Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefit of space exploration
Advantage of space exploration
Benefit of space exploration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefit of space exploration
In the times article “ Man Takes First Steps on the Moon: Special Edition”, the leaders of the world are chiming in congratulating America on the moon landing. They are also describing the mesmeric scene of the moon landing in their own newsletters. Each article, although written in different perspectives of each country, uses dramatic diction to describe Armstrong’s “ dramatic descent” onto the mysterious lunar soil in front of them(Paragraph 3). They use this language because the lunar landing is a new experience the world has the opportunity to witness, and they are ecstatic. The readers of the Times will see the different countries perspectives on the lunar landing this will include the countries, London, Moscow, and Cuban radio. William Safire, speechwriter for President Nixon, wrote a speech for the president to deliver incase the perfect lunar walk did not conclude in a happy ending. if the two men on this mission died the “ In Event of Moon Disaster” speech would have been given to America to mourn the loss of these wonderful and brave men. “they will be mourned by their family and friends; they will be mourned by their nation.”(Paragraph 3). “These two men laying down their lives in mankind’s most noble goal.” is said to uplift the spirits of Americans after this tragic event ( Paragraph 2) . the tone of this speech is humble, soft …show more content…
Ayn Rand interprets the 1969 moon landing in this speech to her fans of objectivism, which implies the audience has prior knowledge of Ayn Rand’s work, or prior knowledge on the idea of objectivism. Rand reflects on the beliefs of rationality, and with a harsh diction when she says, “It was a long, violent crack” and she continues to make words pertaining to NASA sound bad and almost painful (Paragraph 3). Rand uses this diction to further her listeners belief in
Good morning/ Afternoon Teacher I am Rachel Perkins And I was asked by The Australian Film Institute to be here to today to talk about my musical. My musical One Night The Moon which was the winner of the Australian Film Institute Award for Best Cinematography in a Non-Feature Film in 2001. I am also here to talk about how distinctive voices are used to show the experiences of others. The voices of Albert and Jim are two characters that give us two different perspectives this is due to their views. Albert one of the characters in my film is an Aboriginal character played by Kenton Pell who is hired by the police as a tracker. Albert is a very deeply spiritual person this gave him a spiritual voice throughout the play but when he get 's kick off the land and banned from the search the gets frustrated which gave him this really emotional voice. This event has a greater meaning which I will elaborate on later and now Onto Jim. Jim is your 1930s white Australian that owns a farm and is going through tough times because of the Great depression. Jim does not allow Albert to find his daughter, This is due to his racist and prejudiced views of black Australians. Jim has an authorial voice because he see’s himself as inferior. Near to the end of
As a result of the successful mission that landed the first men on the moon, called the Apollo 11 mission, many people were inspired to provide commentary on this landing. Although these texts describe unique individual purposes about this landing, they all effectively support their purposes through the use of several rhetorical devices.
For a short while, all of mankind was transported to the moon. Not literally, of course, but with the help of television, every human felt as though they were sitting next to Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin on that lunar rover. Lock taps into that feeling by having the man on the moon represent how every human with a television was feeling: hands on knees, sitting forward in excitement, nothing else but the images of the television in their eyes. The emotion is clear: unbridled excitement, a sense of possibility, amazed
The assassination of John F. Kennedy is one of the most devastating events in our nation’s history. John F. Kennedy, also known as JFK, became America’s 35th president when he was elected in 1960. Soon after being elected, Kennedy made it a goal to land a man on the moon. As promised, in 1969, Apollo 11 did just that. Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael Collins were the astronauts that were sent into orbit and eventually landed on the moon (Dunbar). These two events helped shape our nation’s history, and were very important in characterizing that time period. There are several different theories on the death of John F. Kennedy and the landing of the moon.
On July 20, 1969 Neil Armstrong planted the first human footprints in the lunar soil. The United States had accomplished their goal in sending men to the moon. They managed to not only send them 238,857 mi. (384,403 km) into space to our neighbor celestial body, but also send them back with a successful flight to our mother earth. This seems like a difficult task for a country that was behind Russia in space exploration at the time.
“The Secret History of the Women Who Got Us Beyond the Moon,” written by Simon Worrall, takes a more direct approach than its counterpart. Rather than using many quotations and pictures to drive the argument home, Worrall conducts an interview of Nathalia Holt, the author of the book that the article focuses on. Worrall most heavily uses the rhetorical device induction, particularly with the interview’s arrangement. Opening questions of the article covered the general topic of the book and the article, such as: “Who are the rocket girls?”; “Why have we never heard of them?”; and “What drew you to this story, Nathalia?” Worrall later uses more specific questions to narrow down his argument to a more definite point, but his argument turns slowly
“In Event of Moon Disaster” was a speech written by William Safire, but it was delivered to the general public by President Nixon.The purpose of this was to give gratitude to the victims, console America, and ensure the general public that they will still explore space and that the death of the two brave men, Neil Armstrong and Edwin Aldrin, should not alter one's thoughts on exploring and searching for the truth and understanding.
