Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of school administrators in society
Character analysis nothing but the truth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of school administrators in society
The movie Doubt is set in a private Catholic School in 1960s. Sister Aloysius is the principal of the school, and Father Flynn is the clergyman in the church. While the movie deals with some moral dilemmas such as doubt versus certainty, rigidity versus openness and so on, the central theme of the story pivots on accusation on Father Flynn of child molestation. The story has a hanging ending where Father Flynn is proven neither guilty nor proven innocent. Based on the contents of the movie and my own analysis, I believe that certainty plays a bigger role in accusations and I believe that Father Flynn had been falsely blamed and I am also against the rigidity of the society.
The first doubt about Father Flynn’s behavior occurs to Sister Aloysius when he gives a sermon on the nature of doubt. Father notes that doubt can also be a unifying force like faith, and Sister Aloysius assumes that he has had doubts of some kind that must have motivated the topic for the sermon. She then discusses the sermon with her fellow nuns, asks if anyone has observed unusual behavior that would inspire Father Flynn to preach about doubt, and instructs them to observe Father’s behavior closely. The second basis for the doubt occurs when Sister James reveals to Sister Aloysius that Father Flynn and Donald (a twelve year old African American boy in the school) have been spending an unusual amount of time in the church rectory. She also discloses that Donald was called by Father Flynn in the middle of a lesson and she could smell alcohol in his breath when he returned. Sister James also told her that she had seen Father Flynn place a white shirt in Donald’s locker. The movie ends with the final doubt that if Father Flynn were innocent he would not have re...
... middle of paper ...
...p thinking that the school had to adapt to the change in the society, and not because he was trying to make the school less religious. The rigidity of the school was hindering the progress of the school and making the students less adaptable to the world outside the church.
Doubt does have its own place, but doubt without proof is baseless and often considered invalid. In the movie “Doubt”, the real problem was that Sister Aloysius was doubtful of the acts of Father Flynn, and tried to take advantage of every little incident that might prove Father guilty of child molestation. However, I believe that Father Flynn was innocent and was trying to change the society for better. I also strongly believe that it was the rigidity of Sister Aloysius that was holding behind the progression of the school, and the openness in some aspects would drastically change the society.
Humans are funny creatures. We judge and classify others and ourselves into groups. We tear apart others esteem to feel stronger. And we put limits on ourselves, whether they are thought up by our imagination or other’s. The truth is, we aren’t perfect, but we can become better, that is, if we choose to. Benchwarmers captures that thought perfectly. Though it is a comedy, and a very hilarious one at that, it provides some very true points to consider. Benchwarmers is a great movie to watch because within this side-splittingly funny movie, there are important messages such as: bullying is a double edged sword, stereotypes can be overcome, and that diversity is what makes life exciting.
The play “Doubt” by John Patrick Shanley began with a sermon by Father Brendan Flynn, a well liked and enlightened neighborhood priest, who says, "Doubt can be a bond as powerful and sustaining as certainty". (Shanley 6) Sister Aloysius Beauvier is a strict traditional nun, who was declared to protect and secure St. Nicholas Church School. Father Flynn seems to be the protagonist in the play and Sister Aloysius is the antagonist. The whole play, sister Aloysius Beauvier suspected Father Flynn of molesting a 12-year-old boy named Donald Muller, who is the first African-American student in the St. Nicholas Church School. I think that Sister Aloysius’s overreacting, because Father Flynn is innocent. In the middle of these two characters, Sister James is a young and innocent teacher who wants to be neutral between the conflict of Sister Aloysius and Father Flynn.
The differences between the movie doubt and the play have significant differences that would influence ones opinion about certain characters and situations in the story. Though the differences are few one would agree that at least one of these differences are game changers or at the very least they get you thinking and having doubts of your own.
A reputation can be so well established that if one person in power does a wrongdoing people will not believe it. For example when Mrs. Muller says, “Let me ask you something. You honestly think that priest gave Donald that wine to drink?” (47). Donald’s mother is questioning sister Aloysius because she does not believe Father Flynn would do something like that. He has a reputation of being a great priest and his reputation is better than Sister Aloysius’. Mrs. Muller states, “You’re not going against no man in a robe and win, Sister. He’s got the position.” (47). Just by Father Flynn being a male he has a higher reputation than a nun, which he knows and can accumulate for his actions. In the hierarchy of the Church, the head male priest is the most dominant. Therefore, nobody questions what he is doing; he has a reputation of being this influential priest who gives great sermons. He knows that he has the power to do what he wants and has his fellow Monsignor and other men in the ...
... Nonetheless, the signs also point to Father Flynn hurting him, because he was violating him. People’s assumptions are based upon personal experience and gut feeling, also on their upbringing; nature and nurture. Shanley uses inference in this play to create doubt in the audience’s minds'. The verdict is never in, on Flynn; guilty or not guilty. Shanley’s audience is left to be the jury.
The play, Doubt: A Parable written by John Patrick Shanley, is based purely on uncertainty. Throughout the whole play, all I felt was uncertainty and I have still not come to a firm conclusion about what Father Flynn has done. There are many pieces of evidence proving his guilt and proving his innocence. I did enjoy reading the play and I think my favorite part about it is that I will never fully know what happened and who was right. I like being able to create my own ending to a book because you get to use your imagination. Today during the debate I started out as defending Father Flynn’s innocence. I do stand by what I was defending because there is no certain evidence against him that can prove him guilty; it is all based on assumption.
