Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The quiet american character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The quiet american character analysis
In the novel, The Quiet American, the main character, Fowler, claims to be neutral throughout his whole life. With the help of his opium addiction, Fowler tends to put himself in the role of a journalist and to only provide the facts. Any statement tainted by opinion, Fowler disregards. Fowler attempts to take no action and have no opinion. This degree of objectivity although desirable for Fowler brings into question its practicality. Objectivity may be impractical due to the emotional nature of humans. And yet could be practical if someone were to be cautious about the bias in their statements. The problem here is not about whether someone could think only unbiased thoughts, but whether they could function daily. The first scene we should …show more content…
Fowler engages himself into various situations contrary to neutrality. “I took no action--even an opinion is a kind of action” (28) Fowler names two things which would contradict the neutral character stance. Considering these two things, action and opinion, Fowler breaks the first rule about having an opinion. This is demonstrated with him loving Phuong, but he also breaks the rule about not being involved. This is seen in the next paragraph. The main situation Fowler gets involved in is this whole war against Pyle. Fowler not getting involved would have resulted in Pyle not being murdered. Fowler keeps telling himself that he’s neutral, after clear situations in which there is subjectivity. It’s a delusion that Fowler tries to live. Fowler furthers this with his opium use which makes him less emotionally responsive. But this does not absolutely rid him of his instinctive subjective feelings. A reporter reports the crime scene, but Fowler is literally being investigated because of his ties to Pyle. Fowler is considered a suspect, and as the readers know, is actually the character who planned the attack. Planning this attack is a clear sign of involvement, and we know this to be out of
7). Consequently, one can define this use of race as individuation; which Ito and Senholzi’s article define as a process “involve[ing] discriminating individuals through attention to their unique attributes” (1098) in their article on race perception. Unique attributes such as speech, behavior or motives which Morrison develops within the story can greatly affect the reader’s perceptions of the
Symbolism has been seen as a very important role in Flannery O’Connor’s short story “Good country people”. Flannery O’Conner has written several short stories portraying herself as a Catholic writer who attacks religious views being opposed, though uses the fundamentals of nihilism portrayed through Hulga (Joy), the main character of her story. She uses multiple frank descriptions and the usage of different types of symbolism to get the audience to understand her main points. The use of names and an artificial leg give a vivid description of the main character and her views towards nihilism. O’Conner’s symbolistic usage of names, name change and an artificial leg all link the main character’s nihilistic philosophy of life which leads to her
The Comradeship of War in All Quiet on the Western Front War can destroy a young man, mentally and physically. One might say that nothing good comes out of war, but in Remarque's All Quiet on the Western Front, there is one positive characteristic: comradeship. Paul and his friends give Himmelstoss a beating, which he deserves due to his training tactics. This starts the brotherhood of this tiny group. As explosions and gunfire sound off, a young recruit in his first battle is gun-shy and seeks reassurance in Paul's chest and arms, and Paul gently tells him that he will get used to it.
Philip Noyce's adaptation of Graham Greene's novel The Quiet American to film was a large success. It stayed true to the script, and kept the basic essence of the characters; pulling them from the pages of the book and creating them visually into marvels on screen. The earlier film made on the book was made in 1958 by Joseph Mankiewicz. Fowler was played by Michael Redgrave, with Audie Murphy as Pyle. This version was forced to reverse Greene's political stand taken in the book however, meaning it had no-where near as much impact as Noyce's production. Noyce chose to film in actual Vietnamese locations and without compromise, boldly sticking to the novel by not letting the Americans come out of the story too kindly. The Vietnamese conflict-its roots, effects, and lifestyle was captured brilliantly with Brendan Fraser depicting the deceivingly innocent yet devious Pyle, and Michael Caine as Fowler the ageing and unhappy journalist.
TA: Muiris MacGiollabhu Section: Tuesday: 8:30 AM Ugly Americans At the height of the Cold War two super powers, the Soviet Union and America, were competing for natural resources in third world countries, Southeast Asia. As a result, political power and diplomacy with the locals was very important. The Ugly American by William J. Lederer and Eugene Burdick depicts interrelated stories in Southeast Asia and mainly in a fictional place called Sarkhan. The novel is based around the conflict that the United States is failing to turn communism into a reality in Southeast Asia, because the diplomats sent are not willing to learn to speak Sarkhanese, to learn their culture, and connect with the locals. Throughout the chapters in the novel, the reader encounters good and bad things about the way America dealt with the negotiations and turning the local public to the good America ideals instead of the bad communism.
Clare Booth Luce wanted to convey the idea that she is being invited here not to tell scandalous stories, but to convey her own perspective on how the journalists can improve. It might seem as if she doesn't have the right to do so, but they "asked for it!" In this speech introduction, Boothe Luce, with humorous reminders, she was able to establish her own ethical credibility and the right to criticize the journalists.
