The native peoples of the new world faced numerous hardships when people from the western half of the world immigrated to north, central, and south America. The Araucanian peoples of south-central Chile was no exception. Like other native groups in the Americas, they faced harsh labor systems, disease, and colonization by European powers. However, unlike the others, the Araucanian peoples, also known today as the Mapuche, were able to successfully fend off against foreign invaders. How did the Araucanians succeed? What did they do in their wars against the Spanish that resulted in their success? The answer lies in both adaptation and rejection. The Mapuche were able to change and adapt their fighting style in order to better fend off foreign …show more content…
invaders, but the Mapuche also resisted adaptation to Spanish culture, meaning that the Mapuche peoples’ core culture survives and remains near unchanged today. These two opposite actions helped differentiate the Mapuche from all other people in the area. The Araucanian people of south-central Chile can be divided into three groups, based on the north, central, and south bands, all split by a river called the Bio Bio river. The Picunche lived north of the Bío Bío river, the Mapuche in the central band between the Bio Bio river and Toltén river, and the Huilliche, who lived south of the Bío Bío River.1 Before Spanish colonization, these people lived simple semi-nomadic lives, occasionally going to war and at one point, the northern Picunche was taken over by the Inca briefly.2 The three groups were hunter-gatherers and they all spoke the same language, but before Spanish aggression, they had little political and cultural unity.2 Once the Spanish forces started to invade south-central Chile, the Araucanians started to put up a fight. Initially, the group lost their battles against the Spaniards and they were placed into labor systems in order to mine silver for the Spanish.3 The Araucanians were placed under the mita labor system for a short while until eventually, the Spanish abuses became too much and resulted in a wide scale attack that ended rather successfully, with burned colonies and an evicted Spanish population.4 How did the Mapuche succeed this time? What was different? The major break for the Mapuche were through a Mapuche spy who gone by the name Lautaro. When the leader of the Spanish exhibition, Pedro de Valdivia, returned to Santiago with his men, a young boy named Lautaro followed along as an orphan.5 Valdivia took him in as his groom, and in Santiago, Lautaro, now named either Felipe or Antonio, learned all about horse keeping, Spanish culture, and most importantly, Spanish military drills.5 Learning these drills as a young boy allowed Lautaro to teach his people the weaknesses found in the foreign army. Eventually, Lautaro returned to his people and was eventually named toqui, or leader, of his people.6 Lautaro’s espionage as well as keen observations from warriors and the skilled thefts by other Mapuche gave them the upper hand in future battles.6 Additionally, the natives of the area received some aid from Spanish deserters, with 60 Spaniards living among them by 1600.7 These deserters would then teach the Mapuche firearms, fort building, iron making, and some political administration techniques.7 The last lesson, a lesson on political administration techniques, would change the Mapuche social structure forever. The most striking adaptation that the Mapuche used in order to defeat the invading Spanish was the use of horses on the battle field. Horses and other large ridable animals did not exist in South America before Spanish colonization, the only large hoofed animals were camelids like llamas, alpacas, and vicunas. Horses, now introduced to the new world, was a huge problem for the Mapuche people. In order to adapt to the cavalry forces, the Mapuche created pitfalls and trenches to knock the rider off of their horses, as well as creating sharp steaks to impale both the horse and the man.8 The greatest adaptation, however, was the eventual adoption of horses, aided by the information Lautaro gave his people. Natives eventually stole horses to use in raids.8 They did this by following horsemen on foot and striking down riders. This task was simplified due to the rider’s heavy equipment that slowed him down.8 Once the rider was thrown off and killed, the natives kept the horses for themselves. The Araucanians were able to outpace a horse because the people were used to chasing down game for food.9 