Comparing a Nation and a State

1252 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Church-state relationship in the world

Comparing a Nation and a State

The world is organized by man-made boundaries that divide land into sovereign states, (excluding Antarctica). Early states formed through empires, conquest, and colonialism, were held together by religious based rule. The Treaty of Westphalia lessened the powers of religious figures the Catholic Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor, which ended religious wars in Europe in 1648 . This transformation marks the formation of the modern state system, which organizes the world into nation-states. A nation-state exists where common identity coincides with the boundaries of sovereign authority. The synonymous nature of the words nation and state have a European base were early states were nearly synonymous with their nations. These definitions are frequently used interchangeably when they should not be. I will argue that although the terms nation and state are clearly related, they both have distinct meanings, which explains why there are states without a nation, nations without a state, and some nations that spread out over many states.

Max Weber defined a state as a body that successfully claims a monopoly of legitimate force in a particular territory . The government of a state carries out legislative, executive, and judicial functions in order to create internal control and stability in a country. The state is the universal form of political organization, which is composed of a population, territory, and sovereignty. All land (excluding Antarctica) is currently divided into 190 separate states. Examples of states include the United States, France, Chile, and many more. All states have a government that makes political decisions and aims to protect the state from external and internal attack. ...

... middle of paper ...

...mous. The state is a form of political organization that includes population, territory, and sovereignty. A nation is an identity shared by a large number of people, usually based on objective factors such as ethnicity, and language. The nation-state incorporates common identity with common boundaries, but does not suggest that nation and state have interchangeable meanings.

Bibliography:

Richard N. Cooper, States, Citizens and Markets in the 21st Century (Queens University), 1997

Max Weber, Politics as a Vocation (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul), 1970

David Miller, On Nationality (Oxford University Press Inc, New York), 1995

Peter Ravn Rasmussen, "Nations" or "States", http://www.scholiast.org/nations/whatisanation.html

Victor A. Kremenyuk, Conflicts In and Around Russia, (Greenwood Press, Westport CT), 1994

Show More
Related

  • How Does the Constitution Protect the People from Tyranny?

    723 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order to secure the protection of the people’s rights of freedom from the imprisonment of tyranny, a compound government was formed. Central and State government came together to form the compound government, which in other words means federalism. It is one of the many elements that make up the protection of freedom from tyranny, “Hence a double security arises to the rights of the people.” (Madison FP # 51) The states combined covered our need of protection, protection of the countries by the Central government and protection of the people by the States government. Also by joining themselves together, “The different governments will control each other, at the same time that each will be controlled by itself.” (Madison FP # 51)

    Read More

  • Comparing the United States Constitution with Local State Constitutions

    855 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States Constitution begins with the simple phrase “We the People”. Yet, with three simple words, the ideology it stands for has shaped the entire country (O’Connor et al., 2011). The short phrase signifies that the document, and thus, the government, is based upon the people themselves. The Constitution reflects the culture and ideologies of its citizens. Similarly, state constitutions reflect the people, albeit in a more specific locality. The key differences between the United States Constitution and that of local states are due to the distinctions between the scope and characteristics of the people they govern.

    Read More

  • Nationalism Dbq

    630 Words  | 2 Pages

    State-building was defined as culturally distinct groups who come together to form a new state by accepting a single culture. A dominant example would be the United States. The United States became a huge inspiration to many of the European countries when they had won their independence. They fought during the American Revolution for a democracy, they so desperately wanted the people to have a say in the government. Freedom, liberty, and rights are what drove them, they never gave up on their fight for freedom. The United States people were able to separate their differences by coming together and forming a new nation by accepting one single culture. This is what the European countries hoped that they could someday accomplish the same

    Read More

  • Individuality And Conformity In Aldous Huxley's Brave New World

    1015 Words  | 3 Pages

    First of all, The World State takes away individuality and forces its people, through conditioning, to conform to the society’s motto of Community, Identity, and Stability. The most effective way the World State conditions its people is through

    Read More

  • The Difference Between Separation of Powers and Federalism

    308 Words  | 1 Pages

    The difference between the separation of powers and federalism is slim to nothing. Federalism consists of the national government and the fifty states, in which the national government is defined by the separation of powers: the three branches of government. Federalism is the over view form of government that is stated in the Constitution which implies the separation of powers between central and regional government. On the other hand, separation of powers is the separation of branches under the national government. In other words, the separation of powers is a subunit of federalism.

