Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
This week’s written assignment is to compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states. I will address each form of government, providing examples of each and will include applicable comparisons and/or contrasts.
One monarchy, which is characterized by the rule of one person, in ancient Greece was Macedonia. This region was
ruled by a king whose power was constrained to the extent that he had to listen to the citizenry. This king could only
govern as long as he had the support of the aristocrats. Some have considered Sparta to have had a type of monarchy.
( Martin, T.R. (1985) “An Overview of Classical Greek History from Mycenae
to Alexander” Retrieved from
…show more content…
Each were comprised of a select group of individuals. The difference being that an
aristocracy is composed of the elite of a society “a class of eminent citizens was deemed best
qualified to rule the people. And an oligarchy is composed of ‘Oligarchy is the rule of the chosen
few, and these chosen few happen to be the rich and the privileged in Oligarchy.’ ” Author unknown, (2012), Retrieved
from http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-aristocracy-and-vs-oligarchy/
A further distinction between these two forms of government lies in heredity. The aristocracy was largely formed by
blood and were considered nobility. The oligarchy is comprised of individuals based on wealth. Both were
comprised of wealthy individuals but aristocrats to coin a phrase were born aristocrats, while oligarchs achieved their
status.
An example of a democratic government in ancient Greece occurred in Athens which has been
attributed as having the most advanced form of democracy. In democratic Athens, an advanced
system of checks and balances was established to avoid excesses of power. ( Cartwright, M.,
2014 “Athenian Democracy,” Ancient History Encyclopedia, Retrieved
By the fourth century B.C.E. there were hundreds of Greek democracies. Greece was not a single political entity it was a collection of about 1500 separate poleis or cities scattered around the Mediterranean and black sea shores. The cities that were not democracies were either oligarchies or monarchies (often times called tyrannies). Of the democracies, the oldest, the most stable, the most long-lived, and the most radical, was Athens.
...hold absolute power but is equally controlled by the actions of the people as they are considered to be a servant for the people.
The government within the monarchical society was populated by the aristocracy. It was they who were depended upon for directing the course of governmental affairs. The controls of all co...
It is surprising indeed that Even today, tyrannies and dictatorships exist in the world when more than two and a half thousand years ago the ancient Athenians had developed a functional and direct form of democracy. What contributed to this remarkable achievement and how it changed the socio-political. scene in Athens is what will be considered in this paper. The paper will have three sections, each detailing the various stages. of political development from the kings of Attica to the time of Pericles when, in its golden age, Athens was at the height of its. imperial power.
Some couldn't afford it. Most should know the Ruler would have the most power which usually makes the conclusion that s/he has the most currency. Which puts the Ruler on the top of the social structure. After comes the standard rich people who have a good and pretty important career. Under them comes the peasants then the homeless.
... social beings and never made an attempt to hide themselves or their wealth that came from the state under order form the king.
Raaflaub, Kurt A., and Josiah Ober. Origins of democracy in ancient Greece. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
The system of government we have today was starting to developed centuries ago by the Athenians and Romans. Both governments were established with the intent to give power to the people, even though it did not always play out that way in society. The Athenian democracy and the Roman republic were two very different governments in practice, but also maintained similar characteristics in both systems of government.
The social classes consisted of the upper class, which included aristocrats and wealthy landowners, the middle class, which was made up of traders, public workers, shop owners, and members of the social work force. Finally, the lower class consisted of farmers and slaves. The differences between each class were quite noticeable, and the reason behind this was the way that the government regulated the flow of the money (Lemann). The upper class, which held most of the power, greatly influenced the creation of laws and the collection of taxes. This led to excessive taxes for the middle and lower class, which then went to the “government” or the upper class. Consecutively, the upper class paid little to no taxes, allowing their wealth to greatly increase (Thacker). Hence, while the middle and lower classes kept on losing money and becoming poorer, the upper class gained more money and exponentially increased their
government was ruled by a king who had power prestige and wealth. They were also hunter and gathers.
The nobility included people who inherited wealth. They were inclined in cultural endeavors like arts and music. Wealth in this group was transferred from generation to generation.
Probably one of the first things learned from history books or classes on ancient Greece is that the Greeks invented democracy. Athens originally had kings, but gradually, by the 5th century B.C., it developed a system that required active, ongoing participation of the citizens. Rule by the demes or people is a literal translation of the word "democracy". While virtually all citizens were allowed to participate in the democracy, citizens did not include women, children, slaves, or resident aliens, including those from other Greek poleis. This means that the majority were excluded from the democratic process. The democratization of Athens was gradual, but the germ of it, the assembly, was part of the other poleis -- even Sparta.
Ancient Greece was home to two of the most influential cities of its time, Athens and Sparta. Athens was known for its thinkers, art, and architecture while Sparta was the “warrior’s society”. While both cities ended tragically, they were successful for an extended period of time. This could be attributed to their forms of government. In Athens, the power was in the hands of the people in what is now known as a democracy. Sparta went the way of militarism, pursuing military policy. Another difference was the way they treated their women. Given different forms of government, Athens and Sparta were successful in their time.
As an introduction, Greece had a vast number of ancient city-states as one can easily gather from the map above. Many of these include Athens, Sparta, Corinth, Megara, Argos, Macedonia, Epeiros, Sicily and so many more. A lot is said about Athens and Sparta, but very little is spoken of the others. How were the government structures set up? Which of the city states had a monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and which city-state had a democracy? How were they similar? And how were they different? These are the issues I'd like to address. To begin each section and thoroughly answer everything, first I plan to define what each term is, and then I plan to speak on which city-states the term applied to.
Compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states.