Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nokia's General Strategy
Nokia's new business
Nokia's General Strategy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nokia's General Strategy
THE FALL OF A GIANT
One Core competence as defined by C.K Prahalad and Gary Hamel (May-June 1990) provides potential access to a wide variety of markets. Nokia once established itself as the world leader in mobile phones and concurred with the above definition. However from 2008 to 2010, Nokia’s global handset market share declined from 35% to 5%.It set the unenvied new world record of the fastest collapse in history of mobile phone sales over a year (-62% - Tomi Anohen Consulting Analysis January 2013). Nokia has thus seized to be “something that opened up a good number of potential markets.”
Since today, Nokia only opens up a few small, niche (emerging) markets, then success in these markets will not be enough to sustain significant growth. Nokia can be said to have lost its market core competence.
The second core competence should make a significant contribution to the perceived customer benefits of the end product. Nokia appeared to have had the initial advantage in creativity with Nokia Symbian OS smartphones including models of the E series and N series, culminating in the N95...
Mobile is the first order priority device for access because people are connecting with others, finding entertainment, and doing business—all with smart phones. The prices of mobile phones are never over $1,000 in today’s world. They are affordable and accessible. As the result of the changes the worldwide and national business environment has undergone, people own 1-2 cell phones on average. However, the mobile markets in US seems to have been saturated.
In this following report I will discuss the phone industry and analysed it in great detail. I will analysis the market structure and try and understand why the mobile industry falls to heavily oligopoly structure. I will highlight all the structures, however I will discuss in detail how, for example Vodafone can be incorporated in the porter’s five forces method to show how the mobile industry has devolved over the years and to understand if consumers are driven by the actual technology of the phone but if it driven more by style.
Technology has become a huge part of everyday life, and people seem to have one great debate and are fighting over which is the best phone, iPhone or Android. The Apple iPhone is a cellular smartphone that was created and is maintained by Apple Inc. Android is another type of smartphone that is accessible to consumers, but the operating system is powered by Google and many different companies produce Android devices. The different operating systems and interfaces have created a long and carried out debate to which was superior. iPhone is the better phone and there are many reasons as to why it is superior to its rival, Android. The iPhone’s sleek and beautiful design has users’ hands fondling the device and never putting it down. The operating system is very distinct, but is straightforward with its functionality. People who purchase the iPhone believe that they have received their money’s worth and more when owning and iPhone. The iPhone is better than Android when compared because of the beautiful design and attractive display, the operating system and its functionality, and the device’s personal worth is definitely worth the money spent to own one.
Over the past five years, RIM has changed its corporate name to BlackBerry, been purchased by private equity firm Fairfax Financial, written down over $1 billion in assets and unsold inventory, and laid off more than 40% of its workforce (Connors). BlackBerry’s fall from market leadership and financial success is the result of a corporate structure that failed to foster individual employee creativity and company-wide innovation. Financial distress, upper-management turnover, and loss of strategic direction are symptoms of BlackBerry’s problem: a failure to innovate and remain competitive in the smartphone market. Recent attempts to regain foothold in the smartphone market include the unsuccessful launches of the PlayBook tablet in 2011 and Z10 and Q10 phones in 2013. These attempts to dismantle the iPhone and Android market power have resulted in BlackBerry trying to mimic its competitors rather than producing cutting-edge products that create value for its customers.
In today’s current economic state, the likelihood of a company entering into a global market is inevitable. Multinational corporations (MNCs) such as Vodafone are required to standardise their Research & Development activities throughout the world in order to penetrate the market. This is achieved by obtaining new technological opportunities, such as the most up-to-date phones, thus maintaining a competitive driver in the market.
Nokia went on to build a solid reputation and a colossal goodwill over these years to be recognised as one of the most famous brand in the world; a status crucial in fulfilling its duties and responsibilities towards its employees, shareholders, investors, network operators and above all its consumers. Moreover, maintaining those levels of excellence should have guaranteed endurance and sustainability.
Contract Details and Management Contracts are exchange of promises or obligations between two or more organizations, which is the key aspect of any encompassing critical business functions. In this case Bharthi Airtel and IBM, both these organisations agree on aspects like terms, pricing, service level agreements, human resources management, dispute resolution procedure, acceptance strategy and procedures,Exit strategy, Non dis-closure agreements. As a procedure, Bharthi Airtel went through contract management process for finalizing contractual terms with IBM during sourcing lifecycle. Sourcing Life Cycle: IBM and Bharti Airtel Sourcing Life Cycle, explains about the process carried out during each phase. Bharti Airtel came up with a sourcing strategy of outsourcing all of its Non-core IT related systems to a single vendor.
