Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of the British empire in India
The effects of the British empire in India
The effects of the British empire in India
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of the British empire in India
It is one of the popular stories written by Rudyard Kipling’s. In a similar manner, the story about the battle between a two cobras and mongoose. As a matter of fact, it's the story seems to be a straightforward tale where the villains who is playing a negative role and here are clearly as well as completely defined and it is a better triumph over evil. On the other hand, it is the story, which generally deals with themes. By the way indicated, it is the process by that evil as well as the good are defined and it has represented mainly using to serve to make a greater and impactful ideological point. As a matter of fact, Kipling is the person who has written the story which is mainly written at the height of British imperial power, and was the most famous prominent of British imperialism. Apart from …show more content…
In this situation, to define the story Kipling uses the nagaina and nag, cobras as a major symbol of evil in order to define the Hindu culture. For this reason, it helps to promote the British agenda of rule across India. Buy Research Paper for getting information in respect of rikki-tikki-tavi.
Here, nag describes in a simple and clear objective that mainly serve in respect of clearly attribute into an evil nature. Moreover, some sound came from the thick grass at the foot of the brush with a sound of low hiss, which is a horrid cold sound, which made the rikkki Tikki jump back to his car fit. In an ideal manner, there is an inch-by-inch grass rose up spread hood of nag as well as the head. In addition, the story has a huge black cobra and at the same instant, he looked at Rikki Tikki with dangerous snake eyes that has never changed the expression. On the other hand, both objective as well as subjective, objective adjectives is manly used here to describe him. As an example, there are some different adjective, which describes different meanings such as black, always defines observation, horrid defines cold. In a
The author uses diction in the passages to signify the effect of the author¡¯s meaning in story and often sway readers to interpret ideas in one way or another. The man in the story arrives to a ¡°[dry] desert¡± where he accosts an animal with ¡°long-range attack¡± and ¡°powerful fangs.¡± The author creates a perilous scene between the human and animal in order to show that satisfaction does not come from taking lives. With instincts of silence and distrust, both of them freeze in stillness like ¡°live wire.¡± In addition, the man is brought to the point where animal¡¯s ¡°tail twitched,¡± and ¡°the little tocsin sounded¡± and also he hears the ¡°little song of death.¡± With violence ready to occur, the man tries to protect himself and others with a hoe, for his and their safety from the Rattler. The author criticizes how humans should be ¡°obliged not to kill¡±, at least himself, as a human. The author portrays the story with diction and other important techniques, such as imagery, in order to influence the readers with his significant lesson.
At first it is seen as a story about man and the evils he can do, yet
The theme of good vs evil manifests itself in human nature. What is considered to be evil usually varies for different people. The one similarity is that evil harms others. Parallel to this idea is the one common conception of goodness and that it betters others’ lives. Short stories often prove this. In Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery,” the evil is the town’s people killing one person and the goodness is their kind side that hesitates to do so. In this example the evil unfortunately wins. Contradicting this story is Sherman Alexie’s “A Good Story” where the protagonist defends his people from the frightful stereotypes they possess. John Newton refers to it as “A residual politics of recovered authenticity… (Newton).” The story’s purpose is
“‘Son of the big man that killed Nag’, she hissed, ‘stay still. I am not ready yet. Wait for a little. Keep very still, all you three! If you move, I strike, and if you do not move, I strike. Oh, foolish people, who killed my Nag’”(page 26). The following lines demonstrate how Nagaina is determined to get revenge on Nag’s killer, Rikki but is thought to be the man. Nagaina goes against Rikki who is a small creature who does many big things, including going against someone as determined as Nagaina. “He was afraid for the minute; but it is impossible for a mongoose to stay frightened for any length of time, and though Rikki-tikki had never met a live cobra before, his mother had fed him on dead ones, and he knew that all a grown mongoose’s business in life was to fight and eat snakes”(page 8) Rikki-tikki-tavi is a mongoose that is courageous, strong and loyal like a human. These demonstrate how Rikki, a small mongoose, can do big deeds because he is loyal to those he cares about, courageous by defending loved ones, and strong enough to fight against a snake that is difficult to fight against. The author, Rudyard Kipling, uses personification in this story to help show that even if you are little you can do large deeds to protect those you
In the story, after Rikki Tikki Tavi was washed out of his burrow, he was found and loved by a little boy named Teddy and his parents. He knew how to act around humans because every mongoose including his mother wanted to be a house mongoose. He had some problems with a couple of local cobras named Nag and Nagaina. These were very poisonous snakes, who put Rikki’s family in terrible danger. Rikki Tikki Tavi was a very hero like character ,but there were sometimes that he did not demonstrate these qualities.
