Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Movie analysis assignment
Movie analysis assignment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Movie analysis assignment
In the history of movies, there are great movies that come out. Then, filmmakers try to recreate the brilliance of that movie with a sequel, sometimes many sequels. All to make more money with something that is familiar to everyone. It very rarely works as well a second or third time around. Because the films usually completely dumb down the first movie 's premise and drop the important parts, in favor of something a lot simpler. In some cases, there are some exceptions; sometimes the sequel is better than the original. This is my list of the top ten great movies with bad sequels. I hope you enjoy reading this list. 10. "Grease 2"
Both the first and second movies have great songs and dances, but the second movie has a hard time getting around
…show more content…
The sequels, however, just show how hard it is to do sequels, to anything. 8. "Jaws" The second of two appearances from Spielberg, the original is considered one of the best films ever made, with a Hitchcock like approach to the score (to have the score tell the audience that the shark is coming). It is the film that set the standard for later summer blockbusters. "Jaws: The Revenge" is considered one of the worst films of all time and the third one is only slightly better, with nothing all that great to talk about either film. 7. "Speed"
In "Speed", a smart cop (played by Keanu Reeves) who works with a bus driver (played by Sandra Bullock) to help keep a bus going at speed so it does not set the bomb that has been placed on board, off. The sequel, only Bullock returns, and the story involves a cruise liner. The reason the movie does not work is that it seems too familiar and has too much weak dialogue and not enough characterization to keep things moving. It also, unlike the original, does not have enough exciting action sequences. The sequel could have been good, but no Keanu made it tough; it might have faired better if they had junked a sequel idea and tried to do something
…show more content…
"Halloween"
Michael Myers, in later movies, became a supernatural being that could regenerate body parts and could survive anything. Making it so that you could never kill him, you could really only run away from him. The later movies drop their character development in favor for Michael simply running through and just killing everyone. 4. "A Nightmare on Elm Street"
I feel like with this franchise, they just dumbed the premises and Freddy down to keep people coming back. Most of the sequels use a lot of horror cliches, Freddy says a lot of one liners, and mows down stupid teenagers that are mainly cardboard cutouts. That being said, there are some good sequels; these are all of the movies that Wes Craven had a hand in making (Dream Warriors and New Nightmare). 3. "Caddyshack"
The original film has a lot of things going for it. It has a lot of comedic heavyweights in it, like Ted Knight, Bill Murray, Rodney Dangerfield, Brian Doyle-Murray, and Chevy Chase. The film is a winner with all of its quotable dialogue, great characters, and slapstick humor. In the sequel, only Chevy Chase returned after a lot of pushing on the studio 's part. It was a needless sequel that should not have been made. 2. "The
Jaws is a 1975 thriller that was directed by Steven Spielberg and is also based on a 1974 nook with the same name. The film is about a great white shark attacking Amity Island which is obviously not real but a fictional resort.
I think that the opening of the film was not as good as the opening of
The original was renowned for its superior script writing, so it would be assumed that it would be obvious to take notes from the movie, yet it seems that the reboot had failed to do so to formulate a new identity. In its attempt to validate the new script, it failed to distribute the same emotions and vibe of a character trying to discover who he was. This had been quickly noticed by fans or the originals and its sequels and drew much ire for seeming to have an oppositely polarized wording when compared to the
Even though both films are highly reviewed, they both follow the same plot, but then have some major and minor differences. Herbert Ross and Craig Brewer directed an outstanding dancing film, that most American’s like looking at the reviews of the
The pristine 1933 King Kong was constructed as a movie: to convey a story to entertain an audience. Peter Jackson’s 2005 remake took the substructure for King Kong and expanded upon it in virtually every way in order to “make again” the astoundment of the original for a modern-day audience. Audiences received the first King Kong very well. The stop-motion sequences of Kong were astounding for their time and the movie grossed over $90,000 in its beginning weekend. In order to bank upon its prosperity again, sequels were made and thus in 1976 a remake was made to amend upon the original. Paramount updated the movie to color, altered the story, and cast Jeff Bridges, a widely popular actor of the time, as the lead actor. Although the movie received stirred reviews, it did exceptionally well in the box office and tripled Paramount’s initial budget for the motion picture. Even though the movie wasn’t “as good” as the original, audiences still paid money to view it because of that hope that they would feel like they once did when they visually perceived the first King Kong. The remake add...