In a final feat of adaptation, the Mapuche people invented a better, more lightweight saddle that was less heavy on the horse and allowed two riders to ride on a steed’s back.10 These dual saddles gave the Mapuche a greater advantage during battle, because it allowed for one Mapuche to drive the horse, and the other to shoot arrows or swing a club. The adaptation to horses may be one of the greatest alterations to the Mapuche fighting style. Another clever use of adaptation lies in the choice of battle fields. The Mapuche are a people of the land, highly adapted to life in the mountains. One of the many ways the Mapuche were able to avoid catastrophic death was by choosing to fight in the mountains. By choosing these types of environments, the Mapuche could ensure that the enemy’s horses could not gallop as well and that their own ambush strategies were more effective while hidden away in the mountains.11 Another way the Mapuche had used their natural environment to their advantage was through the use of thick and wild forests and wet and muddy wetlands. The thick forests were hard to navigate for the foreign Spaniards, and it made riding on horseback harder.12 Additionally, the wetlands that surrounded the areas made the Spaniards’ gunpowder less effective.12 The Mapuche quickly realized that the Spanish were weak in the forest, and when the Spanish came along and the Mapuche needed to hide, the group of natives would flee into the forest to hide, using the forest for shelter, nourishment, and occasionally, a battle ground.13 Additionally, a great adaptation and advantage that the fighting Araucanians used was the exploitation of the Spanish army’s weaknesses. Again accredited to Lautaro’s espionage, the Mapuche saw the Spanish’s weakness and desire for peace and fully exploited it. The Mapuche strategy was more powerful than their weapons and one strategy they would use involved playing on the fear of Indian congregation. A Mapuche native would spread a rumor of a group of Indians meeting, and the concerned Spanish men would come to investigate.14 The rumor, however was an ambush and the Mapuche natives would surround a startled Spanish man. (ibid) The Spanish man would then drop his supplies and flee, giving them all the leather, food, and weapons they need to strengthen themselves for the next major battle.14 Another psychological warfare strategy the Mapuche used was fear of their “savageness” They learned that the Spanish was scared of cannibals, so the Mapuche ritually ate the Spanish invaders in order to scare them.15 The leader of the Spanish was killed in this way. Valdivia had the muscles cut from his arms and legs, had his own flesh cooked and ate in front of him, and then they eventually cut out his heart and beheaded him, turning the skull of the Spanish captain into a drinking vessel for the toqui leaders of the area.16 Additionally, the Mapuche exploited the Spanish troop’s relative isolation. The Mapuche would conduct raids to destroy and crops and food that the Spanish might have and they would then destroy their own crops, preventing the Spanish from stealing any of it.17 The Mapuche would then rely on the native forests and their knowledge of edible plants in order to survive, while the clueless Spaniards slowly starved.17 The Mapuche utilized different types of adaptations in order to resist Spanish aggression onto their lands, but one of the few aspects of war that wasn’t changed, or at least was barely changed, was their use of weaponry. While some Mapuche were able to access guns and advanced European weaponry and iron making, the grand majority of the Mapuche warriors used their traditional wooden weapons. These weapons, although basic, still gave an advantage to the Mapuche warriors. These weapons could be made quickly and easily, as well as be made from their surroundings. Various hardwood trees made clubs and spears, softwoods made bows, and bamboo made arrows.18 One of their most famous weapon is a curved daggered called a corvo that was used to fence.19 The Spanish had to wait until Spanish iron workers sent them weapons from Spain.18 Additionally, the Mapuche continued their style of martial arts called Kollellaullin, which involved preparing the mind and body by observing ants.20 Weapons were the only aspect to Mapuche warfare that did not need to be changed. While the aspect of Mapuche warfare was changed greatly during the battles with the Spanish, the core culture of the Araucanians remained virtually unchanged throughout the colonial era.
