Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Clare boothe luce 1960 speech rhetorical analysis
Clare boothe luce 1960 speech rhetorical analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Clare boothe luce 1960 speech rhetorical analysis
Clare Booth Luce wanted to convey the idea that she is being invited here not to tell scandalous stories, but to convey her own perspective on how the journalists can improve. It might seem as if she doesn't have the right to do so, but they "asked for it!" In this speech introduction, Boothe Luce, with humorous reminders, she was able to establish her own ethical credibility and the right to criticize the journalists. She stated that " there is no audience anywhere should be more bored...revolted- by a speaker who tried to fawn on it" and one more time directly that she is "not a volunteer for this subject". Because they asked her to give her own opinion, and they must accept the harsh, and critical words that she will mention in her speech.
American journalist and politician Claire Boothe Luce, and her speech to the journalist at the Women's National Press Club, criticize the American press for surrendering fulfilling work for cheap dramatize stories. Luce, in her speech, discussed the many problems the journalist face in the writing community. This purpose is to introduce problems in the writing community. She uses happy tone to appeal to her uninterested colleagues, as well as, diction, ethos, pathos, and logos. Claire Luce gives a powerful speech while bringing the American press down.
In April of 2017, Jorge Ramos gave a TED talk titled, “Why Journalists Have an Obligation to Challenge Power.” Ramos is an immigrant and journalist who introduces the idea that the responsibility and purpose of journalism is to oppose those
I chose this word because the tone of the first chapter seems rather dark. We hear stories of the hopes with which the Puritans arrived in the new world; however, these hopes quickly turned dark because the Purtains found that the first buildings they needed to create were a prison, which alludes to the sins they committed; and a cemetery, which contradicts the new life they hoped to create for themselves.
...n our country. She’s saying that the advancement of women is getting stuck between a rock and a hard place. This was such a strong point in her speech because it shed light into the logical thinking, and made a historical connection to slavery. By making this connection, she was able to help many see that women were convicted slaves to the current state of the union.
It was not until 1919 that women had the right to vote. If it was not for the hard work, determination, and perseverance from Elizabeth Cady Stanton, women today still may not of had the privilege to vote. Because of Elizabeth Cady Stanton and her hard work, women are now treated equally in our society today.
...emain respectable in the journalistic field, it is imperative to abide by all constitutional laws and ethical values.
Literary journalistic discourse is “perhaps the most intertextual of all texts, referring to other texts” in terms of transforming prior historical stories and restructuring conventional literary and journalistic genres and discourses in an attempt to generate a new one, that is, literary journalism (Mills 65-66). Thus, the journalistic discourse cannot be but dialogic and intertextual because its raw material is a news story that can be manipulated, adapted, and adopted by the literary journalist in order to compete other versions of the story. It “assimilates a variety of discourses” that “always to some extent question and relativize each other’s authority” (Waugh 6). Literary journalists, thus, are actively engaged in interpreting and scrutinizing
Some people view John Stuart Mill, and his theory of Utilitarianism, as having a negative impact on journalism. It has been argued that Utilitarianism is useless and ignores justice. Without John Stuart Mill contemporary journalists would be viewed as unethical and rude. The introduction of Utilitarianism to society in the late 1800s has allowed journalists today to relate closer to the public, and gain more of the public’s trust. A reporter that does not meet the ethical standards of the majority of his or her audience breaks this trust with the public, and loses his or her’s
Clare Booth Luce uses the introduction of her speech to set the stage up for constructive criticism over the tendency of American press to sacrifice journalistic integrity in favor of perceived of the perceived public demand for sensational stories.
When receiving criticism it is a confidence booster to hear that there are things that you have done right, which makes you more open to the idea of improvements. Luce strategically uses praises to lift the audience up after preparing them for their criticism, making them more willing to listen. The last two paragraphs of her introduction holds various praises in which Luce recognizes the greatness and success of the American Press. To introduce her main point of praise, Luce prepares the audience by pleading with them to “accept some of the good with the bad,” (line 56). This introduces her praise, by letting them know that not everything they do is bad, that there is some good as well. This lifts up the spirits of the journalists, enabling them to feel good about themselves when Luce ends her introduction by proudly announcing that the United States daily press is “far and away the best press in the world,” (line 59-60). By wrapping up her introduction with such a strong praise, the audience will listen to the actual speech with a more open mind about how her advice can improve their work and make their press releases more truthfully written, attracting more consumers and avoiding criticism and backlash from other media
Over the years, numerous media groups and organizations have drafted their own code of ethics. Although these various existing codes have some differences, most share common elements, including the principles of truthfulness, fairness, freedom, humaneness, and public accountability. In media scholar Edmund Lambeth’s definition of the ethical journalist, he includes the same guiding principles. According to Lambeth, the ethical journalist is a “humane truth seeker who seeks justice and protects freedom as a faithful steward of his craft” (“Staying Alive”, 2006). These values hold up the professional canons of accuracy, fairness, and balance. However, they may also interfere with the demand for timeliness. In the rush to publish or air, for example,
Investigative reporting has been a driving force in journalism for centuries. The reporting tradition of revealing misconduct was already well established much before the 20th Century. Its practise even predates the publication of the first successful colonial newspaper in 1704, demonstrating the press’ watchdog role has had deep historical roots in democracy much prior to the 1960s. Over the past three centuries, investigative reporters have tried to make a difference by raising public consciousness about perceived wrongdoings. Prior to the early 1960s, investigative reporting was highly localised and sporadic. This was a reflection of the character of early journalism and the technological limits of communication. It was not until the 20th century that a unique combination of forces combined to create a sustained era of national exposures. (Reference)
"Journalism Ethics Online Journalism Ethics Gatekeeping." Journalism Ethics for the Global Citizen. Web. 05 Dec. 2010. .
Another concept in this heading its how important journalists are how influential their way of thinking and prejudice can transform the news, or the way we see it and understand it. As a viewer, In my view they should not put their point of view on the news as it can affect in many way the news, or worst as many viewers depend on them of what is important. Even though, journalist are crucial to the news as they have to choose what is worth seeing, interpreted as the reflection of the reporter. Likewise, they have to learn the language of the viewers, meaning they have to decide and understand the private opinion of the spectators if they want them to continue watching or listening to their show.