Quantitative Data Collection Observation of mealtime hand hygiene behaviors occurred during the facility’s meal times, which the assistant administrator emailed to the researcher (7:00, 11:30, and 4:30). One cycle began on different days of the week (Thursday, Wednesday, and Saturday) to determine the adherence to mealtime hand hygiene behaviors under various conditions. All participants received disposable wipes per the facility’s current practice. The researcher observed mealtime hand hygiene behaviors throughout the meal. The researcher began observing as participants entered the dining hall and ended when the participant removed the clothing protector and left the table. Behavior prior to the beginning of the meal was observed but not recorded. If the wipe was placed on table for resident, it was recorded as a visual cue and if it was handed to the resident it was recorded as a nonverbal cue. Verbal cues from healthcare workers were recorded on the Flowsheet for Hand Hygiene Observation (Appendix K). Former participants were observed performing mealtime hand hygiene behaviors during subsequent cycles, but this data was not recorded. Participants were randomly assigned to intervention groups. Both Group A (no visual cue) (n=6) and Group B (visual cue) (n=6) received education and a …show more content…
The data were entered into SPSS by the researcher and were screened for errors and cleaned using established protocols (Pallant, 2013). Frequencies were run on each variable to check minimum and maximum scores and to assess valid and missing data. Missing data were minimal and assigned the code 999 to avoid confusion with the participant’s age of 99 years old. Tests of normality were conducted for continuous variables and all variables were checked for any violation of the assumptions underlying the planned statistical analyses (Pallant, 2013). No violations of statistical assumptions were
Collected data were subjected to analysis of variance using the SAS (9.1, SAS institute, 2004) statistical software package. Statistical assessments of differences between mean values were performed by the LSD test at P = 0.05.
Health tips. Hand hygiene. (2009). Mayo Clinic Health Letter (English Ed.), 27(12), 3. Retrieved from
Feces, viruses, staph, Salmonella and hand-foot-mouth disease. These are just a few of the things that can be on our hands from normal daily living. With compromised immune systems, open wounds and other issues, these are very harmful. That is why it is so important to keep proper hand hygiene in mind at all times. Hospital infections affect almost two million people in the United States every year, 100,000 of whom die. Up to 70 percent of infections could be prevented if the health care workers follow recommended protocol (Michigan Health Lab, May 26, 2016). Nobody wants to know that when your food has
This literature review will analyze and critically explore four studies that have been conducted on hand hygiene compliance rates by Healthcare workers (HCWs). Firstly, it will look at compliance rates for HCWs in the intensive care units (ICU) and then explore the different factors that contribute to low hand hygiene compliance. Hospital Acquired infections (HAI) or Nosocomial Infections appear worldwide, affecting both developed and poor countries. HAIs represent a major source of morbidity and mortality, especially for patients in the ICU (Hugonnet, Perneger, & Pittet, 2002). Hand hygiene can be defined as any method that destroys or removes microorganisms on hands (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009). According to the World Health Organization (2002), a HAI can be defined as an infection occurring in a patient in a hospital or other health care facility in whom the infection was not present or incubating at the time of admission. The hands of HCWs transmit majority of the endemic infections. As
“Failure to attend to hand hygiene has serious consequences: it has a negative effect on patient safety and the quality of patients’ lives, as well as on their confidence in healthcare delivery. However, the prevalence of hand hygiene omission is still high” (Canadian Disease Control, 2016 p 1). Washing hands before and after patient contact seems like a simple solution to prevent the spread of bacteria between patients. But it is not as simple as it seems.According to new CDC data, “approximately one in 25 patients acquires a health care-associated infection during their hospital care, adding up to about 722,000 infections a year. Of these, 75,000 patients die from their infections ( CDC, 2016 p 1).” Leaving a finacial burden on Canada’s health care
Applicable populations: The assessment is designed to be utilized with individuals between the ages of 18-73 (SASSI, 2001).
