McFarland, USA is essentially about Jim White, an Anglo-Saxon high school coach, whom is fired after he accidentally injures his captain football player. He is then forced to relocate to a small town named McFarland, as it was the only school that would hire him, due to the prior incident he had. McFarland is predominantly dominated with Mexican Americans. White eventually creates a cross-country team as he learns of the amazing, physical abilities his students have. With all the odds against them, the team are deemed as underdogs, but eventually come out on top as champions. Director Niki Caro performs a fantastic job portraying the struggles and burdens the young team of Mexican American students overcame to then become champions in the …show more content…
It is mentioned in the film that adolescents can start working on the field as young as ten or eleven years old. At one point in the film, three of the Diaz brothers are forced to quit the team, because their father needs them to pick more produce in the field. In order, to maintain his players, Jim volunteers to go help the Diaz and their family to pick more produce. By the end of their shift, the coach is ready to give up, while the rest of the group has advanced to the next field, he is still in his first aisle. He gives up and lays down, because his back is in intense pain. He later admits that this has been the hardest job he has ever done. This scene does a magnificent job emphasizing how backbreaking these workers must endeavor to earn a …show more content…
My parents never had the funding nor resources to ever be able to learn how to study, instead they were always encouraged to work. This movie is one that many families of Mexican Americans and immigrants can relate to. I love that this movie emphasizes how hard Mexican Americans work, because that is how they are in reality. The movie further exhibited the typical stereotypes Mexicans face daily such as how other teammates from the opposite team mocked them because they thought they did not understand the English
During the mid-1900`s, mental illnesses were rarely discussed in mainstream media due to negative stigma surrounding mental illnesses. As a result, characters in film rarely had mental disorders because of the directors` worries of audiences` reactions to how the illnesses were portrayed. Director, Edward Dmytryk, however, attempted to diminish the stigma through his film Raintree County (1957) with Susanna Drake Shawnessy`s mental instability. Elizabeth Taylor`s portrayal of Susanna, however, heightened the stigma surrounding mental illness as Susanna constantly acted immature and childlike.
This film represents our indigenous culture and regardless of what happens we can find good in a situation. Together the black and white community can come together and achieve more than they could ever do by themselves.
With the recently discovered spark of "Chicano force," Paula and the other student leaders start their battle to enhance the quality of their education. The crew decide to take extraordinary measures after their requests are disregarded by the school board. After Sal Castro cautions school authorities about the reality of the student’s' requests, he is disregarded and resolves to help the students in their fight for a better education. He encourages the students to organize a peaceful walkout strike with the five other high schools to ensure that no students are physically harmed. Soon after the walkouts begin, their cause becomes highly publicized and last for a few days. During one of the walkouts, students are faced with violence by ...
I would recommend this film to other teenagers because it shows that following your dreams is worth pursuing if you are prepared to leave your family and maybe your country.
I would definatly recommend this movie to anyone. It is a true story of the inequality that took place and is very sad yet important to know.
There are about 7 billion people in the world; each one of us is different in our own way. Everyone has had different life experiences, some good and some bad. This world is full of cultures that aren’t the same. Being Mexican-American has made me who I am today because I come from a different culture. I know both of my languages, English and Spanish. Also it has built my character.
This movie was inspiring and encouraging to anyone who is struggling with something. Overcoming his controversies in life became the main point of the movie. Knowing that this movie was based upon a true story inspires the people even more.
I have always believed that all races have their good and bad. Their is never going to be the perfect race. This movie definitely set a powerful message that life is not perfect for any race and that even though people are from different cultures, they are all interconnected somehow. The filmmakers did a great job at showing us that individuals should not be based on first impressions such as skin color or the social status.
This movie is based on changing the lives of Mexican Americans by making a stand and challenging the authority. Even when the cops were against them the whole time and even with the brutal beatings they received within one of the walk out, they held on. They stuck to their guns and they proved their point. The main character was threatened by the school administrators, she was told if she went through with the walkout she would be expelled. While they wanted everyone who was going to graduate to simply look the other way, the students risked it all and gave it their all to make their voices
The improvement in their education that these Mexican American students with the Raza Studies is very similar to the affect that Afterschool programs had for the students in “Pass or Fail in Cambodia Town”. When students from both films were taught about their culture/ history they did better in school. The main point of “Precious Knowledge” is that students thrive when learning about multicultural education, especially students who are underrepresented by mainstream Eurocentric education. However, due to a history of systemic racism and a general lack of knowledge or understanding, many leaders choose to suppress the voices of underrepresented communities.
The film "Garden State" is an eccentric drama; in addition, a romance comedy, with a slew of complex, innate cast of characters, each deeply entrenched in profound emotional and psychological scars, ascending from the regrets of their past. The film is a reflection, on rediscovering yourself after years of goalless ambiguity. Writer/Director Zach Braff, stars as the films’ chief character, Andrew Largeman. In James Berardinelli’s movie review, he said: “Garden State is one of those movies that fails to stay with the viewer for an extended period of time. It 's a forgettable film featuring a throw-away story with unmemorable characters and unremarkable performances.” I must disagree; although "Garden State" can be a tad somber, moody and too subtle for many viewers. Yet, the film is fantastically intriguing, by arousing viewers thoughts, and stimulating ones emotions, and that 's exactly what draws viewers in. Since the storyline requires viewers to dig deeper into the subtle undertones and symbolisms
This report is an analysis of Leadership in the movie Wall Street (1987), directed by Oliver Stone. This report explored the concept of leadership and how it depicted in the movie. The reports explain leader’s use of power and influence tactics. As the report proceeds it shows leader’s attributes and style and how it influences on movie character’s action and the environment in which they operates. In the end, it gives an analysis of the effectivness of the learder.
Growing up, the biggest challenge I faced was being a first generation Latina student. My family came from an extremely rural neighborhood in Guanajuato, Mexico called La Sandia. Both my parents achieved up to 5th-grade education in their hometowns. They decided to sacrifice their lives in Mexico to provide a better life for their family and then decided to migrate to the U.S to achieve what many people consider the American dream.
The movie I decided to analyze for this course was American History X (1998), which stars Edward Norton. Though this movie isn’t widely known, it is one of the more interesting movies I have seen. It’s probably one of the best films that depict the Neo Nazi plague on American culture. The film takes place from the mid to late 1990’s during the Internet boom, and touches on subjects from affirmative action to Rodney King. One of the highlights of this movie that really relates to one of the key aspects of this course is the deterrence of capital punishment. Edward Norton’s portrayal as the grief stricken older brother who turns to racist ideologies and violence to cope with his fathers death, completely disregards the consequences of his actions as he brutally murders someone in front of his family for trying to steal his car. The unstable mentality that he developed after his father’s death really goes hand-to-hand specifically with Isaac Ehrlich’s study of capital punishment and deterrence. Although this movie is entirely fictional, a lot of the central themes (racism, crime punishment, gang pervasiveness, and one’s own vulnerability) are accurate representations of the very problems that essentially afflict us as a society.
To conclude, I think this movie is a good example to show how a homeless person lived and how he survived his life from being a homeless. Throughout all his life he showed what can determination do even though there are obstacles in the way. Doing is best paid off his hardships. So from dreaming big, be determined on what you're trying to do, and be responsible on things will make you succeed in the future.