    Read More

  • Federal Supremacy Clause

    783 Words  | 2 Pages

    The U.S government works under princible called federalisim. Citizens regualte by two separate governments, federal and state. The federal government has limited power over all fifty states. State has power over their state, and no state can not make laws that conflict with federal laws. Federalisim is a system that allows two or more governments to share control over the same geographic region. The power is divided. The difference between federal and state governments power, the powers granted to the U.S. government are to collect taxes, pay debts, provide for the common defense and welfare of the U.S. The Federal Government can even boworrow money, regualte commerce within forgien nations and states. The power of the federal government

    Read More

  • Nationalism And Nationalism

    1339 Words  | 3 Pages

    World War I, also known as “The Great War”, was a global war that revolved mainly around Europe. It took place from 1914 to 1918. This was a very brutal war that caused many casualties. The soldiers who survived experienced severe trauma and mental discomfort. This trauma was a direct result of the violence and agony they experienced during the war. Motivation for this war was the idea of nationalism and the pride in one’s country. This war was the cause of disillusionment among many of the soldiers that were involved in it.

    Read More

  • Dual Federalism Essay

    1433 Words  | 3 Pages

    A federal system of government that is used in the United States splits power and authority among the state’s or

    Read More

  • fog of war

    1454 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to realist view ordering principle of the international system is based on anarchy. There is no higher authority other than the states themselves to check and balance their actions. Consequently, nation-states are the main players in this system. In other words, sovereignty inheres in states, because there is not a higher ruling body in the international system. This is known as state centrism. Survival is an obligation continuing to be sovereign. On the other hand, sovereignty is the characteristic feature of states and its meaning is strongly tied to use of force. According to the most of the realist variants, states are “black boxes”; the determinative factor is states’ observable behavior, not their leaders’ characteristics, their decision making processes or their government systems.

    Read More

  • Nationalism and Democracy

    1179 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nationalism has played a crucial role in world history over the past centuries. It continues to do so today. For many, nationalism is indelibly associated with some of the worst aspects of modern history, such as the destructive confidence of the Napoleon’s army and the murderous pride of Nazi Germany. Large numbers of people, descent in their hearts, have carried out unbelievable atrocities for no better reason than their nation required them to. Authoritarian and totalitarian regime have crushed dissent, eliminated opposition, and trampled on civil liberties in the name of the nation.

    Read More

  • The Banning Of Racial Profiling In The US

    540 Words  | 2 Pages

    The state’s rights are political powers given to the states. Moreover, they are also known as reserved powers. The constitution assigned national government powers, additionally provided the states the independent right to control matters such as education, police protection, licensing, among others.

    Read More

  • Limited Government Essay

    1024 Words  | 3 Pages

    Then there is the state government which are responsible for governing affairs within their borders, and carrying out federal laws and programs at the state level. They are governed by their own constitutions and retain any rights that the U.S. Constitution does not exclusively grant to the federal government. The state government is limited as they cannot form alliances with other states and must honor and respect the laws and institutions of the other states. And finally there is the federal government which is the central and highest level of government in the U.S. It is divided into three branches and each branch has its own rights and power to check and balance the powers of each branch. The federal government has the power to regulate taxes, establish federal welfare programs and make laws in the interest of the nation as a whole. There are also limitations set to the federal government’s authority, as they cannot ask local law enforcements agencies to do minor administrative jobs. Although all levels of government have their own responsibilities there are limits to interfering with other governments

    Read More

  • Effect of Food Security in Climate Change

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nations (FAO) as “a condition in which all people, at all times, have physical and economic

    Read More

  • International System Essay

    926 Words  | 2 Pages

    The international system is an anarchical system which means that, unlike the states, there is no over ruling, governing body that enforces laws and regulations that all states must abide by. The International System in today’s society has become highly influential from a number of significant factors. Some of these factors that will be discussed are Power held by the state, major Wars that have been fought out in recent history and international organisations such as the U.N, NATO and the W.T.O. Each of these factors, have a great influence over the international system and as a result, the states abilities to “freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social, and cultural development”.

    Read More

  • What is State Formation and How Does It Occur?

    1329 Words  | 3 Pages

    To examine what state formation is and how it has occurred the logical route seems to assess from where they have evolved. The notion of the state is a relatively recent concept, for example in 1555 there existed only two national states, England and France. With otherwise the existence of disorganised and corrupt empires, federations and protectorates. It appears states have formed despite the many obstacles facing their development. Not only did the challenges of securing territory exist but ri...

    Read More

More about Comparing a Nation and a State

Open Document