By the end of 2003, Nokia was the clear market leader in the mobile phone industry in terms of sales and profitability. It was ahead of giant companies like Motorola, Ericsson, Siemens, Samsung, and other worthy competitors. Since the early 1990s, Nokia's Strategic Intent was to build distinctive competency in product innovation, rapid response, and global brand management. Its strategic intent required rapid growth in the core businesses of mobile phones and telecommunications networks. This goal was achieved by Nokia's development of new products and expansion into new markets. In order to become the global leader as it is today, the company had overcome numerous challenges and obstacles over the last decade.
There is a slowdown in sales of mobile handsets, in some markets like the UK, as the mature part of the product lifecycle is reached. Customers are exposed to a barrage of different images and messages by mobile phone companies, as the competition gets tougher. Vodafone appeals to new customers and aims to keep its existing ones by emphasising the uniqueness of the brand.
Under the circumstance that the mobile phone industry entered the 3rd generation, Nokia faced competition from both macro level and industry level. For the macro level, the government encouraged competition among the operators and handset manufacturers by giving digital licenses to new entrants. As a result, the mobile phones became more sophisticated, for example, the cameras and the games in the mobile phone. For the industry level, which can be analyzed by the Porter’s Five Forces, (lecture )Nokia was facing threat of new entrants, competitive rivalry and the bargaining power of buyers is increasing as well. As the government encourage completion between the handset manufacturers, there are several new entrants from different countries enter this industry, such as Apple from USA, Samsung from Korea. These new entrants compete with Nokia in both smartphone segment and basic phone segment. Some of them even constructed “ecosystems”, which they could integrate the services and applications quickly, in order to produce the phone in just two days. For the bargaining power of buyers’ aspect, they do not need to rely on the only operating system Symbian. They can choose Windows mobile launched by Microsoft, Android launched by Google and Ios launched by Apple, in addition, basically all of them are better than Symbian (Amiya, 2010). The buyers could choose any
...es with android and internet surfing features. It lost market share as it was not able to keep up with technology and now with mounting losses and sellout even die hard fans of the manufacturer have lost confidence in its products. However in partnership with Microsoft the firm has brought in several interesting smart phones which are slowly helping it regain its lost status and reputation. Even while making expensive smartphones the maker knows that it is the low end durable phones with basic features are what its customers’ desire therefore makes them too and tries to add latest features to make them viable. Whether this strategy of Nokia will help it through to manage competition and stay in the competitive cell phone market remains to be seen.
The mission is accomplished by understanding consumer needs and providing offerings that meet or exceed those needs. Nokia believes that excellence in three areas-product design; services such as mobile Internet, messaging, and network security; and state-of-the-art technology-is the most important aspect of its offerings.
According to Forbes.com Apple recorded US$18 billion in profit from this quarter’s sales of US$74.6 billion. A major chunk of this profit came from Apple iphone sales from international markets. It sold 74.5 million iphones and saw a 70% rise in China sales. But how sustainable this growth would be is a question that looms large in front of tech giant like Apple. Though it has tried to innovate its products according to the changing generations but how far can it keep on doing the same. We will further analyze the Smartphone industry by applying porter’s five forces.
Nokia is continuing to innovate new products and rebuild their brand. In present times Nokia is still in a complicated situation as Sead Fadilpašić puts it., In the article “Nokia – Phones relationship status: It’s complicated”, Fadilpašić discusses the problems Nokia may face in 2016, he states, “The Helsinki-based company said it hopes to come back to designing and providing mobile phone technology, but it needs a partner which would manufacture, market and sell the devices.”, this means that at this point no one is willing to back their ideas, therefore putting them in a difficult situation disabling them to grow their brand. Nokia is still fighting to stay alive, in the end they will have to continue to be innovative and find supporters that believe in their brand.
Today, Nokia runs four business groups: Mobile Phones, Multimedia, Enterprise Solutions and Networks. Mobile Phones have been developed for all major standards and customer segments in over 130 countries. Nokia’s current core mobile phones business, which is based mainly on GSM,CDMA and TDMA technologies. Mobile Phones highly concentrate on bringing feature-rich and segmented mobile phones to the global market. Nokia’s significant product has several features catering the needs, lifestyles and preferences of their customers.