Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of impression management
Case study on impression management
Impression management performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of impression management
In the United States, it is most commonly taught that there are two genders: male and female. However, the 2005 documentary Middle Sexes challenges that idea by looking into the cultures of other countries throughout the world. While a large portion of the United States population thinks that non-cisgender and queer people are unnatural or freaks, that opinion is not global. Many people who follow Christianity in the United States find it morally offensive to be anything but straight and cis, while many other religions and cultures embrace non-binary and queer people as the doing of their god. Middle Sexes looks into the differences between the North American social standards for gender and how they are clash with other cultures’ beliefs. The …show more content…
documentary leaves the audience to beg the question: are we thinking the right way? One of the first stories told in the documentary is the story of a Christian family with an ambiguous son named Noah. Noah is a cisgender male and lives as a boy, but he has stereotypically feminine tendencies and flocks to things that are, in our gendered society, labeled for girls. His parents love him and want the best for him, but are concerned for his well-being in their small, predominantly conservative Christian town. In her article “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough,” Anne Fausto-Sterling writes about the birth of intersexual people. Many physicians perform surgery on intersexual newborns immediately upon their discovery of the child’s biology. Fausto-Sterling writes that the aim of the physicians is to give the child an easier life so that the child can “slip into society as ‘normal’ heterosexual males or females.” Though Noah is not an intersex child (he was born into the typical XY male body), I think that his parents want what the physicians who preform gender reassignment surgeries at birth want. They want their kid to have a normal, easy life. And I don’t see anything wrong with the wishes of Noah’s parents, because they said repeatedly in the documentary that they will love Noah regardless of Noah’s gender and sexuality. During the interview with Noah’s parents, his mother specifically said that she was Christian and that she loves her son despite what is taught in church. But, I think that religion causes a lot of conflict when it comes to gender and sexuality. I will speak from personal experience, and I don’t want to offend anyone’s beliefs, so I will try my best maintain the “in my experience” and the “I” mentality. I was born into the typical XX chromosomal, female body. I am generally comfortable in this body, with some slight discomfort on a very rare occasion. But, much like Noah, I grew up being interested in things that were seen as “for boys.” While other girls were playing dolls and trying on their big sisters’ dresses, I was outside playing with Tonka trucks in the dirt and trying on my big brother’s suits. My female friends were interested in shopping and going to the mall; I was interested in fishing and going to Home Depot. I wore tee shirts and jeans most of the time, and I hated getting dressed up because, for me, that meant wearing a dress or a skirt, and I hated that. It came as no shock to my friends when I came out as gay during my sophomore and junior years of high school. I got a lot of “yeah, I figured,” and “I mean, you wear a LOT of flannels” in response to my coming out. But what people didn’t and probably still don’t realize is that it took a lot of time, emotional instability, and self-reconstruction to get to the point where I could audibly say “I’m gay.” My parents raised me and my five siblings as Roman Catholic, and it is accepted by many who follow that religion that homosexuality is wrong. I figured out that I was gay in the seventh grade, but I pushed it away. I literally tried to pray the gay away. In eighth grade, I received the Sacrament of Confirmation through the Catholic Church. I tried so hard to be what God “wanted” me to be. And I panicked when I realized that, despite my best efforts, I’m as queer as a three dollar bill. So, during my freshman year of high school, I stopped being so devoted to the church. By the end of my sophomore year, I wasn’t going to mass anymore. And, by the end of my senior year, upon being asked about my religion, I answered “I’m agnostic.” But, it took four years of constant change to be that point. Had I not been Catholic, I would have had a much easier life from seventh through twelfth grade. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Erving Goffman is a very well-known example of a sociologist who follows symbolic interactionism, which as a school of thought focuses on face-to-face interaction.
On the topic of gender, he believes that we are constantly trying to give the best impression of our gender, and we form our gender on a daily basis. Goffman calls this “impression management.” He also believes that our identity is formed through our day-to-day interactions, so if someone was to question my gender (which has happened in the past), then I would, in turn, question my gender. Though I believe that at least some part of what Goffman is saying is true, authors Don Zimmerman and Candace West argue against his theory. In their collaborative work “Doing Gender,” the authors present the idea that others’ opinions of an individual’s gender, and which gender they see that individual as has nothing to do with one’s display of …show more content…
gender. In the case of Noah, the child whose story was included in Middle Sexes, his daily self-presentation to the outside world was male.
