Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis essay of the greek political system
Analysis essay of the greek political system
Spartan and athenian government systems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis essay of the greek political system
Ancient Greece was less of a country and more of a collection of neighbouring cities that shared a couple seas. It didn't have a single government that presided over everyone. Instead, each city ran itself as the people there saw fit or had imposed upon them. As such, many differing types of political systems were in place.
Monarchy
In a monarchy, the people were ruled over by a dictator of some sort. The monarch had all say in how the state was run and the citizens held no power at all. This is in stark contrast to a democracy, in which the people have the power. In modern democracy, all (or most) people have a say in government, but even in the ancient Greek version of democracy, there were many more people in charge than in a monarchy.
…show more content…
I couldn't find this in the reading material for the week, but it was easy enough to look up in a dictionary. An aristocracy and an oligarchy are pretty similar. In fact, I'd say an aristocracy is a specific type of oligarchy in which the small ruling group is composed of a specific class.
Tyranny
Tyrannies were just like monarchies, except that the dictator had come to rule the area because they took over by force (Cartledge, 2011). This was different than in a monarchy, as in a monarchy, the role of dictator was passed down through the generations. Aside from that, the two are the same, so tyrannies compare to other types of government the same as monarchies do.
Oligarchy
In an oligarchy, all power belongs to a small group of people. There isn't a single ruler, but the majority of people don't get a say in how things are run. This is sort of a middle ground between a monarchy and a democracy. More people have their say than in a monarchy, but less people do than in a democracy. In ancient Greece, the select few that ran things were the wealthy elite (Cartledge, 2011). Because an aristocracy divides political power on class lines, there's no rising to power. However, in other types of oligarchies, there may be a slim chance of someone without power obtaining power. For example, when political power is given only to the wealthy, there's a slime (almost none) chance of
By the fourth century B.C.E. there were hundreds of Greek democracies. Greece was not a single political entity it was a collection of about 1500 separate poleis or cities scattered around the Mediterranean and black sea shores. The cities that were not democracies were either oligarchies or monarchies (often times called tyrannies). Of the democracies, the oldest, the most stable, the most long-lived, and the most radical, was Athens.
The Athenian government started out as a Monarchy and switched into an Aristocratic Oligarchy, then to Areopagus, nine Archons, and finally an Ecclesia. An Archon was used during the aristocratic society, in other words, a king. He ruled through the Areopagus, the chief judicial and policy-making of the government [Andrews]. At the beginning of Aristocratic, there was nine Archons that ruled for life and held office for ten years. In 682 B.C., the rule of office became annual. The years progressed and two more senior Archons were added, the Archon Basileus, Chief Archon and the Polemarch [Demand 141]. By the seventh century, all adult male citizens of Athens had the right to attend Ecclesia. The Ecclesia is an assembly of citizens who prepared the agenda for the Areopagus. Draco allowed the Strategoi to possess no debt and not own land less than 100 minas. Among the classes of Solon, the Boule is elected third class citizens who make up the council of 400. The
a government in which power is vested in a minority consisting of those believed to be best qualified
Tyranny resembles the monarchy but usually occurs by seizing power during periods of instability (Perry, 59). Whereas the monarchy usually has a constitution or counterbalancing group, tyranny is absolute personal power rule. Aristotle warned tyranny could threaten the well-being of the citizen and the rule of law (Perry, 87).
Oligarchy is valued above a democracy although they are both ruled by the appetite of the soul. Those within an oligarchy pursue necessary appetites whereas democratic individuals pursue unnecessary appetites. Rulers are present...
One of the versions of governing is an oligarchy, a small group of people in control of a country. In book eight of the republic Plato explains the meaning of an oligarchy and when it is very unsuccessful. It doesn't work because whoever has the most wealth can take part in ruling over the city. Plato even explains "when virtue and riches are placed together in the scales of the balance, the one always rises as the other falls...
Ancient Greece today is most known for the culture: the gods, the dramas, how people lived. What most people do not realize is that there were hundreds, maybe even thousands, of different civilizations spread throughout Greece that all had different forms of government. The three main ones were Athens, Sparta, and Miletus. Each was very different from the other. The most powerful out of all three was Sparta: a military based society. The Spartan government had a strong foundation that was all torn down by one bad leader.
These governments came in different styles such as a monarchy which was led by a king. Another form of government that was seen among the Greeks was aristocracy in which the polis was ruled by a small group of noble, land owning families. One of the more notable polis of ancient Greek was that of Sparta in which they used the oligarchy as there form of government. This type of government is where the people are ruled by a few powerful people. Finally, there was democracy which means “rule of the people” (The Legacy of Ancient Greece and Rome 1-7). This was the government that Athens utilized and helped establish. These varying types of government can be seen throughout governments today, however, it is the government established by the Athenians and their political structure that had a greater impact on the west than that of its Greek polis counterparts.
Aristotle points out that throughout the process the type of governing was always monarchical from the household all the way up to the polis. The polis though is not a monarchy or oligarchy because of the natural maturi...
Each had their own version of political councils that were give specific power and tasks that they were to oversee and uphold. Equally, both city-states defined citizens as being only males who were born from descendants of either Athenian or Spartan born parents. Although very similar in structure, Athens and Sparta had their political differences. The main difference being Sparta’s focus being on war and employing a two king system to oversee the army as well as policy at the same time. Today this could be similar to the president and vice-president dynamic. Athens’ structure was much more complex than that of Sparta which gave more freedom to the people; this was partly due to breaking down regions into 10 separate states that formed the larger entire state of Athens. Below are some of the similarities in there government
Ancient Greece was made up of individual city states, known as a Polis, which relied heavily on citizen participation in politics. The idea of self-rule was an entirely new way of governing. Citizenship was unheard of at the time. Although still considered citizens not everybody was allowed to participate. In Athens only adult males who had military training were allowed to vote. The majority of the population, namely slaves, children, metics (free noncitizens) and women were excluded from participation in politics. “[Metics] and women were not citizens and did not enjoy any of the privileges of citizenship.”(Sayre, 137) Athenian citizens had to be descended from citizens, excluding the children of Athenian men and foreign women. Individuals could be granted citizenship in to Athens by the assembly this was usually as a reward for some service to the state. Ancient Greece paved the way for the representative democratic style of government that is practiced by many countries today. Much like how voting rights started out in America, originally only the wealthy land owners were allowed to vote and call themselves citizens, but soon all men were allowed to have a vote and a voice in their states politics. Essentially the Greeks were the first to introduce citizen rights and freedom similar to what’s seen today.
Any form of government in which there are restrictions as to who gets to have a part in the government is considered more of an oligarchy because it would limit the government to be ran by a small group of
Early Greece, before its archaic period, was small and scattered farming villages. These villages began to grow and evolve. They built walls, a community meeting place, and an agora, or marketplace. These evolving villages created governments. Their new governments helped organize citizens with a constitution. These evolved villages became city-states. Each city-state
Willer, R, Youngreen, R, Troyer, L & Lovaglia, M.J 2012, ‘How Do the Powerful Attain Status? The Roots of Legitimate Power Inequalities’, Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 355-367
blood and were considered nobility. The oligarchy is comprised of individuals based on wealth. Both were