Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Kohlberg's contributions to our understanding of moral development
Kohlberg's contributions to our understanding of moral development
Kohlberg's contributions to our understanding of moral development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As children age they experience a great deal of variance in their abilities related to the numerous aspects of life functioning (Robbins, Chaterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 260-296). One aspect of functioning is that of moral reasoning. Throughout a person’s childhood, moral skills develop in relating to others and their surroundings. Moral development has been a popular topic of study for many years. Some theorists have developed tools to measure moral functioning. In order know the accuracy of these tools, experiments must be designed and implemented to test hypotheses and findings. An extensive amount of research has been conducted throughout the years on how children develop morally. Moral development has been identified as a person’s sense of right and wrong and their ways of responding to ethical dilemmas (Tichy, Johnson, Johnson, & Roseth, 2010). There are many varying focuses on moral development. Some examples of this variance can be found in studies such as Tichy, Johnson, Johnson, and Roseth’s (2010) study on constructive controversy and moral development, Stifter, Cipriano, Conway, and Kelleher’s (2009) study on temperament and moral development, Passini’s (2010) study of culture and moral development, and Levenson’s (2009) study of gender and moral development. Though these researchers all play an important role in the study of moral development, the theorist most often associated with the subject is Lawrence Kohlberg (Robbins, Chaterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 277-280). Lawrence Kohlberg has accomplished many findings involving the moral development of children through extensive research (Robbins, Chaterjee, & Canda, 2012, p. 260-296). Kohlberg (1969) suggests that children move through unique stages of moral develo... ... middle of paper ... ...440.x Rest, J., Turiel, E., & Kohlberg, L. (1969). Level of moral development as a determinant of preference and comprehension of moral judgments made by others. Journal Of Personality, 37(2), 225. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.ep8933581 Robbins, S. P., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2012). Contemporary Human Behavior Theory; A Critical Perspective for Social Work (3rd Edition ed.). (C. Campanella, Ed.) Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon. Stifter, C. A., Cipriano, E., Conway, A., & Kelleher, R. (2009). Temperament and the development of conscience: The moderating role of effortful control. Social Development, 18(2), 353-374. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00491.x Tichy, M., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Roseth, C. J. (2010). The impact of constructive controversy on moral development. Journal Of Applied Social Psychology, 40(4), 765-787. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00597.x
Rest, J., Narvaez, D., Thoma, S., & Bebeau, M. (1999). DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(4), 644-659.
Graham, Jesse and Johnathan Haidt. 2011. The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of
The first six years of a child’s life is a window of opportunity when a child unquestionably accepts the virtues modeled by his or her parents (“8 Ways to Raise a Moral Child | Ask Dr. Sears”). In their first few years, children believe that their behaviors are right or wrong according to what a parent tells them. By five years old, a child begins to adopt their parent’s values, whether they are noble or not. Merseault’s childhoo...
Morality, which is one’s general standards about right and wrong behavior, also includes prosocial behavior and other traits such as honesty, fairness, and concern about other people’s rights and welfare (Omrod, 2014). Both morality and prosocial behavior involve multiple parts of the brain, emotions and complex reasoning abilities. Some age-typical characteristics for preschool aged children include, some understanding that behaviors causing physical or psychological harm are morally wrong, a sense of guilt and shame about misbehaviors that cause harm to others, also display empathy and sympathy, and children at this age also show an appreciation for the need to be fair.
The two competing theoretical frameworks that attempt to explain the development of morality are cognitive-behavioral and cognitive-developmental. The cognitive-behavioral approach is taken by Liebert, and the cognitive-developmental approach is taken by Kohlberg.
...Virtue, Personality, and Social Relations: Self-Control as the Moral Muscle." Journal of Personality 67.6 (1999): 1165-194. Print.
The moral development of children can depend on many factors. Parenting and upbringing of the child, their environment, social environment, gender, and race are all aspects that can contribute to how a child develops their moral standards and expectations. Many psychologists have tried for several years to develop a theory of how morality is developed. One in particular is Lawrence Kohlberg (1958). His moral development theory is based on the cognitive development of children and it is thought that moral development proceeds and changes as cognitive development occurs (Arnett, 2012).
(Jensen, 2005, p. 69) could be compared with the importance of desired moral reasoning. The
Scarf, D., Imuta, K., Colombo, M., Hayne, H. (2012) Social evaluation or simple association? Simple association may explain moral reasoning in infants. PLoS ONE 7(8) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042698
Robbins, S., Chatterjee, P., & Canda, E. R. (2006). Contemporary Human Behavior Theory: A Critical Perspective for Social Work (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Kohlberg’s theory of the stages of moral development has gained some popularity despite being controversial. The claim that the levels form a “ladder,” the bottom being the immature child with a pre-conventional level and the top being a post conventional ethical individual. The sequence is unvarying and the subject must begin at the bottom with aspirations to reach the top, possibly doing so. (7) Research confirms that individuals from different cultures actually progress according to Kohlbergs theory, at least to the conventional level. Kohlberg’s stages of moral development continue to provide a foundation for psychology studies of moral reasoning. (6)
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: the nature and validity of moral stages. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
According to Kohlberg, individuals progress through a series of stages in the evolution of their sense of justice and in the kind of reasoning that they utilize to make moral judgments (Feldman, R., 2013, p. 426). His work modified and expanded from Jean Piaget’s previous work to form a theory of cognitive development that explained how pre-adolescent children develop moral reasoning (Cherry, K., 2014, October 12). Kohlberg’s theory of moral development focuses on children’s ability to distinguish right from wrong based on their perception. His theory claims that individuals progress through the levels morality in a fixed order and
Barger, Ph.D., R. N. (2000). A Summary of Lawrence Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development. . Retrieved from www.csudh.edu/dearhabermas/kohlberg01.htm
Part One:The criticisms of Kohlberg's moral development stages seem to center around three major points, his research methods, the "regression" of stage four, and finally his goals.The first criticism that I would like to address is that of his research methods. Kohlberg is often criticized for not only his subject selection, but also the methods by which he tries to extricate data from those subjects. His initial study consisted of school boys from a private institution in Chicago. The problem with this is fairly obvious, that this does not represent a significant portion of the population to allow for generalized conclusions. In other words, how can we test some boys from Chicago and ascertain that this is how all people develop worldwide?I believe that the answer to this criticism comes from the theory that it relates to.