Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on high level radioactive waste management
Essay on high level radioactive waste management
Nuclear waste management about 800 words
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on high level radioactive waste management
High-level Corrected: Disposing of nuclear or radioactive waste is a costly and crucial task that must be managed and disposed of correctly to protect people and the environment from hazardous dangers. There are four types of radioactive waste: exempt waste and very low levels, low-level, intermediate-level, and high-level. High-level: Most of the nuclear waste, about 99%, comes from electricity generation in nuclear reactors. This waste is typically intermediate-level and is buried, with approximately 270,000 tonnes of nuclear waste currently in storage. The majority of nuclear waste, 90%, is kept in storage ponds, while the remaining waste is stored deep underground. Low-level radioactive liquid waste is released into the sea, but this is regulated and controlled. Managing radioactive waste is a full-time job in countries, as one mistake can have severe consequences for millions of people. ASSESSMENT OF SOURCE: Usefulness: The source is very useful as it provides a lot of information on the topic of nuclear waste management. Validity: The validity of the source is questionable as the author and date of publication are unknown. However, the sources used are listed at the end of the article, and the information is presented objectively. Reliability: The reliability of the source is also questionable due to the unknown author and date of publication. Limitations: The lack of an author and publication date makes it difficult to verify the accuracy of the information presented in the source. SOURCE B: According to the law, the USA is required to develop its own disposal facility for the long-term management of radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. Before disposal, the government must approve a program for safe disposal. Until then, the waste is stored in airtight containers underwater at the power plant. The government is responsible for transporting the waste to the storage and disposal sites, which is done by rail or road in massive, sealed containers that meet security and safety requirements. SUMMARY: The USA is legally required to develop a disposal facility for long-term management of radioactive waste from nuclear power plants. The government must approve a safe disposal program before the waste can be disposed of. Until then, the waste is stored in airtight containers underwater at the power plant. The government is responsible for transporting the waste to the storage and disposal sites, which is done by rail or road in massive, sealed containers that meet security and safety requirements. ries, but steps are being taken to improve the situation. The article from Source C provides valuable information on the current state of South Africa’s waste disposal site, Vaalputs, and the plans for its future use. While there are limitations to the sources used in this essay, such as missing dates and author information, the information presented is still useful and reliable. It is important to continue to assess sources and gather information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy and credibility in research.
The article “Nuclear Waste” is an interesting perspective from Richard Muller. Muller is a very credited author and he speaks his mind about the situation where people are trying to figure out how to deal with nuclear waste around the U.S. There are many proposed ideas but Muller has a very simple and straight forward idea that he believes is the ideal decision. The essay he wrote can be interpreted in different ways but his motive for writing is very clear. Muller’s background is quite impressive because he is highly credited. When reading Muller’s essay, you notice points that supports his argument and truth about the situation around nuclear power. He brings his outlook on the situation to the audience and conveys that viewpoint convincingly.
One of the most talked about opposition toward nuclear fission is the radioactive waste it produces. A radioactive waste is what is left behind after using a reactor to make electricity. There are two levels of waste, low and high, but both are regulated by the Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. High level waste is made up of fuel that’s been used directly in the reactor that is highly radioactive but can still be disposed. Low level waste is the contaminated items that have been exposed to radiation. The nuclear wastes are then stored in a safe and secure location with different types of methods such as wet storage, dry storage, and away from reactor storage. Wet storage is the main method of disposing the waste because it is the
The article begins by establishing the credibility of the authors. Their professional competency is established through the acknowledgement of their professional affiliations. These professional affiliations and subsequent status increases their credibility in terms of their authority and knowledge on the subject. Lisa...
waste to be formed. This waste is very dangerous since it remains radioactive for hundreds of
...the data did not involve member checking thus reducing its robustness and enable to exclude researcher’s bias. Although a constant comparative method was evident in the discussion which improved the plausibility of the final findings. Themes identified were well corroborated but not declared was anytime a point of theoretical saturation Thus, the published report was found to be particularly strong in the area of believability and dependability; less strong in the area of transferability; and is weak in the area of credibility and confirmability, although, editorial limitations can be a barrier in providing a detailed account (Craig & Smyth, 2007; Ryan, Coughlan, & Cronin, 2007).