The core change that occurred was the conglomeration of different tribes into one Mapuche nation, a large fighting force that can band together to fight off the Spanish, but also be naturally disbanded in order to prevent capture and subjugation as well as the adoption of a few Spanish goods, such as animals, some plants, and cloth. Other than the consolidation of Mapuche tribes, the Mapuche culture intensified during the era, escalating in order to assert Mapuche cultural dominance. While the core aspect of Mapuche culture remained the …show more content…
same, the Mapuche did adopt some goods from the Spanish. The Mapuche had adopted horses into their culture quite readily due to their use in war, agriculture, cattle raising, and even their own religious rites.21 Metallurgy was also used for firearms in the war as well as daily tools. One of the biggest adoptions was with Spanish alcohol.22 In fact, many Mapuche natives today still struggle with alcohol addiction, started from Spanish trade back in the 1500s.22 The culture of the Araucanians had always focused on kin and nature, with a major religious focus on shamanism. The Mapuche resisted most attempts at catholic conversion by the Spanish as well. Once the Spanish realized that they could not subjugate the Mapuche using warfare and force, the Spaniards decided to set up a system of missions along the Mapuche border in order to slowly convert them to Christianity.24 The Mapuche fully resisted this and ended up killing the priests, mutilating their bodies, and sending their bodies back to the Spanish as a warning. 23 The Mapuche were so dedicated to resisting Christianity and preserving their religion that they held their own Inquisition against Christianity.23 To the Mapuche, the preservation of their culture and religion was most important. The resistance to Christianity also leads to the intensification of their own religion. Machi, a type of shaman in Mapuche culture, conducted more religious festivals in order to predict the outcome of battles waged against the Spanish.25 Additionally, many Mapuche warriors had died in the ensuring battles so the construction of Kuels, or burial mounds, also increased and more and more shamans oversaw the creation and caretaking of Kuels.26 The Mapuche also believed in ancestor spirits called Pillans that would be traditionally called up in times of war.27 Eventually the Pillans all evolved into a super Pillan who would be summoned when the Mapuche wanted to execute a Spanish captive.28 The other intensified action the Mapuche took was through the conglomeration and periodic unification of different tribes. In peaceful times, the Mapuche lived in scattered kin groups called rehues. They had no real king in these kin groups, only a chief called an ulmen.29 During war times, a central power emerged and unified many of the rehues together.29 This is what happened when the Spanish tried to overtake the Mapuche. Some of the ways that the different Mapuche tribes would unify was through ritualistic feasting, marriage between different tribes, and mobilizing labor.30 They also increased the amount of meeting between the different clans in order to strengthen these alliances.31 The Mapuche political order had a hierarchical order. The most powerful men were the toqui chiefs, who worked together to decide on strategies and decisions for war and peace.32 Under the toqui were the ulmen, under the ulmen were privates called cona and the noncommissioned officers were called cupilonko.33 Above these soldiers were a toqui-guilmen (commander), a quince-guilmen (field commander), and a peliqui-gulimen (diplomatic courier).34 All of these warriors and officers worked together and eventually created an intensified warring culture.34 The last major intensification to the Mapuche culture was their proclivity for war. The Spanish had pushed the occasional warring Mapuche into a war hawk nation, ready to attack invaders, defend their lands, and even expand territorial holdings. The Mapuche was able to expand into parts of Argentina, past their normal range, due to their extensive war system.35 The Mapuche’s culture intensified completely for war. In order to pass on the love of war to the next generation, the Mapuche trained boys and youths from a young age to fight.36 Boys were taught how to use weapons when they were only six years old and when the boys were old enough, their teachers decided on what weapon they were most proficient at and that weapon would then be the weapon they specialized in for the rest of their training.36 The Mapuche boys were also trained in swimming, running, and even torture.36 The Mapuche was so bloodthirsty that they would attack and kill any neighboring native groups that suggested peaceful integration or peaceful resistance against the Spanish.37 For example, one tribe called the Promocaes did not want to join forces with Lautaro, leader of the Mapuche in the 1600s, and so Lautaro killed them in response.38 Despite the attacks, some of the Araucanians, mostly Picunche, were Hispanicized to some extent. The Mapuche culture did not change overall during the colonial area, rather that, the culture intensified greatly in response to increasing pressures from foreign cultures.
The Mapuche intensified their political affiliations, their religion, their cultural celebrations, and their warrior ways. In the converse of this, the Mapuche fighting style changed and adapted greatly in order to adapt to the challenges they faced when fighting the Spaniards. These two methods of resistance allowed the Mapuche to survive colonization. To this day, the Mapuche people of Chile are known to be a fierce and proud group of people. Their resistance to the Spanish shows a clear reminder that the fate of natives in the new world was not uniform, that resistance can be successful for some native groups. The strong existence of the Mapuche today stands as the clearest testament to Indian
resistance.
