Marshalls: A Hard Landscaping Manufacturing Company

1072 Words3 Pages

2. Industry analysis: PESTLE analysis 2.1 Political Factors As a hard landscaping manufacturer, the corporation should consider recent policy requiring a certain percentage of electricity to come from renewable sources. These changes in policies require corporations to abide by rules such as UK Government’s Carbon Reduction Commitment Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) and Energy Saving Opportunity Scheme (ESOS) (Refrence). 2.2 Economic Factors Marshalls relies on the level of activity in the UK and international end market, therefore, economic factors are of concern to Marshalls. Although economic downturn will reduce sales and production volumes, economic conditions in the UK have continued to improve (Marshalls PLC 2014) (Can you provide the …show more content…

Building on the work with the ETI, Marshalls donates natural stone paving to the charity in a low price in order to help tackling child labour in India (Marshalls PLC 2014). And in this way, a better corporate image will be presented to public, which will increase sales and production volumes. Demographic trends may also be important. For example, if population in a city is lower that another, potential sales volume would be lower than the city with larger population. 2.4 Technological Factors Technological advancement has also empowered companies’ better performance. Marshalls have a unique national network of manufacturing and distribution sites and has a wide geographical spread, online shopping is as a platform that can drive sales growth. Because Marshalls have developed an online marketplace, where individuals can buy various products through official website that are benefit to enterprise(Can you please explain this a bit). 2.5 Legal …show more content…

There are numbers of corporations with low cost, different sizes, specialties and strategies of firms such as Tobermore, Rosts and Stockscape will affect Marshalls. Based on these, bargaining power of competitors should be the major force (Its too vague). Conclusion: 1. After analyzing how Pestle factors, legal factor is the biggest challenge because Marshalls would like to extend its global reach into as well in Asia, so first of all company should understand the legislation of Asia. 2. Also the threat of substitute products and competitors should be considered, because customer will choose products with lower price, also people today are pay more attention to environmental protection. ( This is NOT the conclusion its recommendations) Recommendation: 1. Marshalls should do research before extend its market to new countries, in order to fully understand the local competitive market situation. 2. There should find lower cost raw material to confront the exiting competitors, because their competitor can offer lower price with same products to a certain extent. Also, for the threat of substitute products, Marshalls better to establish new products and become the only manufacturer (Good

Open Document