, plus people discriminate against the Watsons when they tell them they have to sit in the back. Plus it says a lot that some people would rather kill people who are different than leave them alone. These are the reasons I think the theme is shown better in The Watsons go to Birmingham.
The stories are similar because they both are women. Both wrote and authored their own books/narratives. Also, Harriet Jacobs was encouraged by Stowe's success so, that's why she thought when she could do the same.
“Ah, the creative process is the same secret in science as it is in art,” said Josef Mengele, comparing science to an art. He was less of an artist and more of a curious, debatably crazy, doctor. He was a scientist in Nazi Germany. In general, there was a history of injustice in the world targeting a certain race. When Mengele was around, there were very few medical regulations, so no consent had to be given for doctors to take patients’ cells and other tests done on the patients’ bodies without their consent. This was the same time that Henrietta Lacks lived. Henrietta Lacks was an African American woman who went to the doctor because she had cervical cancer. Her cells were taken and are still alive in culture today (Skloot 41). Hence, her cells were nicknamed Immortal (Skloot 41). Although many, at the time, saw no issue with using a patient without consent issue with what?, on numerous occasions since then courts have determined that having consent is necessary for taking any cells. The story of Henrietta lacks is has similarities to an episode of Law and Order titled Immortal, which is an ethical conundrum. Despite this, the shows are not exactly the same and show differences between them. Both of these stories, one supposedly fictional, can also be compared to the injustices performed by Josef Mengele in Nazi Germany.
A fairly obvious comparison between these two stories is the setting in which they take place. Both occur in New England territory, mainly in the forests and hilly country. It also seems as if the land in each of the tales is rocky and hard to work. The geographical features of these lands sound much the same. In fact, each of the two takes place in an area very close to, if not in, Massachusetts. Tom Walker lives a few miles from Boston, while Jabez Stone lives in New Hampshire, near the area where that state meets up with Vermont and Massachusetts. Daniel Webster lives in Massachusetts, in a town called Marshfield. The geographical and cartographical similarities here show an obvious parallel between the two.
are both set in a terrible time when the black community were slaves and treated like garbage. The only difference is one was successful and the other not so much.
Susan Brownell Anthony, being an abolitionist, educational reformer, labor activist, and organizer for woman suffrage, used her intellectual and confident mind to fight for parity. Anthony fought for women through campaigning for women’s rights as well as a suffragist for many around the nation. She had focused her attention on the need for women to reform law in their own interests, both to improve their conditions and to challenge the "maleness" of current law. Susan B. Anthony helped the abolitionists and fought for women’s rights to change the United States with her Quaker values and strong beliefs in equality.
Both stories were written in different years, but both are written about women in the same era. When women went against the norm during the era the stories were written in they were often looked down on. Especially, Emily, who never married and because she was never married she was constantly judged by the women and men in her city. During that time, it was odd for women not to be married. Emily eventually found someone, but it was known that he was a homosexual.
After moving to Rochester, NY in 1845, the Anthony family became very active in the anti-slavery movement.
Both stories show the characters inequality with their lives as women bound to a society that discriminates women. The two stories were composed in different time frames of the women’s rights movement; it reveals to the readers, that society was not quite there in the fair treatment towards the mothers, daughters, and wives of United States in either era. Inequality is the antagonist that both authors created for the characters. Those experiences might have helped that change in mankind to carve a path for true equality among men and women.
The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an autobiography of Frederick Douglass which depicts the hardships and abuse he witnessed and felt as a slave, gives the reader insight into what it was like to be a slave in America. The type of slavery Frederick Douglass endured as an in-house slave for many years in Maryland was not as harsh or difficult as being a slave in another state such as Tennessee which is farther away from the North, or on a different plantation being used as a field hand. Frederick Douglass had the luxury of living in the city for a while, where “a slave is almost a freeman, compared with those on a plantation” and where “there is a vestige of decency” and “a sense of shame” which makes the city slave owners kinder, since they do not want to seem like an unkind slave owner to their non-slave owner neighbors. Even with this fact in mind, the reader is still able to understand the types of punishments that occurred, how the slaves were treated, and what it was like to live life as a slave because of the detail that Frederick Douglass writes in his book about the experiences he went through all those years that he was a slave and what it was like to become a free man.