The story Rikki TIkki Tavi, by Rudyard Kipling, is about good versus evil and our main character Rikki Tikki Tavi’s battle against Nag and Nagaina, two snakes who are terrorizing the garden. The main narrative takes place as Rikki Tikki Tavi as the hero and the snakes are “without a doubt” the villains of the story. However, I disagree, I do not believe that Nag and Nagaina are evil. Rikki Tikki Tavi would kill them regardless because that is mongoose nature, and they were living in the garden long before Rikki TIkki Tavi got there.
Through the snake’s intelligence, his fair treatment of the man, and his gruesome death, the author evokes compassion in the reader. When the man firsts comes across the snake, his instinct is not to attack, but to “watch what [the man] would do,” and “[hold] his ground in calm watchfulness” as he “[waits] for [the narrator] to show [his] intentions.” The snake’s neutral approach reveals his intelligence and his confidence. He is aware of his power; knows that in one swift move he can easily kill the narrator. But instead of doing so, he keeps a calm exterior, understanding that the man has yet to provoke him, and therefore there is no reason to attack. Furthermore, though the
Rikki also made the garden safe and more carefree. After he got rid of the snakes the garden was a much more peaceful place with not having to worry about the snakes. The humans/ family did not have to worry about being bitten and neither did the animals in the garden. Also the animals did not have to worry about their children being eaten by the snakes. Such as in the quote, “ Naginia used to eat frogs as well as little birds” ( Kipling page 28) So the animals were very happy about the cobras being
It gave him confidence in himself(page 9). This is an example because Rikki-Tikki an animal, thinks he can be confidence in himself just like a human. This personification proves the theme by him being confidence in himself even if he’s small. Another example is the author writes Rikki-tikki had a right to be proud of himself, but he did not grow too proud, and he kept that garden as a mongoose should keep it, with tooth and jump and spring and bite, till never a cobra dared show its head inside the walls(page 21). This is an example because Rikki-Tikki is relating to a human being proud of himself. This personification proves the theme by the author saying Rikki-Tikki was proud of himself because he overcame his fears. To sum up author Rudyard Kipling uses personification to help prove that anyone can be confidence and overcome their fears no matter what size, just believe in
... Nature, including human beings, is `red in tooth and claw'; we are all `killers' in one way or another. Also, the fear which inhabits both human and snake (allowing us, generally, to avoid each other), and which acts as the catalyst for this poem, also precipitates retaliation. Instinct, it seems, won't be gainsaid by morality; as in war, our confrontation with Nature has its origins in some irrational `logic' of the soul. The intangibility of fear, as expressed in the imagery of the poem, is seen by the poet to spring from the same source as the snake, namely the earth - or, rather, what the earth symbolizes, our primitive past embedded in our subconsciouness. By revealing the kinship of feelings that permeates all Nature, Judith Wright universalises the experience of this poem.
The social and political aspects are the most important issues of a country, because it is the scale of measuring people’s comfort. I think that Charles Dickens and Rudyard Kipling show successfully those aspects in their stories, in order to keep the reader conscious about the country’s system and show them the reality of British people and Indians.
In the Freakonomics Radio podcast “The Cobra Effect”, producer Katherine Wells explores a problematic situation that affected the residents of Fort Benning, Georgia. With a population of over 120,000 residents, Fort Benning is twice the land area of Atlanta, Georgia. This is plenty of space for the thousands of pigs that inhabited Fort Benning. Retired Vietnam War veteran Bill Brickner described pigs as a nuisance and pointed out that only a handful of pigs can cause damage to military equipment. With the growing pig population in Fort Benning came a call to action. In the summer of 2007, Fort Benning officials established a policy named the “Pig Eradication Program” in hopes of decreasing the pig population. This policy called for a bounty