Ever since agriculture replaced hunting and gathering, the division of labor led to the creation of social classes and the division of land and unequal distribution of food surplus allowing inequality to flourish. Unfortunately, this has not only remained, but inequality has exponentially grown, making the difference between each social class quite noticeable. This distressing factor makes American economy highly unstable, and there is little to be done in order to fix this grave issue. It is only a matter of time before America’s economy comes crashing down. American economic inequality has been around for a long time, and it has become a monumental issue.
As it has been previously mentioned, agriculture was the main factor in the creation
…show more content…
of economic inequality in the United States. Dr. Jada Thacker explains this further by affirming that agriculture led to the division of labor, in which people no longer shared the same occupation and therefore, no longer possessed the same type of tradable resources. This not only divided people in occupation, but created social classes. Long gone were days in which men hunted and women gathered, and no longer did people divide and share equally. Mankind’s greed had shattered a seemingly equal society (177). Of course, Indians practiced farming before the Europeans arrived, but they relied mainly on gathering and hunting, and the only animal that had been domesticated was the dog; however, the Europeans introduced trade and intensive agriculture. This allowed Indians to have a reliable food source that would not spoil, which led to the accumulation of the newfound wealth. Economic inequality before the Civil War was quite pronounced, even more since slavery was still in practice and slaves made little to no money.
The social classes consisted of the upper class, which included aristocrats and wealthy landowners, the middle class, which was made up of traders, public workers, shop owners, and members of the social work force. Finally, the lower class consisted of farmers and slaves. The differences between each class were quite noticeable, and the reason behind this was the way that the government regulated the flow of the money (Lemann). The upper class, which held most of the power, greatly influenced the creation of laws and the collection of taxes. This led to excessive taxes for the middle and lower class, which then went to the “government” or the upper class. Consecutively, the upper class paid little to no taxes, allowing their wealth to greatly increase (Thacker). Hence, while the middle and lower classes kept on losing money and becoming poorer, the upper class gained more money and exponentially increased their …show more content…
wealth. In modern day America, economic inequality has not only remained, but it has become a greater issue.
The difference between social classes is humongous. According to Nick Fitz’s article “Economic Inequality: It’s worse than you think”, the top 20% of the American households own 84% of the American wealth. Even more stunning, the Walton family alone owns more wealth than 42% of the average American households combined! Furthermore, corporations are faring no better, however. In order to have a more stable economy, the CEO-to-worker-pay-ratio should be 7-1, but truth to be told, it is an excessive amount of 354-1 (Fitz)! One might expect that the United States would be more equal by now, but sadly, this is not true. Comparing the before mentioned ratio to the Civil War, one may notice the difference quite easily. The ratio back at the Civil War was at 20-1, still not at the ideal ratio, but by far better than the current ratio (The
Atlantic). Economic inequality has been around for a long time, and it does not appear to be diminishing in any way. One would think that workers who are part of this unfair system would say something about the ungodly amount of money CEOs make compared to their income, but sadly the actual amount of income is a deeply guarded secret. As the American actor Chris Rock said "Oh, people don’t even know. If poor people knew how rich rich people are, there would be riots in the streets." The sad thing about the situation is that most people who belong to the low or middle class don’t bother in researching about their situation, and just walk through the path of life like a herd of sheep whose wool is harvested by the upper class, who benefit from it. But until all of the sheep catch on to this clever ploy, inequality will stand strong and change will be far from gone.
According to Gregory Mantsios many American people believed that the classes in the United States were irrelevant, that we equally reside(ed) in a middle class nation, that we were all getting richer, and that everyone has an opportunity to succeed in life. But what many believed, was far from the truth. In reality the middle class of the United States receives a very small amount of the nation's wealth, and sixty percent of America's population receives less than 6 percent of the nation's wealth, while the top 1 percent of the American population receives 34 percent of the total national wealth. In the article Class in America ( 2009), written by Gregory Mantsios informs us that there are some huge differences that exist between the classes of America, especially the wealthy and the poor. After
Time and time again we hear politicians and office holders preach the need for a powerful middle-class. You may then be surprised to hear that “about 82% of America’s net worth belongs to the top 20%, the next 80% of people only own about 18% of America’s wealth” (UCSC). Some may argue that this disproportion is the beauty of capitalism, the chance to create an empire. I argue that the proportions are simply unfair. Why is it that “ the average CEO makes 350X as much as his/her employee” (UCSC)?