When the colonists set sail for the New World, they knew that they would not only have to find a way to survive in the wild new habitat, but would also have to deal with rival nations that were claiming their own share of the new land. There had been long rivalry between France, England, and the Dutch. They had read the stories of Columbus and his voyages, and heard rumors of the wild and strange native people who were considered primitive. The Spanish had two different experiences with the Indigenous
As children, students are taught from textbooks that portray Native Americans and other indigenous groups as small, uncivilized, mostly nomadic groups with ways of life that never changed or disfigured the land. Charles Mann’s account of Indian settlements’ histories and archaeological findings tell us otherwise. Mann often states in his book 1491: New Revelations of the Americas before Columbus that the indigenous groups of North and South America were far more advanced and populous than students are taught. He focuses on many different cultural groups and their innovations and histories that ultimately led to either their demise or modern day inhabitants.
Differences between cultures are not something new. Many of us can still see it in our daily lives. Four hundred years ago two very distinctly different cultures clashed in what we call the American Southwest. The Spanish presence brought new ideas, new culture, and new way of life to the new found Americas much to the demise of the already settled native tribes. Already having controlled much of Mexico and South America, problems were rising in the outskirts of New Spain. Secular and religious authorities were in conflict and the ever growing animosity of its aboriginal tribe made it difficult to maintain Spanish control. Though, for four generations the Spaniards had begun to feel successful in their endeavors of New Mexico. In early August, the sedentary and nomadic tribes banned together and overthrow the Spanish authority. There are many angles needed to be addressed in order to see why this happened. Historians and anthropologists have been trying to go beyond the bias history to uncover what happen. In the book “What Caused the Pueblo Revolt of 1680”, historians try to answer this question, some theories hold more pull then others in terms of what and why. Through reading this anthology I believe the revolt happened for cultural and religious reasons because the Spaniards were threatening the indigenous people’s very way of life through violence, exploitation of land/resources (food), and demoralization of their old ways and practices.
“ [They] spent most of the conquest and colonial periods reacting and responding to the European strangers and invaders” (99). Both sides were different in many ways; Their communication, transportation, culture, and the way they survived differentiate the Europeans from the Native Americans. They both acted as wisely as they could when this encounters began after the discovery. “[Tribes] worked mightily and often cleverly to maximize their political sovereignty, cultural autonomy, territorial integrity, power of self identification, and physical nobility” (100). The Europeans were stronger, had better technology, better weapons, and had plenty of experience fighting people like the Native Americans. They could have easily conquer them , but they had a problem of resources, reinforcements and survival. Native American were many but they lacked the knowledge and experience of war and evolution. Europeans were technologically evolved and were experienced at fighting wars, but they ...
Jared Diamond's fundamental argument in Guns, Germs, and Steel is that Eurasians were able to conquer the Americas, sub-Saharan Africa, and Australia because continental differences set Eurasia on a different, better trajectory than the other continents. His argument addresses a simple question: Why did human development proceed at such different rates on different continents? According to the author, the most important continental differences appear in domesticable plants and animals, germs, orientation of continental axes, and ecological barriers. Throughout the book, he refers back to the "Collision at Cajamarca," or the first encounter between the Incan emperor Atahuallpa and the Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro, as a "broad window onto world history." The encounter is effective in capturing his argument, nam...
The Plains region extends from south Canada into modern-day Mexico and from the Mississippi River to the Rocky Mountains. The relatively large area hosts many Native American tribes, which includes the Comanche, Kiowa, and Pawnee just to name a few. One of the biggest events and aspects of Plains region culture is what is known as the Powwow. This event is what makes this region unique and will be the main focus of this part of the essay.
In schools, students are being taught wrong information. “Our gods were vanquished after the fall of Tenochtitlan as were our traditions. Our warriors and nobles were eradicated, our children starved and our women ravished by the white conquerors and their allies.” (157). In books across America, the Spaniards were said to be good people, but the way that Huitzitzilin described what happened, shows the complete opposite of how the Spaniards actually were.