He wore clothes marketed towards boys to school. However, children still questioned his gender. This could be due to the highness of his voice or the toys that he played with, I don’t really know. But these kids’ questions did bother him. He didn’t want to answer them, and he was convicted in that fact. It could be that he doesn’t honestly know that he is a boy or a girl, or that he knew and just didn’t want to answer, but there was an emotional reaction to the question, which in my opinion, is what Goffman was trying to
show. Now, on a daily basis, I present myself as a very masculine female. I wear mostly men’s clothes, except for my pants because a part of having the XX chromosomes for me was getting the XX hips that come with my family, which are not hips made for men’s pants. Before, I mentioned that I hated getting dressed up as a kid, and I still kind of do. I need to evaluate every situation that I get dressed up for. Is it safe for me to wear men’s clothes? Will people be disrespected by a tie and vest on a woman? It is sometimes difficult for me to decide what to wear, and it causes anxiety. And I think that this stems back to Goffman’s idea of impression management. There are people who I don’t want to think or to know that I’m gay because I am afraid of their reaction. So, I wear a dress, both literally and metaphorically, to impress or satisfy them. I have a lot of ideas about sex, gender, and sexuality. But I think the message that the film Middle Sexes and the readings are trying to enforce is that the United States’ opinion of gender and sexuality is just a cultural thing. If someone is Trans or intersex or queer in any way, that’s okay. The U.S. is just stuck in this binary view of the world. We like groups of two. They’re easy. If I had grown up in Suriname, the idea that I love and am attracted to women would be seen as God’s will. As long as I was being good to my girlfriend or wife, I would be doing everything right. I think that it is an absolute shame that I grew up believing that I was a mistake and an abomination because of who I love.
The stark expectations surrounding gender and sex of today’s society stem largely from a need to seek use of exclusionary language. Jacques Derrida, one of the many source contributors from which Judith Butler sought out to formulate Queer Theory as we know it today, pegged the idea that language is exclusionary in and of itself. His most commonly used example is that of “chair” versus “not chair”; how do you define a chair? If you were to look at a bench, a couch, a table, a swing, a bed- these things are “not chair”. Similar to this example is the situation that society forces every individual born into it to face- “male” and “not male”, or “female” and “not female”. Fausto-Sterling approaches this issue from a unique perspective that utilizes both her knowledge as biologist (looking towards the cellular basis of “sex”) paired with her self-proclaimed feminist perspective. Her perspective on a more sensible system of sex was initial...
“Boys will be boys, and girls will be girls”: few of our cultural mythologies seem as natural as this one. But in this exploration of the gender signals that traditionally tell what a “boy” or “girl” is supposed to look and act like, Aaron Devor shows how these signals are not “natural” at all but instead are cultural constructs. While the classic cues of masculinity—aggressive posture, self-confidence, a tough appearance—and the traditional signs of femininity—gentleness, passivity, strong nurturing instincts—are often considered “normal,” Devor explains that they are by no means biological or psychological necessities. Indeed, he suggests, they can be richly mixed and varied, or to paraphrase the old Kinks song “Lola,” “Boys can be girls and girls can be boys.” Devor is dean of social sciences at the University of Victoria and author of Gender Blending: Confronting the Limits of Duality (1989), from which this selection is excerpted, and FTM: Female-to-Male Transsexuals in Society (1997).
The play, A Raisin in the Sun by Lorraine Hansberry, begins with an African American family about to receive a check from their father’s death. The check makes the family think about what each person would do with the money and they all have different ideas. Whenever we find out what Walter Lee and Beneatha each want to do with that money, we learn more about their different views on gender and what they believe a man and women "should” do. The family lives in Chicago in the 1950’s, which from my research about this time and location, I’ve learned it’s like everywhere else during this time; the men think they control everything and everyone. During this time, these men and women were raised like this, so they didn’t know any different. It’s hard for us to read about this stuff because women are much more independent these days than they were even just 10 years ago. Walter and Beneatha have different views on how men and women should act. Walter’s relates more to the time period they are in and Beneatha is more modern.
In this article, Shaw and Lee describe how the action of labels on being “feminine” or “masculine” affect society. Shaw and Lee describe how gender is, “the social organization of sexual difference” (124). In biology gender is what sex a person is and in culture gender is how a person should act and portray themselves. They mention how gender is what we were taught to do in our daily lives from a young age so that it can become natural(Shaw, Lee 126). They speak on the process of gender socialization that teaches us how to act and think in accordance to what sex a person is. Shaw and Lee state that many people identify themselves as being transgendered, which involves a person, “resisting the social construction of gender into two distinct, categories, masculinity and femininity and working to break down these constraining and polarized categories” ( 129). They write about how in mainstream America masculinity and femininity are described with the masculine trait being the more dominant of the two. They define how this contributes to putting a higher value of one gender over the other gender called gender ranking (Shaw, Lee 137). They also speak about how in order for femininity to be viewed that other systems of inequality also need to be looked at first(Shaw,Lee 139).
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
The gender binary of Western culture dichotomizes disgendered females and males, categorizing women and men as opposing beings and excluding all other people. Former professor of Gender Studies Walter Lee Williams argues that gender binarism “ignores the great diversity of human existence,” (191) and is “an artifact of our society’s rigid sex-roles” (197). This social structure has proved detrimental to a plethora of people who fall outside the Western gender dichotomy. And while this gender-exclusive system is an unyielding element of present day North American culture, it only came to be upon European arrival to the Americas. As explained by Judith Lorber in her essay “Night to His Day: The Social Construction of Gender”, “gender is so pervasive in our society we assume it is bred into our genes” (356). Lorber goes on to explain that gender, like culture, is a human production that requires constant participation (358).
