Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
General Overview
“Abortion or induced abortion, by definition is the deliberate termination of a pregnancy via surgical or medical means” (Vaughn, 2013, p. 163). For many years debating the legality and morality of abortion has caused uproars both publically and privately among politicians, religious leaders and the general public. This paper is intended to bring insight to the subject from two ethical theories, Subjective Relativism and Virtue Ethics. After reviewing the subsequent material you will realize abortion in cases of rape is absolutely morally acceptable.
Let’s begin to understand the different subcategories of abortion. Induced abortion from now on referred to just as abortion, is purposely terminating a life will be the type of
…show more content…
abortion we will review in this paper. Spontaneous abortion is the unintentional and most often referred to as a miscarriage. Finally, therapeutic abortion is performed to sustain the life of the mother. Brining a new life into this world can be one of the most beautiful experiences in the world. This may not necessarily be true for all women, to some it may become a horrific reminder of an unspeakable act that cut their soles and scarred them for life. If this new life is a product of rape, the mother may relive that night over and over causing anguish and despair for the rest of her life. Many arguments concerning abortion often stem from questioning the overall morality of termination the pregnancy. Here are a few questions- When is the fetus considered a person with respect to having a right to live? What are a woman’s rights in regards to her body? Subjective Relativism Subjective relativism based on the opinion that an act is morally acceptable if one approves of the act.
“Subjective relativism says that action X is right for Ann if she approves of it yet wrong for Greg if he disapproves of it. (Vaughn, 2013, p. 23) This moral perspective is foolproof, based on the premise that individuals can each have their own views and beliefs yet both perspectives are without judgement. Therefore, if I state that cases of abortion that are a product of rape are morally acceptable then one cannot argue with me. This theory is solely based on personal perspectives of the subject, there is no debating legal rights of the mother or the fetus in question. This theory is can be best summed up by simply stating “That is your …show more content…
opinion”. On the flip side of subjective relativism, if one states they believe abortion in cases of rape in unacceptable then they are entitled to that idea. A subjective relativist can have the opposing opinion from all others and their ideals are just as “right” as anyone else’s. There is no need to reason out the subject because you do not have anything to argue. “If to Ann strawberry ice cream taste good, then it taste good (to her). If to Greg strawberry ice cream taste bad, then it is bad (to him). Likewise, the morality of an action depends on Ann and Greg’s moral tastes. (Vaughn, 2013, p.23). In conclusion one can have the opinion that for them cases of abortion as a product of rape are not morally acceptable due to the fact that subjective relativism is based on “individual opinions”. Virtue Ethics The theory of Virtue Ethics is a moral theory based upon principles of how people become virtuous. Virtue ethics has ancient roots dating back to Aristotle, who believed that moral virtue ethics could be learned through practice over time. A virtue by definition according to our text is “a stable disposition to act and feel according to some ideal or model of excellence. It is a deeply embedded character trait that can affect countless situations.” (Vaughn, 2013 p. 137) Virtue ethics is not always based on whether an act is completely morally right or wrong, but if the motives for the action were completed out of love, loyalty, sympathy or courage not out of duty. The virtue that I would like to examine concerning the moral acceptance of abortion in cases of rape is courage. Courage, is defined as “the quality of mind or spirit that enables a person to face difficulty, danger, pain, etc., without fear; bravery.” (Courage) A woman who faces abortion as a consequence of rape shows courageous behavior in a way no other person would comprehend. She faces many fears, pain and danger for going through the actual procedure of abortion. As well as, being brave for having to face the outside world which often holds judgement based on controversial topic of abortion. She is courageous in the fact that not everyone would be able to abort a child growing inside them, yet the painful memories that would accompany the birth of this child may be too much for one to bear mentally. “Aristotle’s notion of a moral virtue is what he calls the “Golden Mean,” a balance between two behavior extremes. A moral virtue (courage for example) is the midpoint between excess (an excess of courage, or foolhardiness) and a deficit (a deficit of courage, cowardice)” (Vaughn, 2013, p. 137) in other words moderation in everything. This women who chooses to have an abortion may be a good kindhearted woman who just cannot bear to raise a child born from such a heinous act that happened to her, she is courageous for no matter her decision she will have to live with the decision for the rest of her life. Now for the other side of a virtue ethicist; many may feel that abortion in case of rape does not show courage but cowardice, for if a person was to be courageous they would birth and care for this child and overcome the tragic act of rape. Turning the situation into a situation of love and compassion for this child. A virtue ethicist might feel that the real courage was to put the horrible memories of the rape behind them and not worry about what the rest of the world thinks or says of the whole situation, because it is wrong to end a life. The courage for a woman would be not to let the act of rape victimize her but to use it as means to take a bad situation and find the good in it, by not having an abortion and raising this gift of a child that has been given to her, because any life is a gift. Summary Abortion is a hot button topic often avoided to prevent arguments. While one side of subjective relativism states that, if one believes abortion is morally acceptable then it is and on the other side, if one says abortion is not morally acceptable then it is not. Subjective relativism is pretty cut and dry but not always practical. How can it be both acceptable to one and not to another? Too often some ideals are just unacceptable and they need to be reasoned objectively leaving room for error in subjective relativism. Then there is the theories of virtue ethics in which we strive for Eudaimonia, or the greatest good which is happiness. “Aristotle argues that the true goal of humans- their greatest good is Eudaimonia, which means “happiness” or “flourishing” and refers to the full realization of the good life.” (Vaughn, 2013, 136) When evaluating courage as a virtue in relation to abortions and rape one can be seen as achieving eudemonia, if one could terminate the pregnancy and try to just put the whole experience behind them. But on the flip side it would be courageous to face the pregnancy and deal with all the feelings from the rape in an attempt to achieve eudemonia. Going through with the abortion would end a life which would not achieve happiness and not show courage. Clearly this is not a transparent topic and it will be debated over and over in many social circles. Personal Perspective Abortion is a personal topic for me, at one point in my life I had to make the decision whether or not to have an abortion.
