Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Differentiate between a nation and a nation state
Differentiate between a nation and a nation state
Differentiate between a nation and a nation state
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Differentiate between a nation and a nation state
When discussing about a nation-state it is imperative to distinguish it from other nations. A nation state is made from its political legitimacy which enables it to be a sovereign organ or a country within a component of sovereign territory (Hutchinson, 2012). The state is a geopolitical as well as a political organ and the nation is a cultural body, therefore, nation state draws its existence in both geopolitical and ethnic cultural backgrounds.
Further, transnational entities are societies made of a divergent group of people and individuals who are located in different national societies. These international entities act on the grounds of their shared interests or goals which may comprise language, religion or territorial guidelines. The transnational communities use such links to reinforce their cohesions which are way above borders of a nation (Betsill & Bulkeley, 2004).
The upsurge of the nation state result to the growth of transnational entities. This is the incident which occurred during the post national and post-colonial period. Transnational entities developed because there was increased emigration from several national and territorial states, both from centralized states like Turkey and federal states like Mexico.
A group of people are taken as a nation state if; they are permanent residents of a distinct territory, they display some system of government, they have a shared culture, and they pronounce themselves to be independent. When a group becomes a nation, the past loyalties to society or tribe must be surrendered to the incoming political order. This is inclusive of the shared documents and history. Thus, a sense of a shared future develops (Walter, 2004).
The United Kingdom is a good example of a nation st...
... middle of paper ...
...ation facilitates to meet the needs for the nation-state objectives. They have to establish a good relationship with other nations and maintain the relation so as to enhance trade business because of the interests of the nation-state (Friedman, 2008).
In conclusion, understanding various states and transnational entities is very important, especially when countries are planning to work together and conduct transnational businesses. There are many cultures, policies, shared values that vary from county to country, from one sovereign state to the other. In 21st century, if these divergent cultures are put together the whole world economy will grow by double digits. The partnership between countries wide apart in transatlantic can form a perfect transatlantic trade that will be beneficial for the economy of many countries such as that of the U.S. and European Union.
The 19th century set the stage for different policies that lead to the extending of America’s power, which is defined as imperialism. Imperialism started for different reasons like the Americans wanting the U.S. to expand or explore the unknown land, or even some feared existing resources in U.S. might eventually dry up. The reason imperialism started doesn’t really matter, but more of what it caused. Imperialism lead to Cuban assistance, the addition of Hawaii and Alaska to America, and Yellow Journalism.
When asked about the definition of a sovereign nation, Selma Buckwheat (September 25, 2013), elder member of the Anishinabeg tribe, explains by stating, “We govern ourselves and have our own laws” (personal communication). They have a lot of meetings that help understand most of the sovereign nations. In other words, a sovereign nation is power or a territory existing as an independent s...
With the idea of a sovereign state rapidly becoming an ideal of the past, globalization has already left its mark on the world. The main goal of globalization is to unite the globe under a single culture and government, which undermines the ideology of the nation-state, which has “citizens [which are] members of a nation living within the borders of a defined territory.” (Fulcher p. 1)Furthermore, globalization develops international relations, removing or transcending the borders of a nation-state, by economic marketing, increased labour, and transfer of information. Having the globalization movement as well as the development of nation-states both begin around the fifteenth century, it is apparent where the rivalry comes from, as well as just who is the victor in the struggle. This creates higher financial competition between a globalized country and a nation-state, as having a global open economy leads the sovereign state into a sense of “capitalist accumulation and competition” (Bresser-Pereira p. 559). Though the nation-state does not stand on equal ground with the globalization process...
...truggle and violence. From the Iran Revolution to the end of the Iran-Iraq War, the struggle and violence lasted from 1979-1988. If only applied to the Iranian revolution then the period of violence was short, only a year, but without knowing what would have happened had Iraq not invaded Iran, it is hard to say how long that period would have lasted. As I used both the Iranian Revolution and the Iran-Iraq War, the period of violence in this case turns out to be nine years. The implications of policy application of this theory is knowing that the pressure on newly formed regimes to secure internal security through outside conflict means that policies may change or pass with the intention of inciting a state to enter into conflict with the new state. The purpose of this would be to give the newly formed state an opportunity to strengthen and consolidate its authority.
As harmful as ethnic nationalism can be, nationalism can be a force for good. Civic nationalism, as opposed to ethnic nationalism, successfully unites people not by race or ethnicity, but by similar values and ideals. For example, the United States of America was upon the common ideals of freedom and equality. According to one expert, “The United States accepted men of all kinds of descent as their alma mater, transforming them into a ‘new race of men’” (Kohn). The non-exclusivity of American nationalism is exactly what sets apart civic nationalism from ethnic nationalism.