Most people have had some sort of conflict affect their lives at least once. That conflict could alter a person’s views of the world around them. In the play Doubt by John Patrick Shanley, conflict is used to grasp the reader’s emotions and cause the reader to rethink their preconceived notions about the characters in the play. Doubt takes place in 1964 in St. Nicholas, which is a school and Catholic Church in New York. The play focuses on a priest named Father Brendan Flynn and a nun named Sister Aloysius Beauvier. The conflict highlighted in this play is between these two characters. After Father Flynn starts taking an African American student under his wing, named Donald Muller, Sister Aloysius suspects Father Flynn is up to no good. She
“What do you do when you are not sure?” Patrick Shanley’s play, Doubt: A Parable, centers around the theme of doubt and how people react to it. In the Play, the three main characters Sister Aloysius, Sister James, and Father Flynn struggle with their doubts. When Sister Aloysius accuses Father Flynn of molesting a boy named Donald Muller, the first black student of St. Nicolas Church School, doubt begins to flare inside them. Sister James is caught in between believing Sister Aloysius, who demands Father Flynn is guilty, and the Father pleading innocent. Based on the evidence in Patrick Shanley’s Doubt: A Parable, I conclude Father Flynn is indeed guilty on account of his behavior with his students and the students’
A League of Their Own (Marshall, 1992) explicitly characterizes an American era when a woman’s place was in the home. Even our modern perspective implicitly follows suit. Although women have gained rights and freedoms since the 1930’s, sexism remains prevalent in America. This film offers an illustration when men went to war and big business men utilized women as temporary replacements in factories, sports, and so on. Here, course concepts, such as gender socialization, gender expressions, role stereotypes, emotion expressions, and language, correspond to the film’s characters and themes.
However, it is exactly her acute eye for detail and concern for the overall wellbeing of the school and upholding of tradition that causes her to investigate into Donald’s case. She ultimately wants the absolute best for all the children and all follow her gut certainty to make it happen. This is unlike Father Flynn who may care for all the children, but also chooses favorites that can get him into trouble. The audience is forced to recognize that although Father Flynn may appear to have Donald’s interest at heart, which may not be the case behind closed doors. His lack of attention to details and fair treatment for all children causes Father Flynn to bend the rules in favor of himself. Not everyone appears to remain how their characters first appear in this play. The uptight nun can have a soft spot for looking out for the children while the ever loving priest may be too free with the comfort he gives, either way, there is always some forms of doubt. There is never a clear path to take when forming relationships with students and trying to inspire them to learn and
...der further than what we have in front of us. We want to impose our opinion on everything. We want to relate to it in a way that can only be done through out imagination. So, due to this, when we are not given the flexibility, then the context no longer becomes entertaining. The viewers do not want to be told how to think. Given these points, if they are influenced to believe that Sister Aloysius is a cruel individual like the movie portrays, then at the end of the movie and book when Sister Aloysius says, “ I have doubts! I have such doubts!” they will take that as a confession from her, and be further lead to believe that the accusations against Father Flynn are false. I think John Patrick Shanley chooses specific diction to create a conflict that has no precise resolution,he wanted the reader get lost in story and enter into their own story manifested within.
Father Flynn tells Sister Aloysius, “Even if you feel certainty, it is an emotion and not a fact.” I think he means that without concrete evidence, you cannot rely on your emotions for the truth. In Father Flynn’s sermon he discusses doubt and truth. He says, “Doubt can be a bond as powerful and sustaining as certainty.” Sister Aloysius treats her doubt as the truth, and ignores any uncertainty she has. Throughout the story, Father Flynn denies and wrong doing and cites that there is no evidence of any misconduct. Doubt becomes battle with two viewpoints. When questions are asked, they are answered with more questions, leading to more
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.
The use of techniques and strategies in animation is significant as it greatly emphasizes the overall message of the film, and most importantly it allows the audience to understand and identify the film in their own individual perspective. All techniques used in animation films have potential in their own distinctive ways. Films such as ‘200,000 Phantoms/ Nijuman No Borei’ (2007), ‘Philips Broadcast of 1938’ (1938), ‘Uncle’ (1996), ‘The Sorcerer’s Apprentice’ (1940), ‘Felix in Hollywood’ (1923), ‘Billy’s Balloon’ (1998), ‘Mt. Head/ Atama Yama’ (2003) and ‘Simonova Sand Performance’ (2009) demonstrates a variety of techniques and strategies in the most effective ways. In some of the films, there are techniques and strategies used that are similar and some that are very different, nevertheless each are unique in their respective ways. We will explore the techniques used in these films, including its historical or contemporary context based on the methods of production used and the cultural environment from which they arose. We will also see how the films contrast from each other.
As told by John Patrick Shanley in his play, Doubt: A Parable, doubt requires more courage than conviction does, and more energy; because conviction is a resting place and doubt is infinite (Stanley ix). Doubt: A Parable is about a priest named Father Flynn who is being shamed by Sister Aloysius for sexually assaulting a young boy, Donald Muller. Donald Muller is black and also gay. The play causes the reader to question whether or not Father Flynn is guilty. Based on the evidence in Patrick Shanley’s play, I conclude Father Flynn is innocent because Sister Aloysius is stubborn and lacking evidence, as well as the fact that Father Flynn is a good man and well-liked by the congregation.