With each class comes a certain level in financial standing, the lower class having the lowest income and the upper class having the highest income. According to Mantsios’ “Class in America” the wealthiest one percent of the American population hold thirty-four percent of the total national wealth and while this is going on nearly thirty-seven million Americans across the nation live in unrelenting poverty (Mantsios 284-6). There is a clear difference in the way that these two groups of people live, one is extreme poverty and the other extremely
There is a high degree of social inequality within the United States. Of most modern industrial countries, the United Stated has some of the richest and some of the poorest people to be found. That fact is very disturbing, however, explains why much of the inequality exists in the US. In the following essay I will explain to you about the inequality in our country and why it occurs, based on the theoretical perspectives of a functionalist, conflict theorist, and social interationist.
Why are so a large number of people that beg for money, sitting on the streets, looking for food 's some sort? It is not day-to-day that we consider situations like this, but it is out there constantly without all of us realizing it. A number of states have poverty 's more issues than others, but it is sad to think about how plenty of people are actually considered to be in poverty. This is an inequality concerning me a lot, and is getting worse daily. Poverty in the United States relates to people whose annual household earnings are less than a poverty line set by the United States government. Poverty is common, resulted in by numerous different factors such as failing markets, structural problems, unfortunate mishaps, and poor individual
The distribution of wealth by country is an amazing thing to look at (see table 3). The United States comes clearly on top with 41.6% of the wealth across the world, with the next closest being China at 10%. This shows that there is plenty of wealth to go around in the United States; we just don’t equally distribute it. The Gini Coefficient is the best way the world economy can represent the income distribution of a nation’s citizens. The United States ranks well below any other first world country (See table 2) This is an embarrassment to our country. We are a wealthy and successful country, yet we have a bigger gap between the wealthy and poor than any other country that compares to
Between the end of World War II and the late 1970s, income inequality in the U.S. was reduced; but since 1970s, the situation with wealth distribution has changed. Data from tax returns in 1976 show that the top 1 percent of households received 8.9 percent of all pre-tax income. In 2008, the top 1 percent’s share had more than doubled to 21.0 percent.
Income inequality in the United States, as of 2007, has reached levels not seen since 1928. In 1928, the top one percent received nearly 24% of all income within the United States (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). This percentage fell to nearly nine percent in 1975, but has risen to 23.5% as of 2007 (Volscho & Kelly, 2012). Meanwhile, in 2007 (see
3. What are the effects of this wealth inequality in the US and what causes it, as well as some possible solutions and their ramifications, will all be discussed and answered below. There has always been a wealth gap between the richest and poorest in society. However, in the past decade, the wealth gap between the richest and poorest citizens in the US has been growing rapidly. In the 70s and 80s, the wealth and income growth rate for both poor and rich people were similar, however, between the years 2009 and 2012 the top 1% income increased 31% while for the bottom 20%, their income actually dropped and for the vast majority of Americans, the average yearly income only increased by 0.4% [4].
Inequality exist and is high in America because the amount of income and wealth that is distributed through power. In America the income distribution is very inequality and the value of a person wealth is based on their income with their debts subtracted. “As of 2007, the top 1% of households (the upper class) owned 34.6% of all privately held wealth, and the 19% (the managerial, professional, and small business stratum) had 50.5%, which means that just 20% of the people owned a remarkable 85%, leaving only 15% of the wealth for the bottom 80% (wage and salary workers)” (Domhoff, 2011). In contrary the poor do not get ahead and the rich get more. Americans are judged and placed in class categories through their home ownership which translates to wealth. Americans social class is often associated with their assets and wealth. “People seek to own property, to have high incomes, to have interesting and safe jobs, to enjoy the finest in travel and leisure, and to live long and healthy lives” (Domhoff, 2011). Power indicates how these “values” are not distributed equally in American society. Huge gains for the rich include cuts in capital gains and dividends and when tax rates decrease for the tiny percent of Americans income is redistributed. Taxes directly affect the wealth and income of Americans every year.
