Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of nuclear power generation
Essay disposal of nuclear waste
Essay disposal of nuclear waste
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of nuclear power generation
Nuclear Waste Disposal As the millenium approaches, we are faced with the problems created by our technological advances. Everyday we are forced to see the results, from acid rain to polluted beaches. But there is one problem in particular that will probably out-live our generation and the generation which has created it. If properly contained and monitored, it has little affect on us and our environment. However, once it is free of it's containment, it is a destructive and deadly force. This problem is nuclear waste. Thirty thousand metric tons of spent fuel rods from power reactors and another 380,000 cubic meters of high level radioactive waste, have been produced in the United States since the beginning of the nuclear age. Presently, these fuel rods are stored at the nuclear reactors in water filled basins and accumulate at the rate of six tons per day (Whipple, 1996). As the populataion increases, so does the demand for electricity. If we continue relying on nuclear power to provide our electricity, we will continue producing more and more nuclear waste. Greater use of nuclear power and volumes of waste mean a greater chance of accidental release of radiation into the environment. Radiation How it is produced How does radiation in our environment affect us? In order to understand how radiation affects us, we first must understand how it is produced. Fission is the initial step. It is the splitting of uranium or plutonium atoms which produces radioactive "fission fragments" and "activation products" (Bertell, 1985). These products then ionize normal atoms, which leads to a sort of domino affect microscopically. This chain reaction can also cause activation products to be produced by causing chemicals in the air,... ... middle of paper ... ... 1982. http://www.public.iastate.edu/smevela/policy.html. Glasstone, Samuel and Jordan, Walter H. (1980). Nuclear Power and It's Environmental Effects. LaGrange Pk., IL: American Nuclear Society. Liptkin, R. (1995). New Glass Could Store Unused Plutonium. Science News. 148 (23). pp374. Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (1980). Radioactive Waste: Politics, Technology, and Risk. Cambridge, Massachussesetts: Ballinger Publishing Company. Nadis, Steven. (1996). The Sub-Seabed Solution. The Atlantic Monthly. 278(4). pp28-30, 38. St. Joe Valley Greens. (1997). Nuclear Waste Transportation Map. http://users.michiana.org/greens/editorial/transpor.htm. Whipple, Chris G. (1996). Can Nuclear Waste Be Stored Safely at Yucca Mountain?. Scientific American. 274(6). 72-79. Wright, Richard T. (1989). Biology Through the Eyes of Faith. New York: Christian College Coalition.
The article “Nuclear Waste” is an interesting perspective from Richard Muller. Muller is a very credited author and he speaks his mind about the situation where people are trying to figure out how to deal with nuclear waste around the U.S. There are many proposed ideas but Muller has a very simple and straight forward idea that he believes is the ideal decision. The essay he wrote can be interpreted in different ways but his motive for writing is very clear. Muller’s background is quite impressive because he is highly credited. When reading Muller’s essay, you notice points that supports his argument and truth about the situation around nuclear power.
Nuclear power has no place in having a safe, clean, sustainable future. Today, the manufacturing of nuclear power plants has become a critical topic throughout the world that many strongly believe should be stopped. Nuclear Power is not safe anywhere in the world nor is it environmentally friendly. Nuclear power plants are truly something that could cause mass destruction in the world and has the potential to wipe out a whole country with ease. Despite proponents’ that claim that nuclear power is safe, there is a history that proves otherwise and marks a number of disasters caused by nuclear power plants.
Now in our modern society we have a big need for energy and are trying to find alternative types of energy power plants. Nuclear power plants are used in more than 30 countries all around the world (World nuclear association, n.d. para.3). These power plants are able to generate electricity continuously for many months at a time without interruption (World nuclear association, n.d.para.2). Nuclear power plants produce electricity by going through the process of fission. They have pros and cons as well, they can bring more jobs helping out the economy but also the radiation waste that is given off of the plants can harm many people’s health.
Even though the consequences of nuclear energy are known by the public, not all people in the society oppose the future development of nuclear energy. Nuclear power is still a safe and clean source of energy...
Since the end of the World War II, nuclear energy has been one of the most potent forces on the planet. Nuclear powered submarines and aircraft carriers dominate the oceans and nuclear power plants provide nearly 20% of the nation’s power supply (Bayh & Gregg, 2014). All of this nuclear production produces tremendous amounts of nuclear waste. This waste must be disposed of safely, creating a problem for scientists and politicians for decades to come.
