Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Heroism and literature essay
Theme of heroism in heroes
Heroism and literature essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Heroism and literature essay
In Rikki-tikki-tavi, it states, “ This is the story of the great war that Rikki-tikki-tavi fought single-handed, through the bathroom of the bungalow in Segowlee cantonment” (page 4). Have you ever done something that was dangerous but brave? The theme of the fictional story Rikki-tikki-tavi by Rudyard Kipling is that even if you are small you can do great things for those you love.
Rikki-tikki-tavi is a small but brave character in this story. “He was a mongoose, rather like a little cat in his fur and his tail, but quite like a weasel in his head and his habits. His eyes and the end of his restless nose were pink; he could scratch himself anywhere he pleased with any leg, front or back, that he chose to use; he could fluff up his tail till
…show more content…
it looked like a bottle brush, and his war cry as he scuttled through the long grass was Rikk-tikk-tikki-tikki-tchk” (page 4). Rikki was rather related to a little cat in size, but also resembles a weasel (wild animal) in his habits. Rikki is a small creature, mongoose, but he is also dangerous and brave enough to do great deeds. “He spread out his hood more than ever, and Rikki-tikki saw the spectacle mark on the back of it that looks exactly like the eye part of a hook-and-eye fastening. He was afraid for the minute; but it is impossible for a mongoose to stay frightened for any length of time, and though Rikki-tikki had never met a live cobra before, his mother had fed him on dead ones, and he knew that all a grown mongoose’s business in life was to fight and eat snakes” (page 8). In these lines, it shows how small he is compared to the cobra, but yet he is only afraid for a minute, and that shows how he is brave. Since Rikki is brave, he isn’t afraid, plus in the story, it says that all a grown mongoose’s business in life is to fight and eat snakes. Rikki-tikki-tavi is a little courageous animal, mongoose, in this story. Nagaina, another character in the story is loving, vengeful, and dangerous. “Everything. When there were no people in the bungalow, did we have any mongoose in the garden? So long as the bungalow is empty, we are king and queen of the garden; and remember that as soon as our eggs in the melon bed hatch (as they may tomorrow), our children will need room and quiet”(page 13). In these following lines, it shows that she wants what is best for her babies, eggs, that she will do anything for them. Rikki is also loving, he wants to protect those he loves by doing great deeds that are dangerous since it interferes with Nagaina’s problem. “... Keep very still, all you three! If you move, I strike, and if you do not move, I strike. Oh, foolish people, who killed my Nag...”(page 18). These lines show she is wanting revenge on whoever killed Nag which is dangerous, and she is loving since she didn’t care she lost her chance because she was trying to get her last egg back. Nagaina is still vengeful because she is so depressed after losing someone she loves or loved so dear. Nagaina is another creature, who is affectionate and vindictive in this story. The author, Rudyard Kipling, uses personification in this story to help demonstrate that even if you are small you can do big things to protect those you love.
“‘Son of the big man that killed Nag’, she hissed, ‘stay still. I am not ready yet. Wait for a little. Keep very still, all you three! If you move, I strike, and if you do not move, I strike. Oh, foolish people, who killed my Nag’”(page 26). The following lines demonstrate how Nagaina is determined to get revenge on Nag’s killer, Rikki but is thought to be the man. Nagaina goes against Rikki who is a small creature who does many big things, including going against someone as determined as Nagaina. “He was afraid for the minute; but it is impossible for a mongoose to stay frightened for any length of time, and though Rikki-tikki had never met a live cobra before, his mother had fed him on dead ones, and he knew that all a grown mongoose’s business in life was to fight and eat snakes”(page 8) Rikki-tikki-tavi is a mongoose that is courageous, strong and loyal like a human. These demonstrate how Rikki, a small mongoose, can do big deeds because he is loyal to those he cares about, courageous by defending loved ones, and strong enough to fight against a snake that is difficult to fight against. The author, Rudyard Kipling, uses personification in this story to help show that even if you are little you can do large deeds to protect those you
adore. In the end, even if you are small you can always do tremendous deeds for those you love if you put your mind to it and are determined enough. No matter how small you are, you can do amazing deeds that are bigger than you. Rikki-tikki was a small mongoose who went up against three snakes single handed and defeated them to be able to defend those he cares most about. If you genuinely want to do something, and you put your mind to it, you can do things that are even bigger than you.
