Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Labeling theory conclusion
Labeling theory conclusion
Summary of social control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Labeling theory conclusion
1. Discuss Matza’s drift theory and the empirical tests of this theory.
David Matza created a theory that explained why youth “drift” in and out of delinquency stages. The technical definition of drift is “[…] a period when he or she exists in limbo between convention and crime, responding in turn to the demands of each, flirting now with one, now with the other, but postponing commitment, evading decision.” There are many defense mechanisms that include denial of responsibility, injury, victim, condemnation of the condemner, and appeals to higher loyalties.
The empirical tests of this theory are not clear. The textbook reports “Some studies show that delinquents consider these rationalizations valid, while other research suggests that they
…show more content…
Discuss three programs that have been informed by social control theory.
One of the programs that have been informed by the social control theory would be family. “A child’s bond to a family is crucial,” reports the textbook. In order to build a bond such as this, the parents have to give opportunities that would help the child “participate and succeed in a social unit.” By doing this, the child would not be as aggressive and the parent’s parenting skills get better.
School is another program that has been informed by social control theory. A program has been created in middle and high schools that tries to help decrease delinquency and help students stay committed to school. The neighborhood is the final program that has been informed by the social control theory. Different agencies have tried to prevent juvenile crime that can be implemented by neighborhood organizations. Many programs such as crisis-intervention centers, supervision programs, and more are set up to help neighborhoods to have less juvenile crime.
4. Discuss the basic assumptions of labeling theory, and then evaluate the
…show more content…
Delinquents are usually known for their past in criminal behavior and delinquency. This theory may explain why lifetime delinquents and criminals behave the way they do. It does not explain why some people are delinquents and change their lives around.
5. Compare and contrast the consensus and conflict models of lawmaking.
The consensus and conflict models agree that law breaking happens everywhere. Crimes happen everywhere is another agreed upon concept. These two models of lawmaking are vastly different and there is very little that is similar between the two models. The conflict model has a key concept of power, while the consensus model views society as stable and law are for the good of people.
The consensus model assumes that everyone agrees on what is wrong and what is right. The conflict theory questions the system of criminologists labeling criminals by the system. The consensus model believes that deviant behavior is part of functioning society. The conflict theory questions values and has a past in rebellion. The consensus model believes that conflict can be reconciled by the
First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered
Youth crime has been a topic of major debate dating back to the 19th century. Laws have been continuously written to fit what society feels is th best way to handle youth in conflict with the law. What people sometimes fail to see is the true cause of there delinquent actions these teens commit these crimesthe focus of this essay is to relate the story of two Ottawa valley teens in conflict with the law to different sociological theories. First I will give a brief summary of the article and then connect it with theories such as cultural conflict, control theory, strain and labelling theory.
In the May 1993 issue of the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, the introduction of the reconceptualized deterrence theory was presented, explaining that general and specific deterrence are both functions of crime. Mark C. Stafford, an Associate Professor of Sociology and Associate Rural Sociologist at Washington State University, and Mark Warr, an Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Texas in Austin, introduced this theory. They argued that there is no reason to have multiple theories for general and specific deterrence. Rather, a single theory is possible that centers on indirect experience with legal punishment and punishment avoidance and direct experience with legal punishment and avoidance.1 General deterrence includes the knowledge of criminal acts performed by others and the consequences or absence of consequences from the activity. Specific deterrence relies upon personal experience of punishment and the avoidance of punishment for a criminal activity previously committed. Both Stafford and Warr theorized that people are exposed to both types of deterrents, with some people exposed to more of one type than the other. In addition both general and specific deterrence effects may coincide with each other and act as reinforcement.
The criminal justice system is made up of three main parts: law enforcement, the court system, and corrections. These three components are interconnected. You can’t have one without the other. The term “consensus model” describes this relationship. The consensus model supports the idea that all three groups should work together to achieve justice.
Carl et al. (2011, p. 119) suggests that there are two primary models as to how laws were created (i) the consensus (ii) conflict models. While the consensus model of law suggests that laws arise when people witness behaviours that they do not approve of, therefore agreeing to make that behaviour illegal (Carl et al., 2011, p. 119). The conflict model
A connection to school is an essential component of Control theories. Allows students to have social connection if they are not able to make one outside of school. Ridgway was a poor student with an IQ of 82. He was also dyslexic. His class mates described him as well liked.