Whitby, M., Pessoa-Silva, C., Mclaws, M., Allegranzi, B., Sax, H., Larson, E., Seto, W., Donaldson, L. & Pittet, D. (2007). Behavioural considerations for hand hygiene practices: the basic building blocks. Journal Of Hospital Infection, 65 (1), pp. 113-114. 1--8.
Thus, for the purpose of this paper, I will be describing a scenario that I witnessed where a Registered Care Aide (RCA) provided care in an inappropriate manner by means of hand hygiene and highlight the importance of infection control as a way to minimize nosocomial infections and contamination of the surrounding
Then again, when it is an everyday thing, it should be talked about with the employee. I don’t believe that low self-hygiene should be taken lightly, especially when it comes to working in surgery and in an office that is supposed to be high in sterilization.
The authors of this article have outlined the purpose, aims, and objectives of the study. It also provides the methods used which is quantitative approach to collect the data, the results, conclusion of the study. It is important that the author should present the essential components of the study in the abstract because the abstract may be the only section that is read by readers to decide if the study is useful or not or to continue reading (Coughlan, Cronin, and Ryan, 2007; Ingham-Broomfield, 2008 p.104; Stockhausen and Conrick, 2002; Nieswiadomy, 2008 p.380).
This paper is an illustration of quantitative data analysis using the IBM SPSS Statistics software. It does not provide the details of technical skill to operate SPSS but focuses on developing a set of decisions and actions in order to set up, describe, manipulate and analyse data in the specific context of the study of Jackson and Mullarkey (2000). In order to fulfil the task, this paper illustrates a step-by-step of actions that were made on the data. It also gives the insight into the determination of each step that helps interpret the findings from the data.
Using good hand hygiene is a start to making sure the patient environment is safe. “Handwashing is a fundamental principle and practice in the prevention, control, and reduction of healthcare-acquired infections” (Bjerke, 2004, p. 1). Hand hygiene aids in infection control, being as most hospital acquired infections are due to improper or absence of hand hygiene. Fox, Wavra, Drake, Mulligan, Jones, Bennett, and Bader (2015) suggest that 2.5 million deaths occur from hospital-acquired infections and of those deaths, 90,000 were preventable if the workers in healthcare would have used proper hand hygiene. Piece of mind is a mutual benefit of using hand hygiene in the healthcare setting. A nurse benefits from using hand hygiene because it would reduce the risk of that nurse contaminating other patients when going from patient room to patient room. A patient benefits from using hand hygiene because it reduces the risk of that patient spreading infection from one part of the body to another. Piece of mind is the benefit for knowing that patients and nurses are protected in healthcare facilities by using hand hygiene. Patients and nurses will benefit from using hand hygiene because it is a simple way to aid in keeping the individual healthy. The hands carry many germs and constant adherence to good hand hygiene will decrease the risk of people catching illnesses and contaminating shared surfaces (door handles, tables, and
The SPSS software 18.0 has been used for data input and analysis. Every answer in the questionnaire has been computed.
This paper contains an analysis of the hand hygiene/fingernails procedure from Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Mankato, specifically alcohol based hand rubs. This paper also contains an analysis of research to enforce the effectiveness and the importance of hand washing procedures using alcohol based hand rubs in healthcare settings such as hospitals and long-term care facilities. Infection and diseases caused by lack of hand hygiene is a major problem in healthcare that contributes to multiple infections, illnesses and diseases as well as possible death. It’s important to know the importance and effectiveness of hand hygiene using alcohol based hand rubs in healthcare in order to stop these infections, diseases, illnesses, and unnecessary
This paper will detail and observe the social dynamics within a kitchen in The Café restaurant. Although there are various levels, the focus is in the middle class of employees. Their social dynamic, how they interact with one another, will be compared to the employee ranking system to see if there are any major correlations. From the group, I want to see if there is any correlations between the Class groups and if gender plays any role in the social dynamic in the kitchen. This particular group was selected after careful consideration for a large group to observe and interview.