Yes, all world citizen ought to benefit from free access to basic health care.
According to Normative ethics (virtue theories, duty theories and consequentialist theories), there are some fundamental values that humans should never ignore.
Justice is the most important among cardinal values; additionally, virtue theories (that comprehend cardinal values) consider as “virtuous” those humans who embrace all the ideals. Furthermore, there is a moral duty to transmit such ethics to the future generations (cit. IEP).
Additionally, duty theories clarify what “morality” means, for example to care defenceless people, like children or the elderly. Pufendorf added indisputable obligations, for example “do not hurt others”, “give humans equal treatment” and “ always act aiming at the best intentions”. Kant added the “treat people as an end” principle, thus not
…show more content…
handle humans as “means” to get something else (cit. IEP). A further confirmation to the correctness of offering free access to public health comes for the consequentialist theories. “If the majority of the population benefits from a certain decision, thus it was a right choice”. Question 3. I used parts of the three theories and joined them, since they're coherent and not clashing. The World Health Organization is an International authority that aims at balancing the inequalities existing in the health care world. Unfortunately, there are plenty of injustices and even if anyone agrees about the previous ethic values, developed Country grant more rights than developing ones. Not only poor populations undergo this inequality, but also leading powers like the USA. So, they acknowledge fundamental ethics, but they still do not apply them; like in the case of the justice value. However, everyone recognizes the great strides of their political administration in the aim of enlarging access to basic health cares. If an homeless risks his life after being run over by a luxury car, does he deserve to be saved? In a State of justice, the answer ought to be “yes”. For the same reason, a “virtuous” doctor should do the utmost to keep him alive. According to the duty theories, the case we are describing will comply with the moral duty to care defenceless people; given the assumption that to nurse vulnerable people must quite clearly mean “not to hurt them”. I'd like to focus on this point, that outlines the difference between “to do” and “not to do”; in the sense that not taking actions “doesn't grant to go to heaven” (sorry for this image, it was to give you my idea). Going ahead with the explanation of the ethics by using our example, what did Kant mean? Is a human body a mean? Clearly: no. So, according to his statements, the priority is save a life, not to ask for his credit card to check if he owns the funds to pay the hospital bills. The WHO goals deal with the consequentialist theories, in the sense that free access to basic health care grants benefits for a large size of the population. Question 4. My answer complies with Normative ethics because I underlined the importance of fundamental values, like such ethics do.
I emphasize the “doctor and patient” example because it is a common issue I frequently read, happening in those Countries that do not offer free access to cares. Italy grants open access to medical care, both Emergency and General Practitioner and of course we are lucky. In the contrary, it is a source of public debate because of its huge costs in the National expense balance. To cut straight to the point, there are endless polemics about the definition of “basic cares”, so that this diatribe obfuscates essential ethics. Again, Kant's theories start to help us, since humankind is not a mean, and money is not an universal end. I know the Italian reality and our system ought to focus on its organization, rather than the reduction of its care assistance. Evidence of this is the following organizational chart of the Italian health care system; it looks complex, do you agree? To the other side, even if there are some things to fix, it demonstrates that it can be achieved (cit. Commonwealth
fund.com).
Planning included reaching out to other health organizations, objectives, and goals of health fair were established. The implementation includes getting volunteers, set up for the health fair. The evaluation of the process occurred throughout the implementation and changes were made as needed. The evaluation will be completed by gathering information from health booth to determine the number of participants. Review vendor and participant evaluations about the health fair including how they heard about the health fair, ratings of booths and suggestions for improvements. Record everything to determine changes. Reflection on past experiences and what worked and did not work.
There are two basic types of ethical judgments: deontological judgements that focus on duty and obligation and eudaimonist judgements that focus on human excellence and the nature of the good life. I contend that we must carefully distinguish these two types of judgement and not try to understand one as a special case of the other. Ethical theories may be usefully divided into two main kinds, deontological or eudaimonist, on the basis of whether they take one of the other of these types of judgement as primary. A second important contention, which this paper supports but does not attempt to justify fully, is that neither type of theory trumps the other, nor should we subsume them under some more encompassing ethical synthesis.
There are questions about transplant allocation in regards to the four major ethical principles in medical ethics: beneficence, autonomy, nonmaleficence and justice. Beneficence is the “obligation of healthcare providers to help people” that are in need, autonomy is the “right of patients to make choices” in regards to their healthcare, nonmaleficence, is the “duty of the healthcare providers to do no harm”, and justice is the “concept of treating everyone in a fair manner” ("Medical Ethics & the Rationing of Health Care: Introduction", n.d., p. 1).
