Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Athenian democracy and today's democracy
Athenian democracy and today's democracy
Sparta vs athens superiority
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Athenian democracy and today's democracy
Ancient Greece today is most known for the culture: the gods, the dramas, how people lived. What most people do not realize is that there were hundreds, maybe even thousands, of different civilizations spread throughout Greece that all had different forms of government. The three main ones were Athens, Sparta, and Miletus. Each was very different from the other. The most powerful out of all three was Sparta: a military based society. The Spartan government had a strong foundation that was all torn down by one bad leader. The founder of the Spartan government did not found Sparta itself, as it was already in place before he was even born. Old Sparta was based around wealth and there was a large separation gap between the common people and the two kings that ruled. Lycurgus was born into royalty and when his father died, his older brother became king. The queen became pregnant but before the baby was born, the king died. This meant that Lycurgus would be king unless the baby was a boy. The queen tried to convince him to marry her after she aborted the baby so she could remain queen. The reasoning behind this is still unclear but it did not sit right with Lycurgus’ morals so he tricked her into keeping the baby, who turned out to be a boy. If Lycurgus had done what the queen had asked him to do, not only would she remain queen but he …show more content…
would remain king as well. This selflessness and putting Sparta before one’s self would make the foundation of the new government Lycurgus was going to make. After the baby was born, the queen was furious with Lycurgus.
In order to escape her wrath, Lycurgus traveled around the Medatrerian, learning about different governments. Throughout his travels, he knew that one day he would return to Sparta. The Spartan people were begging him to come back. The gap between the common people and the kings had gotten worse and there was inequality within the common people as well. Even the kings were not against him coming back. Finally, he did. He took what he learned from the places he visited and made the perfect government. The basis of the government was to create equality and a strong
military. The biggest reform Lycurgus had to tackle was the equality issue. He did this is a numerous amount of ways but there were four things in particular that really helped the movement. “First and most significant among Lycurgus’ numerous innovations was the institution of the Elders.” (Lycurgus 5) The seperation between the kings and the common people was all based on the ability to make laws. Lycurgus took this power away from the kings and gave it to a committee of Elders. This committee was made up of men who served in the military who were sixty-five or older. While this group was given the power to make laws, it did not create a separation because as long as you were a male who was fighting in the military, you too could join the committee. “Lycurgus’ second, and most revolutionary, reform was his redistribution of land.” (Lycurgus 8) The inequality of wealth amongst the common people came from the ability to make money, which was growing and selling crops. The wealthiest people owned the most land and therefore produced the most crops and made the most money. In order to combat this, Lycurgus redistributed the land so everyone had an equal amount to produce crops on. “He declared that all gold and silver coinage was now invalid, and decreed that only iron should be used as currency; and then he assigned a low value to even a great weight and mass of this, so that a sum of ten minas demanded substantial storage space in a house and a wagon to shift it.” (Lycurgus 9) This made the biggest impact on the Spartan people. There was no such thing as ‘rich’ and ‘poor;’ they could no longer trade with outside civilizations. It made them all equal to each other and no one was better than someone else. While most people were relatively happy with the new changes, the wealthy class were furious. “… Roused the fury of the wealthy against Lycurgus, so that they joined together in a body to jeer at him and to express their anger.” (Lycurgus 11) At one point, they ended up running Lycurgus out of the town where he found refuge in a temple. One young man followed him there and hit him, knocking his eye out. Instead of fighting back, Lycurgus just showed them his eye and they instantly felt ashamed. One of the main parts that made this whole government work was the idea that every person was not an individual but a part of the country. The selflessness and pride of Sparta that came into play with Lycurgus and his nephew really formed the government and culture of Sparta. For hundreds of years, the government and culture stayed relatively the same. It truly is amazing how such a strong civilization could be flipped around with just one bad leader. For the Spartans, that one bad leader was Agesilaus. Agesilaus, like Lycurgus, was born into royalty. His brother was king but when he died his son was supposed to become king. However, it was believed that the son’s actual father was not the king but another man so, with the help of Lystander, Agesilaus became king. Bystander was Agesilaus’ lover and also a respected and trusted general. Soon after Agesilaus became king, he was informed that the Persian empire was building a fleet which could threaten Sparta. However, there was an immediate threat to an area that Lystander had grown fond of and had built up their government. Historians believe that Agesilaus sent out with his military not to defend Sparta but to please his lover and protect his friends. “So [Lystander] persuaded Agesilaus to undertake a campaign - to be fought on behalf