Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect that parents have on children
Parental influence on child behavior
Essays how does parents behavior affect children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect that parents have on children
In the book, The Stranger, Merseault is convicted of first degree murder. During the questioning Merseault is indifferent about the murder. Lawyers note that Merseault feels no remorse towards his violent action and as a result of this, the jury finds Merseault guilty; the penalty is execution. The jury believes he is a danger to society and calls him a monster. Merseault lacks empathy; he is unable to recognize and respond to other people’s feelings (Baron-Cohen). However, this is not enough to state that Merseault is a danger to society. Does Merseault lack more than just empathy? Is he a psychopath? Empathy is a skill children learn from their parents (Kutner). The way a parent shows empathy is crucial to the development of their child’s empathic skills. Infants and toddlers learn empathy by the way their parents treat them when they are sad, angry, or frightened. Children learn these basic survival skills long before they enter the world of formal education. According to findarticles.com, children are educated by identifying with and imitating their parents, which Dr. Benjamin Spock calls, incidental learning. Young children identify more closely with the parent of the same gender, absorbing important lessons about social and moral conduct (“Children Learn through Imitating Behavior of Parents”). The first six years of a child’s life is a window of opportunity when a child unquestionably accepts the virtues modeled by his or her parents (“8 Ways to Raise a Moral Child | Ask Dr. Sears”). In their first few years, children believe that their behaviors are right or wrong according to what a parent tells them. By five years old, a child begins to adopt their parent’s values, whether they are noble or not. Merseault’s childhoo... ... middle of paper ... ... another thing to be convicted to the death penalty and feel no fear. Merseault may not have been dangerous at all until that point in his life, but a jail sentence is not enough to stop a person with no conscience. “Psychopaths don't feel guilty. They don't feel sorry for what they've done. They go through life taking what they want and giving nothing back. They manipulate and deceive and convincingly lie without the slightest second thought” (Khan). Researchers say that approximately one percent of the general population are psychopaths; others say about three or four percent. The reason that the estimates vary is because not everyone has been tested, but also because psychopathy is a sliding scale. A person can be very psychopathic or only slightly, and anywhere in between. How psychopathic does someone have to be before they can be classified a psychopath (Khan)?
The Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines a sociopath as someone who behaves in a dangerous or violent way towards other people and does not feel guilty about such behavior. Sociopaths lack a conscience that allows people to decipher between right and wrong. In A Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allen Poe, the narrator, Montresor, is believed to be a sociopath by many. He kills his friend, Fortunado, after he literally adds insult to a thousand of injuries. Though what the insult was and the previous injuries were never revealed to the reader, it could be assumed that Montresor probably overreacted to the Fortunado’s insult. But in order to answer this question the evaluation upon his motivation, strategy, and Montresor’s feeling and emotion towards
The PCL-R is a tool that enables a distinct group of psychologically abnormal offenders to be measured using a three point rating scale for twenty-two consistent behavioural characteristics. These characteristics have been underlying themes in an ongoing debate between psychiatrists on the definition and existence of psychopaths in discourse. While the literature takes no determinative stance, the psychopath has nonetheless become a distinct group in the binding legislation of the 1913 mental health Act. The PCL-R goes a step further than the act does to identify this group by not only suggesting that the “psychopath” is a statistically relevant group of criminals but Hare takes an objective approach that eliminates any likelihood of mental health practitioners and legal professionals to use this concept as a waste bucket for socially deviant crimes in the future.
The term “psychopath” is often associated with “sociopath” and “antisocial personality disorder”. Due to the confusion over the definitions of these terms, psychologists have had a hard time finding common ground on diagnosing and treating these illnesses. The consensus for a psychopath is that it is someone who is antisocial, lacks empathy, and engages in bold conduct (Cullen, 241).
According to research, psychopathic behavior can take many forms not all of which are violent. Ultimately psychiatrists say that there are pieces of a brain’s emotional machinery missing. As a result making psychopaths lack empathy, guilt or the ability to simply sow remorse (180rule.com). In an interview with James Fallon, a neuroscientist and neuroanatomist, states that there isn’t an acceptable definition of the word, psychopaths and that some psychologists do not even recognize it as a syndrome (Flatow). The closest way to identify a psychopath is through the Psychopathy Checklist – Revised, commonly known as the PCL-R (Hare). This test is used to determine if an individual has a mid- psychopathic disturbance, moderate psychopathic disturbance or if they are psychopathic (Brinkley). The test is scored on a 3 point scale (0, 1, and 2) with the highest score being a 40 which denotes a prototypical psychopath (Hare). When an individual scores a 30 or above it will qualify the individu...
Charles Manson, Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, John Gacy are all well-known names of the most ruthless criminals America has seen. We like to think that these people are rare, genetic mutations with unfortunate situations that lead them to where they are, or at least that’s what we hope. In reality, one in twenty-five people are capable of doing the most heinous, unthinkable, despicable actions to fellow humans without a pinch of guilt. How, you might ask? They lack the “7th sense”, consciousness, according to Dr. Martha Stout, author of “The Sociopath Next Door”. Clinical Psychologist, Stout, has spent the past 25 years at Harvard University studying these socialized psychopaths. With their undeniable charm, impulsivity, cunning manipulation,
The public is disgusted by the bloody deeds that serial killers have committed, but they will forever intrigue us. The fascination stems from the fact that in most cases the killers are so similar to the common person. On the outside they seem as normal as the next. Fortunately for humanity, the next person is not capable of such ghastly deeds. These serial killers are often psychopathic or sociopathic persons who were abused as children. Others may be trying to fulfill their own sadistic fantasies that were brought on by their childhood experiences. The most recent reason identified is a link to a genetic predisposition to violence. The inherent goodness of humans can sometimes go awry and lead to a person who is as evil as a serial killer. No matter how one analyzes the killers, they are not normal in any sense. Edmund Kemper when asked what he thought when he saw a pretty woman walking down the street replied, “One side of me says, 'I'd like to talk to her, date her.' The other side of me says, 'I wonder how her head would look on a stick?'” (Ming Ho).
