Memory Recovery in Therapy: Recommendations to Clinical psychologist Counselors

2508 Words6 Pages

Memory recovery in therapy: Recommendations to clinical psychologists & counselors The false memory and recovered memory literature is marked by controversy. It examines the phenomenon a variety of patients have exhibited: purportedly “losing” memories of trauma, only to recover them later in life (Gavlick, 2001). In these cases, temporary memory loss is attributed to psychological causes (i.e. a traumatic event) rather than known damage to the brain (Gavlick, 2001). While some assert that the creation of false memories through therapeutic practice is a serious concern and founded associations like the False Memory Syndrome Foundation (FMSF) in the U.S. and the British False Memory Society (BFMS) in order to advocate against psychological malpractice, other researchers contend that the evidence for “false memory syndrome,” or the recovery of untrue memories, is weak (Brewin & Andrews, 1998; Pope, 1996). The debate arose largely in the 1990s, though a consensus in the literature still has not been reached. Clearly, the debate is of considerable concern to both clients and therapists. Psychologists and counselors must understand the memory research in order to best serve their clients and better represent themselves professionally without inappropriately using memory recovery techniques (Farrants, 1998; Gavlick, 2001). The United Kingdom Council for Psychotherapy suggested in its Notes for practitioners: Recovered memories of abuse publication that therapists must be “aware of research and knowledge in relevant areas such as memory and repression” and that they have a “duty to inform themselves of current theory and knowledge” (1997, p. 1; Burman, 2002). This paper seeks to update practitioners who are in clinics rather than resea... ... middle of paper ... ...nan, & MacCauley, 2002; Baddeley, Eysecnk, & Anderson, 2009) o Utilize context reinstatement: encourage the client to elaborate on any details that were relevant about what they saw, how they felt at the time, or any other sensory information. These cues can encourage reporting of more details and activate more related nodes (spreading activation model) o Refrain from asking many questions during recall. The client can only devote attention to so many ideas at once, so repeated suggestions from the clinician can confuse retrieval and even interfere with former memories due to retroactive interference o Consider encouraging the client to remember events from different viewpoints or in different orders. This can lead to improved recall because memory traces are complex and contain various types of information, so altering the perspective may provide different insights

Open Document