In Fahrenheit 451, all of the people’s news were not portrayed as unbiased news reports, but as passive entertainment. Things were dramatized, and when options were given, they were easy one sided choices. For instance, the election for president in Fahrenheit 451 was between two men: Winston Noble, a tall, handsome, well spoken man, and Hubert Hoag, a short, fat, suttutering man. Given no other information from the media, the people of course voted for Winston Noble, though each candidate was only judged on their superficial merits; and though Winston Noble looked better, Hubert Hoag may have been the better president. This shows how getting news through only biased dramatized sources can be flawed, and lead to biased decisions. Other forms of passive entertainment such as racing cars at high speeds, and beating other kids also negatively affect the community by creating a dangerous environment for those around. Clarisse stated that ten of her friends had died in car crashes, and 6 were
Throughout The Wars, the main character is involved in many decisions, most of which fit under three main ideas or categories of justification: moral/general good, self-interest, and safety. Timothy Findley indirectly asks the readers of his novel to take these ideas into our own lives, and apply them to the decisions we make as a person or as a society. These decisions may be as simple as what type of bread we buy in the morning to more significant, such as who we vote for on Election Day. For any action we take there is always some type of justification or reason for doing what we are doing. It occurs today as it has occurred in centuries before. And surely, as we look into the future, the decisions will remain, only the justifications will differ, based on information we believe or know to be true.
The argument in “On the Rainy River” is an effective argument because of its use of emotional contributions, personable attributes, and the use of his descriptive thought process throughout the entire essay. Consistent issues such as the narrator’s conscience and conflicts between emotions and values make the argument strong because it captures the audience’s attention. Also, it allows the reader to share a sense of empathy for the narrator’s problem. O’Brien’s use of personable example hooks the audience to be sympathetic towards the narrator’s predicament. In addition, the argument is more believable by the audience because of O’Brien’s credible examples. Furthermore, this argument is strong because the narrator captures the audience’s compassion and opinion of why he does not want to go to war.
The objective of norm in American, by Michael Schudson, explores how and why the objective norms developed in American journalism. Objective is one of the most important occupational values of American journalism, it can be identified by following measures: express allegiance, ethnographers’ observations and occupational routines, resist with the challenging behaviour, impersonality and non-partisanship in news content. Differencing from some scholars’ opinions that economic and technological change enhances the ethic of objective, Schudson thinks four conditions encourage the articulation of norms. Two of them are Durkheimian, the other two are Weberian. One of the Durkheimian conditions thinks the emergence of norm is to achieve horizontal solidarity, another Durkheimian condition find the norm is used to identify the group from other groups. Both Durkheimian conditions are concluded as social cohesion. The Weberian conditions find norm is not appear abruptly, they are transfer from the old generation, who were benefit from these rules, to the young generation. It is the tool for the superiors to control subordinates in a complex organization. Weberian condition is to satisfy the need of social control. By discussing the history of American journalism development, this essay outlining the emergence of these four conditions in the late 19th and early 20th century. By doing so, the author found the reason why a new moral norm appeared in American journalism. Compared with European journalism, this article discusses why objectivity as a norm first and most fully appears in American instead of Europe.
Conflicting perspectives are an innate corollary of the subjective human experience. Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' explores disparate representations of events and personalities to give rise to truth and the language in which it is expressed as innately unstable. Moreover, Julius Caesar and Aldous Huxley's 'Brave New World' offer disparate class perspectives to undermine the possibility of truth as anything but iridescent and personal.
In contrast to that, in Greene’s novel ‘The Quite American’, Alden Pyle was a character representing Lansdale and argued that Pyle and America in general, took a blind initiative in leading an Anti-communist protest in the cold war, unaware of the damage that they were creating in administering a democratic government. Represented in a short sentence “I hope to God you know what you are doing there. Oh, I know your motives are good; they always are….I wish sometimes you had a few bad motives; you might understand a little more about human beings. And that applies to your country too”, (Greene, 1956). Lansdale ‘quietness’ and ‘ignorance’, as describes in ‘The quite American’ created a suspicious feeling in the Asian population. According to Greene, his secretly quite character made many to doubt his claim that he was sent to the countries for economic aid mission, his connection with the different division of the US government and did not trust the enormous plastic that was imported to Vietnam through him.
...through John’s denial of Lenina’s advances, and his feelings of unworthiness throughout the novel. Finally the lack of Freedom is shown more vividly through John’s reactions to the many radical practices to retain stability in the World State. The use of an outsider in a dystopian novel greatly benefits said novel by showing many different perspectives on the flawed aspects of the depicted society.
*Moyers, B., (2005). Moyers on America: A Journalist and His Times. New York: Randleman House, Inc. 2005. Print.
Although there is a preferred meaning Hall (1977) emphasises three positions on interpreting meanings. The first being hegemonic- dominant position, fully accepting the preferred meaning (Hall 1977), the second being the negotiated-corporate position (Hall 1977) and the oppositional position (Hall 1977). The negotiated-corporate position is when the dominant message is shot with contradictions (Hall 1977) and is visibly shown to the viewer. The oppositional position is when the viewer fully rejects the preferred meaning (H...