of Greece, but very far from the mainland - which would cross the sea and strike first to anticipate the Persians’ preparations.” (Agesilaus 6) However, as soon as Agesilaus saw that Lystander was much more popular and well liked than he was, he became angry. “When he arrived at Ephesus, he was immediately irked and annoyed by Lysander’s power and high reputation there.” (Agesilaus 7) He would ignore Lystander’s comments and advice, which did not go by ignored by Lystander. Agesilaus could not stand that someone was as talented and respected as he was, which went against the very foundation of Spartan culture: selflessness. Just like with taking the campaign for Lystander, Agesilaus would often put family and friends before the good of Sparta. A Spartan man named Sphodrias led an unauthorized attack on Athens that went against religious beliefs. Athens was furious and Spartans were in shock and embarrassed. They all wanted Sphodrias to be exiled but Agesilaus’ son and Sphodrias’ son were lovers. “But finally, with the trial imminent, he summoned up courage to mention to Agesilaus that Cleonymus had begged his assistance with his father’s case. Agesilaus that Archidamus was Cleonymus’ lover… This is what Agesilaus consistently said about the case, and he did so to gratify his son.” (Agesilaus 25) Agesilaus let Sphodrias go to please his son. This created tension between Athens and Sparta that would eventually lead to a war. A common theme for Agesilaus was putting other things, whether that be himself or people he loved, before the good of Sparta. Lycurgus based Sparta’s entire government on being loyal and faithful to Sparta so it is no wonder that because of Agesilaus things started to flip around for Sparta. He would push other people who were as good as him down and make military decisions that would affect all of Sparta based on what his close family and friends thought and wanted. For hundreds of years, Sparta was the most powerful civilization on the planet. Even now, they are considered the most powerful society of that time period. All it took was one bad leader to turn a great and respected civilization into a weak one.
The governments of these two city-states were not alike in many ways. “It is true that our government is called a democracy, because its administration is in the hands, not of the few, but of the many,” (Document 3). Athens’ government was what we would consider today a direct democracy. This means that their government was run by the people, or in other words “the many”, rather than a couple government officials, or “the few”. Although Athens was running their city as a government by the people, Sparta had a different form of government. “it is made up of oligarchy, monarchy, and democracy,
Athens was a much more superior polis compared to Sparta because the Athenians invented new ideas and creations that supported the people, such as democracy, the Athenians led the Delian League, and Sparta created the Peloponnesian League after the Athenians created their alliance, and the Athenians changed the ways of their government many times to suit the people, and the Spartans did not.
In the ancient Greek writing "Lycurgus", the Spartan king introduces various political, social, and economic reforms that were simple enough to guide the ancient Greeks, but still complex enough to govern entire nations. The intuition and intelligence of Lycurgus, and his ability to communicate with his people at a personal level earned him unquestioned loyalty and fervent love from his subjects. His temperance and wisdom were often tested, but the great king never folded in the heat of battle. All of the aforementioned qualities became evident when Lycurgus introduced his economic reforms.
The one thing we know for certain about Spartan society is that we don’t know much about it. Very few documents and artifacts about the Spartans have been discovered, but the ones that have tell us everything we know. Two of these works are Plutarch’s On Sparta and Xenophon’s Spartan Society. One of the main things these two accounts focused on was the Lycurgan reforms. Through their stories and writings Plutarch and Xenophon had both some similarities and differences when talking about the political, economic, militaristic, and social reforms. One of the main differences when comparing these two writings is how Plutarch gives a historical account of Spartan society and tries to keep objectivity
...ining until old age. Because they focused more on military training rather than education, these young boys knew of no other life than what was instilled though Lycurgus. Also, under his reforms, Lycurgus killed a lot of babies. Because he wanted to build a strong army and a strong nation, having weaklings was not part of his plan. As a result, Spartan's population was not as grand as what they made it seem.
The spartan laws, created by Lycurgus, caused obedience to be of the utmost importance and a source of pride for the Spartans. It was one of the defining characteristics of the Spartan ethos; any disobedience to the law was punished severely and without hesitation. The Spartan political system showed great insight by Lycurgus, as it was a mixed government, consisting of kingship, aristocracy, and democracy and provided stability to Spartan politics. “The first and of greatest importance was the establishment of the senate, which, having a power equal to the kings.” (Plut. 5) Spartan citizens are equal under the laws of Lycurgus. Although Kings are considered demi gods and the old revered, their privileges are no greater than a normal Spartan. Spartans, essentially, do not have political equality to the Ephori, the senate, or the Spartan kings, to whom they must remain totally obedient. They are equal in that they are all subject to the law. The senate can counteract the kings giving stability to the commonwealth, the ephori are the supreme power in Sparta, bu...
