Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Writing style analysis essay
Writing style analysis essay
Writing style analysis essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Writing style analysis essay
Rikki tikki is an amazing mongoose who saves many animals and his human family in a story, Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, written by Rudyard Kipling, an amazing writer. The story takes place someplace in India. More specific, in a bungalow and garden some place in India. A bungalow is a type of house in India and a garden is a yard. A few of the main characters are Rikki-Tikki and the cobra snakes. The cobra snakes are Nag and Nagina, a cobra is a type of snake in India. With all the amazing plot twists in this story, it’ll be exciting to see what comes next. In the story Rikki saves his family by killing the two cobras and their brood. Rikki should definitely be proud of himself, for saving all those people and garden animals. He also didn’t try to kill …show more content…
everyone, he saved people he cared about, and made a few garden creatures happy and safe. Rikki Tikki should be proud of himself, due to the fact that the cobras were set up as the villains.
The cobras were the villains due to them trying to kill the family in the bungalow, garden animals, and Rikki Tikki. The snakes were actually trying to kill more animals than Rikki. “” When the house is empty of people,” said Nagaina to her husband,“ he will have to go away, and the garden will be our own again. Go in quietly, and remember that the big man who killed karait is the first one to bite. Then come out and tell me, and we will hunt for Rikki-tikki together.”” (Kipling page 21) The snakes are trying to be the “Rulers” of the garden. Rikki Tikki did put an end to this, and made life in the garden and bungalow much more carefree. This in itself is a reason to be …show more content…
proud. Rikki, the mongoose, cared very much for the people around him.
He would die to protect them. That makes him certainly very brave and giving for risking his life. This is a very good reason why he should be proud of himself. “ Teddy shouted to the house: “ Oh look, here! Our mongoose is killing a snake.” (Kipling page 20) The snake that is stated in the quote was a poisonous snake that was going to bite Teddy. In doing so the snake would have killed Teddy. Teddy’s mother was very happy that Rikki risked his life to save Teddy’s. Rikki does this act of giving throughout the story, even if it was for a baby fledgling.
Rikki also made the garden safe and more carefree. After he got rid of the snakes the garden was a much more peaceful place with not having to worry about the snakes. The humans/ family did not have to worry about being bitten and neither did the animals in the garden. Also the animals did not have to worry about their children being eaten by the snakes. Such as in the quote, “ Naginia used to eat frogs as well as little birds” ( Kipling page 28) So the animals were very happy about the cobras being
dead. Yes, Rikki is a murderer, but he was protecting the loved ones in his life. Unlike murderers do, who kill just because. This still does not cover the way he killed the snakes. Rikki would break their necks, not the best way to out. “Rikki bit him close to the back of the head.” (Kipling page 20) This quote was found in a scene where Rikki is fighting a snake and is looking for a good place to hold. After examining the quote it does say that it bites the neck to kill the snake. That would be a quick, painful death, but it still is an act of murder done by Rikki. This also is just the circle of life, and that snakes eat other animals and other animals eat snakes. In conclusion Rikki is the hero of the story and the snakes are the villains. Rikki also risks his own life to save many other lives. Plus this is the circle of life, some animals get eaten by other animals. Rikki was also trying to protect the people that he loved from someone that was greedy, while Rikki was doing it to protect the ones he loved that would be killed for no good reason. The mongoose, Rikki, should be proud of himself. Especially because he is a juvenile mongoose and is not full grown making it harder to kill snakes. Rikki is a sweet hearted creature that wants to live happily at the bungalow with all his garden friends.
Because the artist constantly created a relationship between text and image, each incorporation has a slightly different relationship. The first is that the sheathe without the text inscribed would just be seen as a sharp, brutal, farming object, but with the text it creates a new meaning. In this case, the text can be deemed as prioritized because the there is a reliability the sheathe has with the words. The second is the incorporation of words in within the corrupted snake garden. In this case it tells viewers that not only are there people and institutions in the government whose actions can be deemed slithery and comparable to a snake, but also combined with the inscribed words such as falsehood, malice, venom, and hatred. If it wasn’t already explicit enough, the artist is trying to convey not only is the government is infiltrated with snakes, but they also represent extremely negative behaviors. In case, I think the text is reliant on the image because without the words viewers could get still get the point it’s trying to
Rikki-tikki is proud of himself because he helps the animals and the humans by killing the snakes or dangerous animals. The humans first find him after the flood washes him out of his berrow. Teddy wants to give him a funeral but his mom seas that maybe he isn't dead. He helps a bird and he helps the humans. On Page 16 “Teddy shouted to the house: “Oh look here! Our mongoose is killing a snake.“ On Page 18 and 19 Rikki-tikki killed Nag, “The big man picked up Rikki-tikki and he had said it's the mongoose again, Alice: the little chap has saved our lives now.” Teddy's father, the big man beats the snakes after Rikki bites the snakes to make sure the snakes are dead. Rikki kills the eggs in the melon bead so that there aren't little Cobras around
The sight of the snake is so heartbreaking that even the man is left to rethink
The emotive language Lawson utilises conveys the protectiveness and fear the Drover’s wife experiences when faced with the knowledge that the snake is in the house with them. The love for the family can be seen in the text ‘The Drover’s Wife’ by Henry Lawson as the main character faces many challenges trying to keep her children