The concept that gender is limited strictly to two categories, male and female, has been around since the beginning of mankind. The notion, also known as gender binarism, states that “human beings are by nature either male or female” (Shalko). In past societies, people have followed this idea of only two genders; however, in more recent years, people have uncovered a whole new variety of gender identities. This concept is called gender fluidity; it is the idea that gender has no boundaries that prevent people from expressing who they really are. In today’s world, gender is a touchy subject to speak or write about. Many people are unaccepting of the idea that there are more than two genders. It goes against everything they have ever learned.
Sex is one of the most central themes in society today, with generally everybody in the world, adults and children, either seeing it in the mass media or taking part in it, whether it be for their career, for reproductive reasons, or for pleasure. Because of its predominance, sexuality plays an important, if not the most important, role in social inequality, causing double standards, violence and internal self-worth issues for minorities. Factors such as pornography, prostitution, and the way people view homosexuality and intersexuality as repugnant all influence the prejudice ways in which society views and treats women, homosexuals, and intersexuals.
“Because we belong to various groups, we develop multiple identities that come into play at different times” (Martin, 96). While watching a sports game, my gender identity may be more prominent as I fit in with the guys and talk about what a horrible call the referee just made. Later on at a marriage equality rally sexuality may be the topic that comes to play. I am still the same person in each situation, yet different parts of my identity are displayed based on what the situation dictates. It is much like the different faces we display for various activities. A playful face would not be appropriate at board meeting, much like a work face is not appropriate at your daughters fifth
Gender is a socially constructed phenomenon, and how acceptable one’s relationship is determined by society’s view of gender roles. Because the majority of the population is characterized as heterosexual, those who deviate from that path are ...
In a culture that is rapidly altering, and redefining the way that society recognizes our own identity. Gender, the state that differentiates our feminine and masculine qualities and characteristics, is socially constructed. This differs from the biological determination of a person 's physical attributes. With the idea that Gender is a social construct, individuals have tried to resist the roles that have been established, and try to defy the codes that define masculine and feminine. In this essay I plan to discuss the construction of gendered identities and how this represented in popular culture, answering whether we can or cannot be gender-neutral in our culture.
Society has planted a representation into people’s minds on how each gender is supposed to be constructed. When one thinks of the word gender, the initial responses are male and female but gender may be represented in many additional terms. As defined, “Gender refers to the social expectations that surround these biological categories.” (Steckley, 2017, pg.256) Gender is something that is ascribed,
Throughout Western civilization, culturally hegemonic views on gender and sexuality have upheld a rigid and monolithic societal structure, resulting in the marginalization and dehumanization of millions of individuals who differ from the expected norm. Whether they are ridiculed as freaks, persecuted as blasphemers, or discriminated as sub-human, these individuals have been historically treated as invisible and pushed into vulnerable positions, resulting in cycles of poverty and oppression that remain prevalent even in modern times. Today, while many of these individuals are not publicly displayed as freaks or persecuted under Western law, women, queer, and intersexed persons within our society still nonetheless find themselves under constant
Gender and sexuality can be comprehended through social science. Social science is “the study of human society and of individual relationships in and to society” (free dictionary, 2009). The study of social science deals with different aspects of society such as politics, economics, and the social aspects of society. Gender identity is closely interlinked with social science as it is based on an identity of an individual in the society. Sexuality is “the condition of being characterized and distinguished by sex” (free dictionary, 2009). There are different gender identities such as male, female, gay, lesbian, transgender, and bisexual that exists all around the world. There is inequality in gender identities and dominance of a male regardless of which sexuality they fall under. The males are superior over the females and gays superior over the lesbians, however it different depending on the place and circumstances. This paper will look at the gender roles and stereotypes, social policy, and homosexuality from a modern and a traditional society perspective. The three different areas will be compared by the two different societies to understand how much changes has occurred and whether or not anything has really changed. In general a traditional society is more conservative where as a modern society is fundamentally liberal. This is to say that a traditional society lists certain roles depending on the gender and there are stereotypes that are connected with the genders. One must obey the one that is dominant and make decisions. On the other hand, a modern society is lenient, It accepts the individual’s identity and sexuality. There is no inequality and everyone in the society is to be seen as individuals not a part of a family unit...
Identities are an important part of the human experience. One of the many identities that creates a person is gender. Society, being the entity establishing social norms and social roles, plays a part in effecting the individual’s gender, and how they choose to express themself. The underlying or overlying identities also have the same effect. Gender is not only an identity, it is a lifestyle inside and out. Gender, like race, class, and sexuality; is not limited to the binary scale, and that is normal, natural, and human. The concept of gender is man-made, but it forces one’s hand to analyze the thought processes behind an individual's perception on gender through self, through society, or through the dichotomy and/or correspondence of the