In addition to the potential dangers of accidents in generating stations, nuclear waste is a continuing problem that is growing exponentially. Nuclear waste can remain radioactive for about 600 years and disposing these wastes or storing them is an immense problem. Everyone wants the energy generated by power plants, but no one wants to take responsibility for the waste. Thus far, it is stored deep in the earth, but these storage areas are potentially dangerous and will eventually run out. Some have suggested sending the waste into space, but no one is sure of the repercussions.
What Nuclear power has the ability to do is get a lot of power in a little amount of space. “Roughly 1.6 billion people live without access to electricity, and 2.4 billion rely on traditional biomass because they have no access to modern fuel.” (General Dr. Mohamed ElBaradei) With nuclear power put into these countries that are without power we can have it to where electricity will be accessibility to everyone. By having power accessible to everyone we can accomplish so much more and unlock more possibilities in our world today.
...aken from this source will be used to compliment and corroborate information taken from other sources that are more specific to this topic and will also be useful in providing a more well-rounded understanding of the topic.
The greatest disadvantages of nuclear energy are the risks posed to mankind and the environment by radioactive materials. ‘On average a nuclear plant annually generates 20 metric tons of used nuclear fuel cla...
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (Last updated on 3/20/2013). Radioactive Waste Disposal: An Environmental Perspective [EPA 402-K-94-001]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/radiation/docs/radwaste/. Last accessed 25th April 2014.
...es site requires detailed planning by the agencies of the country, such as the Department of Energy in the US. The long-term isolation of the high level waste is usually done in rural areas and it is suggested that planning, construction and operations of repositories would result in significant socio-economic effect(Finsterbausch 1980).The economic and social cost outweigh the social and economic benefits.
The editorial does not accurately depict the authors argument because of the lack of ethos. The author seems untrustworthy therefore the supporting evidence is lost in the uncertainty.
Traditional methods of waste disposal have proven to be ineffective and have caused harmful effects on the environment. The most popular and inexpensive way to get rid of garbage is burial, but burying your problems does not necessarily mean getting rid of them. Landfill sites pose as severe ecological threats as these mass garbage dump yards overflow with trash and frequently contaminate our air, soil and water with hazardous wastes. About 400 million tons of hazardous wastes are generated each year1. A large-scale release of these materials can cause thousands of deaths and may poison the environment for many years. For example many industrial companies around the world cannot afford to enforce the strict pollution regulations set by many developed countries. This usually forces these types of companies to move to developing countries where pollution regulations are very lenient. These developing countries knowingly accept environmentally hazardous companies usually because they are in desperate need of employment. The harmful effects of these companies were clearly illustrated in the 1960s and 1970s when residents living near Minamata Bay, Japan, developed nervous disorders, tremors, and paralysis in a mysterious epidemic. The root was later found to be a local industry that had released mercury, a highly toxic element, into Minamata Bay. The disaster had claimed the lives of 400 people1. Since 1970 you can bet that a lot more than 400 people have died as a result of waste disposal. If the type of waste disposal were cheaper and effective we wouldn’t have to deal with waste problems, which still plague mankind today.
Solid waste can be classified in different types, depending on their source, household waste is generally classified as municipal waste; industrial waste as hazardous waste or hospital waste as infections waste. It quite obvious that South Africa environment is deteriorated by the illegal dumping area that around here. Solid waste is a major problem this country is facing at the moment. The province that is experience this major problem is Gauteng province, this an urban area am taking about, and since it’s clear that over population is the cause of the problem. Gauteng province is an over populated than rural area .solid waste pollution is refuse or garbage that people use in their everyday life in their house, such as plastic
Wastes are the products of our consumptions in our daily life routines such as lunch, work, school and other things we do. Little things such as throwing out a piece of paper, we are producing waste by the seconds. After we consume a product we usually throw out what’s left that can’t be consumed any further. Results in producing waste, substance that are born after it’s been use or consume by us. At the end of each day we throw out a bag full of garbage, all of the materials in that bag (paper towels, cans, leftover foods and many other material’s) all of these are waste. Hospitals produce medical waste such as use needles for treating patients. Corporations produce papers, plastics, tires, steels, cans and many other type of solid waste which contribute to the pollutions that cause health risk and other environmental issues.