In the book Unlikely Warrior by Georg Rauch the main character Georg shows bravery in the face of adversity many times. One example of him showing bravery is on page 217"that night, the following day, and the next night we spent in the fields near a small creek....I rested with my foot propped up high as much as possible. I had a fever and felt miserable." As a reader this shows me that even though he is sick,wounded,and not feeling the greatest.He is taking on that Bravery to go somewhere that may get them shot by their enemies.I also thought as a reader Georg has a lot of courage, and bravery to keep on going moreover and further each day and not to be a laggard like most of the soldiers are.Another example is on page 57 paragraph 1 "I was
I cannot get that song of the brave Rikki Tikki Tavi the mongoose out of my head. A mongoose is a furry creature from India who kills cobras or other types of snakes and if its eyes get red, the mongoose is mad. Also the mongoose is a curious creature It is strange how similar the book is in the movie. Some of these similarities are the conflicts, the resolution and the rising action.
Rikki-tikki is proud of himself because he helps the animals and the humans by killing the snakes or dangerous animals. The humans first find him after the flood washes him out of his berrow. Teddy wants to give him a funeral but his mom seas that maybe he isn't dead. He helps a bird and he helps the humans. On Page 16 “Teddy shouted to the house: “Oh look here! Our mongoose is killing a snake.“ On Page 18 and 19 Rikki-tikki killed Nag, “The big man picked up Rikki-tikki and he had said it's the mongoose again, Alice: the little chap has saved our lives now.” Teddy's father, the big man beats the snakes after Rikki bites the snakes to make sure the snakes are dead. Rikki kills the eggs in the melon bead so that there aren't little Cobras around
The sight of the snake is so heartbreaking that even the man is left to rethink
This adds to the reader’s sympathy because he didn’t provoke the man’s attack and did nothing to deserve what happened to him. He was punished despite being completely innocent. Though the snake does not pose a direct threat, he is an extremely powerful creature and a great asset to the beauty of nature. He “felt no necessity of getting out of anybody’s path,” showing his confidence in himself. Though he is confident, he is not arrogant. He does not cower at the sight of the man, nor does he try to threaten him. He simply stands his ground confidently, waiting for the man to dictate his next move. This trait of the snake causes the reader to respect him and appreciate his position of power, reinforcing their sympathetic feelings. The snake’s death was slow and painful, and the author described all of the gruesome details in order to further affect the reader. The man himself admits that “it was a nasty sight”. First, he hacked about in the paper bag bush until he “dragged
Rikki-Tikki-Tavi is most definitely a hero for protecting Darzee, the tailorbird, from Nag and Nagina. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi who is exploring the garden for the first time, meets Darzee. Darzee tells Rikki-Tikki-Tavi that a baby fell out of her nest the other day and Nag ate it. Nag confronts Rikki-Tikki-Tavi for the first time, and Rikki-Tikki-Tavi has no clue what to do, never fighting a snake before. Nag and Nagina try to get to Darzee, but Rikki-Tikki-Tavi makes sure they don’t by his quick and subtle movements. Rikki-Tikki-Tavi ends up killing Nag and Nagina goes away. In that scenario Rikki-Tikki-Tavi risks his life, because he did not know how to fight a snake, and ended up saving Darzee.
The comparison of the rattlesnake to a bigger, more frightening, and yet less deadly creature makes the former seem dangerous. While a blacksnake would “flee at the sight of a man”, the rattler proved its fearlessness with the way he “held his ground”. The rattler is cocky, and for good reason, because his poison could kill the man much easier than the theoretical blacksnake could. The man is in a life-threatening situation and the reader is likely to sympathize with his fear and worry. The author uses violent diction when describing the snake to make us see him as a vicious creature, in need of killing to keep others safe. Even dead, the rattler “may still bite”. He needs to be kept as far as possible from people - especially vulnerable people, such as young children - in order to protect them. The author includes this hostile wording to bring awareness to the fact that the snake is remorseless, even in death, and that taking its life is noble and just. Finally, the snake’s “little song of death” is personified negatively by the man to show that the snake is the villain in the story. Life is, according to the rattlesnake, “dear and would be dearly sold”. It comes to light in this phrase that the snake is looking for revenge from the man’s actions. The rattler is not as innocent as he may have initially seemed. As he attempts at the man’s life to bring
Beattie expresses the how the man felt about the snake and the community that he wanted to protect. In paragraph 4, “I have never killed an animal I was not obliged to kill… But I reflected that there were children, dogs, horses at the ranch, as well as men and women lightly shod; my duty…kill the snake…” Beattie is expressing the mans feelings about killing and how the mans character prevented him from killing. In addition to the mans character, Beattie adds in the factor to obtain sympathy for the man’s actions by listing all the characters that the man is protecting through his “courageous” actions. In the 7th paragraph, “I did not cut the rattles off for trophy; I let him drop into the close green companionship of the paper-bag bush…” Beattie expresses the self guilt that the man had about killing the snake to tell readers about the man’s original
The effect the reader perceives in the passage of Rattler is attained from the usage of the author¡¯s imagery. The author describes the pre-action of the battle between the man and the snake as a ¡°furious signal, quite sportingly warning [the man] that [he] had made an unprovoked attack, attempted to take [the snake¡¯s] life... ¡± The warning signal is portrayed in order to reveal the significance of both the man¡¯s and the snake¡¯s value of life. The author sets an image of how one of their lives must end in order to keep the world in peace. In addition, the author describes how ¡°there was blood in [snake¡¯s] mouth and poison dripping from his fangs; it was all a nasty sight, pitiful now that it was done.¡± This bloody image of snake¡¯s impending death shows the significance of the man¡¯s acceptance toward the snake. In a sense, the reader can interpret the man¡¯s sympathy toward the snake because of the possibility that he should have let him go instead of killing him.