Democracy has been the root of a limited government, the system of which government powers are distributed so that one group of leaders do not have too much influence. The limited government has been structured to keep peace amongst all parties that are involved in the government. And under the U.S. Constitution, citizens are given ultimate power by their right to choose their representatives through the democratic process of voting. Each levels of the government are limited as they have their own responsibilities. The city government has the most local level of government as the residents elect a city council and mayor to represent their interest at the city level. All city governments establish housing and health regulations, and are responsible
“Nationalism” is defined as “A social and political outlook insisting that the state should embody a national community united by some or all of the following: history, ethnicity, religion, common culture, and language” . Essentially, nationalism is an intense pride for ones’ country caused by a push for national unity. Nationalism was stirred due to the sense of loss in national origin.
Many different theoretical approaches exist to study the rise of nationalism throughout history. One approach is primordialism. Primordialism states that nationalism is a natural part of human beings. This field contends that distinct nations have existed since the dawn of time. Primordialism is also described as nationalism is created by people being surrounded by distinct cultural features like religion, custom, and language. This view believes that nations are unchanging and primordial from their beginning (Özkirimli 2000, 64-65). Thus, ethnic and national ties are given at birth. One subset of primordialism is the perennalist approach. This approach believes that modern nations are clear descendants of their
The founding of a new government, by definition, does not merely mean the establishment of a governing structure; it denotes the building of nationhood. This sense of nationhood, with time, will invariably deepen into the passion citizens have for their nations. While extreme nationalism is destructive to both self and others, a moderate amount of nationalism is the foundation of our modern democracy. It unites citizen into political units, promotes participation in democratic processes, and stabilizes democracy by building trust. Governments are, thus, important because, to some extent, they help to promote democracy.
The belief of a nation running their own state is a right for most of us. However, this is only a new conviction. The right for one to sovereign their own nation has come due with hard work. Illicit imperialism has stricken humanity for numerous years. Due to the aspiration of power certain nations today do not self-govern their own state. But why would there be a desire for this power? Some of the main items include natural resources, increased assets, and military expansion. Ideally this is great if this is voluntary external rule, but when it’s no longer voluntary this is when the boundary has been crossed. This is why every nation should have control over their own state if they desire.
According to Steven Grosby who is the author of Nationalism A Very Short Introduction a nation is a tendency of humanity to divide itself into distinct, and often conflicting, groups (Grosby 1). I think the point that Grosby tries to make is his most people try to place their self into separate and different groups that help fit into a human group. If you look at from a sports perspective, yesterday we saw a nation of people gathering the streets of Boston to celebrate the New England Patriots Super Bowl victory. Another example of this would be the women march that took place a few weeks ago. We saw a nation of women marching in all major cities for protesting the newly inducted President Trump and they were trying to protect human rights, women rights, and other issues that they
How well has federalism worked in the United States? This is all a matter of opinion. Federalism has indeed been an active structure for government that fits in quite well with the changing American society. This particular system of government has been around for over two hundred years, and under all those years the separation of power under American federalism has changed numerous amounts of times in both law and practice. The United States Constitution does allow changes and amendments in the Constitution have assigned miscellaneous roles to the central and state governments than what originally intended. The suitable equilibrium between national and state powers is repeatedly an issue in American Politics.
This essay will describe the characteristics of the modern nation-state, explain how the United States fits the criteria of and functions as a modern nation-state, discuss the European Union as a transnational entity, analyze how nation-states and transnational entities engage in foreign policy to achieve their interests, and the consequences of this interaction for international politics. Some of the characteristics that make up a modern nation-state are: the population of the territory is united in the national identity and traditions, has an official language or languages and common descent, has an organized government, shall have independence and sovereign (self-ruled), and has a defined territory and/or borders. An example of a modern nation-state is Egypt. Egypt’s identity is closely tied to its location and its long history.
It seems necessary to begin this essay by discussing the differences between a nation and a state before one can analyze what Collier meant when he declared, “leaders must build a nation before they can build a state” (Collier, 2009, pg. 52). A nation represents a collection of people that are united by the sharing of similar cultures, decent, history, and/or languages within a particular region. In contrast, a state represents a region that is considered to have an organized political structure beneath a single government. Therefore, in order to build a nation first, leaders must unite the people with similar backgrounds and languages. After a nation is built, leaders can proceed can continue to rule and shape this unified population within a structured political system. The question now remains as to how this information directly relays into the second chapter of Collier’s book?
Globalization can briefly be defined as ‘something’ that affects and changes the traditional arrangements of the state system. It is a term that directly implies change and therefore is a continuos process over a long period of time as compared to quickly changing into a wanted or desir...