Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparison of solar and nuclear energy disadvantages and advantages
Renewable vs non-renewable energy advantages and disadvantages
Renewable energy pros and cons
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Public’s views on future nuclear power development 1. NIMBY movement NIMBY is a word made up from the first letters of the phrase "Not In My Back Yard". It refers to a movement being held by the public to show their opposition of some new developments or hazardous technologies that may invade their private property. Those proponents are sometimes called themselves Nimbies. They believe some new but hazardous developments maybe needed in society, but should be built further away from where they live. After the 2011 Japanese nuclear accident (disaster in Fukushima), it has revived anti- nuclear passions all over the world, China is one of the places that "Not in My Backyard" syndrome becomes popular again. People consider the risk of nuclear accident unacceptable and generally believe that radioactive waste cannot be disposed in a safe way. With the rising environmental and health awareness, nuclear power is generally rejected in Chinese society. When Chinese people notice the government is now increasing the contribution of nuclear power to make grater total electricity output, many people say no to the plan and against the further use of nuclear power for electricity generation through protests. Some protests have gained great success, Chinese government willing to cancel or postpone nuclear energy processing projects with possible danger. In a case in Southeastern China, the government has canceled a proposed $6 billion nuclear development project due to massive protests against the construction. 2. Proponent’s view Even though the consequences of nuclear energy are known by the public, not all people in the society oppose the future development of nuclear energy. Nuclear power is still a safe and clean source of energy... ... middle of paper ... ...f nuclear power also restricted due to physical condition for building nuclear power plants. Building of nuclear power plants should be far away from the residents, it is not easy to find a remote place with well-developed transportation connection and resources. Besides, nuclear reactors require enormous quantities of water to operate. The water source availability becomes important to ensure the nuclear power plant can operate safely and efficiently. Last but not least, people favors the use of renewable energy instead of nuclear power in the last few decades, such as wind power, solar power, geothermal energy and biofuel. They are now more willing to adopt energy conservation and energy efficiency measures. Carrying out energy efficiency measures is the cheapest and fastest way to reduce the use of any forms of energy sources and in term reduce carbon emissions.
power is not the cleanest energy source. However nuclear energy is cheaper than fossil fuels, and the
One of the many benefits of Nuclear energy is that it is completely emission free, in fact, more than 70% of the clean energy produced in the United States comes from nuclear (“11 Facts about Nuclear Energy”) With those lack of emissions we will see a reduction in the
Nuclear power has no place in having a safe, clean, sustainable future. Today, the manufacturing of nuclear power plants has become a critical topic throughout the world that many strongly believe should be stopped. Nuclear Power is not safe anywhere in the world nor is it environmentally friendly. Nuclear power plants are truly something that could cause mass destruction in the world and has the potential to wipe out a whole country with ease. Despite proponents’ that claim that nuclear power is safe, there is a history that proves otherwise and marks a number of disasters caused by nuclear power plants.
Central Idea: Nuclear energy only contributes a small amount to the world’s electricity yet it has hazards and dangers that far out-way its benefits. There are many other alternative power producing sources that can produce energy more efficiently and more safely than nuclear power plants can.
Nuclear Energy has many proponents and much opposition. Many of the groups that oppose nuclear power have legitimate concerns, mainly with the dangers of nuclear material in relation with human health concerns and environmental troubles that are risked by allowing nuclear power plants to increase in number. Yet, many of these opposition groups have made outspoken and radical claims about the “hidden” motives of why nuclear power is promoted and subsidized by our federal government. For example, The Nuclear Information and Resource Service claim that the federal government has the intention of committing genocide against Native Americans because uranium mining is predominantly done on reservations. Another cry out by nuclear power opponents is the constant reliving of the few nuclear mishaps that occurred decades ago, at Chernobyl or Three Mile Island. No doubt, past accidents have happened worldwide and are important reminders to not play around with nuclear material, but technology has improved as well, a fact opponents fail to consider. Many of these organizations feel that other sources should be used to supply America’s energy needs. These types of statements tag many opponents to nuclear energy as misinformed, out of touch with scientific facts, or just closed minded to the whole concept of nuclear power. On the other hand, the proponents of nuclear energy like President Bush see it as cheap, and environmentally friendly. As a result, President Bush passed the Comprehensive Energy Bill in 2005 that would increase production of all types of energy, including nuclear, by giving subsidies and tax breaks to nuclear power producers. Keeping safe America’s capabilities for generating electric power by way of nuclear e...
