Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Clinical interview and mental status exam
Chapter 5 mental status assessment exam
Mental status examination quiz
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Clinical interview and mental status exam
TEST ASSESSMENT ANALYSIS
Mental Status Exam (MSE)Test purpose:
The purpose of a mental status exam is to evaluate the general functioning of an individual at any given point.
Test use: Mental status exams are used to assess an individual 's cognitive functioning. They can be useful in assisting diagnosing a variety of cognitive disorders.
Test development and history: Mental status exams are rooted in Pinel 's beliefs as described in his 1801 publication of Treatise on Insanity. Pinel, often referred to as one of the modern fathers of psychiatry, asserted that “to seize the true character of mental derangement in a given case, and to pronounce an infallible prognosis of the event, is often a task of particular delicacy, and requires
…show more content…
Applicable populations: Mental status exams are utilized with a variety of populations, but are most commonly utilized with older populations to detect signs of dementia and alzheimer’s.
Validity and reliability: Many commonly utilized mental status exams, such as the Saint Louis University Mental Status Exam (SLUMS), have no established test-retest reliability, inter-rater/intra-rater reliability, or internal consistency. Both the SLUMS and the commonly utilized Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) have been noted for their excellent validity ratings (r = 0.75) (Raad, 2014).
Malingering and deception: Mental status exams are based upon clinical observations from well trained clinicians, therefore minimizing the chance of the exaggerating or minimizing of symptoms.
Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory
…show more content…
Applicable populations: The assessment is designed to be utilized with individuals between the ages of 18-73 (SASSI, 2001).
Validity and reliability: The assessment has an overall reliability coefficient of .93 based on test-retest reliability, making it an extremely reliable assessment (Fredricks, 2010). For it 's validity rate, the assessment has an overall validity of 93.9% (Fredricks, 2010). However, many argue that this reliability and validity be accepted with caution. The test-retest reliability is limited by the fact that it is only reported over a two-week period. In addition, the sample population with a high occurrence of substance abuse disorder, could attribute to it 's high validity rate (Fredricks, 2010).
Malingering and deception: This instrument contains a validity scale, aimed at identifying random response patterns. It has also been noted for its effectiveness in identifying individuals in denial or those trying to conceal their substance abuse issues (SASSI,
The sample used to norm the test was inclusive, and studies have showed little to no discrepancies in scores in regards to demographics (gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status). I found limited data regarding the exactly reliability coefficients and the validity of the test. However, I did discover this test to be used when determining concurrent validity of other tests of anxiety. There are no limits to this test in regards to a population or administration, as it is written at an elementary reading level and provides multiple administration types (verbal, audio CD, reading) and response types (verbal or nonverbal). The only area of limitation that I believe exists with this test is its vulnerability to self-report biases, affecting the accuracy of the scores produced for children. I feel very comfortable using this measure in my profession, and believe it can provide a strong base for assessing a child’s anxiety levels and their impacts socially or
One of the last types of ways investigators are coached to detect deception is in the behavioral attitudes of a person being interviewed such as being unconcerned or over anxious (Kassin, 2005). The success rate of looking for these cues are very successful in telling if an individual is being deceitful and has surpassed any laboratory tests conducted on the subject. The laboratory test however did reveal some interesting facts. The research showed that people who had training and experience did not score better than the control group who received no training. In fact all individuals scored at the chance level with the people who had training scored just above chance or at the chance level. To check if special training in the detection of deception was more accurate a study ...
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
In diagnosing mental health the positive outweigh the negative and it generally helps an individual to understand their condition and possible treatments for it. Integrating biological, psychological and social factors and holism when diagnosing a mental health illness is very beneficial because it looks into every aspect and explores the condition in more depth allowing clinicians to find any underlying conditions and to develop an effective case formulation and treatment
“Ultimately, diagnosis of a substance use disorder or PTSD relies on clinical assessment using DSM criteria. Screening instruments exist that can help uncover or point the way toward a potential diagnosis. For alcohol use disorders, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and the AUDIT-Consumption (AUDIT-C) have been widely validated as self-report screening measures. A single-item screening measure was recently validated for drug use disorders consisting of the single question, “How many times in the past year have you used an illegal drug or used a prescription medication for nonmedical reasons?” A response of 1 time or more yields a positive screen.” -Returning Veterans With Addictions. (2011, July 11). Psychiatric Times. Retrieved Februa...
