Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits and limitations of different methods of presentation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Nancy Duarte” explains in her presentation “The secret structure of great talks” the common structure of great talks that makes their message resonate with listeners. She starts her presentation by saying that everyone has the power to change the world with an idea. She says that an idea can be powerful and change anything through the way it is communicated and shared with others. It can be adopted or rejected by others. But if it is not shared it will become powerless and die. She talks about her experience with vintage European posters that she loves, and she compares herself to a woman shown in a poster who is all fired up risking her life to promote suavitos baking spices. Nancy says that she loves presentations which she thinks are an …show more content…
She started with Aristotle who had a three-act structure, a beginning, a middle, and an end. Then she studied hero archetypes and she found the flaw in presentations that is the presenter is the star of the show while, in fact, the audience is the hero of the idea. Also, she studied Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey, she found that the role of a presenter is to be a mentor who helps the audience move from their old beliefs to his/her new idea. And by studying Gustav Freytag’s pyramid who had a five-act structure, which has an exposition, a rising action, a climax, a falling action, and a denouement. After doing her study she drew a shape, the shape of a great presentation. Nancy Duarte examined this shape by overlaying it over two great communicator’s talks: Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech and Steve Jobs’ 2007 iPhone launch speech, and it worked. So, she uses this shape as an analysis tool to transcribe speeches. And according to this shape, any presentation begins with real situation “what is” and it is compared with the presenter’s idea “what could be” and the middle goes back and forth to draw the audience towards the idea especially who are resisting …show more content…
First, she introduced herself as an excited person who is eager to succeed. This makes the impression that she is a hardworking, knowledgeable woman and gains her audience’s trust. She also explained the stages of a powerful talk thoroughly from beginning to end in an interesting way which stimulates the audience to express their ideas and present themselves correctly. She started her presentation by addressing her audience with a motivating sentence: “You have the power to change the world,” So they can anticipate a great presentation that can change their lives. She showed them how an idea can be powerful if it is communicated well or powerless if it is not. She figured out the importance of incorporating story into presentations. And she supported her discovery with a study she did in philosophy, cinema, and literature fields. She drew a shape that shows the structure of a powerful presentation, and she proved its validity by overlying this shape over two speeches of two great communicators, and it worked. At last, she shared her terrible experience during her childhood, and how she managed to move on and choose the right path for her life and change the world around her. She finished her presentation with an inspirational call to action with hope: “I want to encourage you to do that.” In general, she excelled in presentation and she was
Because of Keller’s use of pathos to grab attention, using a strong, independent ethos and then backing it up using logos, it was easy to get wrapped up in her cause. Keller’s style was effective and left the audience with the desire to take action.
Renowned and engaging speakers have the ability to connect their values and ideas to greater causes and principles, leaving an enduring impact on the audience. You may be questioning what makes a great speaker? And what qualities and features contribute to the formation of a powerful speech? It is understood that a great speaker has the ability to communicate to larger truths and carve those truths on the audience’s hearts and minds as they surpass the context, place and time of the deliverance of the speech, and focus on conveying their ideas and values.
She gives the listeners personal advice she has learned and uses pathos in a more emotional way. Her allusion to the world trade center is a perfect example of this. She reminds us how we can easily overcome obstacles when we work together with other people. Later in the address Amy Poehler shares a few things she learned from when she studied improvisation in Chicago. She says, “Say ‘yes.’ Live in the moment. Make sure you play with people who have your back. Make big choices early and often. Don’t start a scene where two people are talking and jumping out of a plane. Start the scene having already jumped. If you are scared, look into your partner’s eyes. You’ll feel better”,. The way she relates the strategies she learned there back to life touches your heart. She closes her speech with a heartfelt message, “When you feel scared, hold someone’s hand and look into their eyes. And when you feel brave, do the same thing. You are all here because you are smart. And you are brave....As you head out into the world, I wish you love and light, joy, and much
Even the best arguments have no effect on an audience that does not trust the speaker. Many speakers attempt to establish their ethos through mentioning accolades that establish them as experts. While this can build credibility, this type of communication is weaker than one that emphasizes a mutual understanding to create a personal connection. In her opening statement, Quindlen claims that she sees herself as part of the audience (294). She uses
The TED Talk “Why 30 is not the new 20” by Meg Jay, was a powerful and successful speech. Jay delivers an inspirational message to twenty-year-olds to not waste away important years of their life in an unmeaningful relationship or career. Instead she stresses the importance of searching for a life-long partner sooner rather than later in life. She also talked about taking career risks while still young, because these opportunities will likely be indefeasible later in life. Jay 's main points were very effective in persuading one to consider living by this set of social standards. It is clear that Meg Jay is an experienced public speaker, because of how well the overall presentation was. She does all of the basics perfectly, such as standing
Her slow yet concise way of speaking, coupled with easy to follow transitions allowed for a speech that was enjoyable to listen to. Her use of examples from her personal life allowed her audience to get a picture of who she was if they did not know, and allowed her to better relate to them by provided examples of how she is related to the college they are graduating from. Her reference to many modern political problems allowed her to bring up her important role as an activist and facilitated further understanding from the audience. While some areas of her speech were weak, such as the longer than needed pauses and her lack of consistent eye contact, to a few points where she didn’t speak clearly enough, the overall picture that was her speech was fairly strong. Looking at this speech, I hope to incorporate some aspects that I failed to include in my previous speeches. Some of these include her use of hand gestures to emphasize and exaggerate certain phrases and topics, and her combined use of appeals. While my initial thoughts going in were “This is boring” and “This is too slow”, it evolved into me wanting to hear more, and overall my defeat in the beginning turned into a victory at the
Speeches functioned as great tools for inspiring and motivating people. A passionate and charismatic speaker could often change a group of people’s view of the world with just a short speech. A perfect example of this phenomenon can be seen in the leaders of religious groups such as Matthias and Joseph Smith. These two men both possessed the ability to make people pi...
