Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Athens and sparta comparison
Athens and sparta comparison
Limited monarchy in ancient Greece
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Athens and sparta comparison
As an introduction, Greece had a vast number of ancient city-states as one can easily gather from the map above. Many of these include Athens, Sparta, Corinth, Megara, Argos, Macedonia, Epeiros, Sicily and so many more. A lot is said about Athens and Sparta, but very little is spoken of the others. How were the government structures set up? Which of the city states had a monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and which city-state had a democracy? How were they similar? And how were they different? These are the issues I'd like to address. To begin each section and thoroughly answer everything, first I plan to define what each term is, and then I plan to speak on which city-states the term applied to.
According to Dictionary.com,
…show more content…
(Aristotle, The Politics, Book III, 340 B.C.E.).” Tyrants were rulers that came to power through cruel, unjust, and unconstitutional manners, "oftentimes murdering their predecessor (Cartwright, 2013).” Syracuse in Sicily had a long run of extremely well known tyrants to take over. And although it can be noted that not every tyrant was an evil and cruel leader, some were. One example of a famous tyrant rule was that of "Dionysios from 405 BCE and his son Dionysios II, who took over in 367 BCE (Cartwright, 2013).” Athens too had a few tyrants take over from time to time as well as a few other city-states, but not nearly as much as that of the Sicily's tyranny …show more content…
But this particular aristocracy was also ruled by a few. This would make Sparta an oligarchy. Sparta was ruled by its two Kings, five Ephors, and 60 elder Gerousia (Brand, n.d., pg 29). Sparta was not the only oligarchy though. For example, Corinth had a harsh oligarchy until its people overthrew it (Four Forms of Government in Ancient Greece PDF, n.d.). Megara and Thebes also had forms of an oligarchy system (Cartwright, 2013). Speaking of Athens, "411 BCE in Athens, 'the oligarchy of the 400' took power out of the hands of the Assembly and were themselves superseded by a more moderate oligarchy of 5000 (Cartwright, 2013).” Typically, oligarchies were military rule like. When the people did well, the oligarchies usually became
The governments of these two city-states were not alike in many ways. “It is true that our government is called a democracy, because its administration is in the hands, not of the few, but of the many,” (Document 3). Athens’ government was what we would consider today a direct democracy. This means that their government was run by the people, or in other words “the many”, rather than a couple government officials, or “the few”. Although Athens was running their city as a government by the people, Sparta had a different form of government. “it is made up of oligarchy, monarchy, and democracy,
By the fourth century B.C.E. there were hundreds of Greek democracies. Greece was not a single political entity it was a collection of about 1500 separate poleis or cities scattered around the Mediterranean and black sea shores. The cities that were not democracies were either oligarchies or monarchies (often times called tyrannies). Of the democracies, the oldest, the most stable, the most long-lived, and the most radical, was Athens.
Athens was a much more superior polis compared to Sparta because the Athenians invented new ideas and creations that supported the people, such as democracy, the Athenians led the Delian League, and Sparta created the Peloponnesian League after the Athenians created their alliance, and the Athenians changed the ways of their government many times to suit the people, and the Spartans did not.
Compare and contrast a prominent political and cultural element of the Athenian and Spartan poleis and how this was reflected by the Athenian Army at the Battle of Marathon in 490 BC and the 300 Spartan hoplites at the Battle of Thermopylae in 480 BC.
Greece is a country united by its name, but divided by its ways. Although Sparta and Athens were both Greek cities, their societies were different. Sparta was focused on having a perfect military, whereas Athenian daily life revolved learning and knowledge. When Spartan boys were being trained for an army, Athenian boys were being trained for life. Both of these societies revolved around different government, education from when kids to teenagers, the responsibilities each individual had to keep their spot, and how women played a role throughout each city state.
Sparta and Athens - Explain and Contrast Both Sparta and Athens were Greek city-states. Sparta was a strict military ruled city-state where the people established themselves as a military power early. However Athens was more of a political city-state that was more involved with their economical stature than their military forces. Still changes from the Persian wars would change the powers of the city-state and somewhat unite them.
Sparta contained a four branch government system that was considered among the most unique in all of Greece. Unlike the democracy of Athens, Sparta was based on an oligarchy structure. The diarchy, which consisted of two kings, was the first division of this government. These figures held little influence over the state and served more as a symbol of royal heritage (Kennell 83). The second branch was the Gerousia council which acted as an advising body and hel...
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
Sparta had two kings and twenty-eight elders. This system was very important to maintaining their orderly, stable society since if a king died in battle away from home or was sick the other king would govern the country keeping it in order. There were not only the two kings but the twenty-eight elders who would also help govern the country and make laws. Within the oligarchy there was the citizen assembly. WIthout the citizen assembly laws could be passed that would not benefit the state or those who lived in the community. The citizen assembly ensured that the laws would benefit all except the slaves. (Helots) All citizens were men thirty years and older. At this age men were able to become citizens due to the facts that they had survived wars and were considered wiser from their experiences. Lastly but not least there are the five Ephors. The five Ephors were elected by the citizen assembly and their jobs were to make sure that the government was just and not corrupted. Their job was to observe laws and help maintain the king's authority. This is more effective than Athens political system since, rhetoric speakers in Athens would write their speeches somewhat based on people's emotions to be elected. While in Sparta you had to be elected and earn your place within government. In conclusion their oligarchy was important to the city-state's survival by
The Greece’s Classical Society was about 800-300 BCE. This society has caused a huge movement in human history. Greece’s society has arisen the questions and ideas of which form of government is best? Since Greece has many city-states which
These governments came in different styles such as a monarchy which was led by a king. Another form of government that was seen among the Greeks was aristocracy in which the polis was ruled by a small group of noble, land owning families. One of the more notable polis of ancient Greek was that of Sparta in which they used the oligarchy as there form of government. This type of government is where the people are ruled by a few powerful people. Finally, there was democracy which means “rule of the people” (The Legacy of Ancient Greece and Rome 1-7). This was the government that Athens utilized and helped establish. These varying types of government can be seen throughout governments today, however, it is the government established by the Athenians and their political structure that had a greater impact on the west than that of its Greek polis counterparts.
After the Mycenaeans left many Greek citizens began living in tribes instead of cities (“Archaic”). Through these small tribes they began forming city-states known as “polis” (“Archaic”). City-states allowed them to govern themselves instead of a “basil...
I think that Athens is a good place to live in ancient Greece.It was very peaceful in this city-state.There was a problem the problem was they were both good places to live but both thought they were better than each other.Athens had a strong naval unit that sparta knew they could not beat.
The ancient Greece was divided among several hundreds of city-states called “Poleis”. Within this poleis, Athens and Sparta were the most powerful, significant, largest and significant states.
In Carthage the two heads of state known as “suffets” were chosen by the assembly from the wealthy class of citizens (Carthage, 2008). Politicians were not paid, therefore it was not possible for a poor man to rule, for he had no leisure time to commit to politics (Aristotle, 1944, book 2, 1273b). The Roman system of selecting consuls was also an oligarchy, prior to 367 BCE