The Andes had a legacy of resistance that was unseen in other Spanish occupied place during the colonial period. There were rebellions of various kinds as a continued resistance to conquest. In the “Letters of Insurrection”, an anthology of letters written amongst the indigenous Andean people, between January and March 1781 in what is now known as Bolivia, a statement is made about the power of community-based rebellion. The Letters of Insurrection displays effects of colonization and how the “lesser-known” revolutionaries that lived in reducción towns played a role in weakening colonial powers and creating a place of identification for indigenous people.
The Cahuilla were a Native Southern Californian tribe that occupied the Riverside County, Higher Palomar Mountain Region and East Colorado Desert. The tribe was divided into two groups or moieties know as Wildcats or Coyotes. The Cahuilla lived in small clans that varied in population, and together all the separate clans made up a larger political group called a sib ”http://www.aguacaliente.org/content/History%20&%20Culture/.” The tribe was at first considered to be very simple and savage because they were never interacted with. As the Europeans and Spanish Missionaries considered the desert an inhospitable place that was better to avoid because of its lack of food resources. Little did those European and Spanish missionaries know that the land was ripe with food, only if you knew the land and the seasons. The Cahuilla were a very interesting tribe that cared and loved their land and in return the land would provide them with an abundance of food and resources. The Cahuilla had a very simple yet intricate life that involved a seasonal migration in order to gain access to different foods. They relied on different ways of acquiring food which involved both hunting and gathering.
Two of the biggest and greatest civilization in the Americas were the Aztecs and Incas. These two civilization were both said to be conquered by the Spanish, but it wasn’t just the Spanish who conquered them. These two civilizations both fell from a combination of a weak government, lack of technology, new disease introduced by the invaders, and not being prepared for the invaders. For many centuries the Aztec civilization revolved around a ideological, social, and political system in which expansion was the cornerstone. Expansion was the cornerstone of their whole civilization, because their religion requested that a large number of human sacrifices where to be made to the gods.
The Black Legend and White Legend: Relationship Between the Spanish and Indians in the New World
...lear huge tracts of land. They were able to outcompete their American counterparts and the Amerindians by taking food from them and out-breeding them thus taking up more space. This caused not just destruction to the land, but also a decline and in some cases, extinction in the native plant and animal species. These animals not only had a destructive effect on their new environments, but also permanently altered the ecology of the Americas thus forever marking their spot in history.
Throughout history, there are many different indigenous groups that existed. However, not all groups are well known. Some groups were able to expand and become an empire such as the Maya, Aztecs and the Incas. One of the groups that the Aztecs took over is the Mixtec. The Mixtec was well established in areas such as civilization. Their civilizations is comparable to the Aztecs who is known to be innovated in civilization. The Mixtec has their own writing system to record dates and events. Many groups were not able to stand out compared to well-known groups. With the conquering if each other for power, violence breaks out that causes people to be brutally hurt and death. However, many group soon fall after the colonizers of the Spaniards. Despite
In general, the historical explanations of how and why the Spaniards were so militarily successful against the Aztec, Inca and Maya find their base in the racist belief that European culture was superior to the indigenous cultures. For example, Prescott uses a “big man history” to explain the fall of the Aztecs, placing particular emphasis on the interactions of Cortés and Moctezuma, and how each individual helped determine the fate of his people. Cortés is portrayed as a cunning leader who outsmarted the irrational and religious Moctezuma. His narrative paints the Aztecs as superstitious, and almost unintelligent, and displays the clearly racist view that European culture was superior to that of the Aztecs. The principle factors that are generally
The Mapuche, also known as the Araucano, were said to be the first people in the region south of Chile's Biobio River. Archaeological excavations show evidence of their culture dating back to 12,000 years. They were indigenous people that were inhabited originally in the southern portion of Chile in and around Region IX. They had well developed societies, impressive art, and the people were accomplished warriors. The leader what they call toqui was the Maximum Chief in war, and his power was symbolized by an engraved stone hatchet. The Spanish never successfully conquered the Mapuche. They were the only Hispano American nation hat was never vanquished. The Spanish captain won many battles before dying in the battle against the Mapuche. Although the Spanish had better weapons, the Mapuche observed the Spanish style of fighting, and took from it and were able to use what they gathered to help them win. However The Chileans defeated them after 30 years of constant war. In 1883 Chile began deposing Mapuches of land, eventually ceding 428,000 hectares, ...