As a child, Burton lived as a solitary child.” He spent most of his childhood as a recluse, drawing cartoons, and watching old movies” (IMDB) As a child he recalls " I always related to characters like Frankenstein. I think a lot of kids do; it's easier to relate to the monster in the sense of he's alone. Growing up, you could feel those feelings and the way you felt about your neighbours is like they're the angry villagers. "I was never scared of monster movies. I could happily watch a monster movie but if I had one of my relatives come over, you'd be terrified."(Tim Burton: How a strange childhood gave him a taste for the bizarre
With the help of superb editing, sound, mise en scene, and cinematography, this film cannot be topped. The fist scene of the movie creates an atmosphere that helps the viewer know that he/she will enjoy this wonderful classic. Throughout the movie there are surprises and fun that makes this a movie that people will want to watch again and again. Gene Kelly said it best when he said, "Dignity, always dignity. " That is what this movie has from beginning to end, dignity.
Stephen King is one of the greatest authors in history, and will forever be timeless in our hearts and minds. It’s truly amazing how king is able to unearth our deepest fears and bring them to life. He is a major contribution to the literature world of horror, with over three hundred and fifty million copies sold but some critics feel that he is not worthy of being in the same category as The best horror authors. King has revolutionized horror by turning it into something readable for everyone; he makes our fears a reality that we must overcome. He understands all of the defining moments in our lives such as, expressions of loss, and the dreaded terror of the unknown. There should be no doubt that Stephen will remain the modern face of horror despite what ridiculers may state.
A Nightmare on Elm Street and all of the following six sequels fall into its own sub-genre of the teen slasher/stalker sub-genre as well, know as the Nightmare on Elm Street Series. This series of films adds a new dimension to the typical teen slasher/stalker film, depth of character and story.
was a spectacular film there were some things that I did not enjoy like, the
People are addicted to the synthetic feeling of being terrified. Modern day horror films are very different from the first horror films which date back to the late nineteenth century, but the goal of shocking the audience is still the same. Over the course of its existence, the horror industry has had to innovate new ways to keep its viewers on the edge of their seats. Horror films are frightening films created solely to ignite anxiety and panic within the viewers. Dread and alarm summon deep fears by captivating the audience with a shocking, terrifying, and unpredictable finale that leaves the viewer stunned.
Steven Spielberg’s Jaws (1975) is an effective adaption of Peter Benchley’s 1974 by making a few changes to the story, it enhances the fear factor.
Compared to the CGI and other special effects that are available today, this film is terrible. Compared to films of its time, I would say it's above average. It is hard to tell, usually films that are --- less reliant on technology/use social problems that are ongoing --- can be enjoyed for many years, unfortunately this was not the case. This was my first film I have seen in this class that I wasn’t much of a fan of. I still realise the historical significance of the movie though, and it was very interesting the see how far the technology used to create the godzilla movies has come. I have seen both the 1998 and 2014 remakes of the movie. The 1998 movie was impressive to me as a kid, not so much now. The 2014 movie was fun to watch because its cast had plenty of actors that I recognized, the storyline was interesting, and the CGI was pretty believable. I’m sure with time the 2014 version of Godzilla’s special effects will be considered sub-par just like the other
One movie that I personally feel should have a sequel is Avatar. Avatar is a science fiction, action, and adventure film. The story is about a paraplegic marine who joins a program called Avatar in place of his brother in order to interact with Na’vi people of Pandora (a fictional earth like moon). In the movie humans are trying to extract a mineral known as unobtanium which is vital to the survival of the Na’vi people. Jake decides to protect the Na’vi people at the end. In the next movie a continuation of this story with a cliff hanger ending would be ideal. I’m not a huge fan of Avatar, but financially it made over two billion dollars. Avatar also received positive feedback and many people are awaiting a sequel.
I like the film very much. I think its one of the best films I’ve seen ever. The comedy in the film is just my humour, and the action was okay.