Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare between two cultures
Difference between two cultures
Difference between two cultures
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare between two cultures
Differences amongst mankind do not arise because of various ethnic backgrounds, but rather conflicts between man and authority. Differences between society and the government occurred during the Islamic Revolution when Iran transitioned from a democracy to an Islamic Republic. As a result of the Revolution, Iranians participated in numerous protests to fight for their rights and involved themselves in many rebellious activities inspired by Western culture. In the graphic memoir Persepolis, Marjane Satrapi uses characterization and conflict to prove that Iranians have more in common with Westerners than their own government. This further explains why people should not be judged by the actions of their government, but by their character. Satrapi …show more content…
In 1980, the Iranian government forced women to wear the veil. In response to this law, many Iranian women participated, “everywhere in the streets [where] there were demonstrations for and against the veil” (Satrapi 5 panel 1). These “demonstrations” were a form of rebellion implying there was a conflict between the government and its people. Furthermore, these protests were publicly performed “everywhere in the streets” so the reader can infer that Iranians felt very strongly about this issue. Additionally, based on the picture, revolutionary women were chanting, “freedom!” because they desperately wished to have the right to choose to wear the veil. Because they did not want to conform to their government’s laws, the reader is convinced not to stereotype people to their government. While other uprisings occur, Satrapi hears that Iran had reclaimed the city of Khorramshahr during the war on the radio. Since this event could end the war, she went to the basement to rationalize it. As she went downstairs, she realized that, “Iraq proposed a settlement, and Saudi Arabia was willing to pay for reconstruction, to restore peace in the area. But [the Iranian] government was against it” (Satrapi 114 panel 6-8). The fact that Iran’s populous longed for the war to end, “but” the Iranian government was “against” the proposition Iraq and Saudi Arabia proposed explains that it was the government- not the Iranians- which did not call for an armistice with the other Middle Eastern countries. This is also expressed visually through the imagery of the following panel. Satrapi drew the Fundamentalist men, with their beards, inward eyebrows, mouths wide open, and arms defiantly
In Persepolis, Satrapi develops the central idea of Marji and her parents rebelling against the social injustices held by the Shah and the government. This is demonstrated in chapters “ The Trip”, “The Passport”, and “Kim Wilde”. Early in the revolution, females were forced to cover themselves up. They were told to wear their veils because it didn’t show a sign of western American style or sexual
Orientalism is a way of viewing the world as divided into two unequal halves: the Occident and the Orient. Occidental means Western Hemisphere, and Oriental means Eastern Hemisphere. These ideas of orientalism are challenged in Satrapi's Persepolis. A book about a young girl Marji who lived in Iran in the 1980’s, and therefore is placed in the beginning years of political and religious turmoil in Iran. Satrapi Juxtaposes the western view of Iran to Iran by showing similarities between America and Iran through Marji’s youth and adventures throughout the book.
Due to the serious tensions looming in the air, many people would think it is strictly forbidden to laugh a little or have fun in Iran. The constant political instability makes it seem like the citizens live like robots under extreme oppression. However, in Marjane Satrapi’s biography, Persepolis, she gives an inside look at her experiences growing up in Iran and adds comic relief throughout the novel. As the main character, Marjane, evolves from an innocent girl into a mature woman, Satrapi adds bits of comic relief to highlight her typical personality while living in the midst of an oppressive society.
Social class in Iran was extremely important because it separated everyone in to different groups. Depending on what group you are in you are seen and treated different from everyone else. Marji’s maid was born into a lower class family and was treated like the lower class people even though since the age of eight she had grown up with a middle class family. Even children in the lower class had to face conflicts everyday, such as how they were going to support their family all by themselves. All women in Iran were treated equally where the veil was concerned. Iranian fundamentalist men would threaten and physically harm any women they saw who wasn’t wearing the veil.
Through her devotion to the art and music of the United States, she was able to rebel. The encouragement of the pursuit by her parents created further inspiration for her to use it as a way to protest. Already having a deep devotion to American culture, the ability of Satrapi to use her passion to disobey the regime only strengthen her love. The affection she felt for American culture gave her the courage she needed to stand up to the harsh government of Iran. Despite the risks associated with possessing items from America, Satrapi did so anyway. She was willing to risk serious punishment to pursue happiness through the means of her favorite hobbies. The influence of said entertainments helped shaped Satrapi’s views. By providing her with experiences that were foreign to the majority of her peers, the culture that Satrapi enjoyed influence her open-minded opinions. Listening to the music of artists such as Kim Wilde and Iron Maiden and following the clothing trends like denim jackets and Nikes exposed Satrapi to ideals she normally would not have been growing up in post-revolution Iran. They provided a door into a different, more accepting world and a glimpse into the possibilities of what could
Lila Abu-Lughod’s article titled, “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving?” takes a closer look at the problematic ethnocentric approach many have when trying to gain an understanding of another culture that may be foreign to that individual. In this analytical paper, Lughod looks at women in Islam, specifically the treatment of women and how it might be utilized as a justification for invading into a country and liberating its people. The country Lughod refers to in her article is Afghanistan, and Lughod points out the misunderstanding from the people to the Bush administration like First Lady Laura Bush who believed that intervention was necessary to free women from the captivity of their own homes. It is important to consider the role that different lenses play into all of this, especially when one’s lenses are being shaped by the media. Depictions of covered women secluded from society leave a permanent image in the minds of many, who would then later support the idea of liberation. This paper will discuss that the practice of using propaganda when referring to the lifestyle in the Middle East is not exclusive to the U.S; rather it has been utilized throughout history. Additionally, we will take a closer look on the importance of symbols, such as veils in this case; help to further emphasize the cause to liberate. Finally, we will analyze Lughod’s plea towards cultural relativism and away from liberal imperialism.
