Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemmas and religion
Divine command theory of ethics
Divine command theory and cultural relativism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemmas and religion
My Meta-ethical Position When asked the question "Are there any ethical truths?" I respond with a resounding "Yes" and when asked "What makes the ethical truths true?" I respond "Facts independent of anyone's say-so". That makes me an ethical realist. I reject all forms of conventionalism and also subjectivism. There are three different forms of conventionalism, the first is Divine Command Theory which says thing are right or wrong based solely on God's say-so. While I do believe in God I reject that ethical view because who is to say what God says are believes is right or wrong? How are humans to know which God's belief's to follow and how to interpet them? The only thing that the Divine Command Theory is saying is that things are wrong according to God's say-so not why they are right or wrong, therefore there is no really reason. The second view is ethical relativism, that is the view that right or wrong is determined based on society's beliefs. With that view people's behavior is based on society and therefore everyone should always conform to society's norms. I believe that society be and is often wrong which causes me to reject ethical relativism. How can a Chinese society that represses free speech be wrong and those that stand up and fight for their right to speak freely be wrong? They are not they have the right to say that the society they live in is morally wrong. The third version is existentialism, which is the idea that right and wrong is solely up to the individual. The idea that because Mr. X believes rape is right so therefore it is morally right for him when he rapes Ms. Y is wrong. What about Ms. Y's views she believes rape is wrong, so how can the same action be right for him but wrong for her? It can not rape is wrong no matter what your opinion is because facts about right and wrong are indenpent of any say-so. Subjectivism is the idea that there no ethical facts that ethical statements are not saying what "is" the case only what "ought" to be the case.
Conventionalism is the only view of ethical relativism that grounds morality in the group or culture. Pojman states that conventionalists focus on the morality of their own culture, and do not need to concentrate on the culture of others. For example, a young individual in the United States who was raised in a certain religion, and chooses to have premarital sex. In the eyes of their religion they are wrong for their decision, but in the open-minded attitude of the U.
n this reflective journal entry, we are going to look at that the ethical issues that were presented in the Ethics Game simulations, the decision-making steps that were completed to address ethically the issues, and the ethical lenses that I used to make decisions throughout the simulation. We are also going to take a look at how these different ethical lenses influenced my decision and the how I could use the concepts that I have learned in my workplace.
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
When I was working as a Customer Service Representative in the Bank, one of my responsibilities was to supervise the tellers. I was friends with two of the tellers working there at the time. We used to go out together outside of work and had great time. At some point I started noticing that they are being too friendly with each other and acting inappropriate for a professional environment. I decided to confront them and they confessed to me that they were dating. That is when I realized that I was faced with an ethical dilemma.
Review of “Situationism and Virtue Ethics on the Content of Our Character” by Rachana Kamtekatar
“Subjective relativism says that action X is right for Ann if she approves of it yet wrong for Greg if he disapproves of it. (Vaughn, 2013, p. 23) This moral perspective is foolproof, based on the premise that individuals can each have their own views and beliefs yet both perspectives are without judgement. Therefore, if I state that cases of abortion that are a product of rape are morally acceptable then one cannot argue with me. This theory is solely based on personal perspectives of the subject, there is no debating legal rights of the mother or the fetus in question. This theory is can be best summed up by simply stating “That is your
Vaughn first defines ethical relativism by stating that moral standards are not objective, but are relative to what individuals or cultures believe (Vaughn 13). Rachels says that cultural relativism states “that there is no such thing as universal truth in ethics; there are only various cultural codes,
Subjectivism is defined as personal opinions, perceptions, and points of view. It is used by Nietzsche. It shows that there are no facts and there are no true and false. An example of subjectivism is the different arguments and opinions about the idea of abortion. Some people might see it as a murder because it implies killing a human being, while others would argue killing a fetus is a moral if it causes risks on mothers.
Some of the deficiencies in the way cultural relativism addresses moral problems, according to Holmes; are that they remain impractical, they are subject to change depending on where you live, and that people tolerate the different cultures. As a professional business person, I agree with Holmes analysis. Allowing others perceptions or beliefs to get away with our own personal beliefs would be contradicting ourselves. It is important to stand up for our beliefs, and help educate others on ethical issues. Over time we can make a difference in the world by modeling moral beliefs and ethics.
Cultural relativism states that there are correct answers to ethical issues. However, unlike objectivism, cultural relativism also states that these answers may vary from culture to culture. Subjectivism states that there are correct answers to ethical issues but that these answers depend on the individuals. Ethical Nihilism states that there are no correct answers to ethical issues. Nihilism states that since we do not know where we would find these ethical answers then there must not be any. Nihilists state that when we are discussing an ethical issue we are just projecting our emotions and there is no truth value to the claim. Overall, non-objectivists are stating that there may be correct answers to ethical issues; however, if there are, they do not apply to everyone or at every
When reading William Craigs article on Meta-ethical foundations, he discussed a lot about his three basic ideas of what is needed to live a morally acceptable life. He highlights the three foundations of a persons moral source, obligation and accountability. For this paper i decided to take on the task of defining moral accountability and relating it to a real world business perspective. To begin, accountability according to the merriam webster dictionary is, “an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one's actions.” Craig applies this definition to his metha-ethical paper by asking us when we are held moral accountable for our actions, if at all. From a theistic point of view it is very clear that we are morally
I believe that what I know and do is right and are surprised when others don’t agree with my beliefs. By failing to notice that I cannot always be right, I may adopt a “my way or the highway” approach to ethical decision making. When working with others, I will have a tendency to demand that others make the same choices as I would and will judge them based on their ability to live up to the standards I have created for myself.
As a function, ethics is a philosophical study of the moral value of human conduct, and of the rules and principles it should govern. As a system, ethics are a social, religious, or civil code of behavior considered correct by a particular group, profession, or individual. As an instrument, ethics provide perspective regarding the moral fitness of a decision, course of action, or potential outcomes. Ethical decision-making can include many types, including deontological (duty), consequentialism (including utilitarianism), and virtue ethics. Additionally, subsets of relativism, objectivism, and pluralism seek to understand the impact of moral diversity on a human level. Although distinct differences separate these ethical systems, organizations
Second, Subjectivism, which states that every person had their own moral code for what they believe is right and wrong. Included with this is that fact that there is no one truly objective code. Each code is equally valid (handout). Herodotus, who was a Greek historian in the 5th century B.C., believed that no society’s customs were better or worst then any other.
For many, personal morality is something left unexamined except in difficult situations which runs contrary to Socrates great admonition. The prophet Isaiah wrote, “Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD.” This examination is healthy but a worthy discipline for every human being. My moral philosophy is derived from a creator God revealed through the person of Jesus Christ as revealed in the Bible.