Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the connection between Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King
Impact of thoreau on martin luther king jr
What is the main idea of Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
History has encountered many different individuals whom have each impacted the 21 in one way or another; two important men whom have revolted against the government in order to achieve justice are Henry David Thoreau and Martin Luther King Jr. Both men impacted numerous individuals with their powerful words, their words carried the ability to inspire both men and women to do right by their morality and not follow unjust laws. “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” by David Henry Thoreau along with King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, allow the audience to understand what it means to protest for what is moral. A transcendentalist whom strongly urged passive, non-violent resistance to the government’s policies to which an individual is morally opposed wrote his ideas in his essay,“On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” in the year 1849. Thoreau’s transcendentalist belief is seen in his text continuously, “In most cases there is no free exercise whatever of the judgment or of the moral sense; but they put themselves on a level with wood and earth and stones; and wooden men can perhaps be manufactured that will serve the purpose as well. Such command no more respect than men of straw or a lump of dirt. They have the same sort of worth only as horses and dogs”(Thoreau 4). As a white male who was given the right to vote, Thoreau’s writing is more direct and …show more content…
Given that inspiration between Thoreau and King, I believe that yes, both texts are still relevant to the twenty-first century. Their ideas are very powerful and to anyone who is against the corrupt government that still exists today, the twenty first century will be inspired by the powerful messages gifted to us by King and Thoreau. Many people in today 's society still feel victimized by the government and some people in it. The people are still segregated and one day it will end with the help of both of these inspirational human
Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau each write exemplary persuasive essays that depict social injustice and discuss civil disobedience, which is the refusal to comply with the law in order to prove a point. In his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail,” King speaks to a specific audience: the African Americans, and discusses why he feels they should bring an end to segregation. Thoreau on the other hand, in “Civil Disobedience,” speaks to a broader, non-addressed audience as he largely expresses his feelings towards what he feels is an unjust government. Both essays however, focus on the mutual topics of morality and justice and use these topics to inform and motivate their audience to, at times, defy the government in order to establish the necessary justice.
Justice is often misconceived as injustice, and thus some essential matters that require more legal attentions than the others are neglected; ergo, some individuals aim to change that. The principles of civil disobedience, which are advocated in both “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau and “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. to the society, is present up to this time in the U.S. for that purpose.
In his famous essay, “Letter from Birmingham Jail,’’ Martin Luther King, Jr. cites conscience as a guide to obeying just laws and defying unjust laws. In the same way, Henry David Thoreau wrote in his famous essay, “Civil Disobedience,” that people should do what their conscience tells them and not obey unjust laws. The positions of the two writers are very close; they use a common theme of conscience, and they use a similar rhetorical appeal of ethos.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were very significant during the Civil Rights Movement. Both were excellent speakers and shared one goal but had two different ways of resolving it. Martin Luther King Jr. chose to resolve the issues by using non-violence to create equality amongst all races to accomplish the goal. Malcolm X also wanted to decrease discrimination and get of segregation but by using another tactic to successfully accomplish the similar goal. The backgrounds of both men were one of the main driven forces behind the ways they executed their plans to rise above the various mistreatments. Martin Luther King Jr. was a more pronounced orator, a more refined leader, and overall saw the larger picture than Malcolm X.
Compare and Contrast: To my understanding the letter that Martin Luther King Jr. composed while confined in the Birmingham Jail, is as one with the appeal that was given by David Walker. Both the letter and the appeal were pleas, pleas to the African American race. Not only to African Americans, but to my surprise and yours it was also written to all races suffering from the same injustice. These pleas were strong and very urgent.
In the early 1900s, a philosophical movement emerged known as Transcendentalism. Its, including renowned writers such as Henry David Thoreau and Ralph Waldo Emerson, believe in five main principles: non-conformity, self-reliance, free thought, self-confidence, and the importance of nature. These principles inspired Henry David Thoreau’s essay entitled “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience”. This is a bold, powerful piece of work that is very progressive for its time period, and has sparked a fire in the hearts of all those who have indulged in its words.
An influential literary movement in the nineteenth century, transcendentalism placed an emphasis on the wonder of nature and its deep connection to the divine. As the two most prominent figures in the transcendentalist movement, Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau whole-heartedly embraced these principles. In their essays “Self-Reliance” and “Civil Disobedience”, Emerson and Thoreau, respectively, argue for individuality and personal expression in different manners. In “Self-Reliance”, Emerson calls for individuals to speak their minds and resist societal conformity, while in “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau urged Americans to publicly state their opinions in order to improve their own government.
Comparing the Civil Disobedience of Martin Luther King Jr., Henry David Thoreau, and Mohandas Gandhi
Henry David Thoreau author of “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” (1849) was known to be a transcendentalist. Although Thoreau’s main focus was supposed to be against slavery in the United States and the Mexican-American war. His way of thinking did not necessarily appeal to the government. Therefore, leading to him having a rant particularly trying to reach out to the Americans informing them to rebel if troubled by the government. Thoreau himself was imprisoned for not paying taxes, his way of being free.
Compare the philosophies and styles of Martin Luther King Jr. and the leaders of the black power movement.
In Civil Disobedience, Thoreau is talking about how men should not devote themselves to the wrongdoings of society, which is why he exclaims, “The soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war” (6). Those who take action for what they believe in are those who are recognized and praised by the people who refuse to leave the unjust government out of fear. Transcendentalists are those who are not afraid to express themselves whole-heartedly even if that means consequence like imprisonment, murder, etc. If an action is holding one back from living his/her desired life, they should not be afraid to stand up for what they believe
While the notion of a right to revolution is centuries old, and, according to some philosophers, originated with the concept of the State, the means and tools used to express dissatisfaction often go unaddressed. In his work, Civil Disobedience, author, philosopher, and transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau offered reasoning and examples of how one might show dissatisfaction with one’s government. Whether intentional or not, his example provided influence to a number of leaders and
Because man has the power too impact change, and the responsibility to act on injustice, both King and Thoreau awaken the country’s awareness on the the indispensability of civil disobedience, even though their reasons for immediate action differ. In many ways Thoreau and King’s thoughts were identical. Thoreau protested that the nation abuse the responsibility to act on injustice, and so did King. Both unraveling their thoughts and emotions with letters, expressing the nation's need for change. These historical agitators knew that man has the power to impact change, and took action. Although their values were similar, their motives were different. King wrote his letter as a reply to his fellow clergymen whom, were conserved with his actions.
The practice of civil disobedience has long been discussed as to whether it inspires true social change, or only creates conflict within society. The peaceful resistance of Martin Luther King Jr. can be used as a primary example supporting the positive effects of civil disobedience. While the morality of his actions against the previous law of segregation can be debated, the positive influence of ending segregation is undeniable (Bill of Rights Institute). However, King’s methods of achieving this change, such as peaceful protesting and marches, should not be confused with the non-peaceful rejection of laws. While riots and violence encourage hate and separation, civil disobedience displays how society could function peacefully without the laws being opposed (Bill of Rights Institute). It is then demonstrated that the peaceful resistance to laws, or civil disobedience, positively impacts a free society.
A passion for “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” remains at the center of America’s civic code. Yet, many Americans remain largely unaware of how the nation gained those “inalienable rights.” To be clear, the ascent of America’s exceptionalism was established through hard fought violence--not civil disobedience. But when it comes to the protests held by people of color, society promotes “civil disobedience.” And even when peaceful protests do occur, white people often react in opposition and criticism. The hypocrisy surrounding civil disobedience has left people of color wondering what is the right way to protest injustice and political corruption.