Hillary Clinton speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton. Pathos and Logos supported the facts stated to the public with evidence and compassionate words. The rhetorical device of repetition made it possible for the audience to realize the level of importance the topic had. Altogether made the speech have the great impact on people’s perspectives about women
The speaker first grab her viewer’s attention by giving them questions and having self participation. Also, Amy uses humor to keep the audience focus on what is is talking about. She achieved this by her use of funny pictures and videos to break the ice for the viewers and to warm her crowd up. Cuddy also utilized technology in her speech. Her use of technology enhance her discussion by providing visuals to guide the audience in her topic. Together with the technology, Amy used an emotional personal story to keep the attention of the audience. This emotional story used the pathos side of a persuasive speech to use the audience emotion to keep them focus on the subject.
Fiskio herself was a good speaker -- she had a strong, conversational tone and used very intelligent language. She also had great articulation, pronunciation, pitch, volume, fluency, and projection. Although she paced slightly and used some hand gestures, they added to the presentation instead of detracting from it, and she kept good eye contact the entire time. Additionally, she was very confident, and she seemed poised and knowledgeable. She also used a lot of quotes and outside support, which gave her credibility and validity. Nonetheless, the presentation itself was lacking. The ideas seemed unorganized, and there was little to no explanation of their connections and relative importance to the average person. Despite its interesting beginning and ending, the body of the speech was confusing and not extremely engrossing. Even further, Fiskio’s PowerPoint was not very well done. The layout was passable, but it really only consisted of pictures slapped haphazardly on. The PowerPoint was not visually appealing and, though the pictures were good, it just seemed like it was lazily
Over the recent four months in Communication 1402 class, I have addressed three formal speechs and completed a number of chapters in the corresponding textbook “Communication Works”. This course of Communication aims to provide general information what public speaking is and how to address a public speaking. Recalling back the experience during the processes of completing the Speech to Imform, Speech to Persuade, and Group Presentation, I will draw a conclusion about this course and these three presentations in five aspects, comprising my previous perception of public speaking before this course; learning from the Speech to Inform; the goal and evaluation of Speech to Persuade; learning from the Group Presentation; the most important thing learned from this course.
I have also learned about different types of audiences and speeches including persuasive, informative, entertaining and delivering special occasion speeches. It came to my attention that whenever I was making these presentations or speeches, I needed to do so with confidence, consistence and practice before the actual presentation and completely eliminate the element of panic. It was also clear that capturing the attention of the audience and engaging them in the whole process, it was necessary to have a very strong introduction and also try and use visuals to deliver the message. It was therefore vital to respect each person’s diversity and cultural values (Lucas, 2011).
This brings us to the two factors that influence an audience when presenting information through a media: the vividness of presentation and the position of a story (Baran 302). These factors, along with others, induce the audience to feel as if a particul...
In order to successfully deliver an oral presentation such as a speech, the speaker must follow certain procedures to ensure his message can be conveyed clearly. Vast amounts of research are essential in order to acquire the knowledge necessary to be able to speak about a topic comfortably and answer any questions the audience might have during the course of the presentation. After acquiring such knowledge about the topic of the presentation the speaker will feel more confident, confidence is key in delivering speeches and other oral presentations because it makes the speaker look more credible and trustworthy. Lastly, the speaker must be fluid and eloquent with his words, the speaker must be able to sound clear and crisp while delivering their
In public speaking I learned many types of concepts, theories and terms of communication. In concepts of publicly speaking there’s, relaxation, practice, credibility, attention getters, attire, organization, volume, emotion, audience relation, and movement. In my first speech, “The any old bag speech” I quickly learned the do’s, don’ts and concepts of my speech performance.