I chose not to and had twins at the age of 18, however my case had nothing to do with rape. As a woman I find myself continually come back to the notion that it is my body, my choice and not a matter of anyone else’s concern. I did find myself at times swaying back and forth because I do think that life is precious, and that anytime God gives the opportunity to raise a child it is truly a gift. I however cannot fathom the idea of having a child as a product of rape, every time you see that child you would be reminded of that terrible experience. Abortion is a difficult decision it changes your life completely one way or the other. Personally for me the only reason I would even think about abortion would be in a case of
rape.
Patrick Lee and Robert P. George’s, “The Wrong of Abortion” is a contentious composition that argues the choice of abortion is objectively unethical. Throughout their composition, Lee and George use credibility and reason to appeal the immorality of abortions. The use of these two methods of persuasion are effective and compels the reader to consider the ethical significance. Lee and George construct their argument by disputing different theories that would justify abortions. They challenge the ontological and evaluation theories of the fetus, as well as the unintentional killing theory. This article was obtained through Google, in the form of a PDF file that is associated with Iowa State University.
"Who's to judge who's right or wrong?" In the case against moral relativism Pojman provides an analysis of Relativism. His analysis includes an interpretation of Relativism that states the following ideas: Actions vary from society to society, individuals behavior depends on the society they belong to, and there are no standards of living that apply to all human kind. An example that demonstrates these ideas is people around the world eat beef (cows) and in India, cows are not to be eaten. From Pojman second analysis an example can be how the Japanese take of their shoes all the time before entering the house. In Mexico it is rare that people take off their shoes. They might find it wired or not normal. In his third analysis he gives that sense moral relativism and cultural relativism are tied together, that their can be no
Abortion has been an issue of heated debate in the United States for numerous years. Legislation has ruled it legal to perform an abortion on any gestational age of an embryo or fetus. Some people agree with the law and consider themselves pro-choice. Others are completely against abortion and are pro-life. In addition to these two groups is another group who support abortion in the first half of pregnancy, but believe abortion should be banned for the second half.
As one knows, some unwanted pregnancies could often be harmful and distressing for a woman. Women should have the right over their body to choose to sustain the fetus or not. In the past decades, women did not have their freedom of abortion in many countries of the world. There have always been controversies going on about abortion. Each individual has dissimilar views on the legality of abortion. Some people are against abortion for personal religious purposes and beliefs. For those who don’t believe in abortion, it is because they see it as killing a fetus, which is a human being. Others support abortion because they believe in women’s rights. Laws of abortion vary in each country, and abortion is not legal all over the world. It is illegal under any conditions but only permitted to save woman’s life if in countries such as Brazil, Nigeria, United Arab Emirates, and Ireland. However, abortion is legal without any restrictions in countries like Canada, Albania, and Italy. It the past decades Abortion was considered as criminal act in Canada. “If an abortion was carried out without such approval, the woman was liable for imprisonment for 2 years, an...
Moral relativism has two conceptualized frameworks that describe statements. These are Cognitivism and Non-Cognitivism. Cognitivism in a nutshell is merely the opposite of non-cognitivism. Relatively, it is the certainty that moral statements do express beliefs and that they are apt for truth and falsity. Moral judgments generally dwell in this arena due to the element that people incline to make moral judgments a large part in their decision-making and anything which is non-existent in moral values tends to be discarded. The spectrum that Cognitivism belongs to is so broad that it encompasses the milieus of moral realism, moral subjectivism and error theory. Hillary Putnam in his book, Ethics without ontology states that ethical (including mathematical) sentences can be factual and unprejudiced
Relativism is the belief that there is no absolute truth, that the only truth is what an individual or culture happen to believe. People who believe in relativism often think different people can have different views about what's moral and immoral. Cultural relativism, like moral relativism, filter through today's society. People often believe that as long no one gets hurt, everything will be okay. Realistically, the truth about relativism has been discarded along with God.