This adds to the reader’s sympathy because he didn’t provoke the man’s attack and did nothing to deserve what happened to him. He was punished despite being completely innocent. Though the snake does not pose a direct threat, he is an extremely powerful creature and a great asset to the beauty of nature. He “felt no necessity of getting out of anybody’s path,” showing his confidence in himself. Though he is confident, he is not arrogant. He does not cower at the sight of the man, nor does he try to threaten him. He simply stands his ground confidently, waiting for the man to dictate his next move. This trait of the snake causes the reader to respect him and appreciate his position of power, reinforcing their sympathetic feelings. The snake’s death was slow and painful, and the author described all of the gruesome details in order to further affect the reader. The man himself admits that “it was a nasty sight”. First, he hacked about in the paper bag bush until he “dragged
The comparison of the rattlesnake to a bigger, more frightening, and yet less deadly creature makes the former seem dangerous. While a blacksnake would “flee at the sight of a man”, the rattler proved its fearlessness with the way he “held his ground”. The rattler is cocky, and for good reason, because his poison could kill the man much easier than the theoretical blacksnake could. The man is in a life-threatening situation and the reader is likely to sympathize with his fear and worry. The author uses violent diction when describing the snake to make us see him as a vicious creature, in need of killing to keep others safe. Even dead, the rattler “may still bite”. He needs to be kept as far as possible from people - especially vulnerable people, such as young children - in order to protect them. The author includes this hostile wording to bring awareness to the fact that the snake is remorseless, even in death, and that taking its life is noble and just. Finally, the snake’s “little song of death” is personified negatively by the man to show that the snake is the villain in the story. Life is, according to the rattlesnake, “dear and would be dearly sold”. It comes to light in this phrase that the snake is looking for revenge from the man’s actions. The rattler is not as innocent as he may have initially seemed. As he attempts at the man’s life to bring
Unfortunately in today's world we still hear about men who batter their women. These men, according to two psychology professors from the University of Washington, are divided into two different types: pit bulls and cobras. Pit bulls and cobras have both similar and different characteristics. The separation between those two types is important for the development of more effective treatment programs and the efforts of preventing domestic violence.
Ménez, Andre’. The Subtle Beast: Snakes, from Myth to Medicine. New York, New York: CRC Press, 2003.
Beattie expresses the how the man felt about the snake and the community that he wanted to protect. In paragraph 4, “I have never killed an animal I was not obliged to kill… But I reflected that there were children, dogs, horses at the ranch, as well as men and women lightly shod; my duty…kill the snake…” Beattie is expressing the mans feelings about killing and how the mans character prevented him from killing. In addition to the mans character, Beattie adds in the factor to obtain sympathy for the man’s actions by listing all the characters that the man is protecting through his “courageous” actions. In the 7th paragraph, “I did not cut the rattles off for trophy; I let him drop into the close green companionship of the paper-bag bush…” Beattie expresses the self guilt that the man had about killing the snake to tell readers about the man’s original
The effect the reader perceives in the passage of Rattler is attained from the usage of the author¡¯s imagery. The author describes the pre-action of the battle between the man and the snake as a ¡°furious signal, quite sportingly warning [the man] that [he] had made an unprovoked attack, attempted to take [the snake¡¯s] life... ¡± The warning signal is portrayed in order to reveal the significance of both the man¡¯s and the snake¡¯s value of life. The author sets an image of how one of their lives must end in order to keep the world in peace. In addition, the author describes how ¡°there was blood in [snake¡¯s] mouth and poison dripping from his fangs; it was all a nasty sight, pitiful now that it was done.¡± This bloody image of snake¡¯s impending death shows the significance of the man¡¯s acceptance toward the snake. In a sense, the reader can interpret the man¡¯s sympathy toward the snake because of the possibility that he should have let him go instead of killing him.
If a king cobra is close to you it can jump up to be eye level with the average human. It then spits venom into their eyes. This can lead to blindness if it's very serious. If this venom gets into the victim's blood stream, they will die.The king cobra can spit its venom 4 to 8 feet long . So if you ever come in contact with a king cobra, the best thing to do is keep your distance and protect your eyes.
The point I am trying to prove here is, Sykes would always want to scare Delia with a snake, the first time it was with the bull whip and the last night Sykes put the snake in the soap box to scared Delia to death. Little did Sykes know Delia had faced her fears and learned how to overcome of the snakes. Towards the end of the story when Sykes was supposed to be the master of catching Snakes, the rattle snake makes a transparent sound and bites Sykes. He wanted to scare Delia lifeless but his plan back fired on him.
The cobra, ready to strike, takes its final aim at the mongoose until it strikes. The mongoose eats the snake up as it does with most other cobras. Rikki-tikki-tavi is a story of a mongoose, whose name is Rikki-tikki-tavi, who kills a total of three snakes in order to save his family’s life. Rikki started out flowing downstream in an river in India. A human family found him and basically adopted him. Two snakes try to kill Rikki and his new family, but Rikki kills them before they can do that. Both the printed and video versions of Rikki-tikki-tavi were enjoyable to read and listen to, but there were some similarities and differences between the two.
The main character in the story, Rikki-Tikki, is brave and a confidence animal. The story explains how” Rikki-Tikki fights Nag and Karait two cobra snakes that are deadly to protect the little boy “(page 11 & 14). This
... Nature, including human beings, is `red in tooth and claw'; we are all `killers' in one way or another. Also, the fear which inhabits both human and snake (allowing us, generally, to avoid each other), and which acts as the catalyst for this poem, also precipitates retaliation. Instinct, it seems, won't be gainsaid by morality; as in war, our confrontation with Nature has its origins in some irrational `logic' of the soul. The intangibility of fear, as expressed in the imagery of the poem, is seen by the poet to spring from the same source as the snake, namely the earth - or, rather, what the earth symbolizes, our primitive past embedded in our subconsciouness. By revealing the kinship of feelings that permeates all Nature, Judith Wright universalises the experience of this poem.