In the Red Badge of Courage, the protagonist Henry, is a young boy who yearns to be a Great War hero, even though he has never experienced war himself. Anxious for battle, Henry wonders if he truly is courageous, and stories of soldiers running make him uncomfortable. He struggles with his fantasies of courage and glory, and the truth that he is about to experience. He ends up running away in his second battle. Henry is somewhat nave, he dreams of glory, but doesn't think much of the duty that follows.
Without love there is no loyalty, and without loyalty, there is no bravery. In the book and movie of the story Rikki- Tikki- Tavi, they were neck and neck. Snake against mongoose, though one must surely die, neither will back down just yet. The book, Written By Rudyard Kipling, and the movie, produced by Julie Ross, generally both carry the same plot and main idea: After being washed out of his home, and cared for by a loving family of three, he wants to repay them, and in the process does an unforgettable act of service. Though both the mediums were exciting, there were also numerous similarities and differences between the book, and the movie, such as the banana scene, the scene where the family first found him, and the resolution.
The snake was not aware of the man’s intentions was cautious but not yet preparing for an attack. The rattlesnake “lay ridged” through its mistrust of the man did not feel threatened so his “body was undulant” not preparing for an attack. Because of its natural instincts the snake was wary of the man’s presence but did not feel provoked enough to set up a defense. The usual instincts would have been to give a strong attack but choose not to do so. Still attentive to the man’s possible actions, the snake presents him with a warning for both their sake. Therefore as the man raised his weapon the snake set up its rattling and “shook his fair but furious signal” warning the man he “made an unprovoked attack”. The snake had not planned on attacking the man so instead of reacting swiftly the snake had given the man a warning. By doing so the snake shows its value of life because he left the man chance in avoiding an outcome with death for either side. Consequently having misjudged the man’s intent it is left with little time to protect itself from an unexpected attack. With the man suddenly attacking the snake with a hoe it “struck passionately” until it “was soon dead”. As a result of not being able to assemble an attack the snake is left with it’s only chance of winning by striking hard but with ineffective moves. Thus readers feel sympathy for the snake because it had not called for an attack that would have taken either
Gibson, Donald B. The Red Badge of Courage: Redefining the Hero. Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1988.
No one knows what happened that day when Rikki-Tikki-Tavi went down in that hole to fight Nagaina, well no one but me, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi. Just to be clear it’s not something I’m proud of at all. People think I’m a hero but honestly I’m not, but people believe what they want to believe whether it’s the truth or not. What really happened was this; As I plunged into Nagaina’s dark hole with my teeth clenched against her tale, my body scraping against the hard cold earth I came to a realization, I can't let her escape. I had thought I was an honorable mongoose, that I was honoring my new family, but I was doing quite the opposite I had done a ghastly thing. As I was saying, while being dragged in that hole I thought of a plan. I let go of Nagaina’s tail and rested on the cool earth by the entrance of the hole regaining my strength. I had thought she would’ve been slithering in circles trying to find and kill me. I later found that she wasn’t looking for me. She was in a corner crying.
... Nature, including human beings, is `red in tooth and claw'; we are all `killers' in one way or another. Also, the fear which inhabits both human and snake (allowing us, generally, to avoid each other), and which acts as the catalyst for this poem, also precipitates retaliation. Instinct, it seems, won't be gainsaid by morality; as in war, our confrontation with Nature has its origins in some irrational `logic' of the soul. The intangibility of fear, as expressed in the imagery of the poem, is seen by the poet to spring from the same source as the snake, namely the earth - or, rather, what the earth symbolizes, our primitive past embedded in our subconsciouness. By revealing the kinship of feelings that permeates all Nature, Judith Wright universalises the experience of this poem.