There are many examples throughout the text that specifically focus on the overbearing treatment of women. During the country's revolution there is a shift to extremely conservative religious conviction that force women to cover themselves head to toe while in public. Ultimately, Nafisi refuses to wear a veil while teaching at the University of Tehran which leads to her expulsion. These examples presented throughout the text along with various outside sources, can be a tool to interpret and scrutinize the oppressive treatment of people in unjust societies like that of Iran's.
...e panels that depict her actions, and the results of said actions, magnifies the reassurance imparted with Satrapi’s words. She was in no true danger and yet her hasty decision to cast the Guardians attention onto another could very well have proved deadly to her chosen scapegoat. In fact, the Guardian she calls out to for protection from the supposedly “indecent” man immediately responds to the situation with, “Where’s the bastard, I’ll shut him up once and for all!” This blunt, aggressive statement is written on of the very few panels in this chapter that have a black background. It brings a temporary sense of fear and anxiety as to whether or not the poor confused man will fight the Guardians to try and keep his freedom from completely false accusations. The white backgrounds return as the reader learns the man thankfully did not fight the armed group of men.
The religion of Islam was imposed upon Iranians, whether they liked it or not. Marjane and her classmates “...didn’t like to wear the veil, especially since we didn’t understand why we had to”(Satrapi 3). The young girls were against wearing the veil because they were not practicing
The Iranian government is fighting a losing battle against a rapidly growing Western force. Although Iran is not physically waging war against the United States, the government is fighting to eradicate its increasing cultural influence in Iran. The young, Iranian population is currently speaking out against the Islamic Republic’s attempts to rid the country of Western culture, demanding more freedom and less censorship, similar to how Marjane Satrapi acts out against the regime in Persepolis.
The way they dressed quickly changed as shown when Marji asserted that “In no time, the way people dressed became an ideological sign. There were two kinds of women. The fundamentalist woman [and] the modern woman. There were also two sorts of men. The fundamentalist man [and] the progressive man” (75). Satrapi uses the two frames on page 75 to illustrate the idea associated with the two different ways in which both men and women chose to dress whether it be tradition, or not. Satrapi expounds how their choice of dressing then depicts their view on the Islamic Revolution. She explains how the modern women rebelled by wearing heard scarves, instead of the traditional full veil, along with letting some hair slightly fall out to show opposition against the Iranian regime. She continues with how the progressive man also showed their opposition by tucking their shirts in and shaving their facial hair, in contrast to the fundamentalist man who leaves his shirt hung out, along with a full beard. Satrapi denotes that both genders of characters take the risk of not dressing like a fundamentalist, in order to show their form of rebellion in a settle way, knowing of course that there is always a possibility of
Young Marjane Satrapi displays the characteristics that any child might have. She is simple, innocent, and easily influenced. For example, when her parents are demonstrating against the king, Marjane Satrapi says, “As for me, I love the king, he was chosen by God” (Satrapi 19). Her teacher tells her this, and she believes her teacher because Marjane Satrapi is a child and, in all innocence, will believe anything because her teacher, in her eyes, knows everything. Situations such as this show the influence of authority on her as a child because the teacher is an authority who tells Satrapi a misleading fact and Satrapi believes her, or is influenced by her.... ...
In the novel Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, Satrapi’s childhood was highly impacted by American culture. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the affect American culture had on how Satrapi viewed the Iranian Revolution.
She condemns the patriarchal nature of the lecture at her art school in which the female students are told to wear longer scarves so that they don’t distracted the male students, yet their male counterparts remain free to wear tight shirts. This outburst captures how Iranian laws see women as second-class citizens who should be submissive and feel nothing… basically be
In the book The Complete Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi (2003), the author tells her story about living in Iran through Iran’s revolutionary war. The graphic novel starts off with the main character Marjane at 10 years old, before the war begins. As Marjane grows up, more laws start taking place causing the social structure around her to start changing. When more laws start forming, Marjane and many other people start demonstrating deviance against the government and the social norms around them to make social reforms. Marjane also changes as she grows up, going from an innocent 10 year old to a not so innocent emo 18 year old when she’s away from her parents in Austria.