In my many years in the healthcare profession, I have found that an individual’s moral and ethical principles that guide their professional beliefs, attitudes and actions can oftentimes suffer due to unconscious bias, mine included.
Kant posits that the intrinsic value of the good will lies not in its consequences or outcomes, but in its inherent disposition to act in accordance with moral duty. Unlike other attributes or talents, which may be morally neutral or even detrimental when divorced from a good will, moral worth resides solely in the will's commitment to duty. This foundational idea forms the bedrock of Kant's deontological approach to ethics, wherein moral actions are determined not by their consequences but by the adherence to moral principles grounded in
According to the article, “Thinking Ethically: A Framework for Moral Decision Making”, developed by Manuel Velasquez, Claire Andre, Thomas Shanks, S.J., and Michael J. Meyer, there are five different approaches to values to deal with moral issues, which are:
In this paper I am going to be discussing my values and morals in life that helps me be successful with knowing what is right and wrong in personally and professionally everyday life. There are many things that go on in the world today and it is extremely important to have values and morals set in place. Also going to be discussing how cultural heritage has shaped my values and what ethical behaviors I see in myself.
According to (American Nurses Association, 2015), the Code of Ethics for Nurses was developed as a guide for carrying out nursing responsibilities in a manner consistent with quality in nursing care and the ethical obligations of the profession. Nurses are the front line of the health care system and face different types of ethical dilemma in their practice. A great example of the ethical dilemma faced in the nursing practice is what is presented in this case study.
This framework is also referred to as the Duty-Based Approach and it’s a Non-consequentialist theory, which is concerned with the intentions of the person making ethical decisions about a particular action. The ethical action is done because it is the duty of the individual to perform the action. Moral values in this framework are very important and they are highly upheld, individuals are obliged with the duty to do the right thing, even if it produces more harm or less good.
Three of the primary schools of ethics include virtue, teleological and deontological ethics. According to the Encyclopedia Brittanica, virtue ethics is primarily concerned with traits of character that are essential to human flourishing, not with the enumeration of duties. Teleological ethics is
ETHICAL CONSIDERATION It can be argued that patients using a healthcare system have an ethical duty to help with quality assurance activities that ultimately aim to protect them and their fellow man (Wade, 2007). This point of view also applies to contributing data towards national epidemiological studies such as those run by Public Health England that utilise population-wide databases, because they, as well as the general populous, will benefit from such activities (Lynn, 2007). Public health research does provide valuable guidance and direction to healthcare for the masses. It is truly population-based health research and makes highly effective use of health data (Jamrozik, 2004). Many public health strategies involve the accumulation and
The following ethical theories are the ones that resonate with me the most: consequentialism, normative ethics, and ethical relativism. Consequentialism, by definition, states that the value of morality is dependent upon the effects that our actions generate (Sinnott-Armstrong, 2015). This theory strikes out to me as being very important because I strongly believe that in some cases, the overall result holds a greater dominance than the action itself. If a certain action brings about more positive outcomes than negative outcomes, then that action would be the right action to carry out, even if that action may be labeled as unethical or goes against a certain established rule. Therefore, I firmly believe that there should be exceptions around
The aim of this essay is to identify ethical conflicts within a case scenario to propose and discuss the legal and ethical approaches in order to identify ethical differences, which can be achieved through the process of applying good codes of ethics and the correct principles in health care ethics (Ozolins & Grainger, 2015). In addition, it will be considered when it is relevant to apply some codes of conduct, and furthermore there will be an analysis of the national and international charters, and how they are related to the scope of general health application and professional health practice. Lastly, there will be an exploration of ethical theories that informs Professional health care practices (Australian Nursing Midwifery Council, 2008),
Throughout the past several centuries, philosophers have actively discussed and debated what determined the morality of certain actions. Normative ethics, a branch of ethical philosophy, concentrates on the rules, norms, and principles that determine whether or not actions are morally correct. One of the main approaches to normative ethics is known as value ethics, which emphasizes an individual’s values and how these values influence virtues and happiness. Kant and Aristotle take different positions and create theories determining what makes an action virtuous and moral, aiming to help people have a deeper understanding of the concepts behind personal and moral development.
Introduction Ethics is a part of philosophy that deal with the morality of human. It also concerned with distinguishing between right and wrong of human act, good and bad in the society, and between honest and deceitful characteristics of people. In reality, ethics solves to the problems of human morality by providing solutions in relating to the concepts of right and wrong, good and immoral, virtue and vice, fairness and crime. Modern philosophers have categorized ethical theories into three, they are: metaethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics. But in this paper, I will concentrate on virtue theories which is one of a strategy under normative ethics.