The consensus view of crime supports the criminal justice system should work cooperatively to produce justice not competitively. This view states that society as a majority is in agreeance on which behaviors should be outlawed. Behaviors that are considered distasteful to all elements of society are what law defines as crimes.
Thompson, W. E. and Bynum J. E. (2010). Juvenile Delinquency: A sociological Approach Eighth Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
The goal of deterrence has its limits because rules and former sanctions, as well anti-criminal modeling and reinforcement are met with young rebellious minds. Traditional counseling and diversion, which are integral aspects of community corrections, can sometimes be ineffective, and studies have shown that sometimes a natural self intervention can take place as the youth grows older; resulting in the youth outgrowing delinquency. 2. What is the difference between a.. What are foster homes like?
An integrated theory is a combination of 2 or 3 theories that offers many explanations on why crime is occurring, compared to a traditional criminal theory that just focus on one type of aspect (Lilly et al.2010). The purpose of integrated theories is to help explain many aspects into what causes criminal behavior and why one becomes delinquent. From this an argument arises can integrated theories be used to explain all criminal behavior. Integrated theories are successful in explaining certain aspects of crime on what causes one to become deviant; however one theory alone cannot explain why an individual engages in crime. This paper will examine three integrated theories and look in-depth how these theories can explain different aspects on why criminal behavior occurs and the weakness of each theory. The three integrated theories that will be discussed in this paper are Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory, Robert Agnew General Strain theory, and lastly Travis Hirschi’s Social Bond theory.
The Consensus View of Crime describes that crimes are basically behaviors that are believed to be extremely distasteful or unacceptable, in many, if not all elements related to society. Substantive criminal law, which is the written code that defines crimes and their punishments, reflect mainstream society’s values, opinions beliefs (Siegel, p.12). As it relates to consensus view of crime, the term “consensus” is used because it suggests because there is a general understand amount society as a whole of what behaviors are deemed intolerable and therefore should be considered criminal acts. Criminal behaviors are the behaviors that violate the criminal law. Acts are not considered to be crimes unless those particular acts are considered to be illegal based on the criminal law. As mentioned in “Criminology” by Larry J. Siegel, criminal law can be defined by as a body of detailed and specific guidelines about...
Rational Choice Theory is the belief that man is a reasonable actor who decides means and ends, costs and benefits, and makes rational choices. Routine activity theory provides a simple and powerful insight into the causes of crime problems. At its heart is the idea that in the absence of effective controls, offenders will prey upon attractive targets. Social Control Theory gives an explanation for how behavior conforms to that which is generally expected in society. Social disorganization theory explains the ecological differences in levels of crime based on structural and cultural factors shaping the nature of the social order across communities. This approach alters the sociological studies on which is any of two or more random variables exhibiting correlated variation of urban growth to examine the concentration and stability of rates of criminal behavior. Strain Theory. Conflict theory explains the belief that individuals choose to commit a crime, which many po...
In order to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the criminal behavior theories, the word theory needs to be defined. “A theory is an explanation. It tells why or how things are related to each other. A theory of crime explains why or how a certain thing or certain things are related to criminal behavior.” (Bohn and Vogel)
According to Krohn (1986) bridged together theoretical propositions from the delinquency-enhancing effects of differential association and the delinquency-constraining effects of social bonds, as these interact with social learning and social control. His network theory maintains that the lower the network density in relationship to population density, the weaker the constraints against nonconformity, and the higher rates of
Socialization is the process of passing down norms, customs, and ideologies that are important to the society by the previous generations to the younger generations. The school system is a social agency that was created to enhance the processes of socialization through education. The importance of school as an agent of socialization can be best explained by the amount of time students spend in school and in activities happen around school. The manifest functions of school are to educate students the social norms, and the knowledge and skills that help them become economically productive in order to benefit the society. But students not only learn from the academic curriculum but they also benefit from socialize with their teachers and peers.