America’s upper class has been getting richer since the past three decades, and we have still not found a way to stop this. We have been unable to find a way to distribute America’s wealth equally, so we can have a decent lower class and a good middle class. Inequality has caused many people to struggle in various ways, but their is alway another side to the story.
Income inequality has affected American citizens ever since the American Dream came to existence. The American Dream is centered around the concept of working hard and earning enough money to support a family, own a home, send children to college, and invest for retirement. Economic gains in income are one of the only possible ways to achieve enough wealth to fulfill the dream. Unfortunately, many people cannot achieve this dream due to low income. Income inequality refers to the uneven distribution of income and wealth between the social classes of American citizens. The United States has often experienced a rise in inequality as the rich become richer and the poor become poorer, increasing the unstable gap between the two classes. The income gap in America has been increasing steadily since the late 1970’s, and has now reached historic highs not seen since the 1920’s (Desilver). UC Berkeley economics professor, Emmanuel Saez conducted extensive research on past and present income inequality statistics and published them in his report “Striking it Richer.” Saez claims that changes in technology, tax policies, labor unions, corporate benefits, and social norms have caused income inequality. He stands to advocate a change in American economic policies that will help close this inequality gap and considers institutional and tax reforms that should be developed to counter it. Although Saez’s provides legitimate causes of income inequality, I highly disagree with the thought of making changes to end income inequality. In any diverse economic environment, income inequality will exist due to the rise of some economically successful people and the further development of factors that push people into poverty. I believe income inequality e...
An average American is struggling while the rich people are getting richer. The wealth owned by the top 0.1 percent has increased by 22 percent in 2012 but in 1970 wealth owned by the top 0.1 percent was only 7 percent. The top 0.1 percent includes about 100,000 families with total money of more than $20 million in 2012. The unequal distribution money was all connected to the Great Depression that took place in 1929 to 1939. During 1920’s also known as “Roaring Twenties” people had more ideas and new invention due to industrial revolution and discovery of electricity that led to many new invention that people wanted and bought. The top 0.1 of population earned more what the bottom 42% people earned which led to unequal distribution of the money. Economics Inequality has increased since 1970’s due to many factors. Families who were already rich before in 1900’s their children just inherited the money. This case mostly applied to white families because back in in the day racism played a big factor for getting jobs. Another reason is that the top 25 percent are well paid government workers, politician, entrepreneurs, or have a really good investment in stocks. In United States, people favors rich people over poor so the rich people have more opportunities and a better future than a poor and that’s the reason why economics inequality has increased over
In America, wealth inequality is seen distinctly between the average home and the mansions of billionaires and sport superstars. It has been severe for a very long time and wealth differences in the poor and the rich are extremely distinguishable. However, people do not realize how serious the wealth differences are in America, because of how nearly every action a person makes affects wealth. Even being born a certain race may affect your wealth positively or negatively. Wealth inequality in America is impacted or influenced by many factors.
The evidence of this economic inequality is ubiquitously. Income and wealth is an essential part in supporting basic physical and mental health, however, it is distributed unequally throughout the globe creating wealth and poverty stricken social classes. There are solutions available in diminishing and preventing the wealth and poverty inequality. The vast amounts of prosperity can be distributed equally between the different social classes and poverty can be reduced, if not complete eradicated. Problem-solving with different political ideologies can prevent an increase in the lack of fiscal means. The economy in the United States is unequal and unfair, though solutions are accessible to create financial fairness and equality.