Many arguments in the abortion debate assume that the morality of abortion depends upon the moral status of the foetus. While I regard the moral status of the foetus as important, it is not the central issue that determines the moral justifiability of abortion. The foetus may be awarded a level of moral status, nevertheless, such status does not result in the prescription of a set moral judgement. As with many morally significant issues, there are competing interests and a variety of possible outcomes that need to be considered when making a moral judgement on abortion. While we need to determine the moral status of the foetus in order to establish the type of entity we are dealing with, it does not, however, exist in a moral vacuum. There are other key issues requiring attention, such as the moral status and interests of the pregnant woman who may desire an abortion, and importantly, the likely consequences of aborting or not aborting a particular foetus. Furthermore, I assert that moral status should be awarded as a matter of degree, based upon the capacities of sentience and self-consciousness an entity possesses. In a bid to reach a coherent conclusion on the issue, the moral status of both foetus and woman, along with the likely results of aborting a particular foetus, must be considered together. Given the multiple facets requiring consideration, I assert that utilitarianism (Mill 1863) offers a coherent framework for weighing and comparing the inputs across a variety of situations, which can determine whether it is ever morally justifiable to have an abortion.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
Abortion is the act to remove the embryo or the fetus from the mother's womb in order to end pregnancy. It is practiced by two techniques, medical abortion and surgical abortion. Medical abortion is the process of taking pills, and surgical abortion implies a surgery to remove the foetus (1). In the past, the availability of abortion would have never been guessed. Now, in Canada, abortion has been legalized since January 28th in 1988. The Supreme Court of Canada passed a law which states that abortion is possible during the nine months of pregnancy. Provinces decides on the regulations on how and when the abortion is be performed (2). However, abortion has always created controversy, because some think that it is cruel to kill an unborn life, while others think that it is a fundamental human right. Seeing both side of the issue, should abortion be allowed in today's society? In an kantian point of view, abortion has to be prohibited since the act to abort cannot be applied as an universal law. On the other hand, abortion would be permitted in an utilitarian viewpoint, because it maximizes the best outcome and increases happiness of everyone. I, personally, think that abortion is unethical due to the interpretation of the fetus as an object.
For many years, the morality of abortion has been questioned by two perspectives: pro-choice and pro-life. While modern culture explains that abortion is a woman’s free choice if she does not want the unborn baby, the Catholic Church teaches the world that from the moment of conception there is a child with a soul within the womb, and to abort it would be to murder an innocent being.
Imagine…the birth of a human being into the world. 9 months of endless anticipation leading to someone’s first chance at seeing the world for the first time. While some enjoy the result of a pregnancy, leading to a new human being entering life, some are not so fond, or just can’t be in such a situation. Abortion is the supposed “cure” to this problem and is, for the most part, done safely. However, one of the factors stopping someone from committing an abortion is the consideration of moral status on the child.
Abortion is a common practice that may be performed for several reasons, all sharing the same end result, the termination of an unwanted pregnancy. In cases such as rape, incest or a simple lack of responsibility when having sex, having an abortion is a choice that some women may encounter. There are different types of abortion in today’s society. Some which are too scary to even dream of. There are two types of abortions: Spontaneous abortions; miscarriages and Induced, this is the deliberate termination of the fetus.
For Cultural Relativism, it is perfectly normal that something one culture sees as moral, another may see as immoral. There is no connection between them so they are never in conflict relative to their moral beliefs. However, within the context of Ethical Relativism there’s a significant difference. Normally, two cultures will possess varying proportions of the same normal and abnormal habits yet from a cross-cultural standpoint, what is abnormal in one culture can be seen as properly normal in an...
Abortion is the operation to end a pregnancy by removing a fetus or an embryo from the womb. This topic has been one of the most prominent controversies in the United States. A human’s life is special in all stages and should not be taken away for any reason. The robbing of someone’s life at any point is morally wrong and is a crime according to religion and the law regarding murder. If one cannot assume the responsibilities of taking care of a human until they are able to survive on their own, then intercourse is not recommended.
Abortion “is an issue that raises questions about life and death, about what a person is and when one becomes a person, about the meaning of life, about the rights of women, and about the duties of men”(Velasquez 485). Abortion is an unresolved ethical issue that has been in doubt for many years because one can argue that you are killing an innocent person/fetus but many argue that is not person because they don’t have a conscious or the characteristics that defines a “person”. John Stuart Mill in a way justifies abortion, Mill is known to be openly speak about women’s rights and about human rights. Although, it might be immortal to end someone’s life one might argued that the individual has the right to choose and have the option. But in