Kendell, R. and Jablensky, A. (2003), Distinguishing between the validity and utility of psychiatric diagnoses, American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 160, No. 1, pp. 4-12.
“The physician performs a variety of tests to evaluate mental, emotional and language functions, movement and coordination, balance, vision, and the other four senses (Diagnosing
was able to comprehend my directions of the assessment. Even though I offered N.F. the opportunity to ask me questions prior to the start of the assessment tool, N.F. stated to me that he had no questions to ask. Accordingly, I assumed that I did not need to answer any questions. When I began administering the Occupational Questionnaire, N.F. completed the activity column first before completing the columns composing of the questions. Since there are 48 rows and 5 columns to complete, N.F. took his time completing the questionnaire with minimal guidance, even though I was watching him the entire time (Smith et al., 1986).
History shows that signs of mental illness and abnormal behavior have been documented as far back as the early Greeks however, it was not viewed the same as it is today. The mentally ill were previously referred to as mad, insane, lunatics, or maniacs. W.B. Maher and B.A. Maher (1985) note how many of the terms use had roots in old English words that meant emotionally deranged, hurt, unhealthy, or diseased. Although early explanations were not accurate, the characteristics of the mentally ill have remained the same and these characteristics are used to diagnose disorders to date. Cultural norms have always been used to assess and define abnormal behavior. Currently, we have a decent understanding of the correlates and influences of mental illness. Although we do not have complete knowledge, psychopathologists have better resources, technology, and overall research skills than those in ancient times.
These types of personality assessments are useful because they can help us see how each of us are different and how we each fit into our roles and responsibilities. Life would not be nearly as functional if we were all the same, and personality assessments can be useful by showing us how we all can work together and see our strengths and weaknesses in a way that can help us improve them.
“Aptitudes are potential abilities, whereas abilities are the knowledge and skills that an individual currently possesses.” (Schermerhorn 2003) Professionals such as Doctors, Lawyers, and even professional drivers all require a specific level of skill and knowledge to be able to do their jobs. For anyone of these professionals they could not perform their jobs if they had skill but no knowledge or knowledge and no skill. Skills and knowledge are important considerations for a manager when choosing to hire a person. There are many different kinds of tests used to measure mental aptitudes and abilities. Some tests are designed to test specific skills and abilities such as a professional driver would be given a drive test and would be asked to demonstrate their knowledge on how to operate specific equipment on the truck and trailer. Some tests are designed to test general skills and abilities, someone applying for a general secretary job may be ask to take a typing test, 10-key, or demonstrate a general knowledge of computers.
Neuropsychological testing is used to assess and diagnosis brain impairments, such as a head injury, dementia, or Alzheimer’s (Gregory, 1999). Purposes of neuropsychological assessments include determining if the problem is physiological (e.g., brain damage or lesion), the nature of the dysfunction (e.g., location or type), and cognitive deficits caused by the problem (Class Notes VIII). For example, following a brain injury, a neurological battery of tests may be given in order to assess the individual to see if there has been any change in cognitive functioning. Results from neurological assessments can provide information on the individual’s current mental capacities, which allows for the development of a specific diagnosis and an individualized treatment plan (Gregory, 1999). Additionally, these tests help document the effects of a progressive illness (i.e., Alzheimer’s) or can confirm the individual’s recovery (Gregory, 1999). Furthermore, if suspicion or referral questions about cognitive functioning are presented, then screening tests are often given beforehand to assess whether or not a neurological test battery or flexible battery is required. These screening tests are shorter versions that are easier to administer and interpret than the long intensive neurological test batteries (Gregory, 1999).
The tests help to speed up the process of hiring new staff in businesses. My thoughts prior attempting psychometric tests have changed; I now think they are key when hiring new employees, as having the best employees will lead to a successful business. Having attempted the tests, I now know what I need to improve on to ensure I have the best chances of employability. There are a number of resource available which I can use to improve my test performance and by practising I will know exactly what to expect when applying for placements and graduate jobs in the near
To diagnose a substance use disorders, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition (DSM 5) uses a pattern of behaviors based on eleven criteria. These criteria have been broken into four groupings: impaired control (criteria 1-4); social impairment (criteria 5-7); risky use (criteria 8-9); and pharmacological criteria (criteria 10-11) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Although grouped together, each criteria has its own focus.
The verbal reasoning test is one of the most commonly used psychometric tests (or aptitude tests) to measure candidates' suitability and potential. The easier verbal reasoning test, such as sentence completion and analogies, measures your ability to use the English language in the workplace.