Rechard, R. P. (1999). Historical relationship between performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal and other types of risk assessment. Risk Analysis, 19(5), 763-807. doi:10.1023/A:1007058325258
Nuclear waste is radioactive material that is produced as a common by-product of the operation of nuclear power generation and any additional applications of nuclear technology. Nuclear (Radioactive) waste is hazardous to the environment as well as living organisms and is strictly regulated by certain government agencies to protect the world from the risks of this waste. However, nuclear technology can also be a good thing as it is used in smoke alarms and radiotherapy to cure cancer (Brainiac75, 2012). Radioactive waste decays naturally over specific periods depending on the types of radioactive material that the waste is composed of. Radioactive waste has materials that are unstable due to a differing number of neutrons. The neutron is ejected out the nucleus and can produce radiation in the form of an electron formed by a neutron; there are also other types of radiation such as alpha (fast helium atoms) or gamma rays (Black Cat Systems, n.d). Therefore, nuclear waste
McLeish, Ewan. “The Pros and Cons of Nuclear Power”. New York: Rosen Central, 2008. Print.
In 1950, the first commercial nuclear power plants were constructed. The public was promised a non-polluting and resourceful type of energy, but how safe was, and is, nuclear energy? Although there are less than 500 licensed nuclear power plants in the world, many nuclear accidents have already been endangering civilian lives. More serious accidents are not just likely, but inevitable (Fairchild 29). Nuclear energy may appear to be the ideal source of energy for the future: however, there are many negative effects of nuclear energy that can lead to very dangerous situations.
However, the nuclear waste leftover from the plants is radioactive and takes thousands of years to breakdown and decompose. This burden of a waste was planned to be blasted into outer space or entombed deep into a mountain, but it was rejected by most individuals. The big problem of nuclear waste is that it can be used for weapons and highly dangerous, as dangerous as the contamination released from an accidental nuclear meltdown. There is also a massive risk of transporting and handling nuclear waste because of its tedious care and sensitivity. Nuclear waste exposure is also very bad for the people around as for example a case in Pennsylvania shows most children around there ended up having baby teeth carrying strontium-90.
“Every dollar spent on nuclear energy is one less dollar spent on clean renewable energy and one more dollar spent on making the world a comparatively dirtier and a more dangerous place, because nuclear power and nuclear weapons go hand in hand” (Jacobson). Most countries today are becoming more and more dependent on nuclear power as a source of energy because of its high energy output and the availability of uranium used for fuelling nuclear reactors that generate power to provide electricity in households. Although using nuclear power as a source of energy has benefits like this, the danger posed by using nuclear power is too ominous.
Some people worry about the waste that nuclear power leaves behind. In relation to the amount of energy that it produces, the toxic waste is minimal. The waste is very small in comparison to waste produced by fossil fuels. Only thirty tons of high-level waste is made a year per reactor. Some of the waste can be reused while most must be disposed of. Environmentalists worry about the radiation seeping, but geological deposits are proven to be secure for dumping waste. Salt water is also believed to decay radioactive materials (WNA, 2013).
As of right now we contain all of the waste in cement containers until it decays completely. So because of how dangerous the used rods are it is obvious that any catastrophic event would devastate certain areas. Although all incidents are terrible, the benefits of nuclear power overcome them. The reason to set aside one's fears is because advancement in nuclear power has been moving along hastily and should be looked at as the “one of the key energy technologies of tomorrow” not technology of the past. As it stands today if countries like Japan were to shut down their nuclear power plants it could cripple them.
Instead of giving you superpowers, nuclear waste kills you within days if you stood near it without protection. Nuclear waste is a dangerous substance made up of the mutated uranium atoms called isotopes which are created in the process of nuclear energy (nuclear fission). Because the substance is radioactive, it is not safe to be around so it has to be locked up for thousands of years while it becomes safe to be in nature again. Many people think that nuclear energy should be shut down because nuclear waste cannot be disposed of. Nuclear power should continue even though it is hard to transport it to a safe repository. More underground storage areas should be created to combat the transportation problem and the issue of the waste should get more attention and
Imagine a world where low emissions are common, there is no energy crisis, and all of our energy problems are solved. Places like Antarctica are no longer on the verge of disappearance, pollution is at little to none, and endangered animals are now thriving. Renewable energy sources today like wind, solar, and nuclear have potential to make this future a reality. Nuclear works in a similar way that typical power plants do, creating steam that creates energy. An average nuclear power plant site contains two or three reactors, where the nuclear energy and heat from the uranium comes from. Most plants are near water, where sea water is used to cool down the reactor. Now, this uranium reaction created by the steam is therefore used to create energy and is channeled through transmission lines. This entire process creates a byproduct called nuclear waste, which is highly toxic and is usually taken to secure underground facilities. Nuclear, one of the prominent sources of energy, has been at the top of its industry for a long while. In 1957, the very first nuclear reactor was commissioned, and the reactor count was exponentially rising from 1960-1970. As oil prices were increasing in the 70s, nuclear energy seemed to have a bright and popular future, able to fuel our needs (Pearson). Now, in the 21st Century, nuclear has risen to be an energy giant, as it now creates 20% of our energy consumption. Out of America's zero-emission energy, wind and solar only give us 6% while nuclear dominates with 70% (Alexander). But recent nuclear related tragedies have given nuclear energy a bad reputation, and might have uncovered nuclear energy’s Achilles heel. Although it might solve the world’s looming energy cr...