The opposition asserts that the worst of violent crimes are committed by sociopaths (Levy 1308). Violent crimes are unfortunate, and happen more often than many feel comfortable with. This is not to say that they are no longer important, but to simply blame a category of people with violence seems unreasonable to say the least. People of the sociopathic model may very well hurt people based on anger or hate. In studies conducted comparing a sociopath and a psychopath the sociopath showed an ability of learning over time from their crimes, psychopaths could not learn and continued to make mistakes even if shown why it was wrong (Fox, Kvaran, and Fontaine 5). For example, if a psychopath kills several innocent people, we know that they are not
A psychopath is someone who is unable to live harmoniously in society due to their profound lack of compassion, empathy, conscience, and remorse (Hare, 1993). Many psychopathic symptoms have been proposed to result from cognitive and emotional processing impairments. The concept of a psychopath is often of a ruthless and dangerous criminal, an image commonly depicted in the media and film. Though psychopaths do make up an estimated 40% of dangerous offenders in Canada, it is the non-violent manipulators and cheaters, like white-collar criminals and unethical business people, who can have the most impact on the general population (Bonta & Motiuk; 1996, Hare, 1993). Therefore, understanding the cognitive bases and development of psychopathy can allow exploration into possible interventions and treatments, as well as identifying measures for use in diagnosing psychopathy in childhood and adolescence. Additionally, the deciphering of abnormal processes can give insight into normal functioning, thus helping to expand current knowledge. This paper reviews conclusions that processing of
From a young age, many children today are taught the value of empathy and how to be empathetic toward others. According to Oxford Dictionary, empathy is, “The ability to understand and share the feelings of another” (Empathy). Empathy is a characteristic and a developed skill. It can be used by many people of varying ages, and it is beneficial in assessing situations and determining the needs of others. Empathy is a trait that has existed in some since the beginning of the world. It has also appeared as a common theme or motif in many works of writing across many genres of literature. Empathy is a theme that is highlighted through many works of literature.
In sum, scholarship reveals three major ways that psychopaths can be viewed as. There are psychopathic experts that consider psychopaths to be violent, those who consider them usually non-violent and high-functioning, and others who believe they are non-violent, but do take the opportunity to take advantage of unsuspecting people in criminal ways. Psychopaths are for the most part non-violent and high-functioning, but do have a tendency to use people for their own benefits in ways that society does not consider legal or moral. However, the show Dexter perpetuates a problematic cultural myth that all psychopaths are relentless violent criminals. In reality, there are much more non-violent and high-functioning psychopaths that exist in our global society than most would assume after viewing Dexter.
The latest figure shocking members of the public, is that psychopaths make up 1% of today’s population (Brewer, 2012). The unproved statistic has had many initially light-heartedly questioning who have they chosen to surround themselves with. But then, on a more serious note, what exactly is a psychopath? Surely one in a hundred people couldn’t have the capacity to go on a serial killing spree - and is there anything we can do to ensure our own safety?
Some argue that they shouldn’t due to their lack of emotions and empathy. Others argue that they should for the reason that there are set laws regarding how people should behave in a society, such as not killing. Once again, the purpose of this paper is not to determine which opinion is the correct opinion, but perhaps to shed a light on the perspective of a psychopath. A suitable example of how people can have such different perspectives from each other is found when regarding ethics or morals. Morals tend to be determined by culture, although they can differ slightly among the individuals. “Some philosophers have argued that psychopaths’ deficits in empathy cause them to have difficulties with the acquisition of moral concepts, and that these difficulties, in turn, entail that they lack moral responsibility for their actions” (Levy, 351). As of current, there is no way to verify that psychopaths don’t understand ethics or morals, they just might understand them in a different manner from the majority of the culture. Psychopaths most likely follow ethics that happen to be considered obscene to the majority of society, such as types of ethical hedonism. The general idea behind hedonism is the idea that pleasure should be sought after. Dana Kay Nelkin said, “When we think about psychopaths’ actions, and the pleasure they sometimes take
A person's ability to develop is due to two factors, maturation and learning. Although maturation, or the biological development of genes, is important, it is the learning - the process through which we develop through our experiences, which make us who we are (Shaffer, 8). In pre-modern times, a child was not treated like they are today. The child was dressed like and worked along side adults, in hope that they would become them, yet more modern times the child's need to play and be treated differently than adults has become recognized. Along with these notions of pre-modern children and their developmental skills came the ideas of original sin and innate purity. These philosophical ideas about children were the views that children were either born "good" or "bad" and that these were the basis for what would come of their life.
In Everyday Heros, Ferrigno explains that empathy is the supernatural ability to fully interpret and replicate the emotions, moods, and temperaments of others. I knew that when my thirteen year old son, Dylan, started middle school that I was going to be in for it. The difference between parenting an elementary school child and a middle school child is night and day. My son
Empathy is when I am able to feel or share feelings with another person. In order to do this, to truly do this I would have to had live through exactly they did or had some telepathic emotional connection to them. Only, our minds aren’t designed this way, we can’t truly ever feel real empathy. I can’t even begin to imagine know what it would take to really feel empathy and the emotions it would give me. Empathy doesn’t really doesn’t really exist; there is no way to actually feel what another person is going through, the closest we can come to empathy is visualizing another person’s perspective, in other words, I don’t agree with Wallace that empathy is the most important thing to learn in college, how to care is.