Xenophon illustrated this very principle in Spartan Society in nearly every example of the greatness of the society is brought up. First, in describing the very ruler, Lycurgus, as wise and, “not copying the other states, but by deciding on an opposite course to the majority that he made his country outstandingly fortunate” (Spartan Society, 166). This statement is in the opening remarks of the writing and lays the foundation of how Xenophon views the Spartans and more clearly their wise leader, Lycurgus. Throughout the rest of the writing Lycurgus is always placed against and superior to the “others” or the nations referred to as “elsewhere.” This does not have specifics of other countries or people groups, but gives a general idea and concept of the ideal society being Sparta. Xenophon says two times in the middle of the work that the views and practices of Lycurgus are opposite of the majority and even the rest of Greece, but then goes to explain their superiority in the following paragraphs (Spartan Society, 173,174). This work goes to show that humanism, idealism, and rationalism all play a heavy part in the development of Xenophon’s Spartan Society, and also in the development of the people of
Firstly, he divided the land into nine thousand equal shares that were divided amongst the state and, the rest was divided up between the Spartiates. The Helots would be assigned to work on a given parcel for agricultural production. The second instrumental economic reform initiated by Lycurgus was the transformation of Spartan currency from gold/silver to iron of little worth. What this did was create an abundance of currency in Sparta, rather than relying on gold and silver, it created a system where accumulating massive wealth was nearly impossible. This reform was met with resistance from Spartan notables, the new currency essentially eliminated large personal wealth. The currency reform effectively eliminated external trade and commerce and created a system where Spartans were dependent on one another. The nature of the economic reforms would have ever-lasting consequences for the nature of the Spartan
The law of Sparta was written and developed by Lycurgus (Blundell). Lycurgus was a famous law maker of the Spartan culture and he is credited with founding many of Spartan institutions and militant reforms (Blundell). One
Sparta was a city-state based on strict military ruling, at the age of seven a young Spartan would start out training and be trained into killing machines. When a Spartan baby is born, high elite Spartan soldiers would observe the baby to see if it was healthy and strong, if not the baby was ill and weak so it would be taken up a mountain and left there to die. This is just one example that shows how Sparta only wants a strong army and doesn't care about anything else. Strict rules of the government made it so that every Sp...
Sparta was a strict military city-state. The people were Dorians who conquered Laconia. This region lies in the Peloponnesus, which lied in southern Greece. The invaders turned the conquered people into state owned slaves, called helots. Since the helots greatly outnumbered their rulers, Spartans established a strict and brutal system of control. The Spartan government had two kings and a council of elders who advised the monarchs. An assembly made up of all citizens approved all major decisions. From child-hood, a Spartan prepared to be part of the military. All newborn were examined and the healthy lived and the sickly were left to die. Spartans wanted future soldiers or mothers of soldiers to be healthy. At the age of seven, boys trained for a lifetime in the Spartan military. They moved to the barracks and endured brutal and extensive training.
Throughout ancient Greece history, there has been multiple lawgivers that shaped Greece's culture and social dynamics. Two of those main and well-known lawgivers of that time are Lycurgus and Solon. While Lycurgus reform shaped Spartan society and Solon's shaped Athens, their laws were created for the greater good of their cities. Both lawgivers have a different approach as to how they could help their cities and not favor just one side of the social hierarchy and not the other. They seem to have a different definition of justice and equality. In their reform, Solon was more of a neutralist while Lycurgus was trying to achieve equality. While both addressed the inequality that loomed over their cities, their reform and tactics were completely different from each other but one thing for sure, it changed Athens and Sparta drastically during that period of time.
Sparta contained a four branch government system that was considered among the most unique in all of Greece. Unlike the democracy of Athens, Sparta was based on an oligarchy structure. The diarchy, which consisted of two kings, was the first division of this government. These figures held little influence over the state and served more as a symbol of royal heritage (Kennell 83). The second branch was the Gerousia council which acted as an advising body and hel...
Athens and Sparta were both city-states in Classical Greece. While Athens embraced democracy, Sparta was a dictatorial fierce warrior state. Sparta was a militaristic community, Athens was a freethinking, and commerce minded city-state. Modern societies have modeled their government organizational structure and military discipline practices from lessons learned of these ancient city-states. There is much is to be praised regarding Classical Greece for their courage, their progressive thinking and the birth of democracy. However, I think it is important to remember that in both cases, Athens and Sparta were able to sustain their lifestyle on the backs of countless slaves, non-citizens and women and that there is a darker and less romantic side to the past.
These governments came in different styles such as a monarchy which was led by a king. Another form of government that was seen among the Greeks was aristocracy in which the polis was ruled by a small group of noble, land owning families. One of the more notable polis of ancient Greek was that of Sparta in which they used the oligarchy as there form of government. This type of government is where the people are ruled by a few powerful people. Finally, there was democracy which means “rule of the people” (The Legacy of Ancient Greece and Rome 1-7). This was the government that Athens utilized and helped establish. These varying types of government can be seen throughout governments today, however, it is the government established by the Athenians and their political structure that had a greater impact on the west than that of its Greek polis counterparts.