In the moon speech, John F. Kennedy uses different techniques of ethical appeal to persuade the audience. He uses the example of the worlds evolution to persuade the audience that the challenge is possible. “No man can fully grasp how far and how fast we have come, but condense, if you will, the 50,000 years of man’s recorded history in a time span of but a half- century...Only five years ago man learned to write and use a cart with wheels. Christianity began less than two years ago. The printing press came this year, and then less than two months ago, during this whole 50- year span of human history, the steam engine provided a new source of power’ (pr.6). This provides the audience with evidence, that if we have come this far in a short amount of time, we will be able to go farther with the challenge of space race. The speaker also references back to the 1630’s to get his point across. “William Bradford, speaking in 1630 of the founding of the Plymouth Bay Colony, said that all great and honorable actions are accompanied with great difficulties, and both must be enterprised and overcome with answerable courage” (pr.10). Meaning that the challenge to become first, would be accompanied with ...
Rachel Perkins hybrid musical drama One Night the Moon set in the 1930’s Australian outback and Malala Yousafzai’s ‘speech to the UN’ in 2013 were composed to raise awareness and reveal truths of multiple perspectives, representing the voice of the unheard and disempowered in juxtaposition to the dominant and powerful. Both Perkins and Yousafzai challenge societal expectations of their context, advocating for all voices to be heard and for the potential unity between cultures and races through education and shifts in paradigm.
In September 1961, president John. F. Kennedy delivers one of his best inspirational speeches titled “We choose to go to the Moon”. This notorious speech was addressed at Rice University in Houston Texas to a very fortunate crowd of students. The significance of his timing is both vital and genius for at the time being the cold war between the United States of America and Russia had been in mid-hype, Russia leading in the space race. This brought doubt to the Americas power and authority thus giving his speech more influential drive. Kennedys fear of the Soviet Union landing on the moon first is because he did not want to see the accomplishment “governed by a hostile flag of conquest, but by a banner of
The idea of traveling to the moon came to light on May 25, 1961 in a special joint Congress session (1). John Kennedy, the president, made an appearance at this joint meeting to show support his overwhelming support for the advances in space technology. After this sitting, NASA promptly started working on blueprints to travel to the moon. NASA then administered the first Apollo mission, “testing the structural cohesion of the first proposed launch vehicle and spacecraft amalgamation” (4). Sadly, on January 27, 1967, at the Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Florida, a fire started during a manned launch-pad test of the new Apollo spacecraft. Three astronauts were killed in the fire. Despite this complication,
Mailer’s apocalyptic view of 1969 and the end of a century is a reoccurring theme behind Mailer’s look at the United States Space Program and the flight of Apollo 11. Mailer can only see the political goals of going to the moon, not the romanticism and spirituality that surrounded it. Mailer saw the flight of Apollo 11 as a gigantic, technological achievement, but Mailer believes the technology was developed for all the wrong reasons. 2
One Friday night, the Parker family gathered around their 1962 television to watch the nightly news. When watching, the news reporter described the near future plans for the trip to the moon. The family, thinking quietly to themselves, had much doubt in their minds. The father turned to his wife in confusion and said “People on the moon? That is crazy! I have never heard of such a thing.”
On September 12, 1962 John Franklin Kennedy charged the nation to achieve what no other civilization had done before; he charged the United States to place a man on the moon. Kennedy delivered his man on the moon speech in a time of great peril for the United States. It appeared that the Soviet Union was rising faster than the United States was posed to take our place as the world’s super power. His moving speech in Rice Stadium inspired the nation and other nations, to take the challenge and travel to the moon. Kennnedy use of allusions, repetition, and rhetorical questions motivate and embolden his audience, and make a difference that would last forever.
President John F. Kennedy said in 1961 that he believed that the United States could put a man on the moon before the end of the decade. Unfortunately, he never lived to see this prophetic feat performed. But in July of 1969, Neil Armstrong stepped foot on the moon before live audiences around the world. As he stepped out on this extraterrestrial surface, he stated the now famous words, “That was one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” But why was Kennedy so adamant about sending men to the moon? What significance could such a feat serve in our lives?