In the article an account from the slave trade: Love Story of Jeffery and Dorcas and Wesley Harris: Account of escaping slavery. These are two stories about one main slave in each story that is determined. Both stories have qualities that are similar but also different ones too.Both have goals set to get what they want and a whole lot of bravery.
The first similarity I encountered is that, in both short stories, the protagonists seem condemned to a perpetual state of confinement. In Odour of Chrysanthemums, Elizabeth Bates is imprisoned as a woman in society; she is reliant on her husband, as she has no social or financial independence. She is extremely vulnerable, and the parochial society requires she be subservient and docile. Despite the era’s dictate and her paucity of autonomy, Elizabeth is an intransigent, resolute, rational and astute woman. Walter was little more to her than a stranger, as we see in “She felt that in the next world he would be a stranger to her. If they met, in the beyond, they would be ashamed of what had been before”. Walter is merely a source of sustenance, and Elizabeth never demonstrated amorous intentions or utter compliance to him. Ultimately, however, she becomes submissive to death, her new master. Elizabeth is delivered as a captive from society and Man to death. This condition of incarceration also relates to the recurring illustration and notion of suffocation; not only was Walter asphyxiated, but Elizabeth, too, seems to suffocate and drown progressively, immersed in such a suppressing environment. In A Painful Case, Mr Duffy is encompassed in the prosaic lemniscate of...
They are similar, the civil rights is a huge part with the law and kept Martin and Bernadette in vivid pictures of how this needs an effect for a change. They both understand how acknowledging what goes on with our government gives the picture of how things will be for everybody. From Bernadette's point of view is a little more personal with her stating events of herself in the problem, but Martin more explains how it hurts not just himself, but why and how people of the US are not alone. I think King explains how ones doings effect the world, and Devlin tells how the assumption effects herself and what is going on around her as this is happening. Northern Ireland and America are different yet coinciding, after-all we are all brothers and sisters
Throughout history it has been observed that civil rights and liberties for minorities has fluctuated greatly. With this has come many disputes regarding the classification of people. Involved in some of these conflicts were activists like Martin Luther King Jr, Sojourner Truth, and Susan B. Anthony. In modern times, the state of the civil liberties these leaders fought for are questioned as to whether or not these issues have truly been solved. As seen in their past speeches and current statuses, it is clear that these problems were meant to be solved. The fact of the matter is that civil liberty issues of yesterday have been solved today; these include women’s suffrage, the mistreatment of American women by race, and the segregation of White
...ight. The stories both develop as the main characters are involved in some personal dilemma, be it coming to grips with being infertile or proving one's self to be just as worthy as a boy. In both stories the character's internal conflict is resolved as Rosie wins the fight and Mrs. Mortimer 'went through the rest of the winter as if she were carrying the baby herself.'; However, in 'The Good Corn'; Mrs. Mortimer also forgives her husband and the tension between the characters is also resolved. This is not the case with Rosie in 'The Great Leap Frog Contest'; as it states that she 'talked all the way home'; and Rex was left 'a confused young man.'; In this story the tension between the characters still remains to the very end.
The writings of both the poets strictly tend to focus on the issues concerning racism, ethnicity, prejudice; slavery, inner struggles, and the pursuit of achieve freedom and equality in the society. Both Nadine Gordimer and Patricia Smith are regarded as two of the most renowned contributors to this field of literature. When reading both pieces of literature I noticed a few differences to the story as well. One of the differences was in the poem “what it’s like to be a black girl” the main character was coping with growing up and dealing with all the struggles that being a young black girl goes through. With