...nce World War II to the present day, the technology of nuclear power has increased significantly in terms of energy output and safety. The energy efficiency of nuclear power is far superior to its counterpart fossil fuel and renewable energy. Compared to fossil fuels, tiny amounts of fuel used by nuclear reactors is equivalent to a large sum of coal. This is a no brainer. Why mine a ton of coal when a little uranium can be used to gain the same amount of energy? Not only is it efficient, it’s safe to use. Used fuel is packed away in storage safely, so there isn’t any chance of radiation leaking out. In the present day, nuclear power incidents haven’t been occurring lately. Advancements in technology and equipment used have made nuclear energy a very reliable and safe source of energy. With today’s energy needs, nuclear power has the ability to keep up in the race.
...tor, 1992). Perhaps the LULU risk that the public is hearing from the ãexpertsä is in fact inaccurate. As a future recommendation for NIMBY conflicts, both the public and technical community views should be treated as problematic. Also, there should not be such a stereotypical view of leaders of activist groups as being irrational, over-emotional, or ill informed. Finally, NIMBY activists should see themselves as part of the situation that the project will address, instead of focusing on just the narrow issue of opposing the project. They must see the larger picture and be willing to offer and maybe help implement alternatives to the project.
Firstly, opponents believe that active trades between countries and the country with based source of nuclear power influence positively in politics around the world. However, we all are aware of how powerful nuclear energy is and have fear deep inside in the nuclear power state. For examples, the country with nuclear energy could raise an enormous threat if relationship between countries goes wrong. According to Keonghan News (2013), North Korea is one of 5 countries that is holding nuclear power and also they regularly threats U.S. and South Korea to show off their power and scares us...
The use of nuclear power in the mid-1980s was not a popular idea on account of all the fears that it had presented. The public seemed to have rejected it because of the fear of radiation. The Chernobyl accident in the Soviet Union in April of 1986 reinforced the fears, and gave them an international dimension (Cohen 1). Nevertheless, the public has to come to terms that one of the major requirements for sustaining human progress is an adequate source of energy. The current largest sources of energy are the combustion of coal, oil, and natural gas. Fear of radiation may push nuclear power under the carpet but another fear of the unknown is how costly is this going to be? If we as the public have to overcome the fear of radiation and costly project, we first have to understand the details of nuclear energy. The known is a lot less scary then the unknown. If we could put away all the presumptions we have about this new energy source, then maybe we can understand that this would be a good decision for use in the near future.
increasing the supply of renewable energy would allow us to replace carbon-intensive energy sources and significantly reduce U.S. global warming emissions… a 25 percent by 2025 national renewable electricity standard would lower power plant CO2 emissions 277 million metric tons annually by 2025—the equivalent of the annual output from 70 typical (600 MW) new coal plants (“Benefits of Renewable Energy
The energy produced from nuclear reactions is very dense, providing almost ten million times more energy per atom than fossil fuels.2 In addition, nuclear plants are cost competitive, being no more expensive than alternative sources. Although there are huge initial start up costs, the only other expenses are the costs to process nuclear fuel, safely remove and store radioactive waste and daily upkeep of the plant.2
The controversial issue of how safe nuclear energy is, is over speculated by news programs and novice nuclear energy protesters. But the truth is, nuclear energy is capable of a lot more good than bad. In the
Media coverage of such cases have made the public less comfortable with the idea of moving further towards nuclear power and they only opt for reducing human activities to reduce global warming. It is true that there have been some notable disasters involving nuclear power, but compared to other power systems, nuclear power has an impressive track record. First, it is less harmful and second, it will be able to cater for the growing world population. Nuclear power produces clean energy and it delivers it at a cost that is competitive in the energy market (Patterson). According to the US Energy Information Administration, there are currently 65 such plants in the Unite States (National Research Council). They produce 19 percent of the total US energy generation.
Also, this type of energy is cleaner and much more beneficial to the environment since it results in very little greenhouse gas emissions. Renewable energy is also cheaper and more affordable compared to other sources of energy generated. Due to these advantages of the renewable energy, engineers have decided to find more efficient ways of using renewable energy. Over the past couple of decades, engineers have been successful at finding more efficient ways to harness and manipulate the renewable energy.
Building a nuclear power plant requires less land space than solar or wind farms. With the current overcrowding issue in the Philippines, taking up less space for energy production is more ideal and less insulting to Filipino families who live under bridges just to fit in the cities. It is also a better option for manufacturers because less land space means less costs at least in terms of land ownership.